Scottish Socialist Voice
Issue 280
29th September 2006

back to index


—front page—

Scotland’s deadly divide

100 richest Scots have a total wealth of £13billion
1 million Scots are living below the poverty line

Scotland is a nation of contrasts. Never mind the wild mountains and tranquil lochs, the most striking feature of the landscape is the yawning chasm between rich and poor.
On the one hand, you have the soaring wealth of the high-profile entrepreneurial class, and on the other, the working and workless poor, amongst whom life expectancy is in freefall and life chances are narrowing to a vanishing point.
The Scotland where children are growing up to ill-health and grinding poverty, in condemned housing, where drugs and drink problems spiral out of control and young people are left behind by or lost in the system, belies the idea that we are thriving in the union.
Devolution may have provided a marginal extension of democracy, but only full independence can gain us the control we need to deliver these desperate households from the half-life of poverty.
Pensions and the minimum wage are reserved matters. Yet a decent pension could transform the lives of our elderly, a hike in wages could make all the difference to a young person starting out in life, a parent trying to give their children a solid upbringing, adults trying to steer clear of debt and depression.
Independence First, a cross-party organisation calling for a referendum on Scottish independence, is staging a march through the capital this Saturday, to raise the banner of a Scottish republic.
The SSP supports Independence First, as breaking up the United Kingdom not only dismantles America’s most slavish war ally, it also helps pave the way for a Scottish socialist republic.
Today in Calton, in Glasgow’s east end, life expectancy has dwindled to 54, lower even than in Bosnia, Lebanon, the Gaza strip. A child born here is four times more likely to be hospitalised in his or her lifetime, three times more likely to suffer heart disease, ten times more likely to grow up in a workless household than a child born into an affluent suburb.
In Scotland, one million people live in poverty - that is, on less than 60 per cent of the median income, and that includes those who are working. One third of all full-time workers earn less than £6.50 an hour. One half of part-time workers learn less than £6.50 an hour, the majority of them women.
The consequences of this low wage economy are spelled out in our health statistics, in babies born with low birth weights, in young children with advanced dental decay, in obese teenagers, in adults dying of cancer.
To truly address this ghastly and deadly imbalance in fortunes, we need a Scotland built on equality. Tinkering round the edges, with wee reforms here and teeny tiny tweaks to the benefit system there, does nothing in the long run, other than condemn yet another generation to a life in the Scotland most politicians would rather not talk about.
Let’s talk about it. Let’s do something about it. Let’s fight for our independence, for a republic that is first and foremost a socialist one.

Independence First march

Saturday 30 Sept, 1.30pm, starting at Market Street, behind Waverley Station, Edinburgh
For an independent socialist Scotland

—page two—

Corporate cash-in for Labour

by Davy Landels

‘War protesters banned from Labour conference,’ screamed the headline in The Independent, with news of how Labour had tried to stamp on any unsightly demonstrations outside their conference.
The report went on to highlight how Labour-controlled Manchester City Council had refused permission to allow the grieving families of dead service personnel to set up a peace camp in the area.
After several weeks of protest and defiance, the families were granted permission at the last minute.
But there is a group of lucky people who are not only allowed into the conference, they are welcomed with open arms - as long as they bring their cheque books.
Big business is there by the bucket-load.
From nuclear energy to mobile phones, private medicine to junk food, they’re all there, ready and willing to catch the ear of any government minister who deals with their specialist subject.
As the conference begins, UNISON members have embarked on a series of one-day strikes to defend the NHS from another round of privatisation.
Workers at NHS Logistics, the department that deals with buying and distribution in the NHS, are to have their second one-day strike on the Thursday of the conference.
They will be staging a demonstration outside.
It is also widely believed that the Labour National Executive Committee (NEC) will back a UNISON motion denouncing privatisation in the NHS.
If this goes ahead, it represents a resounding condemnation of the leadership’s policy.
But meanwhile, back on the conference fringe, private healthcare company BUPA will host and sponsor a meeting with Health Minister Andy Burnham on “Regulating Standards in Healthcare”.
Who says politicians don’t do irony?
Given that the Labour government has been throwing billions of pounds at the private rail companies, the problem solving and economics sections should be very illuminating.
Kraft Foods - who manufacture overly-processed, packaged foods, marketed aggressively to children, products like Dairylea Lunchables and Dairylea Dunkers - are paying for another fringe meeting.
The audience here will hear Schools Minister Jim Knight address a theme based on “a whole school approach to nutrition and activity”.
This might give us an inkling of the government’s commitment to healthy school meals, and whether they are to be provided free to all schoolchildren, or not.
The Building Societies Association (BSA) are hosting a meeting at which Housing Minister Yvette Cooper will be speaking.
Members of the BSA, such as Abbey National, have made billions of pounds from the privatisation of council housing, which has seriously increased rather than reduced housing debt.
Malcolm Wicks, the Energy Minister, will speak at a meeting paid for by the UK Petrol Industry Association, whose members include Esso, Shell and BP, about the environmental cost of producing energy.
But Esso, Shell and BP are some of the biggest polluters in the planet.
They are the problem not the solution with regards to environmental degradation.
How ironic that they should ‘host’ such an event.
So while angry workers are kept outside, big business gets its feet under the table.
Families who have lost loved ones in Labour’s bloody wars are threatened with a ban for even staging a peaceful protest camp outside.
Meanwhile inside, multinationals who bleed workers dry through exploitation, causing untold misery across the planet, are welcomed in like honoured guests.
Working people across Britain can only come to the conclusion that the Labour government does not and cannot represent them and also represent the interests of big business.
As a wise man once said, “You can’t ride two horses with the one behind.”

Paisley fights for playing fields

The SSP is pitching itself against Renfrewshire council in the battle to save Millarston playing fields, in Paisley’s West end, which have been earmarked for a housing development.
“Local people will lose a valuable amenity, and find themselves surrounded by yet more houses,” says Iain Hogg, of Renfrewshire SSP.
He adds:
“The council has already presided over the loss of industry and the loss of shopping facilities in the town; now they are allowing culture and sport, which are so important for building community spirit, to fall by the wayside.”
Local doctor Gerry McCartney warns that removing open spaces like this will only contribute further to Scotland’s obesity epidemic, as people have fewer and fewer opportunities for exercise.
The SSP is also supporting the Friends of Seedhill Playing Fields in their fight against a similar sell-off in the East end of Paisley.

