Issue 230
25th Aug 05


—front page—

GUNS OFF OUR STREETS

Increasingly desperate attempts to justify the police execution of Jean Charles de Menezes in Stockwell tube station are unravelling daily.

by Ken Ferguson

In point after point, the tales told by the Metropolitan Police to explain away the killing are contradicted by the emerging truth.
n He didn’t run away from police and vault the barrier into Stockwell station - he walked, used his travel pass and, like any other commuter, picked up his free Metro.
n He wasn’t wearing a bulky, bomb-concealing jacket.
n Specialist military personnel drawn from the elite Special Reconnaissance Unit - drawn from units with years of experience in such matters in Northern Ireland and allied to the SAS - did not believe Mr De Menezes to be a bomber. They followed him from his flat on the same bus to the tube. Presumably they did so in the anticipation that he was not about to blow them up.
n On the tube he was held in restraint holds by the police when he was shot. It is difficult to see what threat he posed.

The entire event now has the character of a desperate Whitehall cover up with the spin machine working overtime to present Met Chief Sir Ian Blair as having the full confidence of the government as he grapples with the terrorist threat.
Establishment politicians have been queuing up to explain away the increasingly hard to justify shooting and close ranks around the gunman.
Perhaps one of the most distasteful of these attempts was Sir Ian’s attempt to minimise the police execution with appeals to remember those killed in the bombs.
He ignores the fact that those expressing concern over the De Menezes shooting universally condemned the London bombings.
Sir Ian misses the key point that the tube victims were murdered by terrorists, while the innocent Brazilian was killed by agents of the state acting with the sanction of the law.
They acted as part of a disciplined force armed not just with automatic pistols bur with a shoot to kill policy.

Scotland
And it is now clear that armed police officers in Scotland are operating under the same guidelines that led to the tragic death of Jean Charles de Menezes in London.
Scottish police firearms Tsar Ian Gordon told Scotland Against Criminalising Communities (SACC) last week:
“Scottish Police forces will deal with terrorist threats in the same way as our colleagues in England, Wales and Northern Ireland.”
Mr Gordon is the Deputy Chief Constable of Tayside Police and holds the national portfolio for police use of firearms in Scotland, on behalf of ACPOS (the Association of Chief Police Officers in Scotland).
His statement was in response to a request from SACC that Scottish police forces dissociate themselves from the ‘shoot-to-kill-on-suspicion’ policy operated by the Metropolitan Police.
In a letter to police dated 29 July, SACC wrote:
“We note with alarm that Metropolitan Police officers are ready to shoot in situations where a clear and visible threat does not exist, and where the cause for suspicion appears to be a belief - perhaps based upon intelligence - held by the officers concerned. We note that intelligence is fallible and can rarely be assessed by the officers on the spot.

Unethical
“We believe that the combination of ‘shoot-to-kill’ and ‘shoot-on-suspicion’ is a cocktail that will prove fatal to responsible, effective policing. It is unwise, unethical and probably illegal.”
The rising tide of leaks around the event makes these concerns particularly pertinent.
The British state has a long history of deploying shoot to kill policies from the Amritsar shootings against Indian nationalists in 1919 to numerous events in the long war just ended in Ireland, such as the Bloody Sunday murders.
The role that senior decision-makers played in the De Menezes tragedy remains shrouded in mystery.
Perhaps it will take years and, undoubtedly, a fully independent, public enquiry to uncover them.
But it is fairly clear that major priority after the event was largely involved in a campaign of whitewash and cover up.
Shortly after the new facts about the shooting were passed to the press, Harriet Wistrich and Gareth Peirce, the lawyers for the De Menezes family, wrote:
“It is inconceivable that the true facts as revealed yesterday, were not made known to senior police and ministers immediately; for any to have made comments publicly without first informing themselves of the true facts would have been entirely reckless and wrong.

back to index

—page two—

news

Gate Gourmet bosses dish out hate cuisine

by Ken Ferguson

“Dedication - it is not to be found is any training manual, but it’s in our employees’ blood. Gate Gourmet people thrive on pace and meeting tough demands.”
This piece of corporate speak wisdom is displayed on the hard-nosed union buster’s website.
It contrasts sharply with the year long Heathrow plot to provoke strike action, sack workers and to replace them with cut price replacements.
They did calculate that solidarity action might happen but clearly did not expect the magnificent stoppage by BA’s baggage handlers, which paralysed the airline and cost the firm £40 million.

Solidarity
It also showed the potential of solidarity action and why the bosses - backed by the pro-business groupies of New Labour - want to keep it illegal.
Solidarity is now building both across the UK and internationally with a hardship fund set up and the International Food Workers putting the Gate workers’ case across the globe. Local solidarity with the largely Asian work force has also been strong.
Talks have taken place under the umbrella of the conciliation service ACAS but company statements have made it clear that they are intent on their union busting and sacking plan.
As the Voice goes to press, Gate Gourmet bosses had walked out of talks with the TGWU, insisting that they would not reinstate the whole workforce.
The solidarity action of the baggage handlers won widespread support across the trade union movement and catapulted the Gate Gourmet dispute - and the management’s dirty tactics - to international prominence.

Illegal
The irony is that their solidarity is illegal under anti-union laws - set up by Thatcher's government and now maintained by New Labour - while it was perfectly legal for Gate Gourmet to sack their entire workforce without notice.
However, the TGWU distanced itself from the magnificent action taken by the baggage handlers, clearly fearing legal consequences under the current laws
There is talk now of finding a compromise, but the trade union movement now faces a hard reality.
For Gate Gourmet workers to win, the anti-union laws will need to be defied and large scale solidarity fought for. Nothing less will do.
As the old saying has it - you can peel an onion layer by layer but you can’t skin a tiger claw by claw.

Protest
Messages of support for the Gate Gourmet workers and in protest at their sacking have rolled in to the labourstart website, at one point as many as 30 a minute.
The website passes the messages on to the workers, and to Gate Gourmet
n To email your protest to the company go to www.labourstart.org and click on: Gate Gourmet reinstate sacked workers now.

