Scottish Socialist Voice
Issue 275
25th August 2006

back to index


—front page—

THE TRUTH ABOUT TOMMY SHERIDAN:

He won his case but lost the party...
How it got to the point of no return for Tommy and the SSP

See pages 3, 5, 6&7

NEW LABOUR’S STATE OF FEAR

Thousands of people across Scotland took to the streets this summer to protest against the British government’s support for Israel’s onslaught on Lebanon and Gaza.
While Bush and Blair sat back and let the carnage unfold, ordinary people of all ages, from all nations and walks of life, stood shoulder-to-shoulder in condemning the so-called War on Terror that brings only violence and murderous fear. A fear that the government is doing all it can to encourage.
Witness the 24 arrests on 10 August, following the foiling of an alleged terror plot. The government and police have released unprecedented detail of their investigation into this alleged plot, before anyone has been brought to trial, never mind found guilty.
Whatever the truth of the matter, its reporting is designed to make us fearful, and therefore more inclined to support US-led invasions of ‘rogue’ states.
Ours is a government that sanctions unjustified, random acts of terror yet seeks to condemn others as terrorists.
Many people are jittery and it is mostly members of Muslim communities who are paying the price, through being victimised, suspected, singled out.
But non-Muslims pay the price too, as lives are impoverished by fear and distrust. But this summer’s anti-war marches prove we can fight together for a better society, in which war and racism have no place, and people come before profits.
The Scottish Socialist Party has always been at the forefront of the anti-war movement, from the bombing of Afghanistan in 2001 to this latest abomination in Lebanon.
The SSP will never cease to oppose the oppression of peoples, whoever they are and wherever they come from.
Join us in the struggle for peace and justice.
UNITY! The socialist weapon that strikes fear into the stony hearts of the powerful
Across the globe, military and economic war is raging.
In Scotland, the vast majority of the population is confronted with attacks from the powerful minority who wield power.
Whether it is fighting for jobs and pensions at home or against bloody war abroad, the people have one key weapon: UNITY.
United action swept away the Tsar in 1917, defeated Apartheid and freed Mandela in South Africa, smashed the Poll Tax and holds the key to winning an independent socialist Scotland.
The need for unity spotlighted by the bitter battles around the miners strike, mass unemployment and the danger of nuclear annihilation plated an important part in the formation of the Scottish Socialist Party in 1998.
UNITY was right then, and it is right now.
The struggles waged by the SSP in support of civil servants, nursery nurses and firefighters among others have underlined the key combative role of the party.
Work on free school meals, against prescription charges, for the end of the Council Tax, lift the curtain on how things might be.
It is not a choice of working in communities and workplaces set against working in parliament but a commitment to work where socialist ideas can be advanced and there is a job to be done.
That’s why we will be marching against the war, supporting CND’s peace activity in September and standing in next year’s council and parliamentary elections.
Those dividing the unity that makes such work possible are doing the bosses’ work for them and no amount of bluster and posturing can hide that fact.
The SSP will stand united to meet the challenge of those who would split the left and, more importantly, the rich and powerful who bring war, misery and poverty to the world.
Unity is Strength!

RALLY:
Unity, Integrity, Socialism
Scottish Socialist Party rally
Saturday 2 September, 4pm-6pm
Central Station Hotel, Glasgow,
Music and bar: 6pm-8pm

—page two—

news

Child deportation condemned

by Wullie McGartland

The UK government has drawn up plans to deport up to 500 Vietnamese children.
The Home Office’s Immigration and Nationality Directorate has been hatching plans to forcibly remove children who have no family in Britain, sending them back to countries with deplorable human rights records and even to countries ravaged by war.
The Guardian newspaper, which broke the story, said minutes from a Home Office Consultative meeting in May revealed a change in Government policy on children whose asylum claims have failed.
At the moment, unaccompanied minors are granted discretionary leave to remain in the UK until they are 18.
The Guardian reported that a civil servant told refugee groups at the May meeting: “Problems have arisen with discretionary leave. Many under-18s are under the false impression they have a right to stay indefinitely. This needs to be addressed.”
The Home Office plans admitted that there will be occasions when children are removed for the purposes of “immigration control”, no matter if returning them to their country of origin is against their best interests.
Many of the Vietnamese children being considered for forced removal are girls in their early teens smuggled into this country by human traffickers and forced into prostitution and slave labour jobs.
Bali Hothi, of Dost, a project that works with young refugees and victims of trafficking, including Vietnamese children, condemned the Home Office proposals saying that children could be returned to the families and communities that sold them into trafficking gangs in the first place.
This, she said, was in clear “violation of basic human rights.”
Discussions at the meeting also exposed the Home Office is considering forced returns of children to war-torn countries such as Angola and the Democratic Republic of Congo.
Christine Beddoe, director of Ecpat UK, a coalition of children’s charities, also condemned the plans, saying:
“We are deeply concerned that the government has agreed to a programme of forced returns that places vulnerable children at risk of exploitation and trafficking.
“It is counter to all UK and international obligations on child protection.”
The move comes a year after the government announced a trial scheme to return asylum seeker children without parents to Albania.
At the time, the Home Office vowed it was “determined to tackle the unacceptable practice of unaccompanied children and young people being left in the UK, separated from their families and communities”.
However they had to scrap the plan due to resistance from the Albanian authorities.

UK Government separates mothers from their babies

The UK Immigration service has also come under attack for its treatment of breastfeeding mothers.
Earlier this year, a Vietnamese mother had her Birmingham home raided by Immigration Officers without any notice. She was removed and locked up at the immigration removals centre at Yarl’s Wood in Bedfordshire, without her six-month-old baby.
She was then told she would be sent back to Vietnam, even though she was married to a British citizen and the authorities were aware that they had a child.
She was only reunited with the baby after a last minute reprieve allowed her to stay in the UK to challenge the decision. She was not allowed any contact with the baby for four days.
The case caused uproar and forced immigration minister, Liam Byrne, to make a statement claiming that this was an isolated incident, and admitting that the correct procedures on the treatment of families had not been properly followed.
However it has now emerged that the same thing happened to a Turkish mother.
Known only as Mrs P, she was taken to Yarl’s Wood and told she was to be deported after a routine weekly visit to sign on at an immigration centre in central London. She did not take her 15-month-old boy, after being asked on previous visits not to bring him to the centre, and had left him with a minder. They took her into detention despite the fact that her husband, also Turkish, had been granted refugee status.
She had been advised to keep breastfeeding her baby by her doctor as the child had a kidney condition.
She spent two nights in detention before being reunited with her child after a last minute reprieve allowed her to stay in the UK to appeal.
In a statement via her lawyer, Mrs P said: “I have had terrible experiences in Turkey, but this was worse. I thought constantly of my son. I cried all the time. It has taken my son some time to settle down after my return. His sleep pattern was disturbed and his behaviour deteriorated.”
While in detention, immigration officials even made comments about her top being damp because she was leaking milk from her breasts.
Annette Elder, the solicitor for both women, stated that if the women had been involved in criminal proceedings, before the children were separated from their mothers, proper childcare arrangements would have been made.
Patti Rundall, of the charity Baby Milk Action, said both cases “fly in the face of a number of UN resolutions and conventions.
“There seems to have been no regard for or understanding of the needs and rights of the child or mother.”

Arms companies profiting from mayhem and misery

Anti-war activists have demanded a ban on brutal cluster bombs after reports that at least seven Lebanese people have been killed by unexploded munitions since the latest ceasefire began.
Sean Sutton, of the charity Mines Action Group (MAG), says that it is “absolutely impossible” to tell how many explosives have been dropped by Israeli forces.
“This is an emergency situation. It won’t be solved overnight.”
The charity said that seven villages that it had visited around Nabatiyeh had reported deaths and injuries from unexploded munitions, including cluster bombs, aerial bombs, ground-launched artillery and mortar bombs.
“We (heard) about a 13-year-old boy who was picking grapes when a cluster bomb in the branches exploded and killed him.
“Cluster bombs...are in houses, on balconies, roofs and fields. We’ve seen villages completely covered in them.”
Cluster bombs are often designed to look attractive to young children who play with what are in effect booby traps which then explode to deadly effect.
A researcher for Land Mine Action, long-time campaigners for a complete ban on this vile weaponry, commented:
“Even before this latest war, Lebanese people were dying from cluster bombs left over from the last war with Israel. This shows the long-lived impact of such weapons...(which) kill civilians indiscriminately because of the vast area they cover.
“They have an especially disproportionate effect on children, who make up 60 to 70 per cent of cluster bomb casualties.”
Meanwhile anti-arms trade campaigners condemned the government’s decision to sell the repressive Saudi Arabian regime a new fleet of Tornado jets, complete with the new Eurofighter, made by a consortium including BAE systems.
The widespread welcome from unions and business for the grisly deal, reportedly worth £10billion, shows how deeply embedded the weapons trade is in UK industry.
But the Campaign Against the Arms Trade (CAAT) insists such deals do us little good.
“The people of the UK have lost out, as selling arms to a volatile area can only add to an insecure and unstable world.
“The government speaks of security one day and undermines it the next.”

Airport staffing levels and cost-cutting risks lives

by Ken Ferguson

Responding to the latest security crisis at UK terminals, the main civil aviation union the Transport and General Workers’ Union (TGWU) are demanding an urgent assessment of staffing levels in UK airport security.
Brendan Gould, TGWU national secretary for civil aviation, warned that airline pressure to speed up security checks could compromise security.
“As the largest union in the industry, we are acutely aware of the problems facing aviation, but the industry must not dictate the way we fly according to business-only considerations.
“Staff have carried out a difficult job well, yet have been bearing the brunt of staffing levels cut to the bone.
“Whilst the security threat has been downgraded for now, the aviation industry has to recognise that an intensified security regime in airports will remain in operation.”
The union intends to bring its concerns to the Department of Transport, the airlines and the airport authorities as a matter of urgency.
Meanwhile, talks to avert a strike by baggage handlers and check-in staff at Stansted over the coming bank holiday weekend are continuing between the TGWU,
GMB and Swissport, the ground-handling agent for airlines at the airport.
Workers, disgusted at a ‘miserly’ pay offer, have voted three-to-one for industrial action to win an improved deal.
TGWU regional industrial organiser Maureen Byrne commented:
“The company is trying to drive down costs by attacking our members’ pay, which is already low, (starting) on salaries of between £11,500 and £14,000 a year, working in a
difficult and pressurised environment.”