...And Highlands fight for housing

Highlands Against Stock Transfer (HAST) have uncovered what appears to be a financial black hole in Highland Housing Association’s business plan, the HHA being the not-for-profit landlord who will assume responsibility for all council housing in the region if stock transfer gets the go-ahead after the ballot in October.
The private company has made, it seems, no provision for the upgrade and building of sheltered housing; a glaring gap of £22million
A feasibility study by the Highland Council found that 549 sheltered houses required significant structural work if they were to meet current standards.
And the cost of that is £22million.
HAST chairperson Donnie Kerr comments:
“Authorities such as the Care Commission should not allow the landlord to ignore vulnerable tenants. The company will have to borrow substantial private funds, and all tenants will eventually foot the bill.
“The council, if it retains the stock, will have access to central government funding to help meet these costs.”
* nostocktransfer@yahoo.com

Anti-union laws force hush-up

by Ken Ferguson

Revelations that two sacked Gate Gourmet shop stewards have received payments totalling £600,000 from their union, the TGWU, have dramatically highlighted the straitjacket represented by the UK’s anti-union laws.
Last summer’s Gate Gourmet dispute became a symbol not just of resistance to hard line managers, but also the restrictions on solidarity action represented by the anti-union laws.
Gate Gourmet workers took illegal strike action after the in-flight catering firm announced plans to sack 667 staff members because BA had cut back on its catering contract.
Briefly the Gate Gourmet workers were the heroes of the hour at last year’s TUC conference, even addressing the TGWU’s annual leadership dinner.
But when the chips were down, the union leadership, faced with the prospect of draconian legal sanctions, blinked and signed a compromise deal which saw workers sacked, but with enhanced redundancy payments.
Two former shop stewards, Pat Breslin and Mark Fisher, receive the six figure payout after claims they were following union policy by organising the illegal action as part of the TGWU’s campaign against Gate Gourmet.
Lawyers believed that the action put the two men at risk of being sued by BA under the anti-union laws.
Both men were among the workers sacked in the compromise deal that ended the dispute.
The union also faced being sued for the cost of the strike, £42million, if BA could prove any involvement of its officials in urging the baggage handlers to strike.
The affair spotlights the legal minefield which unions risk if they attempt to do the very job that they exist for.
And it’s a minefield for which the bosses have the map.
The sacked stewards have signed a gagging order barring them from talking to the press.
Any future disclosure will have to be approved by the TGWU general secretary.
A TGWU spokesman declined to comment on the grounds that the deal was confidential.

—page three—

Scotland’s World Cup triumph

- or, how we win, even when we’re losing

SSP national convenor Colin Fox is in South Africa at the invitation of the Homeless World Cup 2006. He sends the Voice his exclusive report.
Sitting beneath the magnificent Table Mountain in the heart of Cape Town, listening as South African President Thabo Mbeki formally opens the proceedings, amidst the vivid colours of 48 national flags and assorted South African others, and the uproarious cheers of the football fans, it is all too easy to forget that all 400 players on display have nowhere to stay when they get home.
Behind the Homeless World Cup (HWC), a highly organised operation with multinational sponsorship and global news coverage, lies that very important message.
Millions of people are homeless across the world and this homelessness destroys dignity, self-respect and all sense of inclusion.
The tournament was the brainchild of Scots ‘social entrepreneur’ and street newspaper editor Mel Young and his Austrian counterpart, Harald Schmidt.
In 2001, they attended a conference of the International Network of Street Papers, here in Cape Town. Relaxing afterwards over a beer, they discussed how homeless people might emulate the same sense of shared experience they had enjoyed at the conference.
They hit upon the shared language that football holds for so many people across the world and the Homeless World Cup idea was born.
Five years and thousands of individual successes later, the 2006 HWC is back in Cape Town and going from strength to strength.
Such is the extent of the event’s success that a bidding war has broken out amongst various cities as to who should host future tournaments.
The prize for the next two has been won by Copenhagen and Melbourne respectively.
But the real achievement is the changed lives of the homeless participants. According to an impact report, compiled to measure the experience of participants in last year’s HWC in Edinburgh, 94 per cent said they had renewed motivation for life after taking part while 85 per cent reported an improvement in their relationships with the people around them.
Nearly 40 per cent were able to gain employment afterwards; indeed 12 players now earn their living from football, as coaches or semi-professional players.
The Cape Town event will raise awareness about homelessness in a country where, post-Apartheid, it remains a huge problem for so much of the black population.
For all the glamour of this great sporting tournament, the reminders of Africa’s endemic poverty are never far away.
Whilst the crowd revels in the presence of Eusebio, the first great African-born footballing superstar - of Benfica and Portugal fame during the 1960s - and the players from Sowetan giants Kaiser Chiefs, not to mention endorsements from the likes of Real Madrid, poverty stalks Cape Town.
There is a very strong Scottish presence at this event, from Mel Young himself to the Scots comperes and referees, to civic dignatories, including the Provost of Edinburgh, Lesley Hinds.
We met as she handed over the baton from last year’s hosts to Thabo Mbeki.
But the most important Scots of all are the gallant Scotland team themselves.
Unfortunately, this was not to be their tournament and they went out after the opening qualifying round.
But the seven men and women in the dark blue played magnificently despite the rain, a pitch breaking up beneath them, and the loss of the Flower of Scotland CD for the national anthem.
They did themselves proud and being people who have endured some troubled times in their short lives, you could see the pride in their eyes and a spring in their step at being part of this immense occasion.

Glasgow rejects ID cards scheme

A survey by No2ID has revealed an overwhelming rejection of the government’s ID card plans.
Over two thirds of the respondents, covering all ages and social background across Glasgow, were firmly against the ID card scheme and the creation of a national database.
That 70 per cent of young people expressed concern about the security of their biometric data, which includes fingerprints, iris and facial scanning, must surely cause concern in government circles.
More worryingly still is the finding that 100 per cent of civil servants questioned by No2ID expressed doubts that the government could store data securely.
Pensioners were also anxious, 64 per cent of them expressing strong opposition to the scheme, for which Labour hacks have been cheerleading since 2002, claiming it will cut crime and reduce terrorism.
Neither claim is true, as both police bodies and anti-terrorism experts have made clear.
Interestingly, the cost - £93 - was the least of people’s worries, with only 58 per cent citing price as a reason for their opposition.
Most are worried about losing their civil liberties and their details becoming more, rather than less, vulnerable to identity theft.
Warns Geraint Bevan, No2ID spokesperson: “We will all be issued a national identity number, which will follow you your entire life. If someone were to steal your number then they could pretend to be you.”
But the Labour Party is undaunted, Tony Blair stating that the ID scheme would form a ‘major plank’ of the next manifesto.
* www.no2ID.net

War is bad - and that’s official!

by Ken Ferguson

A heady combination of Harvard academics, military elites, policemen and policy-makers have just published their startling conclusion on the Iraq war.
They have come right out and said it: the Iraq war was a bad idea which has provided a major boost for terrorism.
Now many Voice readers may think they knew this already but isn’t it nice to have it confirmed by proper experts?
The impressively-titled National Intelligence Estimate, which draws on the work of 16 US spy agencies, has concluded that the 2003 invasion and subsequent occupation has fuelled radicalism, spawning a new generation of terrorists.
As such, it serves as yet another hammer blow for the increasingly incredible Bush/Blair ‘War on Terror’.
Entitled Trends in Global Terrorism: Implications for the United States, the report argues that Islamic radicalism has not only spread, but also diversified.
It cites the Iraq war specifically as a prime cause for the spread of the ideology of jihad, or ‘holy war’.
No doubt the sub-imperialist rhetoric about our brave boys from the well-fed suits of New Labour will continue.
But battlefront reports  confirm the bloody truth, that huge amounts of ammunition have been fired as British forces face 24/7 attacks in a situation where, they were told, they would not have to fire a shot.
Now Sir Richard Dannatt, the head of the British Army, warns that it can ‘only just’ cope.
The fact that the death toll is rising while equipment, food supplies and support to UK troops continues to deteriorate will go largely unmentioned at the Labour gathering in Manchester, where the fixers have also prevented any debate on the future of Britain’s WMD, aka Trident.
And don’t expect to hear much about how those much-lauded brave lads are doing Blair’s bidding for a shameful £2.45 an hour.
It was Sir Richard, not union-sponsored Labour MPs, who reminded everyone that the military were never brought under minimum wage legislation, and that private soldiers risking death daily in our theatres of war often earn half of that minimum.
It’s an age-old story, this.
Poet Hamish Henderson, who fought with the 51st Highland Division against Nazism and was a bitter opponent of British imperialism, demanded a different course for Scotland in which ‘broken families in lands we’ve harried will curse Scotland the Brave nae mair.’
Next year is the 300th anniversary of the Treaty of Union which set the imperial ball rolling.
It provides a key opportunity at the Holyrood poll to begin the process of its liquidation. Now there’s an anti-imperialist act to get excited about!