CHIEF LAPS UP PROFITS

Wage and job slashing Gate Gourmet bosses who think a top wage of £16,000 is too high for its West London work force don’t practice what they preach.
Gate is owned by US equity house, the Texas Pacific Group, founded by one David Bonderman.
Equity houses are in fact a polite name for jackals making their money by snapping up near bankrupt firms and turning them into profitable concerns.
Inevitably job cuts and slashed wages are among their tools to achieve this.
It certainly works for Mr Bonderman who has amassed an estimated £6 billion personal fortune with his sackings and slashings approach.
Despite owning a catering concern, Bonderman appears not to have heard the saying about what is sauce for the goose being sauce for the gander.
Just a month after TPG snapped up Gate Gourmet out of administration for $675 million in 2002, Mr Bonderman celebrated his 60th birthday with a high profile bash in Las Vegas.
The menu is undisclosed but it seems certain than it would be considerably classier than the fare offered to BA’s passengers by Gate Gourmet.
What is known is that the gathering was entertained by wrinkly rockers the Rolling Stones, who did a 40 minute set.
They were paid £4.4 million for their services while man-of-many faces, comic actor Robin Williams, acted as warm up man for a mere £600,000.
However as the champagne corks popped in Las Vegas, a different fate was being planned for the West London work force of Gate Gourmet.
The company is run by Bonderman’s UK hatchet man David Siegel.
Given that the firm has been in dispute with similar workers in the US where it sought wage cuts of $7 per hour and cuts in health insurance and that it plotted the provocation of the London dispute, the agenda is clear.
Gate have blamed BA for the crisis and there is little doubt that the ‘world’s favourite airline’ has been turning the price screw on its contractor.
Gate’s response was to place the burden on the workers, seek pay cuts and provoke a strike to enable them to sack them.
They were supposed to be replaced by lower paid workers specially recruited and trained as a shadow work force in a tactic as old as capitalism.
However the big miscalculation was that workers at the Heathrow complex were all employed by BA when it was state owned. More importantly they are all unionised, largely in the TGWU, as a legacy of that period.
Gate are now finding that they are up against a determined work force with solid support in the local communities around Heathrow.

Media get knives out for multiculturalism

by Eddie Truman

The tidal wave of anti Muslim racism continues to engulf the UK with Scotland proving no exception.
Complaints have poured into the BBC over its Panorama programme, made by John Ware and trailed in The Observer the previous week, about the Muslim Council of Britain - an organisation regarded as being made up of moderate voices within the Muslim community.
The effect of the programme was clearly designed to promote the idea that there is no such thing as a moderate Muslim.
This is not the first contentious Panorama programme that Ware has been centrally involved in.
In July 2003 he was the writer and presenter of another Panorama Special, in this case dealing with alleged abuse of the asylum system.
On the day of the broadcast, Ware published an article in the Daily Mail (23 July 2003) based on and publicising his programme.
It was headlined: “For years the Mail has been attacked for its refusal to be silent on the asylum crisis. Tonight’s Panorama says we were utterly justified.”
It is increasingly clear that the ‘liberal media’, like The Observer, are the target of a sustained campaign to plant anti-Muslim scare stories.

Scare stories

Presumably the old favourite of the security services, the Daily Telegraph, is deemed to have a readership that is already racist and xenophobic and it is the liberal middle class readership of The Observer that needs to be terrorised with scare stories about Muslims.
And if Muslims in Scotland thought that things really couldn’t get any worse, in stepped the Moderator of the Church of Scotland to prove them wrong.
Interviewed in a Sunday broadsheet, the Reverend Lacy used the same language as the racist press and right wing purveyors of hate like the BNP.
The Reverend Lacy said extremist Muslim clerics should leave the country, and branded them “hypocrites” who treat their neighbours as “enemies”.
Church of Scotland Moderator, Rev David Lacy, also accused radical Islamists of speaking out “against us from within” while receiving “heart operations and care on our system”.
The problem for the Reverend Lacy was that the Muslim cleric the Scottish press subsequently latched onto to back up his call, Yaqub Zaki, was born in Greenock.
Scottish Muslims could be forgiven for wondering if Guantanamo Bay might be the place the Moderator had in mind for them.

Livingston by-election

The sudden death of Labour MP Robin Cook, who resigned his cabinet post over the Iraq war, will create a by-election in the Livingston constituency.
Livingston is a working class constituency with a proud tradition of trade unionism through the miners strike, Plessey and British Leyland, which has been left to the predations of the largely anti-union electronics industry.
The Scottish Socialist Party will select a candidate to contest this by election, whenever it is called, on Wednesday 31 August.
Colin Fox, SSP convenor and MSP for Lothian, has said:
“We’ll approach this campaign with verve and passion taking our anti-poverty message and the campaign against attacks on our civil liberties onto the streets of Livingston.
“I’m sure our candidate and campaign will be more than a match for the dull efforts of the SNP, Labour, Liberals and Tories. The entire membership of the SSP will pull in behind our local branch to support their endeavours.”

Public meeting

Defend our Fire Service

Wednesday 7 September, 7pm, Craigsfarm Campus, Craigshill
Speakers: Colin Fox, SSP Convenor
Tommy Sheridan MSP
David Melrose, Fire Reforms Action Group

back to index

—page three—

news

Support grows for suspended MSPs

The campaign to reverse the suspensions and £30,000 fine placed on SSP MSPs is gathering pace.
The online petition calling for the reinstatement of the four, who protested in the Parliament in defence of the right to march at Gleneagles, has so far collected nearly 1900 signatures from all over the world, from Bolivia to, believe it or not, Antarctica.
Rallies are planned for all over Scotland, and a protest will take place outside the Scottish Parliament on the day it reopens - Tuesday 6 September at 9am.
The campaign fund is growing too, but the SSP urgently needs donations to help fund legal action and to cover the wages of SSP support staff hit by the massive fine. Make cheques to the ‘Scottish Socialist Appeal Fund’ and send to SSP, 70 Stanley St, Glasgow, G41 1JB or phone 0141 429 8200 if you could use a collection sheet in your workplace or union.
You can sign the petition by following the link from www.scottishsocialistparty.org. Get involved in the campaign and stand up for the party that stands up for democracy!
Here are some of the messages of support our MSPs have received.

Of course I support your cause.
Tony Benn

The right to dissent and to disrupt proceedings have always been part of the labour movement’s parliamentary armour.
From the time of Jimmy Maxton’s expulsion from the Commons through to Scotland United’s disruption in the Chamber, breaking the parliamentary rules has been one way of loosening the establishment’s control of business and forcing important issues to the centre of political debate. 
The absurd parliamentary pomposity of the likes of George Reid and the vindictive attack on the SSP members and their staff serve only to show that the mainstream members of our Parliament have little idea about what the real business of democracy is.
John McAllion, former Labour MSP

The SSP MSPs were right to defend democracy by protesting in what is supposed to be the home of democracy in Scotland. The punishment is way over the top and has more to do with establishment parties hitting out at the SSP for challenging the British establishment rather than the protest on the day.
Campbell Martin MSP

New Labour are nothing if not predictable, as soon as an outbreak of democracy occurs, the first thing they do is fine and banish it.
Mark Thomas, Comedian and campaigner

This is why people need trade unions. To ensure procedures are in place which guarantee transparency, representation and natural justice, all of which are sadly lacking in this case. The Scottish Parliament should not hide behind the Scotland Act in attempt to deny individuals these rights - it is essential this ad hoc punishment is challenged.
Paul Holleran, National Union of Journalists Scottish Organiser