—page three—

Editorial Comment

THIS IS OUR TRUTH

I’m sick and tired of hearing things
From uptight, short-sighted, narrow-minded hypocritics
All I want is the truth
Just gimme some truth
- John Lennon

How did it come to this? The SSP - the most successful socialist party in Scotland since World War II - is on the verge of a split.
Tommy Sheridan - one of the most monumental figures in Scottish socialism - is standing on the outside of the party trying to hurl grenades in, writing off the SSP as a “colossal train wreck”. He plans to launch a new party next week, and two platform groupings within the SSP have announced they are to join him.
This has not occurred because the SSP, which just a few months ago had the vast majority of socialist traditions in Scotland united under the same banner, has ruptured through political disagreement.
We face this schism as a result of a sleazy little story in a newspaper no-one trusts anyway.
The differences within the SSP centre on what is true and what is lies, on one man’s battle to preserve his personal reputation at the expense of the reputation of his party.
The Voice has not commented on the events surrounding Tommy Sheridan’s resignation for the last year and a half, other than to recognise the huge contribution he has made to building socialism in Scotland, and to correct news speculation that his resignation was caused by infighting or a leadership coup.
Our editorial at the time, in Voice issue 198, was agreed with the entire Executive Committee of the SSP, and Tommy himself. The Voice said:
“There is not one particle of truth in any of the allegations of internecine battles or political manoeuvring running behind what’s happened...
“Tommy tendered his resignation after a meeting that was extremely difficult. Not one member of the Executive Committee voted on it without questioning themselves again and again.
“But the Executive emerged from the meeting unanimous and united.”
In the following editions we got on with the job of covering the too often ignored campaigns against poverty and inequality which spring up daily on Scotland’s streets and all over the world, and the slaughter that has been unleashed by the American and British governments.
Despite Tommy’s allegation in June this year - when he launched his diatribe in the mainstream media against the “cabal” he claimed was out to destroy him - that the Voice “has been a tool of the undeclared faction over the last 18 months”, we never once referred to his court case, with the exception of reporting the SSP’s battle to keep confidential party documents out of the court.
Moreover, the Voice has given equal coverage to the hard work carried out by all six of the SSP’s MSPs since their election in 2003.
But after the shabby pantomime that Tommy Sheridan directed in the Court of Session - which became the daily focus of every newspaper in Scotland, not to mention media throughout the world - and with the SSP on the brink of a split, the Voice cannot ignore the situation before us and is therefore forced to comment.
Our centre pages this week sets out, in chronological order, the events of the last year and a half. Everything we have documented there can be corroborated from other sources - none of it is the invention of a ‘faction’ driven by jealousy or personal hatred. It is an accurate and honest record of a deeply traumatic period in our movement’s history.
We also re-print the minutes of the 9 November 2004 Executive Committee meeting. While some have claimed these minutes are fake, they were ratified by an EC meeting on 24 November 2004. It has also been said that the minutes are unnecessarily salacious, containing more detail than ordinary EC minutes and kept with the intention of being used against Tommy.
In fact, they are briefer than usual EC minutes, containing only the bare bones of a four-hour discussion.
They record the reason the SSP Executive asked one of the most outstanding campaigners for socialism in Scotland to resign from his position as convenor - failure to do so would have been a criminal betrayal of the SSP membership’s right to hold its leadership accountable for its actions.
It has been said, and bears repeating, that the decision to ask Tommy to resign was never about whether or not he went to swingers clubs, or cheated on his wife. It was always about his attitude to the truth, in that he thought it was dispensable, and that comrades should collaborate in a cover-up. He saw no contradiction in being a ‘working-class hero’ while lying to the working-class. But the EC did, and voted accordingly.
Since then, he has spun a tale about a ‘vicious faction’ that sought to undermine him and in so doing, put the SSP itself on trial.
He has talked at length in the press about this faction, which he claims controls the machinery of the SSP and enjoys a majority on the Executive Committee.
The EC was elected by SSP members at conference less than six months ago. The vast majority of SSP members are not members of any platform within the SSP - even the misnamed ‘SSP Majority’ faction, set up to support Tommy, comprises only a small minority of SSP members.
In fact no network, platform or grouping within the SSP held a majority on the EC - yet Tommy and his supporters decided, in the wake of his court victory, to walk away from the SSP nonetheless.
The two groupings within the SSP who have decided to exit with him - the Socialist Workers’ Platform and the International Socialist Platform (CWI) - have handcuffed themselves to a deadweight, who will sink them like a stone.
In leaving the SSP, they are leaving the most democratic political party in Scotland.
At our conference in just six weeks’ time, party members can hold EC members to account for any mistakes they believe they have made in the handling of this situation. SSP members can hold the editor of the Voice to account for this article if they so wish.
That is the nature of democracy - we must all take responsibility for our actions and face the consequences.
But rather than take responsibility for his actions, Tommy Sheridan has lied his way through his court case, screeched “scab” at those who refused to support his corrupt effort to clear his name, and now, realising that he was unlikely to reclaim the convenorship of the SSP and lead an expulsion purge of those who have told the truth, he has chosen to establish his own party, in opposition to the SSP.
He pleads victimisation, claiming to have been hounded out, but in truth, he is running from those who would not allow him to rewrite history - he is running from the truth.
Tommy Sheridan is attempting to build a new party on a landfill site of lies, and it is destined to sink into the muck on which it is founded.

—page four—

one world

GIE’S PEACE
– Morag Balfour

Morag is a long term activist in the peace movement and is the SSP’s peace and disarmament spokesperson

Arrested development

The other week I attended the Trident Ploughshares camp. It was the usual mix of serious work and play for us anti-nuclear activist - and a great opportunity to put my pal Barbara’s spanking new hip to the test. Her state of the art ceramic hip is actually called a trident.
We set out for camp tooled up with cans of spray paint and the trident replacement hip.
We did our first action on Monday 7 August.
We arranged to get picked up from our B&B at 10pm by a mate who was passing the door anyway.
In case you’re wondering, the battle to camp outdoors was lost by me many moons ago so I have to put up with looking decadent.
To our surprise, we saw no MoD Police patrols when we approached our target railway bridge.
With some help we decanted from the car and set to work. I was attempting to write ‘Jesus hates bombs’ AGAIN!!
I guess my biggest concern was being nicked too soon as it would be shameful to leave ‘Jesus hates’ - although I know he isn’t in a position to sue me for libel. Miraculously, I completed my phrase and Jesus doesn’t have to sue me!
Meanwhile, Barbara used up a can of paint and vented spleen impressively.
Then we sat and waited.
After a wee while, I phoned the Trident Ploughshares legal support phone number and asked them to inform the Coulport MoD Police that we were waiting to be arrested.
I made a couple more phone calls before they arrived.
They were bemused and confused when we explained that we’d called in our own criminal activity.
One of the things I’ve always loved about our movement is its level of accountability.
I’m not ashamed of what I do so I don’t mind proclaiming it to the rafters. Anyway, we told them that we didn’t get out much, had no friends, were miserable decrepits and only spray paint stuff so we can have some company.
Barbara ate far more wheat than she should’ve that week, which lead to some comic farting. She let me know when they were on their way and then we fell about laughing.
Wednesday 9 August was Nagasaki day.
We followed much the same evening routine but went for a different bridge, this time near Faslane.
We got everything painted that we wanted and then a wee police car drew up beside us.
I went this time for ‘No nukes! Not now! Not ever!’ and put down my spray can expectantly.
They parked the car next to me but didn’t get out. I asked Barbara why we weren’t getting nicked and she didn’t know either, so we just picked up our cans and set to again. These were MoD police new to the job.
Senior officers who arrived shortly afterwards expressed audible incredulity at their decision to sit watching us. I wasn’t arrested or charged properly. The wee souls were reading off laminated cards.
Coming back to the subject of accountability, I must admit I tend to be a bit of a hard-liner. If people are not prepared to take responsibility for their particular behaviours they should change their behaviour. I joined the Iona Community for similar reasons.
Their economic accountability is very disciplined and I find it quite challenging. I benefit from robust accountability structures. I get suspicious when people shy away from the truth. I become incensed when people distort or pervert the truth for their own selfish reasons.
Understand this folks, I’m pro-truth, not anti-Sheridan.
It’s a work of great malevolence to label honest people as scabs.
I woke up in a parallel universe the other week. Apparently deceit and slander are now noble and righteous.
Now that is perverse.

Coke told to can it

by Ken Ferguson

Coca-Cola and Pepsi Cola, those iconic symbols of the all-American way, have been banned in the South Indian state of Kerala.
The Left Democratic Front government has banned the production and sale of the toxic fizzies throughout the state.
The companies will be asked to close their operations entirely.
As seven other Indian states consider following Kerala’s example, the state’s Chief Minister VS Achuthanandan told journalists that the ban was being imposed in order to combat the health hazards posed by the products.
He commented:
“We have arrived at the decision to ask both Coke and Pepsi to stop production and distribution of all their products, based on scientific studies which have proved that they are harmful.”
The government was also clearly influenced by community campaigning in Plachimada on the issues of falling water levels and soil and groundwater pollution associated with Coca Cola’s bottling operations.
Coca-Cola’s bottling plant in Plachimada has remained shut down since March 2004 because of community opposition.

Toxic
Both government and independent studies have found the presence of toxic waste around Coca-Cola’s bottling plants across India.
“We will take steps to close down the Pepsi factory in Puddussery village in Palakkad district of Kerala,” the chief minister added.
Environmental campaigning body the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE), a research and advocacy group in India, released a study that found a “cocktail of between three to five different pesticides in all samples” of Coca-Cola and Pepsi products they tested in India.
On average, their study said, the pesticide residues were 24 times higher than European Union (EU) standards and those proposed by the Bureau of India Standards (BIS), the government body responsible for standardisation and quality control.
Coke and Pepsi have now been banned in government buildings and educational institutions in many states in India, including Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Karnataka, Chattisgarh, Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat and Delhi.
R Ajayan, of the Plachimada Solidarity Committee, a statewide coalition that has been campaigning on the water depletion and pollution issues, praised the Kerala ban saying:
“We welcome the move to completely ban the manufacturing and sale of Coca-Cola and Pepsi in Kerala.
“The cola companies have inflicted a lot of damage to the fabric of the community in Plachimada, by destroying lives and livelihoods.
“We are now putting the companies on notice that they must make reparations to the affected community members, and the campaign will move to a new stage.”
Across India, work is now underway to develop regulations to govern safety standards for soft drinks to ensure consumer safety.
Campaigners at the CSE have accused the Coca-Cola company and Pepsico, as well as “powerful interests in the government”, of blocking the adoption of the standards.