Muslims condemn Reid’s racist rant

The Labour government has once again tried to scapegoat Britain’s Islamic community for its own disastrous War on Terror.
Last week, Home Secretary John Reid lectured Muslims on the dangers of their children becoming involved with Islamic extremism, effectively blaming them for this, rather than his pal Tony Blair’s murderous military campaigns in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Speaking in London, Reid said terrorist fanatics were on the hunt for vulnerable young people to recruit to their cause.
“There is no nice way of saying this. These fanatics are looking to groom and brainwash children, including your children, for suicide bombings. Grooming them to kill themselves in order to murder others.
“Look for the telltale signs now and talk to them before their hatred grows and you risk losing them forever. In protecting our families, we are protecting our community.”
His words have been condemned as inflammatory, driving an ever larger wedge between his government and Muslims.
Osama Saeed, Scottish spokesman for Muslim Association of Britain (MAB), comments:
“The insinuation that Muslims are [standing by and] watching their own families engage in terror... is offensive.
“Every few weeks the government pop up and tell the Muslim community to do more, ensuring the narrative is about us, rather than their own botched up foreign policy.”
Mr Saeed pointed out that Muslim parents actually stop their children getting involved in any political activities, let alone terrorism.
“(P)arents are scared of letting their children out for anything remotely political for fear of harassment from the police or ending up on a CIA watchlist.”
He cited the UK government’s policies as the real recruiters for terrorism.
“Whatever happens, young people will feel angry about foreign policy. There are two options - to engage politically or to go down the Al-Qaeda path. The former needs to be encouraged and bolstered, but the government’s own repressive terror laws are stifling legitimate protest.”

—page four—

Fuelling global warming

California takes car-makers to court

The state of California is suing the six largest US and Japanese car manufacturers in America for the damage they have caused by failing to rein in harmful fuel emissions in their products.
In an unprecedented attempt to make the polluter pay, California’s Attorney General filed suit on Wednesday 20 September against General Motors, Toyota, Ford, Honda, Nissan and DaimlerChrysler AG, alleging that the vehicles they manufacture have emitted harmful greenhouse gases that have damaged the health of the people and the environment and cost the state dearly in terms of monies spent trying to redress these harmful impacts.
California is seeking compensation for these costs, which run to millions of dollars, and for the damage wreaked by ever-rising vehicle emissions.
California is one of the leading lights in the emissions-curbing game, having passed a bill this August to limit emissions from industry.
Governor Arnold Schwarzeneggar is due to sign this into law at the end of October.
Attorney General Bill Lockyer intends to cite greenhouse gases as a ‘public nuisance’, as has been done in a similar case, brought by seven states, including Connecticut and California, against five power companies, in a bid to force them to reduce emissions.
So far, one District Judge has thrown the case out on the grounds that it is too political.
The California car lawsuit is the first time a US state has sought monetary damages for vehicles’ contribution to global warming.
The car industry is likely to fight back, and hard. Its initial responses have bristled with hostility as they argue that this case “opens the door to lawsuits targeting any activity that uses fossil fuel for energy.”
When California, Vermont and Rhode Island sought to reduce car emissions, as mentioned above, the car industry promptly filed suit against them.
Vermont, the “green state”, is feeling the heat from global warming. Its economy is dependent upon tourism, particularly ski-ing, and maple sugaring, all of which are affected by climate.
California too is suffering, from the reduction of the snow pack in the Sierra Nevada impacting on the drinking water supply, to wildfires and droughts threatening agriculture, including the famous wine regions, to the storms and rising sea-levels which affect communities all along the coast.
Fuel emissions have risen 85 per cent in California since 1960, and it has the smog to prove it.
Rhode Island has similar issues.
Thus the three states felt federal laws were too weak to address the environmental catastrophe that is already being visited upon them, and took the initiative.
The car industry, however, insists that states have no right to set their own emissions targets.
They say it is up to national government to do something, not industry.
Funnily enough, the government says its up to industry to do something, not government.
The lawsuit guys just want something done. But curbing fuel emissions is an uphill struggle in a country that, according to a report by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published this summer, has made no progress on fuel economy regulations in a quarter of a century.
Auto manufacturers are prioritising technologies that make cars go faster or tow more rather than ones that do more miles to the gallon, thereby encouraging, if not actually creating, a  trend towards gas-guzzling Sports Utility Vehicles (SUVs - the US equivalent of 4x4s), culminating in the ridiculous tank-like Hummers that are now hitting the streets.
Indeed, the EPA found that 2006-year model vehicles were the heaviest, fastest and most powerful in any year since the agency began collecting data.
The 1970s oil crisis, and subsequent high prices, sparked a drive for fuel-efficient cars in the US and rapid progress was made.
By 1982, the industry standard was 21.1 miles per gallon.
It still is.
Progress stalled because oil became cheap once again, and successive governments could make short-term political gains giving endless leeway to the hydro-carbon industrialists.
The US car industry is particularly dependent upon the big truck mentality, hence the equating of good, solid American values with owning a car the size of your house.
But if California gets its way, the tide could turn.
If not, at least someone’s stuck their finger in the stream and started to make waves.

Hummin’
You think 4x4s are ridiculous? You ain’t seen nothin’! Get a load of the Hummer!
Adapted from the US Army Humvee, this urban monster is celebrated for its “excellent ability to handle uneven terrain”. Hence its popularity in cities.
It costs over $100 to fill the tank, which you have to do often as it only manages 11 miles to the gallon.
Nor will it serve you well in a war zone, as the armour plating does not come as standard. However, air con and stereo-surround system does; just in case you were worried you weren’t burning up enough fossil fuels.
Amongst the Hummer’s fans are McDonald’s, those purveyors of fine foods and wholesome values, who recently ran a Happy Meal promotion in which they gave away toy Hummers.
Yes, the perfect marriage of pollution for the body and pollution for the environment.
The irony that vehicle emissions-related illnesses, such as asthma, hit children hardest as their developing bodies cannot cope with all those airborne particles of nastiness is just lost on these guys.
* See ronaldmchummer.com and sierraclubplus.org/hummerdinger/

Gie’s Peace – Morag Balfour

Morag is a long term activist in the peace movement and is the SSP’s peace and disarmament spokesperson