The actions of the four SSP MSPs were entirely justified as a protest against actions of the Scottish Parliament which would have completely denied a previous decision.
The form of the protest may be open to debate, however the important thing now is to clear up the disproportionality of the Parliament’s response. It sets both a poor precedent and standards which are not the most appropriate for the future.
Margo Macdonald MSP

This is not only a barbaric attack on the SSP and its staff financially, but also on the democratic process. When the Scottish Socialist Party MSPs were expelled then, quite frankly, the working class and the most vulnerable people in our society do not have a voice in the Parliament.
Alex Brownridge, Secretary CWU Scotland No2 Branch

Defend civil liberties, defend the right to peaceful protest

Tuesday 6 September

Edinburgh: St George’s West Church, Shandwick Place, Speakers: Colin Fox MSP, Margo Macdonald MSP, Alex Brownridge CWU, Gate Gourmet striker and De Menezes family campaign

Aberdeen: venue to be confirmed, Speakers: Rosie Kane MSP and others tbc

Alloa: venue tbc, Speakers: Campbell Martin MSP and others tbc

Wednesday 7 September

Dundee: venue and speakers tbc

Thursday 8 September

Glasgow: Quality Central Hotel, Hope St, Speakers include: Colin Fox MSP, Paddy Hill (Birmingham Six), Gate Gourmet Worker (tbc) and De Menezes family campaign (tbc)

Inverness: venue and speakers tbc

Others with date and venue to be confirmed include Kintyre and in Orkney, check the Voice for details

back to index

—page four—

One World

Twenty years after bombing, Rainbow Warrior battles on

by Wullie McGartland

Twenty years ago, on 10 July 1985, the French secret service sunk the Greenpeace ship Rainbow Warrior off the coast of New Zealand.
The mine attached by French agents blew a gaping hole in the ship’s hull and one crew member, Fernando Pereira, was killed.
The ship was in Auckland harbour preparing to protest against French nuclear bomb testing in the South Pacific.
There was international condemnation of this act of state sponsored terrorism, and the secret service eventually  admitted its involvement in the crime after two of their agents were arrested and convicted of the bombing.
The pair were sentenced to ten years, but were released after only a year to return to France and be hailed as heroes.
The French government of the time, lead by the late Francois Mitterrand, claimed that the secret service had carried out the bombing without their knowledge.
However a recent report published in the paper Le Monde by Admiral Pierre Lacoste - former head of the secret service - claimed not only had Mitterrand known about the bombing, he had sanctioned it.
Despite the criminal acts of the Mitterrand government, Greenpeace have continued campaigning and have grown since the 1985 bombing. The Rainbow Warrior II carries on the work of her predecessor, while the original ship, fittingly, serves as a dive wreck and fish sanctuary.
The 20th anniversary of the bombing was marked by demonstrations and rallies in France and New Zealand.

Navajo nation calls halt to uranium mining ‘genocide’

by Ken Ferguson

Action by the Navajo Nation in the US has highlighted an issue often ignored by pro-nuclear power supporters - the need for fuel to keep reactors working.
Their move to ban uranium mining on their lands, allied to rising prices, raises questions for those who see more nuclear power as the ‘magic bullet’ to solve the energy crisis and cut global warming.
The Navajo Nation encompasses a big part of Arizona and parts of New Mexico and Utah, with a total population of around 275,000 people.
The price of uranium has more than doubled over the past two years, from less than $10 per pound to more than $23 per pound.
HCI, a subsidiary of Dallas-based Uranium Resources, has been seeking federal permits for the last decade to begin uranium mining southwest and east of Crownpoint, New Mexico, and uranium processing north of a defunct uranium mill.
Earlier this year, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission approved a license for HCI to begin the first of its four proposed mine sites around Church Rock and Crownpoint
Both are part of the Navajo Nation. Around 15,000 people live in the Church Rock-Crownpoint region.
More than 1,200 uranium mines operated on the Navajo Nation from the 1940s through the 1980s, mining more than 13 million tons of uranium ore.
Large numbers of miners died of lung cancer associated with breathing radioactive dust.
The US government knew the dangers of radiation but, in a familiar story, told the miners that it was safe.
Those living near the mines, and the families of miners, also have a high cancer rate.
“I don’t want to subject any more of my people to exposure to uranium and the cancers that it causes,” said Navajo Nation president Joe Shirley Jr as he signed the anti-mining law.
The Diné Natural Resources Protection Act bans the mining and processing of uranium on Navajo land.
“As long as there are no answers to cancer, we shouldn’t have uranium mining on the Navajo Nation,” he added.
“I believe the powers that be committed genocide on Navajo land by allowing uranium mining.”
The act states, “No person shall engage in uranium mining and processing on any sites within Navajo Indian Country.”
The widespread opposition to new uranium mining was reflected in thousands of Navajos signing petitions against it.
Many organisations on the Navajo Nation are opposing attempts to restart uranium mining.
For many years uranium miners and their families have been fighting for compensation for the medical costs for lung cancers from mining uranium.
In 1990 the US Congress passed the Radiation Compensation Act, which was amended in 2000 under the Clinton administration.
However, no miners or their families have yet received any funds under these acts

back to index

—page five—

your voice

Divided Ireland

Colm Breathnach’s piece on Sinn Fein and the current situation in the six counties in last week’s Voice (229) lacked historical analysis of the armed struggle and its roots.
Whilst correct in stating that the PIRA emerged from a split in the Irish Republican movement back in 1969, he offers no reason as to why the split took place.
By the late 1960s the system of apartheid against the Catholic/nationalist working class in the six counties - discriminated against in housing, employment, social services, and policing, etc. - spawned the formation of the civil rights movement. Inspired by the black civil rights movement in the US, it was led by students from Queens University in Belfast and embarked on a campaign of peaceful protest marches and non-violent civil disobedience all across the province.
The aim of this movement was not a united Ireland, merely equal rights for Catholics under British rule.
Capturing the imagination of the nationalist community, and attracting the attention of the international media, it was soon considered a threat to loyalist hegemony.
What followed was nothing less than organised terror, unleashed by a loyalist militia masquerading as a police force, backed up by gangs of loyalist thugs.
Not content with attacking the protesters and beating them down, they entered nationalist communities and began burning people out of their homes.
This was a pogrom by any other name, responsible in the summer of 1969 for the largest displacement of civilians at that time since the Second World War. The Official IRA, Dublin led, in effect wrung their hands, having abandoned armed struggle in favour of futile attempts at uniting the working class across the sectarian divide.
The PIRA arose out of the necessity of protecting nationalist communities in the province. If they had not, a clear and organised policy of ethnic cleansing would have succeeded.
The notion that the PIRA and the armed struggle split the working class is, frankly, ludicrous. The poison of sectarian hatred had played a part in the political, social and cultural life of the six counties for generations before the Troubles began.
The PIRA’s strategy throughout the armed struggle was to target the state apparatus. Nowhere in their literature or statements will you ever find anything so much as hinting at sectarianism. Yes, innocent civilians were killed by both sides, but in the case of loyalist paramilitaries, they were killed as part of a concerted terror campaign waged against Catholics.
The PIRA flirted with many political doctrines throughout their existence - socialism, federalism, nationalism - but that in no way undermines their legitimacy as defenders of nationalist communities from the British State and loyalist murder gangs.
Loyalism is a fascist ideology, based on nothing more than religious supremacy. In both philosophy and practise it is akin to Zionism. There can be no accommodation with such an ideology either inside or outside the SSP.
The ending of the armed struggle is to be welcomed. However, by embracing the partitionist political institutions of the British government the leadership of Sinn Fein have led the nationalist people down a political cul de sac.
Until there is a complete British withdrawal from the province - militarily, politically and economically - sectarianism will continue to poison relations between the Catholic and Protestant working class.
In the words of the great James Connolly: “There can be no socialism without national liberation. There can be no national liberation without socialism.”
John Wight, Edinburgh