Regulations
Amit Srivastava, of the India Resource Centre, an international campaigning organisation, spelt it out:
“The government of India must also ensure that there are laws that protect our groundwater, and that regulations are in place to put an end to the kinds of rampant pollution that we have seen with the Coca-Cola company.”
The Supreme Court of India has also ordered Coca-Cola and Pepsico to reveal the ingredients in their products in six weeks, or face a potential national ban
* For more information, visit www.IndiaResource.org
R. Ajayan, Plachimada Solidarity Committee (India) Tel: +91 9847142513
Amit Srivastava, India Resource Center (US)
+1 415 336 7584. Email: amit@indiaresource.org

Coca-Cola: the charge sheet
Drought: Coca-Cola leaves you thirsty. The company uses so much water, even building pipelines to divert water supplies direct to its bottling plants, that local communities go short.
For ordinary people, this means long journeys for fresh water, while for farmers, it’s certain death, as no water equals no livelihood.
Pollution: Coca-Cola is a dirty company. The company is guilty of distributing toxic waste, including cadmium and lead, to farmers, claiming it was fertiliser. The long-term effects this may have on human health are as yet unquantified but likely to be devastating.
Sickness: Coca-Cola makes you ill. The sugar content is the least of it. In India, Coke contains high levels of pesticides, including DDT. These poisons would not be permissible in foodstuffs sold in the EU and US.
Violence: Coca-Cola doesn’t pull its punches. In Mehdiganj, near Varanasi, a 1500-strong anti-Coca-Cola protest, in November 2004, was met at the gates of the bottling plant by armed police, brought in to ‘protect’ the premises. Many protestors were severely beaten up.

—page five—

your voice

Tommy admitted that he confirmed sex club visit to EC meeting
On Friday 4 August 2006, Tommy Sheridan left the Court of Session after receiving £200,000 damages over allegations about his private life that were printed in the News of the World.
It was presented as a victory for truth and justice.
During the case, 11 leading members of the Scottish Socialist Party stated that Tommy Sheridan attended an SSP executive meeting on 9 November 2004 and admitted visiting a sex club in Manchester with a News of the World journalist, but would deny the allegations. In court, Tommy Sheridan accused them of being liars and perjurers, and of trying to frame him in “the mother of all stitch-ups”.
According to press reports, he has subsequently sold his story to a tabloid newspaper owned by Trinity Mirror PLC, pocketing a further £30,000 in the process.
The Daily Record front page headline of 7 August 2006, reads, “I’ll destroy the scabs who tried to ruin me”.
The 11 people Tommy Sheridan wants to “destroy” have spent their entire adult lives in the labour and trade union movement - including Richie Venton, the party’s industrial organiser, and Colin Fox, the party’s convenor. Yet, all they have done is stand in court - against their will - and tell the truth.
Now, as the possibility of a perjury investigation looms, we cannot stand by and watch this grotesque, Orwellian situation continue.
To protect the integrity of these witnesses, and others, we are forced to come forward and state that at a series of individual discussions arranged by Tommy Sheridan in 2005, he confirmed to each of the people below that he attended the SSP executive meeting stating that he was the unnamed MSP at the centre of allegations in the News of the World involving a sex club in Manchester.
We call on Tommy Sheridan to publicly retract the accusations that he has made against the honest, decent men and women whom he has slandered.
David Archibald, Govan Branch; Steve Hudson, Dennistoun Branch; Charlie McCarthy, Coatbridge and Airdrie Branch; Nick McKerrell, Shettleston Branch; Jim McVicar, Baillieston Branch; Liam Young, Maryhill East Branch

Defend the honest eleven
Obviously those who continue to accuse eleven Scottish Socialist Party Executive members of “concocting” a story have no sense of irony.
In late 2004, The Herald ran an article about a closed meeting of SSP members in Dundee. Information leaked to The Herald regarding the meeting included a quote attributed to Alan McCombes that the SSP Executive would not assist Tommy in building a “tower of lies”.
The document posted on the party website in response to the end of the court case confirms that such meetings took place all over Scotland as the Executive disseminated to members the crux of the 9 November 2004 Executive meeting (i.e. that Tommy intended to publicly deny events reported in the News of the World that he had confirmed as true to the Executive, and that his resignation had therefore been sought).
Many hundreds of SSP members must therefore have been made aware of the reasons behind the resignation.
Given this fact and the press coverage of the Dundee meeting, it is inconceivable that Tommy Sheridan was unaware of these meetings or their content.
If Tommy is the victim of a baseless conspiracy formulated by jealous inadequates, then its roots are to be found in November 2004 and must have been evident to Tommy at the time. Despite this, no suggestion of a conspiracy was made by Tommy. Even more damning, in the Daily Record of 7 August 2006, Tommy is quoted as believing that he had the support of the Executive in his quest to sue the News of the World before “smelling a rat” only earlier this year. This line of defence is simply untenable and flies in the face of reason.
Tommy and his allies are telling the rest of us either that these meetings didn’t happen or that the content of them was not what we heard with our own ears.
How ironic is it that Steve Arnott suggested in court that there was a case of mass delusion among those who believed the testimony of the eleven Executive members.
Every SSP member who attended one of those meetings knows full well that the concoction of stories is coming from those hell-bent on destroying the Executive members who had the audacity to tell the truth.
It is imperative that these party members act on this knowledge and support the Executive members who are under a wholly unwarranted and baseless attack.
David Stevenson, Cambuslang

‘The lie will unravel’
Tommy Sheridan has destroyed the reputation of the SSP in order to protect a lie. But the lie will unravel.
I am a member of the SSP and was well aware that Sheridan did admit to going to a swingers club with a News of the World journalist, as most party members were briefed about this honestly. Our concern was that he planned to lie in court. It was discussed frankly at the National Council meeting I attended on 28 May this year. Sheridan was present and spoke for ten minutes, and far from denying that he went to the swingers’ club, he bullied and demanded that we give him our “full political support” in his battle against the “scum, reactionary News of the World” - the same paper that he had just circulated a press release to, attacking his own party. I can hardly contain my rage that since the court case, Sheridan has continued to attack the SSP, for example, by labelling eleven good comrades as “scabs”. It sickens me that he has accepted £25,000 profit from a tabloid, after his courtroom denunciation of cheque-book journal ism.
SSP members have been silenced for 21 months because we agreed to keep Tommy’s confidentiality, but I am no longer prepared to participate in a cover-up which could mislead SSP voters.
History will not absolve Sheridan. It will absolve the 11 SSP members who refused to re-write the party’s history, or lie in court on a personal matter of Tommy’s that had nothing to do with the struggle for a fair society.
Carol Hainey, Falkirk

A victory for us all?
We must not fall into the trap that Michael Jones QC laid for the jury in the Tommy Sheridan case. There is no reason to believe that the jury had any view, one way or the other, regarding the testimony of SSP comrades. For the News of the World to win its case they had to prove that the damaging allegations contained in their published articles were “substantially correct”.
Of all the allegations, from committing adultery through to snorting cocaine, only a fraction had any support from credible witnesses - hardly “substantially correct”. Additionally, if the jury had found for the News of the World, it would have indicated to the press that published stories could contain scurrilous allegations only a fraction of which need be credibly supported in court. Such a decision would not be in the public interest. The jury’s verdict is a victory for us all, regardless of the veracity of Tommy’s evidence. The case against the News of the World did not hinge on whether or not Tommy had visited a swingers club a couple of times. That was not, by any means, the most defamatory allegation. It follows that SSP comrades had little to gain (and much to lose) by lying about the EC meeting of 9 November 2004 - either way. Katrine Trolle’s evidence was far more convincing than anything said on that score by current SSP members. It is a tragedy that, apparently, two of our MSPs thought it necessary to lie in court. That throws a very unpleasant light on the relationship that this party has with the truth. Left wing politics has a reputation for splitting more easily than Welsh slate, but now we face a real divide - and it is ethical, not political.
Christine Chandler, Aberdeen

Rebel Ink
- Kevin Williamson

Kevin is an award winning writer and publisher, causing havoc at the cutting edge of Scottish culture

KEVIN SIGNS OFF

Nine years ago - on the exact date of the 700th anniversary of William Wallace’s famous victory at Stirling Bridge - Scots voted to set up a parliament of our own for the first time since 1707. It was a pivotal turning point in the history of Scotland.
A small band of activists took this as a cue to attempt to unite the Scottish left by setting up a socialist party to fight against poverty, injustice, war and London rule. I’m proud to have been one of that number.
Eight years later and the party we created seems unrecognisable to me. Comrades and friends have become locked in a bitter factional struggle that seems certain to tear the party in two.
Over the last few weeks, being a member of the SSP has seemed akin to being trapped in a sack full of angry wasps. The atmosphere has become ugly and toxic.
Which is (partially) why, after thinking things over, I’ve decided - with much sadness and regret, but no bitterness - to end my eight year membership of the SSP.
So this’ll be my last weekly column in the Voice. (I’ve sent a formal letter of resignation, with the reasons why, to the party’s National Secretary - a copy of which I’ve posted up at http://myresignationletter fromtheSSP.blogspot.com.)
I’m still reflecting on the events surrounding the recent court case between Tommy Sheridan and the News of the World. I can’t say I’m unhappy with the verdict as I thoroughly despise the Murdoch press and everything it represents.
But the idea that the means justifies the end is morally repugnant. The methods will always be incorporated into the end result. Tommy compared the trial to Gretna versus Real Madrid. By the end it was like watching Rangers versus Hearts. So utterly shameful were the methods of the two contestants that, eventually, I wanted them both to lose.
From a personal perspective I hope Tommy eventually finds the courage to be honest with himself and everyone around him. If he does then he’ll be a better man for it.
But politically, Tommy is finished. He has lost his reputation for honesty and integrity and has gone into bed with the opportunistic dinosaurs of the Brit left. Soon he will discover that he will either have to dance to their tune on Scottish independence or face being dumped by them.
Tommy and the Brit left camp are a remnant of the days when the left embraced the cult of personality, and thought that socialist politics was all about leaders and followers, with the great (male) orators up on the podium and the applauding masses down below. They have been left behind in the previous century.
With the benefit of hindsight, the idea of uniting the left in Scotland into a single party was a mistake. The pro-independence left and the Brit left are two separate entities with separate political agendas. Which is why the SSP was doomed from the start.
For similar reasons Tommy’s new Solidarity party - with its unstable marriage of convenience between Brit left opportunists and progressive pro-independence lefts - will also be torn apart over the question of Scottish independence.
My own politics have evolved over the last eight years. Support for the principles underpinning Scottish independence, feminism and libertarian socialism are now non-negotiable.
I’d like to think the SSP can be won over to such principles. But I’m not yet convinced. From now until the crucial independence Election in May 2007, I’m gonna step up my own involvement in the fight for Scottish independence.
I’d like to thank the editor(s) and staff of the Voice for their hard work and support over the last ten years. Youse have been great. I’ve really enjoyed writing this weekly column, stirring up a bit of debate.
I’m leaving the SSP with no bitterness towards anyone on either side. Life’s too short. The SSP has many members I’m proud to have called comrades and friends. All the best for the future. The fight goes on.