Rise of raunch

I took a train journey at the weekend. I was on my way to the wedding of a close friend. My train was delayed and I missed my connection to Stafford. I ended up stranded in Crew for 50 minutes and saw something you’d not see in Scotland; people taking advantage of a stop to have a cigarette, in a railway station.
One young woman stepped off the train to smoke and then proceeded to flirt with a guy in a shell suit (it was white and hadn’t seen a washing machine for some time) and the train conductor, who I’d struggle to find even a little attractive.
She wore skimpy shorts, a revealing top, high heels and some bling around her neck.
I took a book on my travels, Female Chauvinist Pigs - Women and the Rise of Raunch Culture by Ariel Levy.
In it, she talks primarily about American women, but the parallels here at home were numerous.
She spoke of the objectification and exploitation of women, by women. Some of these women claimed to be in the feminist vanguard but were unable to give a logical explanation of their practice other than ‘we can be like men’.
It seems that the new ideal for many of these women were the plastic perfect porn stars now seen in mainstream culture.
Levy makes mention that sexual abuse is a regular story in the early lives of the majority of those in the sex industry.
Her discussions with young women of school age drew out some catastrophic news about the state of our youth.
A person is valued if they are ‘hot’. One is expected to dress provocatively to look hot. You can only judge how hot you are by the feedback given to you by males you are attempting to turn on.
Some of these young people based their sense of self-worth solely on the approval meted out by hormonally-raging teenage boys, and were engaging in sexual activity that they neither wanted nor enjoyed in order to gain this approval.
The evidence cited by Levy suggests that this behaviour is becoming the norm, especially where abstinence-only sex education is being prescribed.
Little advice is being given to these young people that will actually help them negotiate their way through the early stages of their developing sexuality.
The lassie I saw in the railway station looked fairly young. As I am now an ‘old’ person, I thought she looked cold, rather than hot, and a little bit vapid.
I wonder if she too now looks to strangers to give her the identity she needs. What a waste.
Women ought to find out for themselves who they are. I fear that the Americanisation of almost everything is too rife to withstand.
Sex is often casual - the cliched, but often unfairly termed, ‘way that men do it’.
I don’t see this as liberation. We have the right, all of us, to meaningful sexual encounters, where we choose to have them.
We have the right to feel good about who we are, no matter what we look like.
Girls have the right to grow up with age-appropriate clothing and age-appropriate experiences of the world they inhabit. Our bodies are not a commodity available for exploitation.
My goddaughter started school recently. She already has a strong sense of self and I adore her.
I worry now that she will be crushed and manipulated into some horrid monster none of us recognise.
Thankfully she has enough old-school feminists around who are very vigilant.
Others are not so lucky. We either defeat this cultural imperialism now or face the death of ‘woman’ as some of us, at least, still know her.

 

—page five—

letters page

Free school meals now!

Don’t take no for an answer when nation’s health is at stake

by Frances Curran, SSP West of Scotland MSP

First Minister and former teacher Jack McConnell recently got his ten-year report card from the Scottish Diet Action Plan on improving the health of Scots.
He scored a bottom-of-the-class one out of ten.
Jack should be sent back to policy school for revision because some of the answers to the question ‘how do you improve the health of children and young people’ are easy-peasy.
Get them to eat healthy, nutritious food, and do this by introducing free, healthy school dinners.
The Scottish Executive and Labour MSPs are childishly putting their fingers in their ears and sticking their tongues out at the growing evidence that free, healthy school meals works.
They should stop throwing their toys out of the pram, grow up and support my Free Healthy School Meals bill which has huge support in Scotland and which began its  journey through the parliament on 28 September, on its way to becoming a law if it gets a majority of MSPs to vote for it.
Proof that it works and could help change the lives and health of our children can be summed up in one word - Hull.
The foresight of Hull City Council puts to shame all the naysayers in the Scottish Parliament.
Every day in Hull, 68 per cent of primary school children eat a healthy, well-balanced, nutritious meal. 
It’s enough to make a Health Tsar do a double back-flip in celebration.
How did they manage such a breakthrough, given that only 34 per cent ate healthy meals two years ago?
Did they force-feed the little darlings broccoli and carrots?
Or administer intravenous doses of vitamins, and nutrients?
No. Nothing so drastic. They just introduced healthy, free school dinners (and breakfasts and after-school snacks) for all primary school kids.
Kind of blows a great big polystyrene hole in the argument that ‘kids won’t eat healthy meals, they’ll still go to the chippy’.
So, what would it cost the Scottish Parliament to introduce free school meals throughout Scotland? A mere £74million.
Last year the Scottish Parliament underspend (money they fail to spend in any given year) was £235million. In previous years it’s been much higher - three times that amount in 2001.
So £74million is nothing to Scotland’s MSPs, when you consider the health benefits of nutritious, free school meals, both immediate and long-term.
A nation of kids who eat healthily will take their eating habits with them into later life, and pass them on to their own children. Heart disease and obesity levels will plummet, saving millions for the NHS.
For kids today, it will also mean higher concentration levels, higher academic achievement, and less tantrums and less bad behaviour in class.
Holyrood has the chance to make Scots healthier and smarter for years to come.
But first, its MSPs need to pass the free school meals bill...

Vox Pops

Neil Scott

As a long-term A supply teacher working in primary schools in Glasgow, I work in schools in areas suffering from deprivation, as well as schools in middle class areas.
Today’s world has meant parents across the social spectrum are struggling to feed their children healthy, nutritious food.
This can be for reasons of deprivation, or because both parents work and rely on the school to provide healthy food as well as input into education for healthy eating and lifestyle. The reality of bringing up children in today’s competitive world is made apparent in the classroom when children cannot concentrate because they are full of sugar or are hungry. In some schools I have been in, I have brought in breakfast bars for children who, for whatever reason, have not had breakfast. I see the differences in the concentration of the children when they receive the free fruit supplied by Glasgow City Council.
People have said that there will be no uptake for healthy food. I beg to differ. When fruit was first introduced into the classrooms a few years back, the uptake was low.
Nowadays, children who refuse the fruit are few and far between. I think the Hull model has put paid to that argument. This initiative from the SSP is one that will change the lives of many.
It offers not only healthy food to all children, but also levels the field of educational opportunity a fraction for those children who are being left behind by today’s fast-food reliant society.

Mhairi McAlpine -
Mhairi lives in Govan, Glasgow, and is a mother to two boys. Her eldest has just started primary school

The campaign for free, nutritious school meals is very important. It would increase the uptake of school dinners and reinforce the healthy eating messages, making sure all children get a good meal at least once a day, free from the pressures of the marketing and advertising of junk food that’s so heavily pitched at children and parents.