For anybody interested in reading an alternative view of Sinn Fein, see the article in the current issue of Scottish Left Review, ‘Forgotten Socialists’ by Mark Hirst - available online at - www.scottishleftreview.org

Chris Guthrie, Coatbridge

Support at any cost?
Regarding Omar Ibrahim’s letter in Voice 229. I agree that no-one should be prevented by the state from voicing an opinion no matter what they say, right, left or whatever - today it might be Hizb-ut-tahrir, tomorrow it might be us - but these dangerous flirtations with political Islam by the Left are going to be the rock we perish on.
Hizb-ut-tahrir are an example of a natural enemy of socialism - they are anathema to almost everything we stand for. For somebody who purports to be a socialist to applaud the insidious views of organisations such as these is almost beyond belief. If we lived in a society governed by such groups, Omar’s letter wouldn’t have been printed because there would be no SSV, no SSP, no political parties or groups whatsoever, all would be banned. Organisations like Hizb-ut-tahrir want to destroy things like the advancements made in women’s rights, freedom of expression, gay rights, secularism - things people have fought for, died for, been incarcerated for decades for - and set up a world bound by superstition.
Just because you see these groups as “anti-imperialist” isn’t a reason to lend them any credibility or support. They may be against imperialism as we know it but they advocate ummah, the forced global proliferation of Islam and sharia law. This may not be economic imperialism but is religious imperialism really any better?
John Patrick,
Glasgow

More from Camp Secret Squirrel
Following last week’s article on the SSY camp, I just wanted to write in with some of my personal experiences.
The educational on Saturday morning will go down in history as one of the most inspiring, thought-provoking meetings to take place in the SSY. Absolutely no topic was left uncovered: the family, Live 8, consumerism, New Labour, unjust law, corruption, smashing McDonald’s windows... those three hours, if I’d had any doubts before, would have turned me over to socialism instantaneously.
Following the educational, the rest of the discussions were from a choice of three. Saturday afternoon’s were tremendously difficult to choose from: Music, Radical Media and Knife Crime. I went for Radical Media, after much deliberation. Some impressive ideas about the media’s role in the struggle, and how we can improve Leftfield and the SSY website, were thrown back and forth.
Sunday was just as productive.
I went for the Venezuela workshop, knowing nothing about the situation there, and came out a few hours later absolutely brimming with new information and ideas.
This was apparent, again, in the Climate Chaos meeting, where some terrific ideas were put forward.
This meeting was just as inspiring as Saturday’s educational, covering everything from consumerism to public transport, nuclear power to GM crops. Sunday was also the day when female comrades put up a big middle finger to any opposition, and started an SSY Women’s Group. Hopefully, this group has a big future ahead of it, and next year, Camp Secret Squirrel’s men may not outnumber the women to such a massive scale.
I can honestly say that I learnt more in one weekend at Camp Secret Squirrel than in the past five years at a Scottish high school, not only through the workshops, but in campsite banter and debates over the fire.
This weekend has left me more positive and full of hope than I’ve ever been. The world is ours.
We can make a difference.

Charlotte Cameron, 17, Castle Douglas

Rebel correspondence

Message from The Irrepressible Wing of Scotland’s Frank Zapatistas:

We the IW of the SFZ have renamed Princes Street in Edinburgh to William Wallace Street on this day the 23rd of August 2005 to commemorate the death and martyrdom of one William Wallace, rebel patriot hero of all Scotland, which took place seven hundred years ago today (23rd of August 1305).
The Princes of Princes Street were drunken German oafs whose memory does not deserve to be commemorated in the capital of Scotland. Hence the renaming of Princes Street to William Wallace Street.
Similarly, The Royal Mile in Edinburgh has been renamed The Wallace Mile in memory of the blows struck for freedom and independence by said William Wallace.
When Scotland is finally free these name changes will become permanent.
Long Live The Scottish Republic!

back to index

—centre pages—

Land of the free?

Cindy Sheehan spent over a week camped outside of George Bush’s Texas ranch, demanding to know why the war in Iraq which killed her son, Casey, was started and why it continues today. Her campaign goes on, and has brought international attention to growing American opposition to the war, with the families of military personnel leading calls to bring the troops home.
Jo Harvie spoke to Monica Benderman, whose husband Kevin was jailed for laying down his gun and refusing to fight this war.