—centre pages—

No secrets - no lies: The truth behind two turbulent years in the SSP

2004

Sun 30 Oct: The News of the World (NotW) runs a front page account, by Anvar Khan, of a visit to a sex club with an unnamed, married MSP.
Two members of the SSP Executive Committee (EC), aware that the article refers to Tommy Sheridan, ask him to apologise and resign as convenor as soon as he is named as the MSP involved. He refuses.
A further attempt is made to deal with the situation privately, with Tommy invited to attend an informal meeting on Sat 6 Nov. He refuses and an emergency EC meeting is called.
Tues 9 Nov: Tommy admits to the emergency EC meeting that he is the unnamed MSP, saying he attended the club twice, in 1996 and 2002. He adds that he has taken legal advice, and will continue to publicly deny the story as he is confident no proof exists. He leaves the meeting early. There is a unanimous vote not to comply with his strategy of denial, and a consensus is reached that he should be given until Sat 13 Nov to resign as party convenor.
Thurs 11 Nov: Tommy’s resignation is reported on Daily Record front page. Tommy is quoted as saying he intends to spend more time with family. Feverish media speculation follows.
Sun 14 Nov: The NotW prints additional allegations of an affair, to which Tommy had never admitted at the EC, and which were never considered by EC members in discussions regarding Tommy’s resignation. A second emergency EC unanimously agrees a statement, saying “...The Executive completely dismisses the rumours that have circulated in the press that Tommy’s resignation was provoked by a leadership challenge, a factional power struggle or any other form of internal in-fighting... We understand that recent allegations in a Murdoch newspaper may be the subject of a future libel action by Tommy Sheridan and consequently the Scottish Socialist Party does not wish to comment on matters concerning the allegation.”
Wed 24 Nov: A further emergency EC agrees and ratifies the minutes of the two previous meetings and unanimously agrees proposals regarding the forthcoming National Council (NC) meeting, including a verbal report on the reasons for Tommy’s resignation and an argument in favour of keeping the minutes of the three EC meetings confidential.
Sat 27 Nov: The Herald runs article headlined, ‘SSP leaders to face the party without crucial meeting’s minute’.
Emergency NC is attended by more than 100 party delegates. Allan Green’s verbal report is endorsed by Tommy Sheridan. A motion endorsing the EC’s decisions is passed by 85 votes to 20.
Tommy Sheridan issues a press statement saying, “I wholeheartedly support the SSP Executive Committee statement agreed at today’s meeting. The Scottish Socialist Party has today showed great maturity in reaching a unified position on the way forward.
“I would like to take this opportunity to confirm that my resignation as party convenor has nothing at all to do with internal power struggles. There is not and never has been any internal squabbles or back-biting about a leadership challenge. We are a party of principle and action.
“We have drawn a line under these internal deliberations. I will now work alongside the other party MSPs and the wider party membership to campaign for justice, equality, peace and socialism.”

2006
Thurs 11 May: In connection with Tommy Sheridan’s libel case against the NotW, four SSP members are cited to appear in court in order to hand over documents relating to his resignation, including the minutes of the 9 November 2004 emergency EC.
Fri 12 May: Colin Fox and Allan Green meet with Tommy. Allan Green shows him the minutes and both ask him to withdraw his libel action, pledging to raise funds to help him with costs incurred so far. Tommy asks them to defy the court’s demand to hand in the minute.
Sun 14 May: An emergency EC agrees that Alan McCombes is to take sole possession of the minutes and refuse to hand them in to the court.
Tues 16 May: Alan McCombes goes to the Court of Session, where he explains, on the grounds that the party has the right to hold private discussions on confidential matters, that he is not prepared to release the minutes. He is warned he faces contempt of court charges.
Sun 21 May: A scheduled EC meeting endorses the decision to defy. It withdraws, in the interest of unity, a motion agreed previously calling on Tommy to drop his libel action.
Week beginning Mon 22 May: At the Court of Session, Judge Lady Smith announces her intention to call Tommy Sheridan and members of the Cardonald SSP branch to explain a resolution circulated on Tommy’s parliamentary email demanding that the EC minutes are destroyed.
At some point this week, a fake set of minutes are sent to the NotW, which include the initials of a number of EC members. Whoever sent them this fabricated document handed over the names of SSP members who would later be dragged before the court to testify.
Fri 26 May: Alan McCombes is jailed for 12 days by Lady Smith at the Court of Session. She says that Alan is “flouting the law. It is difficult to resist drawing the conclusion he puts his loyalty to the Scottish Socialist Party above his duty to this court.”
Sat 27 May: SSP offices in Glasgow and Edinburgh, and Alan’s home, are raided by Sheriff Officers, instructed by the court to search for the minutes. They don’t find them.
Sun 28 May: Emergency NC meets in Glasgow. While the meeting is in progress, Tommy Sheridan issues an ‘open letter’ to the press, where he alleges there is a conspiracy to undermine him by a “an unsavoury cabal of comrades... who are more interested in pursuing personal vendettas, through vile lies and slander, than conducting the class struggle.” He had never raised these allegations formally within the SSP.
In a torrid, angry atmosphere, some speakers are bitterly harangued by hecklers. Tommy Sheridan speaks in favour of handing the minutes in to the court, and repeats some of the accusations from his open letter.
The meeting votes 82 to 67 in favour of ending the strategy of defiance. Without discussion, the NC is forced to vote on a motion offering Sheridan “our full political support in his battle” against News International, which is passed by 81 votes to 60.
Mon 29 May: The minutes are handed in to the Court of Session in a sealed envelope, and Alan McCombes is released from Saughton Prison after four days in jail.
Sun 18 June: An EC meeting agrees that those SSP members now cited as witnesses in the libel action should go to court under protest but neither perjure themselves nor place themselves in contempt of court. Two EC members vote against this statement, but offer no alternative strategy.
Tues 4 July: Court case begins.
Fri 4 August: Tommy Sheridan wins his libel action, and is awarded £200,000. He immediately announces he will challenge Colin Fox for the SSP convenorship. He later states he will stand for the position if he can secure nominations from at least 25 branches.
Mon 7 August: As part of a series of exclusive, paid-for interviews with Tommy, the Daily Record’s front page headline reads, ‘I will destroy the scabs who tried to ruin me’. The inside pages run pictures of four SSP MSPs, with the word ‘scab’ printed over each.
Wed 16 August: In a statement released on the ‘SSP Majority’ website, Tommy Sheridan and Rosemary Byrne call a meeting to discuss a new party of the left in Scotland, declaring the SSP a “colossal train wreck”.
Sat 19 and Sun 20 August: In interviews with The Herald and Sunday Herald, Tommy says he regrets calling SSP members “scabs”, saying he should have saved the word for use in internal party meetings. Instead, he labels SSP members who gave evidence “collaborators”, and unambiguously states his intention to leave the SSP and start a new party.
Two platforms within the SSP - the CWI and SWP - announce their intention to leave the SSP and join Tommy’s new formation.

“Court quotes…”

Katrine Trolle - Tues 18 July

Mike Jones QC: Are you lying about having a sexual relationship with Mr Sheridan?
Katrine Trolle: No, it’s embarrassing enough without making it up. My colleagues, clients, friends, my boyfriend and his family have read all about this... I did do these things, but I’ve changed a lot in recent years... I wouldn’t have caused this pain to those nearest me.

Allan Green - Wed 19 July

“You can lie, accuse me of monstrous frame-ups, none of it the truth. For you to turn round and accuse me of monstrous frame-ups it is shameful Tommy, it is shameful.”

Carolyn Leckie - Thurs 20 July
CL: Our mouths have been clamped for the last 18 months. We have maintained confidentiality, you have continued to lie to your family. The lurid headlines would have been chip paper by now.
TS: You voted against political solidarity?
CL: I voted against you jumping off a cliff and jumping off with you.

Tommy Sheridan - Fri 21 July

Mike Jones QC: ‘The courts should have been properly defied’; this was your position?
Tommy Sheridan: Yes. A difference of strategy, I would have told the court there was no minute. Going to the court and saying ‘we have a minute’ was stupid.
Mike Jones QC: So lies are justified?
Tommy Sheridan: When you’re fighting the most reactionary scab outfit in the world, yes, sometimes you have to fight dirty.
Mike Jones QC: Not a question of truth but of whose side you are on?
Tommy Sheridan: Some people have not just lied but have politically scabbed.

Rosemary Byrne - Mon 24 July

“There was a lot of hysteria [at the 9/11/04 Executive Committee meeting], allegations and accusations were thrown about. It was a kangaroo court.”

Steve Arnott - Wed 26 July

During his sworn testimony, Steve Arnott, SSP regional organiser for the Highlands and Islands, suggested that those who testified that Sheridan admitted visiting Cupid’s sex club were perhaps suffering from a form of “mass delusion”.

Courage and honesty

Tommy Sheridan has repeatedly attacked the 11 SSP members who gave honest evidence in court as “scabs”.
Tommy made a half-hearted effort at retraction in interviews with the mainstream press over the weekend. He implied it was a spur of the moment reaction, but went on to say he would have made the scab accusation in internal meetings.
In fact Tommy, and supporters of his, used the word both in the run up the court case, while giving his evidence, where he said witnesses had “politically scabbed”, and again after the case.
Here, SSP workplace organiser Richie Venton gives his view on the ‘scab’ allegations.
It takes courage to be honest, but only an honest, open, campaigning socialist party is capable of winning mass support for the vision we all hold dear - of an independent socialist Scotland.
Far from being ‘scabs’, ‘liars’ or ‘conspirators’ in ‘the mother of all stitch-ups’, I and others have upheld the honesty and integrity of the SSP, refusing to rewrite history.
We refused to join him in scorching the very earth the SSP stands on...
Tommy defied all friendly advice from me and others and forged ahead with his court case. By doing so he put the party on trial as much as News of the World (NotW).
Do our accusers know what a scab is? Which picket line have I or the ‘SSP 11’ ever crossed? What strike have we broken or undermined? When have we sought personal or financial gain out of defying the majority decisions of a workers’ organisation?
Using ‘scab’ as a term of abuse against fellow socialists at best devalues the whole meaning of the word in the class struggle. Such anathema, such a vile judgement on my integrity as a socialist of 35-years of selfless activity, cannot become an accepted ‘fact’ through repetition in the socialist and trade union movement...
Tommy’s misnamed SSP Majority faction made a cold, cynical calculation when they portrayed his libel action against NotW as part of the class struggle - and that we had to choose between him and them.
They then branded 11 socialists as scabs - and call us ‘collaborators’ with Murdoch’s rag. This way they hope to win the support of trade unionists in particular - out of their healthy instinct for solidarity.