Hull’s success ignored by Scottish Executive

by Felicity Garvie

When the Scottish Socialist Party tried to get our first Free School Meals Bill through Parliament four years ago, the bill’s opponents complained that making healthy meals free would not encourage school pupils take them. We had to look as far a field as Scandinavia for evidence to the contrary, where in Finland and Sweden uptake rates of free school meals were over 90 per cent and 85 per cent respectively.
In 2004 we brought the headteacher of a Finnish school to Glasgow for the launch of Frances Curran’s new bill to promote free, healthy dinners for primary schools.
When she was asked why her government decided to make meals free for school children, the question left her bamboozled! To her it was just obvious - if school meals are free for all, everyone takes them.
Now, with Frances’ bill entering parliament this week, the evidence that free school meals do work comes from somewhere much closer to home. Hull, in fact.
There, a progressive, Labour-majority council decided to provide healthy meals free in all primary schools, initially, for three years. Their main motivation was the recognition that poor diet was seriously reducing their children’s life expectancy, their attainment in school and their chances of getting a good job in adult life.
Statistics showed that a child born in Kingston-upon-Hull was likely to live 12 years less than one born in affluent Kingston-upon-Thames near London. The councillors decided they had to take action.
In November 2003 they phased in healthy meals in all their primary schools. At first, the kids turned their noses up at the new dinners and uptake dropped drastically, from 45 per cent to 36 per cent.
But when the dinners were made free in April 2004, uptake recovered. Two years later, it has doubled, with 64 per cent of pupils taking their free, healthy school dinner. In some primaries, where teachers have actively bought into the council’s ‘Eat Well, Do Well’ programme, 98 per cent of kids eat the meals .
Make no mistake, Hull is proving that this policy works. Basically, it moves the choice of what to eat at lunchtime from children, and restores it to the local authority, allowing them to ensure that the kids are eating healthily.
Choice isn’t really choice if we’re expecting young children to decide between healthy and junk food, when they’re the targets of relentless, aggressive advertising, peer pressure and they’re just not used to eating vegetables.
It also removes the onus on parents to provide a packed lunch, most of which, Jamie Oliver recently showed, are less than nutritionally balanced. And it relieves hard-pressed parents of the need to give their children dinner money, which takes up a substantial chunk o flow-waged families’ income.
This is a major success story in the fight to combat our children’s horrendously poor diets. It was done by Labour (yes, you read that right!) councillors with vision and the courage of their convictions. It is supported in England by no less than 72 Labour MPs.
So why is the Scottish Executive steadfastly ignoring Hull’s shining example? Could it be because the exact same policy carried out by their comrades in Hull is being championed by the Scottish Socialist Party? The Executive even has a new bill out which does everything except make school dinners free - that is specifically excluded.
It’s time to get up close and personal with your Labour MSP. Get a few parents together with their kids and arrange to speak to your MSP about school meals. Ask them if they’re aware of Hull’s success and if they’re not, wise them up.
Tell them that their vote next year depends on whether they are prepared to support Frances’ bill.
And if they’re not, let them know you will be telling your community about your little chat.

* To get the info and campaigning tools on the Free School Meals bill, attend a seminar/workshop in the Scottish Parliament on Saturday 4 November. A DVD from Hull will be shown. Contact Felicity Garvie on 0131 348 5632 to book your place

—centre pages—

 

FREE SCHOOL MEALS FOR ALL

—page eight—

people not profit

Food for thought

Roz Paterson looks at international projects which have examined the impact of healthy eating in schools, and discovers that nutritious school meals can help transform life in the classroom, and the health of the whole population.

In 1997, the Central Alternative High School in Appleton, Wisconsin, was a place you didn’t want to be.
The students, noted an incoming member of staff, were “rude, obnoxious and out of control.”
The police had been called in several times, to deal with kids taking drugs or in possession of guns.
Youngsters were dropping out, truanting, failing, and the teachers were at their wits’ end.
Walk through the corridors now and you’ll be struck by how quiet the place is during lessons, how cheerful the majority of students are. Look closer.
Note too that there are no vending machines purveying Coca-Cola or 7-Up. And no burgers or fries for sale in the canteen.
So what happened? Good, nutritious school dinners is what happened.
In 1997, Natural Ovens of Minitowac, Wisconsin, who catered for state schools throughout Wisconsin, kicked off a five year project designed to establish whether good, fresh, nutritious food would lead to improvements in children’s health, learning ability and behaviour.
Replacing the usual suspects, the greasy meats and chips, the fizzy drinks and chocolate bars, were salads and vegetables, meat stews and lean cuts, whole grain breads, fresh fruit and plentiful water.
Almost as soon as the programme began, the effects were noticeable.
Expulsion rates and drop-outs began to dwindle. Weapons and drugs violations, and suicides, reduced to zero.
Teachers were astounded. Suddenly they didn’t have to spend their working lives being disciplinarians; they could actually teach. And be more ambitious in what they taught, as their pupils were taking it all in.
As for the students, they were calmer, more motivated, and happier.
One teacher noted how some teenagers, who had been on the fast-track to juvenile detention, had turned themselves around and become hard-working pupils.
Furthermore, said Deb Larson, the high school counsellor, as general indiscipline went down, there was space to identify real problems.
“I don’t have the angry outbursts, so instead, we got to deal with the real issues that were underlying and causing some of the problems in the kids’ lives.”
Good food works like this... as they say on those hair ads, here’s the science! The brain is an organ of the body. Like the liver or the heart, it needs nutrients to work properly. It needs water, proteins, carbohydrates, fats, vitamins and minerals.
The neurotransmitters which ferry signals to and from the brain need amino acids to function; these are found in meat, fish and cheese.
To convert the amino acids into neurotransmitters, you need a diet rich in vitamins and minerals, which means a diet as varied as you can manage, including plenty of fresh fruit and veg, but also seeds, nuts, eggs, fish and pulses.
Fat is essential. In fact, half the brain is fat, as each neuron is encased in fat molecules.
This fat layer helps conduct nerve impulses faster. It also regulates circulation, inflammation, memory and mood. Thus a fat-free diet for a growing child is a disaster.
Carbohydrates are essential too, as they give the brain energy.
Grains, fruit and veg contain carbohydrates which break down to form the sugar glucose. They do so steadily and slowly, which is important.
A sugar jag, from chocolate or coke, will give you an energy spike, followed by a dip. Bad enough in adults but for youngsters, this can lead to dizziness and confusion manifesting as a lethargic, distracted attitude.
Finally, think water, think blood. Blood keeps everything moving and working. It is 83 per cent water, so hydration throughout the day is vital if you are to concentrate properly.
There has been plentiful research in this area, showing, for instance, that iron deficiencies can lead to shortening of the attention span, irritability, fatigue and poor concentration.
Low protein levels have been linked to poor exam results.
Enough science for ya? OK, so back to Wisconsin, where pupils were enthused by the new food, and how it made them feel.
Said one teenage girl, “Now that I can concentrate, I think it is easier to get along with people.”
Said Dr Thomas Scullon, supervisor of schools in the district:
“It can take several years to make the transition. The program will sell itself on its own merits, given the time.”
He continued: “I think instead of looking at the food program as a ‘break-even’ we have to take a look at what do we have to put in to make it really good for kids.
“If it results in a happier kid, improved learning and ultimately a better community, then it’s a cost we cannot avoid. It’s something we must do.”
School principal LeAnn Coenen agrees:
“I can’t buy the argument that it’s too costly for schools to provide good nutrition for their students.
“I found that one cost will reduce another.
“I don’t have the vandalism. I don’t have the litter. I don’t have the need for high security.
“We’ve got to stop using our most precious commodity - our kids - to make extra money.”

How free school meals turned round Finland’s health record

School meals are free in Finland. And very good they are too.
Thirty years ago, Finland had the highest obesity rate in Europe. It also had the highest incidence of working-age people dropping dead with heart attacks.
The government realised that the problem could not be tackled with educational material alone.
A major public intervention was required, and one of the most important theatres of change was school.
School meals had been free since the late 1940s. But the North Karelia Project, as this major public intervention was known, required that they also be highly nutritious and made, as much as possible, from locally sourced produce.
This dovetailed nicely with an initiative to downscale the nation’s vast dairy industry, which was contributing to the heart and fat problem by loading supermarket shelves, and therefore people’s tables, with full-fat milk and cream and cheese.
The government paid farmers to switch to growing veg and fruit, to ease the transition, and the nation’s eating habits began to shift.
The government was thinking long-term.
School lunches in Finland are attractive and menus are drawn up locally, not nationally. They include dishes like lasagne and grated carrot, fish and potato casserole, home-made pizzas and salad.
Dr Pekka Puska, director general of the National Public Health Institute of Finland and one of the founders of the North Karelia Project, says that making school lunches free and of such a high nutritional standard has enabled “(us) to bring about changes in what children eat - ensuring that they eat a lot of vegetables - and this then gets back to families.”
In 30 years, the percentage of overweight schoolchildren in Finland is down to nearly one in ten. It’s one in three here.
The number of premature deaths amongst working age people has dropped 82 per cent.
That didn’t happen through healthy eating helplines and a couple of Jamie Oliver TV specials.