As I write this, the number of American military servicemen and women killed in Iraq since the invasion stood at 2060. By the time you read this, it will be more - the website icasualties.org puts the average for August at three American military deaths a day.
It’s a huge price to pay for a war that’s supposed to be over, and public support for Bush’s occupation is crumbling. A recent survey found only 43 per cent of Americans predict a victory in Iraq - terrible news for Bush considering he already declared victory, over two years ago.
As negotiations resumed last Thursday over the new Iraqi constitution, at least 43 Iraqis were slaughtered when car bombs exploded near a Baghdad bus station.
On the same day, a Pennsylvanian firefighter was one of four American part time soldiers to be sent home in a flag-draped coffin.
They were killed on the streets of Samarra, a city 60 miles north of Baghdad which used to be famous as one of the world’s most important archeological sites.
It’s now noted for 70 per cent unemployment amongst men aged 18 to 35 and as a site of fierce post-occupation violence.
Is it any wonder that increasing numbers of Americans are asking themselves what this is all for? Perhaps none more so that the soldiers themselves.
As in Scotland, with a spokeswoman for Scottish regiments last week admitting Iraq is a factor in a collapse in the number of new army recruits, so recruitment rates have dropped in the US.
The GI Rights Hotline took 32,000 calls last year, and another 3000 every month, from soldiers who want out or who have been made ill by their experience.
Sergeant Kevin Benderman has spent ten years as a mechanic in the US army.
He served one tour of duty in Iraq at the start of the invasion, and was awarded two medals, citing the fact “drivers and tank commanders asked for Sgt. Benderman by name” to lead repair teams, so respected were his abilities.
But, when ordered to return to Iraq in January this year, he had come to the decision that he could not, and would not, go back. On 28 July, he was sentenced to 15 months in prison.
His partner Monica explains that, on his first tour, “Kevin went with the mistaken but committed belief that he could keep the soldiers he served with safe. He did not deploy to ‘kill terrorists’.
“During his time there, Kevin learned that he could not keep everyone safe.
“A Lieutenant in his unit lost his life, and scouts sent on the mission with him were injured when two Bradleys [armoured infantry fighting vehicles] failed, and there was nothing to defend these soldiers against hidden insurgents.”
At home, the image of a little girl by the side of an Iraqi road, her arm badly burnt and blistered, stayed with Kevin.
“Kevin is someone who wants to do everything he can to help those in need,” says Monica, “and when his command would not stop to help this girl saying that they could not give up their medical supplies, Kevin offered his.
“They still would not stop. Kevin will live with this forever.”
In the midst of a war zone, Kevin is the kind of guy who still managed to make friends with the locals. That played a substantial part in his changing view of the wrongs of the invasion. “He was taken by their strength and warmth in spite of the fact that he was there as a member of the opposing forces. They would bring drinks and ice to the American soldiers in his camp, and often invited the soldiers to their house for meals. 
“Kevin learned a lot from this compassion from those who were being occupied. He became friends with some and learned some of the history of their country as well as some of their personal stories. 
“After being taken in trust like that, it became even more difficult for Kevin to believe that he should be there as part of an invading force. 
“He watched people like his friends using mud puddles for drinking water, and for their toileting needs. He saw them washing clothes in the rivers, and in the desert heat he saw them continue to live in spite of the fact that their electricity was gone, and their basic necessities were not being met.
“Kevin thought about all of this for the year after he returned home, and I believe that as his home became more comfortable to him, and he felt cared for again, he came to realise that what he had was all anyone really wanted. 
“He also came to realise that he had no right to decide how another person should live their life, nor could he force anyone to be anything they weren’t supposed to be. 
“This all played a part in his decision to file for Conscientious Objector status.”
So that’s what he did. He first asked to be placed in a non-combat role, and then in September last year was one of the many thousands who contacted the GI Rights Hotline to get the information he needed to apply for Conscientious Objector status. But his commanding officer returned the form saying he was recommending disapproval.
The weekend before he was due to deploy, another soldier in Kevin’s unit attempted suicide.
On the following Monday, Kevin reported for duty at a unit that would remain in the US, where he had been reassigned until his Conscientious Objector status was considered.
“No-one said anything to him about potential charges. As a matter of fact they assigned him regular duties and actually allowed him to go to the inspector general’s office to report problems on behalf of the soldier who had attempted suicide. 
“There were two other flights leaving for Iraq during this week, and not one commander made any attempt to order Kevin to deploy on either one of them.”
Still, two weeks later, he was summoned before his command and charged with desertion.
With Kevin now seeing out his 15 month sentence behind bars in military prison. Amnesty International has taken up his case.
Monica is determined that their campaign goes on, not just for Kevin’s freedom but against what they believe is a cruelly unnecessary war.
“Most soldiers enlist to defend their country, and they trust that their leaders will not take them into war without just cause,” says Monica.
“We have received support from people all over the world who understand why Kevin has taken the stand that he has, and who are doing what they can to help spread the word of his message...
“Many of the veterans, and the people who have served in this war and are now out understand that Kevin is standing for them. They know what combat is like, and they don’t want anyone to have to face it. 
“There are families who still have loved ones in Iraq that have a difficult time with this. We respect their feelings. This is not about disrespecting the service of soldiers, this is about standing up for them. 
“The soldiers are being abused now, and the longer the abuse is allowed to continue, the greater the chance for violence to continue in Iraq
“If we don’t get our soldiers out, if we don’t get them home to their families, if we don’t take the stress of combat away, they will only see more people in Iraq as enemies, and this madness will never end.”
Across the US, there are young men and women, and experienced veterans now taking similar stands.
This Sunday, 28 August, there’s a vigil for three more ‘prisoners of conscience’ held in Fort Sill in Oklahoma. One of them was told by an army recruiter that he would never have to kill anyone.
The Centre for Conscience and War, a Christian group involved in the GI Rights Hotline, say recruits are commonly told by recruiters that they will not have to go to war if they sign up. When confronted by reality, they find it very difficult to get access to the information they need to get out.
Other military personnel, like Carl Webb who is currently AWOL from the National Guard, find themselves trapped by the ‘stop loss programme’ - which forces soldiers to stay on after the end of their contracts.
“This policy is practically an unofficial draft,” says Carl.
“It is conscription against a person’s will.”
But his protest is not just against this policy, which he describes as “unethical and illegal” - it’s against “unethical and illegal US aggression... It’s all about oil and profits.” Camilo Mejía was the first US veteran of this war to publicly refuse to return to Iraq.
His seven month sentence finished in February this year, and he remains a leading figure in the US peace and justice movement. He’ll speak at the demonstration in Washington on 24 September, part of international protests against the occupation of Iraq on that day.
“It truly is a scary thing to say no to the military,” writes Camilo on his website, www.freecamilo.org .
“Realising our opposition to war, as members of the armed forces, is only the beginning of a long road to resistance, a road that in the end many choose not to follow.
“Many service men and women strongly oppose the war but choose to take their chances in combat because they’re that afraid to stand up to military authority and say ‘I will not fight this war’. My heart goes out to those military personnel, especially to those who decide to speak out once they’re back from the war.
“But, I must say, as long as there are people who for one reason or other continue to fight, there will be war.”
The US military seems to be doing everything in its power to stop recruits getting out of fighting a war they oppose.
But many are refusing anyway.
Official Pentagon figures currently list 5000 troops as missing from duty, but campaigning groups say the figure could be more like 8000.
The bravery of Camilo, Carl, Kevin and all those who speak out is a powerful weapon in the US movement for peace that seems now to be growing in strength and influence.
“We miss each other,” Monica tells me. “We are very close, and we fight our battles together. It is not easy being apart, it is not easy being unable to share ideas and thoughts.”
But they’re kept strong by supporters - including Iraqis who held a special day of prayers for Kevin on 5 August in over 100 mosques throughout Iraq - and the bigger picture, the peace they are fighting for.
“We will get through this because we understand that Kevin’s stand, and my opportunity to speak about it is important, beyond just us.”

n To contact Kevin and Monica with messages of support, see www.bendermandefense.org

Iraqi unions face legal threat to independence

by Ken Ferguson

The rising tempo of union organisation in occupied Iraq is clearly worrying the US-backed administration.
The Iraqi government is attempting to control trade union activity by overturning an agreement that allowed unions to operate without any undue interference or harassment from the state.
A new decree adopted by the Iraqi Council of Ministers stated that the government would be “taking control of all monies belonging to the trade unions to prevent them from dispensing any such monies”.
Ominously the decree also says that new proposals on how trade unions should function, operate and organise will be prepared.
The proposals have drawn protests from UK trade unions.
TUC general secretary Brendan Barber has written to both the Iraqi embassy and Foreign Secretary Jack Straw opposing the move.
“If the government of Iraq wishes to revise the arrangements under which trade unions operate they should be discussing that with the trade unions themselves rather than
closing them down.”