Examine the facts:

One man made sure SSP members were forced to appear in Court - Tommy. It was him that took legal action, not the NotW.
We repeatedly advised him against this, warning it would drag his name through manure and embroil the SSP in what is nothing more nor less than an unsavoury celebrity sex scandal.
Once summonsed as witnesses, what were we supposed to do? Not turn up? Face warrants for our arrest? Go on the run (with or without our families)? It is grotesque distortion to say we ‘collaborated’ with NotW - we were hostages, not witnesses - dragged there by Tommy’s reckless, selfish actions...
We faced a choice (under oath) of EITHER admitting the truth about why we asked Tommy to resign as convenor (precisely to prevent him being exposed as a liar and hypocrite whilst still SSP convenor) or corroborate his monstrous allegations about being framed, stitched up, dumped for factional reasons - with forged or ‘dodgy’ minutes to back it up.
Virtually no SSP member disagreed with our sad, unavoidable decision to ask Tommy to resign as convener at the vast number of well-attended meetings in 2004.
If we had not kept a true and accurate record (minutes) of why the most effective socialist convener in decades had been asked to resign, whose version would you now believe? The truth - or the lie created by a very effective orator and media operator in defence of his own reputation?
Whatever you think of us keeping minutes, even if they had not existed we would have been quizzed by the QC about our recollection of the EC meeting which asked Tommy to resign - that’s what we actually faced in court.
Do you think we could have got away with lying in court but telling the truth to the SSP membership? Apart from the legal risks, how the hell can a party of our public standing get away with lies in a public courtroom, followed by a different public explanation outside the court - and retain any respect?
An isolated sect or underground conspiracy might get away with that - but not a broad, open, campaigning socialist party that working class people can believe in, which the SSP has always aspired to be.
* This is a shortened version of Richie’s statement, which is available in full at : www.scottishsocialistparty.org

SSP emergency EC minutes - 9th Nov 2004

EC Minutes 09.11.04

SSP Executive Committee - minutes Emergency Meeting - Tuesday 9th November 2004 - Glasgow
Present: Carolyn Leckie (Chair), Allan Green, Jo Harvie, Frances Curran, Graeme Mclver, Richie Venton, Felicity Garvie, Steven Nimmo, Colin Fox, Jock Penman, Tommy Sheridan, Alan McCombes, Catriona Grant, Barbara Scott (minutes), Rosie Kane, Duncan Rowan, Rosemary Byrne, Allison Kane, Keith Baldassara, Kevin McVey, Pat Smith

Tommy Sheridan’s contribution
The meeting began with an introduction by Tommy Sheridan. He responded to a recent article in the News of the World which alleged that a married MSP had visited a swingers/sex club in Manchester in the company of a female journalist who had now written a book about her lifestyle. Tommy admitted to the meeting that he had in fact visited the club on two occasions, in 1996 and 2002 with close friends. He acknowledged that this had been reckless behaviour and had, with hindsight, been a mistake. He reported that he had met with Keith B and Alan Mc and asked them for the opportunity to fight this on his own and for other party members if questioned about it, to either give no comment or refer all questions to himself. He said he was confident there was no proof in existence that he had visited the club.
Tommy said he was not prepared to resign as Convener unless proof was revealed to exist. His strategy was to deny the allegations and in this regard he had already taken advice from NUJ solicitors. He also stated that it was up to each comrade to decide if they had lost confidence in his Convenership. If he did not still have the confidence of the comrades by the February national conference, he was prepared to stand down at that time citing “family reasons”. He stated his belief that to stand down immediately would be a gift horse to the enemies of the party.

Alan McCombes’ contribution
Alan McCombes then gave his account of the issue. He stated that this was the most painful discussion he had ever been part of and that himself, Keith B and Tommy S had worked together for over 20 years with no previous trace of acrimony. Alan stated that he had first been made aware of this incident in 2001 at the annual Socialism event when Nicky McKerrell had informed him that someone was trying to sell a story to the media about the club in Manchester which involved Tommy. Alan asked Tommy about it at that time, and Tommy denied the allegations absolutely. However a year later Keith B had contacted Alan because mutual friends had told him that Tommy had visited such a club. Alan and Keith had raised the issue again with Tommy who had this time admitted that it was true and asked them not to reveal it further as there was no evidence, and no possibility that anyone involved would tell anyone. Alan and Keith agreed although they had concerns about the potential time bomb. When the News of the World recently ran the story, Alan immediately realised the unnamed MSP was Tommy. Alan’s feeling is that to go to this type of club with a journalist is reckless, irresponsible, and politically damaging to the party. He is not concerned about any perceived moral issue, but feels there are conflicts with the party’s evolving positions on issues such as pornography, prostitution, lap-dancing etc. Alan felt that the public would forgive sexual misconduct, but not the convener of the party telling lies about this and refusing to face up to the consequences.
Alan had asked Tommy to manage this issue in the media as soon as he is named as the MSP involved in the story, apologise and resign as convener, citing the reason as wanting to spend more time with his family. However Tommy had refused to do this, instead wanting Alan and Keith to participate in a cover-up.
Alan voiced his concern about the NUJ being involved in this, as their help had been enlisted with false information. He cited the Bill Clinton/Monica Lewinsky affair and pointed out that the most damaging part of that to Bill Clinton was the public denial. He felt it would be political suicide to deny these allegations in the press.
Tommy’s refusal to comply with this advice led to Alan and Keith talking to other comrades, however Tommy refused to meet with this group and began acting independently of the party, for instance arranging the Rose Gentle demonstration at the weekend unilaterally.
Alan finished by asking Tommy again to tell the truth and stand down as Convener, and not to ask the Executive to participate in a cover-up.

General Discussion
Duncan wished to clarify the situation regarding the North East. Additional allegations were circulating in the press about Tommy and an SSP member from Aberdeen. Duncan said that the News of the World journalists had mistakenly identified a particular comrade as the person involved in these allegations, and had hounded her to the point where she had taken an overdose.
There followed a long discussion. Tommy left the meeting at 20:15 after the following comrades had contributed: Duncan, Catriona, Carolyn, Frances, Keith, and Richie.
Before he left, he repeated that he did not believe there was any evidence which would prove him to be lying. He did not accept that he should admit the visits to the club and felt that no-one should comment on private lives. He said he would not be forced into a course of action by the News of the World.
The discussion continued after Tommy left with the following people taking part: Colin, Catriona, Alan Me, Kevin, Rosie, Felicity, Allan G, Carolyn, Rosemary, Graeme, Steven, Jo, Frances, Richie, Keith and Duncan.
Without exception all contributors disagreed with the strategy of denying the allegations. All felt that this would be the most damaging strategy for the party. The general feeling was that this was a bad situation, and that the “least worst” option must be found. All agreed that it would be better if Tommy changed his mind about denying the allegations.

The following proposals were put forward:
1) Tommy to be given until 10:00 tomorrow morning (Wed 10th Nov) to resign as Convener and the story to be run in the Voice, thus giving the party the upper hand rather than waiting for our enemies to fire the bullet
2) Tommy to be given until Saturday 13th Nov to resign, thus giving him the chance to think it over and talk to his family etc
3) Tommy to stand down at February conference citing family reasons
4) To comply with Tommy’s strategy of denial

There was a vote:   
Option 1 - 7
Option 2 - 9
Option 3 - 0
Option 4 - 0

For the purposes of clarity, a unanimous endorsement of Option 2 was sought and obtained.
It was agreed that Colin and Frances would speak to Tommy tonight if possible and no later than tomorrow morning (Wed 10th Nov). He will also be asked to withdraw his First Minister’s Question tabled for Thursday 11th Nov.
The EC will meet on Saturday 13th rather than the planned Sunday 14th meeting to plan the announcement of Tommy’s resignation, first to the party membership and secondly to the press.
The Regional Organisers will set up meetings to explain to members.
The meeting closed at 22:30.
Barbara Scott

—page eight—

Postcards from the cutting edge (or, what SSY did on their holidays...)

On wine, women’s issues and song

by Lynsey MacGregor

Having missed last year’s camp, I can’t really comment on whether Secret Squirrel has improved or not, but on the whole I thought it was an excellent weekend.
The workshops were run in an extremely inclusive way.
We use popular education methods where everyone breaks into groups and each person gets a chance to talk.
We believe this raises the confidence of new members and encourages independent thought.
I particularly enjoyed meeting with the SSY Women’s Group.
We’re about to get our campaign against abstinence-only sex education in schools underway.
It was really heartening to have a meeting with a group of young socialist women about what kind of education we actually want to see in our schools.
The men in SSY also had a meeting - facilitated by Catriona Grant - aimed at making them examine their own attitudes and behaviours.
I’m glad SSY as a whole is taking a really progressive attitude towards gender politics and hope that this continues.
The most heartening thing for me though is just how many ideas SSY members had for the camp.
I’m on the SSY National Committee and I, along with the other NC members, had the job of cutting down the list of proposed workshops to a number that we could do in two days.
It was an absolutely mammoth task but I’m not complaining; it gives me real hope for the future to see just how much our members are thinking.

And thanks for all the crisps

by Blair Milne

The political and social aspects have to be some of the most memorable of my summer, with several positive outcomes and a commitment to the continuation of our organisation.
The workshop I facilitated was nerve-racking; The men’s meeting, correspondent to the SSY women’s meeting, was a thought provoking experience; in its first attempt, the band night was a huge success (maybe one day everybody will appreciate my music); and the non-stop campfire party was a blast.
 But too often at events like these, those who committed themselves to the organisation and smooth running of the event are forgotten. The people who committed to cooking meals, running the bar and tidying the site at the end of it all never get the mention they are due. The transporting of food, drink, equipment and resources are also tasks easily forgotten. Like everything in life, the camp’s success had more to do with hard graft than abstract ideas.
Sitting at the campsite on Monday, waiting for the cars to arrive that would take the equipment, and myself back to Edinburgh, eating leftover crisps as the sun began to set, I had ample time to reflect on this.  So thank you to absolutely everyone who helped make CSSII happen. It was definitely worth it.