—page nine—

voice mail

LETTERS

Protection for the environment
I was heartened to see Morag Balfour raise the subject of environmentally friendly sanitary protection in the Voice (see issue 278).
In addition to washable towels, mooncups - which collect the blood rather than absorbing it - are also environmentally friendly.
They can be ordered online from www.mooncup.co.uk/wc.php?u=340 with 20 per cent of the sale going to the SSP.
Mhairi McAlpine,Glasgow

We salute your democracy, equality and accountability!
On behalf of the Irish Socialist Network, I wish to express our solidarity with the SSP at this challenging time. In recent years, the SSP has been a source of encouragement to radical socialists who are working to build new parties of the working class. 
Like many, we are dismayed by recent attacks, both personal and political, on SSP members. We are glad to see that the SSP has rebounded from recent setbacks, to continue challenging capitalism in Scotland by building a class struggle party fighting for an independent socialist Scotland
While closely following the development of the SSP, we have never tried to slavishly follow a particular model, and we know the comrades in the SSP respect the right of socialists in different countries to chart their own road towards liberation. True internationalism is based on an equal cooperation and respect between parties, not dictation from distant ‘centres’ or instructions from all-powerful leaders. 
As a participatory, democratic and revolutionary socialist organisation, we share with the SSP an anti-war, anti-imperialist outlook firmly grounded in class politics and a commitment to working class unity. 
We salute your firm stand in favour of internal democracy, equality, and accountability. Our mutual commitment to principle is not the same as dogmatism and we know that all of us must learn new ways of organising, including a commitment to participatory educational processes and democratic structures. 
We look forward to working with comrades in the SSP, and throughout the world, in building societies controlled from top to bottom by working people.
Paul Moloney, National Secretary,
Irish Socialist Network, Dublin
* www.irishsocialist.net

New Ideas – voices from the SSY

Lynsey MacGregor

At this moment in time, the Scottish Catholic Education Service (SCES) are preparing to roll out their ‘Called to Love’ pilot in Scottish high schools.
According to the SCES website, sex education should have some core principles. These include the sanctity of human life; the virtues of modesty and chastity; the importance of marriage and the family and the value of abstinence outside marriage.
It’s all written in nice flowery language, but let’s be honest about what these core principles mean for school students. It means getting anti-abortion, heterosexist sex education that reinforces traditional gender roles and promotes heterosexual marriage as the absolute pinnacle of relationships.
This isn’t guesswork; abstinence only sex education programs are already going on in the USA. School students there have been subjected to horrendous sexist rhetoric.
In one school, classes were divided by sex and sent to different rooms. The young women were sat down in a circle and had a rose handed to them. They were told to pull a petal from the rose and pass it around the circle. Eventually it got to the end and had been stripped bare.
The reason for making them do this? Well, as the ‘educator’ told them, that’s what happens to you every time you have sex with someone outside of marriage - they’re taking a part of you away that you can never get back.
If you sleep with too many people, then nobody will ever want to marry you and your relationships will always be worthless.
As well as being full of nonsensical misogyny like this, the projects have been an utter failure. In many schools where this style of sex ‘education’ is used, the rate of unwanted pregnancies has actually risen!
The SSY Women’s Group believe that denying young people truly informative sex education that is free of bigotry and sexist bias is utterly irresponsible, as well as being tantamount to sticking your head in the sand.
Whether the SCES like it or not, young people will have sex. They need to be properly informed about methods of contraception; how to protect themselves against Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs) and what their reproductive rights are.
We want to see sex education being given from a young age in state schools. We want sex education that recognises women’s right to bodily autonomy and does not attempt to make women feel guilty about having abortions.
We want sex education where all relationships are given equal respect so students will no longer have to deal with the underlying homophobia that leads to so many LGBT young people leaving school without having had decent sex education.
AAbstinence only education projects are an utterly irresponsible and useless approach to sex education which, if adopted on a wider scale, will only result in a generation of uninformed young people and rising rates of STIs and unwanted pregnancies.
SSY will not stand idly by and let young people be failed by their schools. We are producing and distributing ‘reproductive rights cards’.
The cards are a handy size, well designed and give young women vital information about their rights to contraception, abortion and sexual health services. Soon we will have fuller information packs ready.
If the schools wont get young women informed, the SSY Women’s Group will. We will actively counter the ‘Called To Love’ project with information, real education and feminist, socialist action.

Speakers unite against Apartheid Wall

Since 2002 Israel has been building what it calls a ‘separation barrier’ in the occupied West Bank, claiming that it is a defensive measure against terror attacks.
However, the construction of this ‘barrier’ might very well prevent any remaining chance of Palestinian self determination and meaningful peace.
Its construction constitutes collective punishment against all Palestinians and a transparent land grab, as it cuts its way through Palestinian farmland and communities.
The International Court of Justice at the Hague has ruled its construction a violation of international law.
Sarah Assouline and Saif Abukeshek are an Israeli and a Palestinian who have dedicated themselves to the popular struggle against the wall.
They arrive in Scotland this weekend as part of a European tour of meetings, to raise awareness about the wall and to raise money for an Israeli campaigning group, called Anarchists Against the Wall (AATW).
They are speaking together as partners in this struggle and in the larger struggle against Palestinian dispossession.
For several years, AATW has participated in direct action and demonstrations against the wall. The principle that guides the activities of AATW is that of taking part only in joint struggles led by Palestinians.
AATW activists have destroyed parts of the wall, forced open gates in the wall and removed road blocks. They marched together with Palestinians to their lands and stood in front of bulldozers with farmers whose olive trees were threatened.
Their contribution to the struggle has been recognised by all those involved.
The group’s work has also been recognised by the Israeli authorities, who have rewarded it with violent repression, hundreds of arrests and about 40 indictments.
The legal costs of defending these charges are around $20,000 and counting.
AATW is now seeking the support of communities and organisations in Europe for its legal fund in order to fight back against the legal persecution and continue its part in the fight against the wall.

* Public meetings in Glasgow and Edinburgh
Friday 29 September, 7.30pm, Lecture Theatre A, Boyd Orr Building, University of Glasgow
Saturday 30 September, 4pm, Augustine Unitarian Church, George IV Bridge, Edinburgh
Admission £2 at both venues

—page ten—

international news

UN official: ‘Torture worse now than under Saddam’