Attack

UNISON general secretary Dave Prentis told Straw that the decree represents a major attack on the ability of independent and democratic trade unions to organise.
“I am concerned that this decree, and especially the measures relating to trade union financial assets, is an attempt to curb the growth of free trade unions in Iraq,” he said.
Train drivers have faced a number of attacks and ASLEF leader Keith Norman said:
“ASLEF demands no less for Iraqi workers and their trade unions than it does for British workers.
“That is to be able to elect their leaders, control their funds, be free of government interference and enjoy the rights laid down by the International Labour Organisation.”
It seems likely that this will produce restrictions on union activity as the drive to privatise and marketise the country gathers pace. The moves to restrict union activity come against a background of continuing growth in union membership. There been attacks on numerous trade union members, including a number of train drivers.
This process of organisation is being assisted by UK unions such as UNISON, which has recently been providing training for activists in Jordan who then deploy their skills in Iraq.

Strike
One example of the growing union activity saw health care workers in the hospital and medical centres in Kirkuk and its suburban cities organising a two-hour general strike against pay cuts imposed by the Health Ministry.
The workers explained:
“After two and half years of the downfall of the former regime, we the health care workers who are considered the most important part of the society do not enjoy our most basic rights.
“However, the ministry, instead of appreciating our work, issued a resolution to decrease our pay that we earned through years of struggle.
Iraq is a very rich country and has all resources that are able to bring prosperity and welfare for every Iraqi.”
Alongside opposing pay cuts, they are seeking extra payments for weekend working, for working in areas where epidemics are present, and a link between pay and inflation.

Dangers
And the dangers faced by trade unionists were highlighted last week when a US military helicopter attacked workers gathered in Alawi Al-Hilla district in Baghdad on 15 August 2005, where the Transport and Communication Workers’ Union has its head office, injuring 26 workers who were taken to hospital.
Unions have protested about the attack to the Iraqi authorities.

back to index

—page eight

 

holyrood news

SNP to change prescription charge stance

Call is for ‘phase out’ - not support for SSP’s bill for abolition
A dramatic shift in SNP party policy over the abolition of NHS prescription charges has just been flagged up by their health spokeswoman, Shona Robinson MSP.
She has tabled a motion for the SNP autumn conference seeking to ‘phase out’ the charges. Up to now the SNP has not supported scrapping the charges.
Scottish Socialist Party MSP Colin Fox has a private members bill going through the Holyrood Parliament calling for the charges to be scrapped, which no member of the SNP has supported. He believes the change of heart is an admission that their current policy has failed.
Shona Robinson has paid the Scottish Campaign to Remove Prescription charges [SCRAP] a huge complement here. She will have seen that the overwhelming majority of submissions to the Health Committee of the Parliament demand complete abolition of this hated tax on the sick.
“This policy change is their response to the overwhelming case put by the many health professionals, patients associations, community campaigns and anti-poverty groups across Scotland.
“Public support for scrapping the charges is now enormous. However, typically, the timid SNP, having conceded the case for abolition, lack the political courage to scrap the £6.50 charge. Instead they opt for a prolonged ‘phasing out’ of this health inequality.
“But their new position actually makes no more sense than their old one. According to them it is ok for tens of thousands of patients to continue to go without the medicines they need until such times as the SNP get round to abolishing the charge.
“The SNP’s new stance is identical to the Lib Dems. Both parties apparently now accept the case for abolition but don’t support my Bill because they want to wait until after the 2007 election and introduce one of their own.
“Patients across Scotland will have no time for such silly games. Eighty per cent of Scots favour scrapping the charges now.
“The New Labour Scottish Executive has responded to the unsustainable status quo in their time honoured fashion - they launched a review!
“They actually favour extending the crazy exemption categories rather than abolition, saying the cost is too great.”
All this jockeying for position by the SNP, Lib Dems and Labour makes for an interesting autumn. The evidence taking sessions of the Health Committee of the Parliament will begin in November and a full debate in the chamber is scheduled for early January 2006.
Meanwhile the Scottish Campaign to Remove All Prescription charges [SCRAP] will continue piling on the pressure and harnessing the growing support for the Bill over the next few critical months.
n Keep up with all the latest news or download resources by visiting the SCRAP website at www.scrapthecharges.org.uk

SSP’s Service Tax shown to be better than we thought!

by Pam Currie

Scottish Socialist Party Glasgow MSP Tommy Sheridan’s Bill to abolish the Council Tax and replace it with a fairer alternative received a boost last week, when independent figures produced by Scottish Parliament researchers revealed an even bigger percentage of the population would be better off under the proposals.
Research for the SSP by academics at Paisley University estimated that across Scotland, 77 per cent of the population would be better off, including the thousands of low paid workers hardest hit by the current Council Tax arrangements.

Better off
But new research has suggested that in Glasgow, up to 86 per cent of Council Tax payers would be better off.
The city currently has the highest Council Tax bills in the country - an average of £1213 in 2005/06 - and the lowest collection rates.
Glasgow’s problems go back to the mid-90s local government reorganisation and the abolition of Strathclyde Region.
Under the Region, wealthy areas such as Eastwood and Bearsden paid rates - and later the Poll Tax - into the same pot as Easterhouse and Pollok.
But under the current arrangements, low paid workers living in Glasgow pay through the nose for services used by those living in the commuter belt!
The SSP’s Scottish Service Tax would reverse this situation.
The tax would be set nationally and would be based on income, not the size or value of your home. Those earning less than £10,000 a year - most pensioners, students and many part time workers - would pay nothing at all.
Most ordinary workers would be better off under the scheme - 235,000 households in fact - while just 38,000 would pay more, including the likes of Jack and Bridget McConnell, who would pay 20 per cent on earnings over £90,000.
The Scottish Service Tax Bill will go before Holyrood’s Local Government committee in September.