Open air, open minds

by Rowan Muir

Good weather, great people, interesting discussions and a healthy dash of food and drink! I’ll expand....
The camp went off with a bang on Friday night, with sing-songs around the campfire; a good initial bonding for SSY members and guests alike, many of whom knew few of the faces sporadically lit by the jumping flames.
Saturday began on a slower note, the excitement of the camp however still very much in the air.
The workshops were very refreshing, something I think the SSY and SSP alike should be proud of.
The move towards different kinds of educational sessions are essential for grabbing the attention of newcomers, and maintaining and developing the interests of the more experienced socialists.
What I took from the camp was that people entered the sessions with open and interested minds, and instead of being lectured to and interest quickly dissipating, the workshops were challenging; encouraging discussion, the exploration of relevant issues and consequently, the formation of opinions.
The most lasting impression of the camp for me is one of hope, as clichéd as it may be!
There was undoubtedly for many members a background air of frustration at the current situation, with papers being poured over on their arrival. However the unity and friendship of the youth members there made the future look a far less daunting place.
Sunday night, sat around the campfire with full bellies and drinks in hand, brought the summing-up of the weekend and one message repeatedly:
We the youth have a highly political, progressive, democratic and forward-thinking movement of which we are very proud, and which we will fight to maintain, ensuring the bright future of socialism in Scotland.

Seeing ourselves as others see us

by James Nesbitt

The Umbrian hills in Italy recently hosted Scottish Socialist Youth (SSY) and hundreds of others for the USFI’s 27th annual international youth summer camp,  attended by over 550 young revolutionaries, hailing from all across Europe, and as far afield as the Philippines.
Designed to help build links between socialists from different nations and varying situations, the camp was successful in terms of each delegation enriching its understanding of the international struggle against capitalism.
Many levels of success and optimism were expressed.
It was particularly heartening to learn from the Greek and French sections, who both have recent experiences of mass movements of young people entering into conflict with the current system.
We were saddened, yet inspired, after speaking with the Filipino comrades, who shared their experiences of state repression, armed resistance movements and comrades being brutally murdered by Maoist guerrillas.
Each of the delegations we met with expressed keen interest in the progress of the SSP - our project is looked to internationally as a massive step forward for Left regroupment and the fight for socialism.
To this end we deemed it crucial to engage with the other major regroupment ‘projects’, particularly the Portuguese Left Bloc, the Danish Red-Green Alliance and Rifondazione Comunista of Italy.
Each of our situations presents important lessons for the anti-capitalist Left. Meeting with the delegation from Portugal impressed us and reinvigorated our hopes for building a united left - they have managed to build a popular base and a national profile on a radical socialist programme, despite many internal contradictions.
The Danes told us of their continued development and growth, but expressed some concerns at a perceived stagnation and feelings of frustration amongst much of the membership.
Rifondazione seems to hold the bleakest prospects (the party is being torn apart in a civil war over its participation in the centre-left government), with some comrades speaking of Rifondazione as “dead” or “a thing of the past”.
The international socialist movement must learn from all of these parties.
We felt that we managed to make a positive intervention, in giving an insight into the situation in Scotland and pioneering our distinctive political methods.
At the camp commission’s closing ‘balance sheet’, we were praised by both the Danish and Belgian sections for our commitment to revolutionising educational methods on the Left, particularly through participatory meeting techniques and the use of popular education.
This came as a refreshing break from the slightly stale and at times alienating practice at some of the larger meetings of long lectures by perceived ‘experts’.
This is intended as a constructive criticism - I personally felt that much of the political content was more developed and advanced than the current level in the SSP.
The USFI seem to have worked to recognise the crucial nature of class issues such as LGBT liberation, internationalism, women’s liberation and Marxist ecology. In particular, they make no bones about their commitment to feminism, something which would undoubtedly be contentious in the SSP.
Our delegation came home satisfied, having learned a lot, had fun and made important new contacts.
The USFI are not the only show in town on the international far-left, but SSY were glad to have been involved and grateful to the organisers and delegations for their friendliness, hospitality and solidarity. I would strongly recommend young members attend next year and to learn more about the USFI, their history and their current perspectives.
* For more info, see: internationalviewpoint.org

—page nine—

cultural resistance

Agit gypsy punk underdogs

Gypsy Punk - Underdog World Strike by Gogol Bordello. CD out now

by Matt Preston

Gypsy Punk - Underdog World Strike is the title of Gogol Bordello’s third album. A better description of their music, and their intent, is hard to find.
The album is a visceral, giddy mix of Eastern European gypsy folk and agitational, agitated punk rock.
“This is my life and freedom is my profession,” sings the wide-eyed and mustachioed Eugene Hutz on Undestructable - a passionate call to arms for the downtrodden.
Hutz discovered punk under Soviet censorship by swapping bootleg tapes of the Sex Pistols and the Dead Kennedys recorded from illicit radio stations. He later found his gypsy roots when his family fled from Kiev to rural Ukraine in the wake of the Chernobyl disaster.
Forced to leave his records behind, he fostered a passion for the raw folk music he found, and was captivated by the mysticism of a tradition where violins are only made from trees struck by lightening.
Returning to Kiev in 1989 and seeing Sonic Youth play live, Hutz formed a vision of his future, and, after three years spent in refugee camps around Europe, he arrived in New York ready to form Gogol Bordello. In the song Underdog World Strike, Hutz effectively describes the band’s musical approach: “Be it punk, hip-hop, be it a reggae sound. It is all connected through the gypsy part of town.”
A collective of musicians from around the world, found by Hutz playing at Eastern European weddings in New York, they mix violin, accordion and Eastern rhythms with the power of dub and punk.
In doing so they fuse together an international music of resistance, uniting it within the culture of one of the world’s most downtrodden, dispossessed people.
For Hutz, struggle is central to the music:
“Culture is a living being. The minute the culture is not challenged, it dies. In order to keep it alive, you have to be countercultural.”
The album, produced by Steve Albini, reflects the wild energy of the band; yet it is restrained when compared to their live show.
Combining elements of cabaret, situationist theatre, and often violently self-destructive, the band have been shunned by New York’s more traditional alternative venues.
Playing recently in London, they whipped a 2000 strong crowd into a frenzy. Punters, who had in 12 years of going to gigs found themselves drifting safely to the back of venues, were drawn to the front row, pogoing like it was 1977.
After two and a half hours onstage, with the crowd still jumping like the show had just begun, Hutz finished the set by surfing the crowd atop a bass drum. A friend said breathlessly at the end: “This is what it must have been like to see The Clash.”
But for Hutz this is not mindless chaos: “I feel like we’re going against ironic treatment of the world and culture and life. Unless you see more people speaking from the heart, we’re gonna continue to rage about that - drunk, sober, or lobotomised.” This is a band who have the power to uplift and unite, to make you dance like a maniac and feel “undestructable”.
Yet in the relatively sober song Illuminating, Hutz reminds us that we should not expect to find a Pied Piper to lead our dance to freedom:
“There’ll be no saviours any soon coming down. And anyway illuminations never come from the crowned.”
Gogol Bordello invite their listeners to discard any rose-tinted, safe vision of the world they may have fostered and simultaneously revile and celebrate the truth of human existence.
* Gogol Bordello play Glasgow Barrowland on November 1. See www.gogolbordello.com

New play looks at impact of Iraq occupation

The Iraq war is a popular subject at Edinburgh Festival 2006. One of the new plays, Babylon Burning, is inspired by Joan Littlewood’s famous production of Oh What A Lovely War! - about the bloodletting amongst soldiers on the Western Front during World War One. Babylon Burning is about the destructive impact of the Bush-Blair invasion on Iraqi civilians and the quagmire in which so many soldiers, British and American, are losing their humanity and sometimes their lives.
Director Robert Rae has put it on as a community play, with a cast nearing 100 local people. Here, Dick Barbor Might, who contributed to the play as a researcher and as one of a number of writers, writes about the historical context.
“It seems that we have always been fighting over this place”, as a soldier reflects in the play. The history of modern Iraq began with an ill-fated invasion by an Anglo-Indian army in one of the Middle Eastern campaigns that the British Empire waged against Germany’s Turkish ally during WW1. That army surrendered to a Turkish force at Kut al-Amara. Many surrendering soldiers who died in captivity are buried in Baghdad’s North Gate Cemetery. This is where, in the final climactic scene of Babylon Burning, Laura goes to find the grave of her great uncle, one of the soldier victims of the surrender.
Ninety years on, Laura is a soldier in today’s army of occupation. Each of these wars was supposed to be over in a few weeks but each turned into a long, drawn-out conflict and a catastrophe for the world.
In 1917 it was the British who tried to call the tune in Baghdad. Nowadays it’s the Americans. Then, it was mostly soldiers who died. Now it’s mainly civilians. Yet, still, there are disturbing echoes from WW1. In each war the message from the occupiers has been the same: we’ve driven out your oppressors, we’re here for your benefit. But each time imperial policy-makers have valued Iraqis only as reliable collaborators.
By 2001 Iraq had become a prime focus for a powerful group of policy-makers in Washington - the neo-Conservatives. Influential under Reagan, they had become dissatisfied with Clinton’s policies and his failure to overthrow Saddam - once a CIA intelligence asset and US proxy in a war against Iran but since turned enemy.
Their opportunity came on 11 September 2001. Although Saddam and Osama Bin Laden loathed each other, a case was made, based upon exaggerated and fabricated “intelligence”, that Saddam was part responsible for 9/11 and that he had WMD.
The neo-Cons were ably seconded by Tony Blair and his spin-doctors. Yet there were those who protested at the blatant lies and illegality, insiders like the British international law expert Elizabeth Wilmshurst and the millions who marched throughout the world (100,000 in Glasgow alone).
Iraq’s rich and ancient culture and its once buoyant economy had already been damaged by Saddam’s oppression and by the multiple devastations of two decades of war and cruelly imposed external sanctions. Since March 2003, and as resistance has mounted, Iraq has been laid waste by the incalculable follies, air strikes, atrocities, collective punishments and manipulations of the occupation, by the savagery of the Jihadists, by inter-communal strife and by the ever downward spiral of violence. The war consumes its victims, mainly Iraqi adults and children but also the dead, wounded and traumatised soldiers of the occupation.
There is another kind of story, which is represented in the course of this play. These stories are of Iraqis not as hapless victims but as people supporting their families and neighbours come-what-may and hoping still for a better future for their country. This kind of story invites compassion and in its humanity offers us hope.
* Babylon Burning is on at 7.30pm, at Theatre Workshop (box office 0131 226 5425), Hamilton Place, Stockbridge, Edinburgh until 27 August. There is a parallel programme of theatre, music, art, poetry and talks - details from the theatre.

Viva Sabina!