A senior United Nations (UN) official has said that incidences of torture in Iraq could be worse now than under the country’s former dictator Saddam Hussein.
“The situation as far as torture is concerned now in Iraq is totally out of hand,” the UN’s chief anti-torture expert said last week. When they made their case for invading and occupying Iraq in 2003, George Bush and Tony Blair repeatedly stated that they wanted to bring freedom, democracy and respect for human rights to the oil-rich nation.
Now, says the UN’s Manfred Nowak, abuses are being committed by security forces, militia groups and anti-US insurgents.
The human rights office of the UN Assistance Mission in Iraq reported that corpses in the Baghdad mortuary “often bear signs of severe torture”.
Such wounds confirm reports given by Iraqi refugees, said Mr Nowak. “The situation is so bad,” he said, “many people say it is worse than it has been in the times of Saddam Hussein.”
Detainees’ bodies frequently show signs of beating using electrical cables, wounds in heads and genitals, broken bones (back, legs and hands), electric and cigarette burns, the UN report states.
Outside Baghdad, many deaths go unrecorded because the carnage is so intense casualty figures cannot be collected from hospitals. In the notoriously violent al-Anbar province in western Iraq, Health Ministry figures indicate that, in July, nobody died there in violent circumstances.
The UN report goes on to say that bodies at the Baghdad morgue “often bear signs of severe torture including acid-induced injuries and burns caused by chemical substances”.
Countless bodies have missing skin, missing eyes, missing teeth and wounds caused by power drills or nails. Those not killed by these abuses are shot in the head.
The UN report says victims come from prisons run by US-led multinational forces as well as by the ministries of interior and defence and private militias.
The report also states that the regularity of sectarian violence in Iraq means bodies are regularly found which “bear signs indicating that the victims have been brutally tortured before their extra-judicial execution”.
The report concludes that torture endangers “the very fabric of the country” as victims take their own revenge, adding to the cycle of violence.
Mr Nowak based his information on autopsies and interviews with Iraqis in neighbouring Jordan, and added that although he wanted to visit Iraq in person, he wouldn’t be able to prepare an accurate report because he would be forced to stay in Baghdad’s heavily guarded Green Zone, for obvious reasons of safety.
One former Iraqi government minister told The Independent that some ministers have never even been to their ministries “but get their officials to bring documents to the Green Zone where they sign them”.

UN report on civilian casualties in Iraq

* Iraq government ‘facing a generalised breakdown of law and order which presents a serious challenge to the institutions of Iraq
* 3,590 reported civilian deaths in Iraq in July, and 3,009 in August, compared to just under 6,000 in May and June
* More than 100 deaths a day in Iraq, due to fatalities inflicted by the multinational forces, sectarian murders, and al-Qaida and nationalist insurgent attacks
* Initial US military claims of a ‘dramatic drop’ in fatalities revised upwards because figures for people killed by bombs, mortars, rockets and other mass attacks were omitted
* 300,000 people displaced in Iraq since the bombing of a shrine in Samara in February
* UN’s figures likely to be ‘on the low side’ because of difficulties of collecting accurate figures

Oxfam report on global military spending

* Global military spending expected to hit $1.06trillion (£840billion) this year, topping the record set during the Cold War era
* Arms sales ‘fuel and lengthen’ conflicts
* ‘It is time the world stemmed the uncontrolled flood of weapons into the world’s war zones’
* 192-nation UN General Assembly expected to vote next month on whether to draft treaty banning arms sales to those intent on genocide, human rights abuses or UN arms embargo violations

India: Coca-Cola ban overturned

Next time you buy a can of Coke, think on this. Some of the profits you help to generate are used to pursue legal actions, such as the recent (successful) attempt to overturn the Coca-Cola ban in Kerala, India.
The ban came into effect only in August this year, following confirmation by the NGO the Centre for Science and Environment, in Dehli, that the Coke sold in this region was contaminated with harmful pesticides.
Tests on 57 samples from 11 Coca-Cola products found pesticide residues were 24 times higher than the legal safe limit set by the Indian government.
The toxins are believed to enter the products through contaminated groundwater used in their manufacture.
The pesticides could, if ingested over a long period of time, cause cancer, damage to the central nervous system, birth defects and disruption of the immune system.
Other Indian states have banned Coca-Cola - and Pepsi - from schools, colleges and hospitals, but the Kerala government is the only one to have imposed a state-wide ban, ensuring that Coke is not available anywhere.
Predictably, Coca-Cola, famed for its aggressive marketing, were having none of it - and the court, this time, agreed. Coca-Cola claims that, in banning their product, the state government was acting outside its remit as only the national government has the power to ban foodstuffs.
The company also insists that its products are safe and, John Gummer-style, that “our families and friends” drink it.
Kerala intends to appeal and the popular anger against the multinational shows no signs of abating.

Events:

Fife Spanish Civil War commemorations
Music night: 27 Sept, 7-10pm at Adam Smith Theatre, Kirkcaldy;
Memorabilia display: 27 Sept until 8 October, Adam Smith Theatre;
Film night: 3 Oct, Adam Smith Theatre, 7pm. Ken Loach’s Land and Freedom;
Spanish Civil War memorial re-dedication ceremony: 7 Oct, 11am. Assemble at Kirkcaldy Town House.

—page eleven—

international news

Referendum votes for toughest asylum laws in Western world

by Roz Paterson

Switzerland, one of the wealthiest nations in Europe, has voted overwhelmingly to close the door in the face of those seeking asylum. Nearly 70 per cent voted, in a referendum last Sunday, in favour of a new law that includes the requirement that all asylum-seekers produce a passport with which to identify themselves within 48 hours of arrival in Switzerland.
The supposedly neutral nation, home to humanitarian agencies including the Red Cross and the UN refugee agency UNHCR, now has one of the toughest immigration and asylum laws in the Western world.
The new law also denies financial assistance to failed asylum-seekers, and detention of up to 24 months for those who refuse to leave.
Further, migrants from within the EU are also hit hard, as only those with professional skills will be granted work permits.
Right-wing justice minister Cristoph Blocher led the charge, claiming the harsh new legislation was needed to stem ‘abuse’ of the system.
Though passed by parliament, opponents to the law, including socialists, aid agencies and church groups, managed to muster enough signatures to force a national vote. But the Fortress Europe mentality, bolstered by fraudulent scare stories of cultures being ‘swamped’ and welfare systems ransacked, proved too strong a foe.
In ratifying the legislation, Switzerland now stands in clear breach of the 1951 Geneva Refugee Convention, which recognises the status of refugees without ID documents.
The UNHCR, which is based in Geneva, were ‘disappointed’ by Sunday’s vote, saying that the passport requirement, for instance, is a blunt instrument that will harm those genuinely fleeing persecution, as many actually destroy their ID papers in order to escape, and contacting their home government for confirmation of identity can be a dangerous business.
“The law is racist and xenophobic. It is horrible... [and] a violation of human rights,” says Jean Ziegler, UN Special Rapporteur on food and a Swiss national himself.
“These laws practically abolish the right to asylum and the right to immigration by people who aren’t doctors or nuclear physicists. I am Swiss and it is an embarrassment.”
Fortress Europe is becoming ever more impenetrable, despite its pivotal role in causing so many of the conflicts which spawn refugee crises.
In the UK, the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006 includes the abolition of Indefinite Leave to Remain, to   be replaced with five years’ leave, after which a refugee’s status is subject to review.
The act also extends and consolidates the inefficient and stigmatising voucher system for failed asylum-seekers who are, incongruously enough, unable to return home safely.
The Terrorism Act 2006 also has implications for asylum-seekers in its ‘glorification’ of terrorism clause, which could result in people legitimately opposing despotic regimes being excluded from the asylum process. The New Asylum Model, which includes the provision of a case owner to each asylum case, is designed, says the Refugee Council, simply to improve speed rather than accuracy in the asylum process. And finally, the Memoranda of Understanding, which the UK has agreed with countries including Libya and Jordan, allows the deportation of those suspected of terrorism-related activities, and could thus result in people being sent back to regimes where they may be tortured.
Other nations are joining the anti-asylum bandwagon.
France has recently agreed with Senegal to send back “immigrants in an irregular situation to their countries of origin.” So unpopular is this move that its chief architect, Interior Minister Nicolas Sarkozy, was surrounded by angry mobs during a recent tour of African nations.
France also has laws restricting the time in which asylum-seekers can make their application, which must be in French, though the state no longer provides translators.
Decisions are reached within two weeks and those who fail are usually deported before their appeals are heard.
Spain meanwhile is spending money hand over fist to keep African immigrants away from their shores. The country also has a shocking reputation with regards to its inhumane treatment of unaccompanied minors, despite Spanish law decreeing they should have the same rights as Spanish children, and be afforded shelter, education and healthcare.
Italy is another offender.
In 2005, legislation came into force allowing asylum-seekers to be detained as a matter of course, for up to 60 days, in ‘Identification Centres’, where poor standards of hygiene and healthcare, and physical abuse, are rife.
Italy has also been criticised for its policy of routinely deporting people who arrive illegally, no matter their circumstances.
Welcome to the new Europe.