—page nine—

cultural resistance

Willie Gallacher

A Life of Struggle - Willie Gallacher exhibition, at Paisley Museum (High St, Paisley, PA1 2BA) until 9 October. Free entry

Inspirational Red Clydesider Willie Gallacher is being commemorated at a special exhibition in his hometown of Paisley.
Marking the 40th anniversary of his death, Paisley Museum remembers local hero Gallacher in an historic display entitled A Life of Struggle.
Among the artefacts on display are photographs, newspaper cuttings, trade union banners, pamphlets, documents, a tribute by leading Scots poet Hugh McDiarmid, Willie’s old battered suitcase from his travels worldwide, and a bust of Gallacher presented by friends in the former Soviet Union.
Born on Xmas Day 1881, Gallacher later became Britain’s first Communist MP and was jailed on four occasions as a leading figure in anti-government revolts. In November 1925, along with 11 other leading members of the CPGB, Gallacher was arrested and put on trial for sedition and incitement to mutiny. At the subsequent trial these 12 CPGB members were all found guilty and sentenced to between six and 12 months' imprisonment.
The trial and imprisonment of the CPGB leadership was seen as no mere coincidence. It was widely regarded as a ploy by the Conservative government to dispose of a serious political obstacle to their widely anticipated anti-trades union and wage- cutting policies.
Gallacher would’ve been jailed a total of five times had one George Bernard Shaw not stepped in to pay his £200 bail on one occasion.
To mark the opening of the exhibition, which runs until 9 October, almost a hundred folk packed into the museum to hear speakers sharing their stories of Gallacher. In opening the meeting, National Secretary for the Communist Party of Scotland Eric Canning said:
“If Willie was alive today and was a witness to the war in Iraq and the prospect of Britain hanging on to the coat tails of US imperialism, I know where Willie would stand. He would be deeply opposed!”
Tommy Sheridan added:
“It is important for young people to learn of the bravery of people like Willie Gallacher and his friend and comrade John Maclean. In the most difficult times when the capitalists were beginning to take the threat of socialism more seriously, Gallacher and Maclean stood up against the jingoism of the 1914 War and later they set up the Clyde Workers Committee.
“In 1916 there were strikes on the Clyde because shipyard workers refused to be super-exploited while workers died in the battlefields.
“Willie firmly believed in fighting for peace and socialism and in learning the lessons of the Russian Revolution and applying them to Scotland... We need to abide by the 80/20 principle.
“If we agree on 80 per cent then we should not allow ourselves to be divided by the 20 per cent.”
John Close, long standing friend and comrade of Gallacher said Willie left school at twelve years old and went into full-time work: “He was self taught and never had a formal education. But he was able to debate with Lenin and was fully conversant with all aspects of social affairs.
“He could take on any of the parliamentarians and his speeches were landmarks in British history.”
His death in August 1965 was marked by the biggest funeral in Paisley’s history, with 7000 mourners from across the world forming a mile-long cortege through the West End to Woodside Crematorium. Some 40,000 people lined the streets to see Gallacher’s coffin draped with the red flag.
n The museum is open Tuesday to Saturday 10am-5pm and Sunday 2pm-5pm. Phone 0141 889 3151 for more details.

This here music mash up the nation

London Booted - Various Artists. Double vinyl album - limited run. Released 5 September on Prank Monkey records

by Simon Whittle

In spring 2004, a challenge was posted on web forum Get Your Bootleg On: remix a track from The Clash’s London Calling. Songs were posted back from all across the globe.
Mostly mash ups (music from one artist’s song, mixed with another artist’s vocals) and others that feature the odd sample from the classic 1979 LP, London Booted is London Calling for the 22nd century.
CultureDeluxe.co.uk made the album available as a download-only album for about a year (if you donated to War Child, Future Forests and Cancer Research), taking it offline a couple of months ago.
Now it’s set for an official release on Prank Monkey “after a titanic struggle, and through contacting various people connected with The Clash - London Booted is a DIY dream”. Clash guitarist Mick Jones agrees:
“There’s a really interesting thing out there called London Booted. Apparently, it took them 20 hours from the minute they asked to get a full listing of every song.
“There are a couple of genres that I’ve never heard of. Have you come across electro-glitch? It’s cool though.”
Some bits are fantastic. Eve Massacre’s The Power of Rebelution Can’t Fail (Madonna/others vs The Clash’s Rudie Can’t Fail) has to be the stand-out track for me.
Outkast are mixed into a cut-up Spanish Bombs to make Spanish Bombs (Over Baghdad), as Instamatic’s Tim Bearcub explains:
“When I first got involved in London Booted, I was a big fan of Joe Strummer, his politics especially, and wanted to make sure whatever I did retained that.
“Unfortunately events overtook me as on the day I finally kicked myself enough to start work on it, the bombs in Madrid went off.
“Now I had a BIG problem - I couldn’t avoid the politics either in the track (about ETA and the Spanish Civil War and fascism) or current events as whatever I did with the track (even put Britney over it) now would be related to what had just happened in Madrid.
“I thought ‘fuck it’ and decided to bite the bullet and make the track overtly topical by using Outkast’s Bombs Over Baghdad - yes an obvious over-used ’pella but it worked really well.”
French bootleggers Loo & Placido’s What About Brixton? is yet another bastardo fantastico.
Aberdeen mixmob E-Jitz rework I’m Not Down (Hold Your Head Up).
And Pop Razors (also from Aberdeen) turn Strummer and Jones’s Lover’s Rock into their own, speedier 40 Lovers.
If you’re familiar with the 1979 original, then London Booted is the one for you.
n Pre-order London Booted from HMV for £16.99. All proceeds go to The Breast Cancer Campaign and Strummerville (foundation for new music). See: culturedeluxe.co.uk/prankmonkey

E-Jitz’s Mickey Duff on creating I’m Not Down (Hold Your Head Up)

We wis hangin’ aboot next tae the showies, when ah spotted the boy Richie Deluxe. He startit tae tell us aboot folks droppin’ oot o’ somethin’ called London Booted and ah felt sorry for the wee radge.
So ah says, “Right, me an’ Sandy’ll do ain if ye buy us a couple o black puddin’ suppers an’ a couple of bottles o’ ginger”. I mean how hard can it be?
So ah starts off wi the guitars at the beginning and got them doon tae a nice loop. Ma wee brither Malky put his heid roond the door, “See that? Ye wanna get tha fuckin’ Beach Boys on there, eh?”
Aye, fuckin’ right ah do. Bastarts wi their nae baws high voices. After aboot an hoor o’ their whinin’ I gave up.
Just afore ah sent this off tae Sandy for a shotty I got the boy fa plays drums in Franz Ferd tae come doon and play some drums fer me, on account o’ the fact ah ken him cos ma sister’s best mate’s boyfriend’s mum’s hairdresser’s mate once said “Hi” tae him in the street. Sweet drums them.
Sent it aff tae Sandy and he kicked Brian Wilson an’ the boys aff it replacing it with some wifey vocals, mair drums and a bit o spit an’ polish. An that, ma boys, is how we came up wi’ this track.

back to index

—page ten—

BLOOD ON THE COAL FUELS CHINA’S DASH FOR GROWTH

by Ken Ferguson

Six thousand Chinese miners died in 3,629 reported accidents last year, an average of more than 16 deaths a day.
Union activists suspect the real annual death toll in China’s coal mines might be two or three times higher, because many incidents are believed to go unreported.
Mining deaths are now among the worst in the world and are part of the growing human cost of the decisions of China’s ruling elite to take the capitalist road whilst describing it as ‘Socialism with Chinese characteristics’.
Social provision has been weakened and thousands have become migrant workers in their own country as China strides down a path of development which matches the brutalities of rapid growth described vividly by Marx and Engels in the 19th century.
Just as their predecessors did in Victorian times, today’s capitalists and free market pundits heap praise on China’s ‘economic miracle’ and scramble to grab a slice of billions being generated by the boom.
Workers facing growing insecurity and low wages are the motor of the burgeoning production of goods of every type at a fraction of European costs which is rapidly turning China into the workshop of the world.
And of course with this growth comes an almost insatiable demand for energy - in particular coal, which is frantically excavated by miners often working in appalling conditions.