Preview: Viva Zapatero! (cert 15) directed by Sabina Guzzanti. Glasgow Film Theatre, 28-29 August

by Anna Battista

Many Latin and Greek authors produced astonishing pieces of satire, among them Aristophanes, Lucilius and Horace. Later on, Molière coined a definition of this genre, stating that satire “castigat ridendo mores” (criticises customs through humour). Satire may have been a popular genre in the past but, in Italy, it became a cause of concern during Silvio Berlusconi’s reign. Soon after he was elected Prime Minister, Berlusconi - also the owner of Italian private TV channels, newspapers, a publishing empire and, as Prime Minister, able to influence the Italian state broadcaster Rai - literally purged the airwaves of whoever dared to say anything against him, among them many journalists and comedians.
One of the victims of the purge was Sabina Guzzanti. The daughter of former left wing journalist Paolo Guzzanti - who became in recent years a Berlusconi supporter and a Forza Italia party senator - Sabina’s name has always been linked in Italy to satirical TV shows in which, together with her brother Corrado and her sister Caterina, she mocked left and right wing politicians and showbiz icons. The Berlusconi curse fell on Sabina in November 2003 when her programme RaiOt was cancelled after just one episode. The title of the programme echoed the pronunciation of the English word ‘riot’, but also stood for ‘Rai Eight’, a phantomatic eighth TV channel free from any political influence that Sabina hoped one day would exist.
Entitled ‘Weapons of Mass Distraction’ and dedicated to censorship and information, the first episode of the programme featured a monologue by Sabina about Berlusconi’s TV monopoly and an analysis of the Legge Gasparri (Gasparri Law), a law meant to reform the Italian means of communications that takes its name from the previous Minister for Telecommunications Maurizio Gasparri.
Sabina’s film Viva Zapatero! (2005) - a Michael Moore-style documentary - is the story of how RaiOt was censored, and how, a few days later, Berlusconi’s company Mediaset sued it for damages for her jokes on the Gasparri Law (as if Mediaset were the press office of the Ministry for Telecommunications), and for causing losses to the company in the stock exchange on the morning after the first episode of the programme was broadcast. RaiOt was never broadcast again despite a judge issuing a sentence in its favour.
Throughout the film Sabina the “jester”, as she defines herself, interviews many prominent Italians such as journalist Enzo Biagi (who was himself fired from Rai for having invited on his programme, broadcast before the 2001 elections, actor and director Roberto Benigni who poked fun at Berlusconi), Nobel Prize winner Dario Fo and comedians Beppe Grillo and Paolo Rossi, and meets their foreign counterparts Rory Bremner and the French group Le Grand Guignol, drawing comparisons between satire in Italy and abroad. There’s actually no José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero in the film: Sabina uses his name as a reference since the Spanish Prime minister abolished laws in Spain that allowed him to appoint television executives.
Viva Zapatero! is not an anti-Berlusconi film: it is a way to document the state of the mass media and of freedom of speech in Italy. Article 21 of the Italian Constitution may state, “All persons have the right to express freely their ideas by word, in writing and by all other means of communication”, but this doesn’t actually happen. Indeed, a survey by Reporters Sans Frontières, mentioned in the film, ranks Italy 53rd in a worldwide chart of media freedom.
The film is also meant to stimulate the debate and wake up that part of the Italian population that has been caught for a few years in a Berlusconi-induced slumber. Guzzanti’s Viva Zapatero! is a very powerful film even now that Berlusconi is not in power anymore. It is indeed naïve to believe that everything is fine in Italy now that the Cavaliere is gone.
Journalist Michele Santoro - another victim of Berlusconi’s censorship - stated during last year’s Venice Film Festival where Sabina’s film received a 15-minute ovation, that Viva Zapatero! is about what Italy should do after Berlusconi.
Until proper laws that ensure media pluralism in Italy and that establish nobody can control more than one channel are issued, there won’t be any freedom of expression and real competition in the Italian media. Till then, the Berlusconi logic will prevail, and censorship will keep on triumphing.

—page ten—

Belfast remembers hunger strikers

by Gerry Corbett

The 25th anniversary of the Long Kesh hunger strikers has seen a year-long series of events across Ireland and the world. Last Sunday, these events culminated with a commemoration march in Belfast.
Around 25,000 people congregated on the Falls Road before marching the three miles to Casement Park, home stadium of Antrim football and hurling teams.
Side streets off the Falls Road were allocated to different areas, or political ‘cumanns’.
The march was lead by the ‘blanket’ men and women, marching along the route with fists raised defiantly.
They were followed by ex-prisoners dressed in white shirts, cheered on by local people lining the route.
Equally enthusiastically received was a group of people representing Hezbollah.
The march continued with banners from across Ireland and abroad, ending with a great rally at which the crowd was addressed by Gerry Adams.
A whole range of struggles were represented, including banners demanding Israel out of Lebanon, and ones supporting Cuba, Guatemala and Venezuela.
The route was further enlivened by the presence of open-backed lorries on which different mini-plays, depicting various scenes from the Irish struggles, were enacted throughout the day.
Four similar events took place simultaneously, in the north, south, east and Twinbrook areas of Belfast.
Further events are planned for the next month or so, including a commemoration of the women hunger strikers in Armagh Jail.

ETA issues warning as govt allows peace process to stall

by Voice Reporter

ARMED Basque group ETA has warned that the peace process, launched with the group’s declaration of a ceasefire five months ago, is now facing a serious crisis.
The Basque group accused Spanish politicians of dragging their feet over finding an end to the conflict.
In a statement sent to the Basque pro-independence newspaper Gara, ETA made a veiled threat to retaliate if the Spanish government continues its repression of Basque pro-independence activists.
This was clearly a reference to such actions as bans on rallies by the outlawed Batasuna party, which is the leading pro-independence force in the Basque country and faces fierce repression from the Spanish state.
The statement warned:
“If the attacks against the Basque country continue, ETA will respond.”
ETA pointed out that the government had agreed to a “ceasefire” of its own in talks leading up to the ETA truce, apparently agreeing to stop arresting ETA members.
But, charge ETA, the government is not living up to this commitment.
The government has repeatedly denied having made any promises to ETA to win the ceasefire, which began in late March.
Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero announced formally in late June that his government would hold talks with ETA.
However, he insisted that he would make no concessions towards independence. The government is due to report to parliament in September on how the peace process is progressing but Zapatero has already said that a breakthrough is years away.
In the statement to Gara, ETA accused the ruling Socialists and the Basque Nationalist Party, which governs the Spanish part of the Basque country, of “showing a clear will to delay the steps to be taken.”
Neither party is interested in negotiating any real changes to the Basque country’s status within Spain, the ETA statement went on. Zapatero’s party clearly just wants to make history by ending the decades-old conflict and is trying to “convert the peace process into a mere tool for staying in power.”
The peace process, the statement concluded, “is in a clear situation of crisis.”
Leading Spanish daily El Pais reported Madrid policy-makers as saying that the statement highlighted ETA frustration with the government’s refusal to allow all-party talks in the Basque region on its future until Batasuna regains legal status by ‘renouncing ETA and violence’.

—page eleven—

international news

Palestinians may pay price for Israel’s humiliation in Lebanon

“Dead bodies are arriving in our hospitals so mangled, with their flesh torn in such a grotesque way, that it is clear the occupation army is using a new type of weapon.”
While the world watched Israel drop bombs on the civilians of Lebanon, events in Gaza and the West Bank continued to deteriorate for the Palestinians.
Even as the shaky ceasefire came into effect on Monday past, an Israeli Merkava tank fired into a house in northern Gaza, killing a woman and her two children.
Overworked medical staff, struggling for supplies as the Israeli siege of finances and imports pinches harder and harder, are now reporting injuries they have never seen before, leading them to suspect that Israel is road-testing new weaponry on a people who are becoming increasingly invisible to the rest of the world.
Since the beginning of July, 187 Palestinians have been killed by the Israeli army.
Riyad Awad, the director of Gaza’s Health Information Centre, comments: “Not a day passes without the Israeli army killing an average of five or six Palestinians, mostly children and women and other innocent civilians. Israel feels the world is giving it a mandate to kill and maim at will.”

Humiliated
But it gets worse. Humiliated by Hezbollah’s resistance, and under pressure at home from hard-liners, the Israeli government may go in even harder on Gaza and the West Bank to bolster its damaged military reputation.
And to punish them for showing solidarity with Hezbollah, an organisation whose fierce military and political resistance has inspired Palestinians, during the summer conflict. Palestinians live like inmates of a prison, every aspect of their lives controlled by the occupiers and in constant threat of violence and death.
All the while, their democratically elected Hamas government is still unable to function, starved as it is of monies and resources, and with half its ministers in Israeli jails. Currently, Hamas leaders are trying to pull together a government of national unity in Gaza, while Israeli shells fizz through the air.
Palestinian prime minister Ismail Haniyeh is urging that the Palestinian Authority be dissolved.
There is no point, he says, “in deceiving ourselves and giving the world an erroneous impression that there is a Palestinian national government when the Israeli occupation army is killing every shred of authority and abducting ministers and law-makers and forcing officials to go underground.”
Incredibly, Israel continues to play the victim in this, as it has over Lebanon.
It had to attack Gaza and root out militants, it insists, because one of its soldiers had been abducted.

Double standards
Yet, just a day before, two Gaza civilians, Osama and Mustafa Muamar, were kidnapped and remain in Israeli custody. The international press barely noticed.
These double standards came into play regarding Lebanon too. Apparently, it was all Hezbollah’s fault, for kidnapping two Israeli soldiers.
Never mind that Israel has been aggravating at the border for months. Or that Israel is hated by the Lebanese for its horrendously bloody invasion of 1982. Or that, it appears, Israel had this attack planned at least a year in advance and was just waiting for an excuse to wade in.
The World Council of Churches, whose delegation recently visited Beirut, Jerusalem and Ramallah, are in no doubt. “(T)his was a planned operation all ready to go.”
The air force was practically taxiing along the runway and, swiftly and is if reading from a well-rehearsed plan, its first move was to knock out five bridges, a power plant, the international airport and major roads, bringing Lebanon to its knees but making little impact on Hezbollah, the supposed targets.
In fact, according to a report in the San Francisco Chronicle, an Israeli army officer was making Power Point presentations outlining this very operation to selected Western audiences over a year ago.
The echoes with US attacks on Iraq are more than coincidental; Israel is working on an American agenda here, perhaps as its battering-ram, preparing the ground for a US-led assault on Iran - the real force, they insist, behind Hezbollah.
America is hell-bent on portraying Iran as a crazed, anti-democratic enemy. Thus they ignore whatever is inconvenient. For instance, that in 2003, the Khatomi government offered to negotiate with the US, including over nuclear power and a two-state solution for Israel-Palestine.
The Bush administration’s reaction was instructive; the Swiss diplomat who bore the message was censured.
Iran reiterated its support for a two-state solution again in 2006, as did Hamas, though you wouldn’t know it, given Israel and America’s insistence that Hamas wants only the destruction of Israel and therefore cannot be tolerated as a government.
Selective hearing, and reporting, is a common feature of this ongoing conflict.
The 33-day war on Lebanon resulted in at least 1300 dead, from resistance fighters incinerated in their cars to whole families crushed beneath the weight of their homes, their arms still gripping each other even in death.