Hideous deaths
Official figures show that in the first six months of this year 3,393 miners died in accidents, with major disasters an almost weekly affair.
Miners have suffered unimaginably hideous deaths in gas explosions, roof collapses and drownings through mine flooding in private mines, both legal and illegal, as well as government-operated pits.
The four months to the end of July saw a sharp increase in the rate of deaths and the frequency of accidents. April began with 21 miners dying in an explosion at the Xinfeng mine near Yuzhou city in China’s Henan province.
This tragedy was followed by the deaths of 31 miners in two separate mines only hours apart in Jixi City in Heilongjiang province. In one single serious accident in June 115 men were killed and 24 injured in a gas explosion in the government-owned Jixi Coal Mine in Jixi City.
Official figures show that, in July, 126 mine accidents claimed 329 lives.
However, the official statistics are widely thought to understate the real death toll, which some unofficial estimates put at almost twice the reported level.
Officials at both national and local levels, many with direct financial interests in the hazardous mines, do everything possible to hide the actual number of fatalities.
The only media allowed at mining disasters are the closely-controlled government press and television. Overseas reporters are kept away, normally with the excuse of protecting their safety.
According to an increasing number of reports, mine owners, often with the aid and knowledge of local officials, are going to even greater lengths to cover up deaths at their enterprises.
One such attempt occurred on May 4, following an explosion and flooding that trapped 21 miners in an unlicensed coal mine at Hejin City, in Shanix province.
Rather than begin a rescue operation, the mine owner spent his time destroying miners’ employment records and covering over scorch marks from the blast. The owner finally reported the accident to the local authorities on May 12 but failed to tell them that miners were still trapped in the shaft. When a rescue operation was finally mounted, all 21 men were found dead.
Subsequent investigations found that most of the victims had not died from drowning following the blast as was first thought, but perished either from lack of food and water or asphyxiation.
The miners could most probably have been saved had a timely rescue attempt taken place.
Most of the mining disasters are a direct result of the refusal of the government and private owners to provide proper safety equipment.
Many mines in some of China’s most gaseous regions lack proper ventilation, making methane gas explosions, with their accompanying high death toll, a forgone conclusion.
The government blames the unsafe conditions in mainly small or illegal unregulated mines for the escalating death rate, but increasing numbers of miners are being killed in large state-owned mines, which authorities claim have high safety standards.
For example, the government-owned Jixi City mine where the 115 miners died received an official award for safety shortly before the disaster.

Unsafe conditions
An interview conducted by the China Labour Bulletin with the widow of one of the victims revealed that workers were deeply concerned about unsafe working conditions.
Her husband told her that management cared nothing about safety. “They care just for a bit more money and the miners lost their lives for that,” she said.
“Even working so hard and risking their lives, the miners don’t earn much.
“My husband used to make 700 to 800 yuan a month (about US$100) but now he has lost his life for it.”
She accused the mine officials of being “pretty corrupt”.
Coal provides over 70 per cent of the country’s energy.
Many small mines were closed in a government drive but the resultant leap in coal prices has led to the owners of hundreds of illegal and small coal operations reopening their mines to cash in on the bonanza, despite running the risk of prosecution.
Managers in the state owned mines have also begun to put pressure on safety in order to push up production to take advantage of the domestic price increase and opportunities that have opened up internationally.
According to one recent report, Chinese coal now fetches up to US$23 per tonne on the world market and is beginning to challenge major producers such as Australia for supply to South Korea and Japan.
The appearance of millions of tonnes of cheap Chinese coal on global markets will inevitably have the sharpest consequences for miners worldwide as companies in other coal producing countries move to cut jobs and weaken working conditions in a drive to remain competitive and profitable.

Latin American TV network to challenge imperialist vision

by Jack Ferguson

Venezuela and other Latin American countries have taken another huge step towards integration with the launch of Telesur, a new international TV network for the Americas.
The Spanish language channel - funded by the governments of Venezuela, Cuba, Argentina and Uruguay - aims to provide a real voice for the continent’s people, as opposed to the imperialist visions of channels such as CNN. Telesur was launched on 24 July, the birthday of Latin American independence leader Simon Bolivar.
Over the coming months it will be broadcasting an exciting range of programmes to the Americas, Western Europe and North Africa. The editorial board includes veteran activist Tariq Ali, Uruguayan writer and historian Eduardo Galeano, US activist and actor Danny Glover and singer Harry Belafonte. Telesur’s director Aram Aharonian said:
“Today we begin to see ourselves with our own eyes.”
Telesur’s new president Andres Izarra, who resigned as Venezuela’s Minister of Information & Communication to prevent a conflict of interest, said Telesur “is an initiative against cultural imperialism and against imperialism in any of its expressions”.
Tariq Ali drew a parallel with Arab TV station Al Jazeera, and the role it had played in getting real news to those living under Arab dictatorships.
Telesur has announced talks on a strategic alliance with Al Jazeera on exchange of news and programming. Other speakers highlighted the role that the corporate owned TV networks played in supporting and co-ordinating the coup against Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez in 2002.
The new channel has already drawn the wrath of the US, with Republican Representative Connie Mack from Florida introducing an amendment calling for the US to fund its own broadcasts to Venezuela in the model of the anti-Cuban propaganda channels, TV and Radio Marti.
Part of this proposal was passed but the full wording was not. The unpassed section called for a Venezuelan security zone to isolate Chavez “and limit his ability to destabilise Latin America”.
Hugo Chavez said:
“We should not be surprised by any actions the US government takes. If the Bush administration were to implement [Mack’s] amendment, our government would have to respond. Any counter-revolutionary actions will be responded with a deepening of the revolution. We are preparing to counteract the technological superiority of the United States, because Telesur’s signal will reach there as well.”

back to index

—page eleven—

Miami Five win retrial

by Jack Ferguson

Five Cuban anti-terrorist agents imprisoned in the US for trying to prevent terrorist attacks on Cuba have finally won a retrial. Now solidarity campaigners worldwide are demanding nothing short of their immediate release.
The ‘Miami Five’ were convicted of espionage in 2001 in a farcical trial held in the midst of the right-wing Cuban exile community in Miami. The five had in fact merely been observing the movements of Cuban exile terrorist groups, whose attacks,