Wreaking havoc
Yet the news reported it as if the Israeli casualties were comparable, as if the rockets firing into Haifa were wreaking anything like the havoc that aerial bombardment was wreaking in Tyre and Sidon, where dozens were dying at a stroke, and the injured had no hospitals to go to, and no roads to travel to them on anyway, where journalists had to put down their cameras to pull old women and men out the rubble because everyone else was dead or gone, where electricity was off for hours and food and water supplies had stopped.
Yet Israel is not undamaged. Not only is its government mocked by its failure to smash Hezbollah, whose support has grown and who, as Israel retreats, is at the forefront of the reconstruction in Lebanon. Israel has also lost its sheen of invincibility, and that could prove very dangerous in the years to come. For everyone.

Afghan fighting ‘worst since Korean war, if not WWII,’ says British general

by Ken Ferguson

Only a few short months ago, Defence Secretary and born again imperialist John Reid assured worried MPs that British troops bound for Afghanistan would be involved in nothing more deadly than building schools and brewing tea.
They would probably carry out their “mission”, the Airdrie sage assured us, “without firing a shot.”
Perhaps he even believed it. In the face of the fact that Afghans have taken on all comers, from Queen Victoria’s Sepoys to Brezhnev’s Red Army, and fought them to a standstill.
While the constantly career-changing Reid strikes his latest hard man pose in the safety of the Home Office, the garrisons despatched to Afghanistan are facing the most sustained fighting since the Korean war.
Who says so?
None other than Lt General David Richards, commander not just of the Brits in the area but of all NATO forces.
In a brutally frank assessment of the crisis, the general told reporters that the fighting in Afghanistan was the most sustained since certainly the Korean war in the early 1950s and perhaps even since World War II.
He drew a picture of isolated garrisons holding fixed positions under almost constant attack and facing exhaustion through intense heat and lack of sleep.
In the last 40 days, a dozen soldiers have died and the general himself described the Brits as “pinned down”.
Now we hear there is to be a major offensive involving 10,000 British, Canadian and other NATO troops, who will undertake ‘search and destroy’ missions while the Afghan army literally holds the forts now held by the Brits.
If all this sounds familiar to older readers it is because it is.
It’s a carbon copy of scores of colonial conflicts, from Algeria to Vietnam and another imperialist disaster is inevitably on the cards.
From the quagmire of Iraq, where dozens die almost unremarked every day through the terror bombing in Lebanon to the gathering crisis in Afghanistan, this Labour militarist’s chickens are coming home to roost.
However, the body bags that will return as a result of this bloody folly will not be filled by the sons of the Labour Party elite but by young men from the schemes of Glasgow, Edinburgh and Dundee still being sucked in to serve British Imperialism.
As the actions at Prestwick and the protests against the war have demonstrated, there is an alternative view to the Blair/Bush madness.
The need for an independent Scottish socialist republic which breaks the links with Britain’s bloodstained imperialism has never been more urgent.

—page twelve—

A&E to close in Scotland’s ‘epicentre of heart disease’

by Roz Paterson

The axe is about to fall on Monklands Hospital A&E department, despite months of angry protest and the expert opinion of concerned health professionals.
To no-one’s surprise, the Scottish Executive endorsed the brutal decision by Lanarkshire health board to downgrade casualty services to a minor injuries clinic, despite this being an area with the highest incidence of heart disease in Europe, nearly 28 per cent above the Scottish average. An area where an extra hour’s journey in an ambulance could spell the difference between life and death.
“How,” demands Dr George Vetters, formerly a consultant in public health for NHS Lanarkshire, “in the epicentre of heart disease in Scotland, does removing acute emergency care improve the lot of the people?”
How indeed. In truth, this was never about health provision; instead it was a crass exercise in political expediency. The government wanted to hack down the health budget through closures, and shutting down Wishaw wasn’t possible, it being in First Minister Jack McConnell’s constituency, and nor was shutting down Hairmyres, in East Kilbride, it being the subject of a PFI deal and thus close to the Labour administration’s heart.
So Monklands it had to be.
Unfortunately for everyone who has to live with this decision, Hairmyres and Wishaw, who must now cope with those who would otherwise have gone to Monklands, are struggling to cope with their patient-load as it is.
People are being turned away, waiting lists are rising - this axing can only make matters worse.
And this is by no means the end of the story.
Plans are already afoot to close seven out of 15 A&E units across West and Central Scotland.
Kevin McVey, SSP regional organiser for Central Scotland and a member of campaign group Lanarkshire Health United (LHU), says the campaign is far from over, despite this being “nominally the end of the process”.
Like many, he is incensed that the public consultation proved to be such a sham, and that Labour MSPs tried to save their political necks through campaigns promoting one hospital over another, crudely trying to pitch communities in opposition to each other, “while accepting the logic that one A&E unit had to go. Our position has always been that Lanarkshire needs all three units.”
SSP MSP for Central Scotland, Carolyn Leckie, a former NHS employee who has been at the forefront of the LHU campaign, commented: “It would appear that the Scottish Executive has joined the health bureaucrats in completely ignoring the clearly expressed wishes of the people of Lanarkshire to retain Accident & Emergency provision at each of their three hospitals.
“It is clear that the Executive has conspired with the Health Board in dramatically undermining local health services and it will be ordinary people who will pay the price for this outrageous decision.”
She believes that local politicians should be held accountable for this decision.
“Local Labour politicians have to answer for the fact that their party’s policies, such as PFI contracts for hospital buildings, are at the heart of why this decision has been made.
“They undermined the unity of the campaign by attempting to play one community off against another and their strategy has spectacularly backfired.
“The people of Lanarkshire should hold them to account for their claim that the NHS is safe in their hands which has been shown by this announcement to be no more than a hollow sham.”
Carolyn has pledged to give her continued support to the campaign against the Monklands closure.

SCHOOL MEALS BILL ESSENTIAL

by Simon Whittle

It was revealed last week that globally, there are now more overweight people than those who are undernourished. A staggering 1billion people are now overweight, while 800million go hungry.
Professor Barry Popkin, from the University of North Carolina, told the International Association of Agricultural Economists earlier this month that the “burden of obesity” was shifting from the rich to the poor.
Adult dietary patterns are learnt in childhood. Celebrity chef Jamie Oliver’s Jamie’s School Dinners made the case for healthy, nutritious meals to be served up in schools.
Not only did more kids stay in school (eventually) to enjoy healthier meals where Jamie and his magic touch had been, but public backing knocked the Labour government into a corner and forced them to act on the issue. Or so they promised at the time.
But in a follow-up documentary to his groundbreaking series, which will be screened on Channel 4 next month, Jamie says the government has failed to deliver on its promises.
When he won two TV Baftas earlier this year, Jamie accused successive education ministers of using “the same bloody excuse” (that they’d just started their new job after a cabinet reshuffle) for not doing anything about it.
In Scotland, there’s no excuse. SSP MSP Frances Curran’s Free School Meals Bill is not supported by Labour simply because it’s a Scottish Socialist Party bill.
Earlier this year, Frances lodged a Holyrood bill for the introduction of universal free meals in schools. Parliament will vote on the bill, which is backed by 21 MSPs, in the autumn.
The West of Scotland SSP MSP recently told the Sunday Herald:
“Making meals healthy...is only half the equation.
“We have still got 50 per cent of young people of secondary age who are not getting that healthy school meal and, in order to get them eating it, we’ve got to make them free.”
Only political hypocrisy will stop Frances Curran’s Free School Meals Bill going through, as the arguments against it are extinct.
Just look at the facts:
Nearly a quarter of Scots children (240,000) live in households officially recognised as poor. Parents often go without food themselves in order to provide for their children. Around 25 per cent of low-income families can’t afford to give their children the food they want to.
Means-testing creates stigma that discourages uptake of free school meals. Low-income families spend nearly £11 a week less on average than the Family Budget Unit estimates is essential to provide a healthy diet. Extending entitlement to free school meals would help increase the disposable income of some of our poorest households by up to £27 per week.
Poor diet in children is linked to disease in later life. Scottish children eat only two of the five recommended portions of fresh fruit and vegetables a day. Around 75 per cent of Scottish children appear to eat no green leafy vegetables. Nutritious food at school improves cognition, attendance and classroom behaviour.
With Frances Curran’s Free School Meals Bill, Scotland’s politicians have a chance to break this cycle of ill-health, easing the blight on the NHS, and on thousands of low-income families throughout Scotland.
* Figures from Child Poverty Action Group. See www.cpag.org.uk/scotland/meals_bill_main.htm

M74 fight still on

by Arlene Nunnery

An activist workshop event on Sunday 13 August marked the reinvigoration of Jam74, the campaign against the M74 extension.
The event, called for by SSP activists, was a bid to kick start the anti-motorway campaign after the collapse of a legal challenge last year.
The challenge, a judicial review of the Scottish Executive’s right to overturn a Public Local Inquiry’s decision that the road should not be built, collapsed at the Court of Session on only its second day last month. It was a disappointment, undoubtedly, but SSP members involved in Jam74 always argued against focussing all our energy on what was a fairly weak legal challenge.
The financial costs involved were massive but our main objection was to Friends of the Earth and Green Party members advocating the abandonment of other campaign activity, in particular direct action, which they claimed would adversely affect the outcome of the case, i.e. don’t upset the judge.
As a result, the campaign stalled for a year whilst the Greens and FOE fundraised for the ill-fated court case.
Now, communities and activists along the proposed route are getting back to grassroots, and Sunday’s event provided a welcome opportunity to re-orientate the campaign and develop a plan of activity for the next three months.
In the main, this will focus on street work and direct action in an attempt to raise awareness of the motorway plan locally and nationally, and build a bigger resistance to the extension being built.
Anyone interested in getting involved is very welcome, regardless of where they live, as this motorway will affect more than those who work or reside in its shadow.
Estimated to cost between £500million and £1billion, this five-mile road is set to become one the most expensive road-building programmes in history, one that will impact on all public spending in Scotland.
* For further info check the website: www.jam74.org


back to index