Native Australians win hunting rights

Native Australians have won hunting and fishing rights in the state capital of Queensland, Perth, in a landmark ruling that has sent right-wing groups into a tailspin.
The Nyoonga are the first indigenous people to win title of a state capital and it has set a precedent for further rulings in other urban conurbations, notably Sydney and Melbourne.
But the local and federal governments seem intent on launching an appeal. Prime Minister John Howard, an ally of Tony Blair’s over the war on Iraq, has already made it clear that the judgement causes him ‘considerable concern’.
This native title, say right-wingers, could mean people being charged for the use of parks and waterways.
“This really could have quite profound and significant implications and change our way of life,” insists state senator Alan Eggleston, a member of the Liberal party. In fact, the ruling means that the Nyoonga people can use the land, 6000 square kilometres including Perth and its environs, for hunting, fishing and camping, all traditional activities, as well as tending and preserving sacred sites and land. But the title does not extend to land owned on a freehold or long lease basis, which means farms and business and private homes are not affected.
Furthermore, with regards to Mr Egglestone’s statement, Glen Kelly, head of the South West Aboriginal Council, says the Nyoonga would seek a say in the management of parks and state forests, but that “in general, life will go on as it currently is.” The Nyoonga won the title because they were able, incredibly, to prove that there remains a “continuing Nyoonga law and culture, which is understood, which still binds them to the country, and which regulates their relationships,” according to Fred Chaney, deputy chair of the National Native Title Tribunal. He continues: “It’s an amazing example of cultural survival under extremely adverse circumstances.” The Nyoonga, from the dawn of European settlement in the 18th century, have been shifted around, exploited, killed, imprisoned, and torn apart from their families. The very basis of Nyoonga culture  is a respect and reverence for the land the lived on.
European settlement began the process of severing them from the land, through land appropriations, and the imposition of British law. A British law under which they had rather fewer rights than whites.
For over a century, thousands of Nyoonga were herded into penal colonies, or state-run ‘concentration camps’ such as Moore River Native Settlement, 135 kilometres north of Perth, and the subject of the film Rabbit-Proof Fence.
Furthermore, between 10 and 25 per cent of Nyoonga children were taken away from their parents and forcibly adopted, in a bid to ‘breed out’ the black blood. This was based on the belief that Europeans were simply a more advanced version of indigenous peoples such as native Australians, and thus it was just a matter of ‘encouraging’ mixed marriages to fast-track the uncivilised genes out the human system. The ‘stolen generation’, as this abduction of children became known, remains the subject of enormous rage and anger. Many families have never recovered, many communities remain shattered, and many children, scattered as far afield as orphanages in Canada, never made it home.

Laughter and applause at UN as Chavez brands George Bush ‘Devil’

by Wullie McGartland

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez compared George W Bush to the devil and accused him of trying to impose “dictatorship” on the world, in a speech to the United Nations (UN).
The day before President Chavez’s speech, Bush had also addressed the UN. The Venezuelan leader denounced George W’s appearance.
“The Devil came here yesterday,” he said, to laughter and applause. “Yesterday The Devil was here, in this very place. This table from where I speak still smells like sulfur. Yesterday, ladies and gentlemen, in this same hall, the President of the United States came here talking as if he owned the world.”
He added: “As the spokesperson for Imperialism, [Bush] came to give us his recipes for maintaining the current scheme of domination, exploitation and pillage of the world’s people.”
President Chavez, who brandished a copy of American writer Noam Chomsky’s Hegemony or Survival: America’s Quest for Global Dominance, said Mr Bush promoted “a false democracy of the elite” and a “democracy of bombs”. He responded to Bush’s speech, in which the US president claimed that the US wants peace throughout the world, saying: “If we walk the streets of the Bronx, if we walk through the streets of New York, Washington, San Diego, California, any city, San Antonio, San Francisco, and we ask the people on the street - the people of the US want peace. The difference is that the government of... the US, does not want peace.
“It wants to impose its model of exploitation and plundering and its hegemony upon us under threat of war... The people want peace, and what is happening in Iraq? And what happened in Lebanon and Palestine? And what has happened over the last 100 years in Latin America and the world, and now the threats against Venezuela, new threats against Iran?
“[Bush] spoke to the people of Lebanon - ‘Many of you have seen your homes and communities caught in crossfire’. What cynicism! What capacity to blatantly lie before the world!
“The bombs in Beirut launched with millimetric precision are ‘crossfire’?”
Chavez urged all present to read Chomsky’s book - it seemed to work as two days later it went to the top of Amazon.com’s best seller list.
Chavez upset the US before he even arrived at the UN, accusing the Bush administration of trying to deny visas to his medical and security team, telling a summit of Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) in Havana that “the gringos don’t want me to go”.
He had told the NAM summit that Third World nations needed to unite in order to overcome the legacy of imperialist domination. proposing the creation of a “Bank of the South” to encourage economic co-operation and integration of the Third World.
“We don’t accept the kind of development the International Monetary Fund and World Bank want to push on us,” Chavez said.

 

—page twelve—

Thousands march against warmongers

Around 50,000 people descended on Manchester on the eve of the Labour Party conference to voice their opposition to the Tony Blair’s premiership, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the new Trident nuclear weapons programme.
The Time To Go demo attracted activists from across the country and all kinds of organisations and none, from Muslim associations to youth groups to socialists to trades unions.
The march began at 2pm on an unseasonably warm, early autumn afternoon in Albert Square, the moment coinciding exactly with the standing ovation that greeted the Blairs as they arrived at their party conference.
The contrast between the spontaneous show of spirit and human solidarity on the streets and the stage-managed fakery within the conference confines could not have been more pronounced.
Rose Gentle, whose 19 year old son Gordon was killed in Basra in the summer of 2004, was amongst those leading the march along Princess Street and past the conference centre.
At this point the noise from the already lively crowd grew to a crescendo. But if the Labour hacks were listening, that would be a first.
Shoppers along the route stopped to watch the endless stream of people pass by, and clap and shout encouragement. This was the biggest protest demonstration the city has seen in over a century.
The march then proceeded to Deansgate for a mass ‘die-in’ to symbolise the untold numbers of dead in Iraq.
Amongst the protestors were the pall-bearers of a coffin containing a grim reaper wearing a Tony Blair mask. Another, protestor, dressed as a butcher, brandished a placard denouncing George Bush, the Butcher of Baghdad.
Now that the incidence of torture, human degradation and death within Iraq has outstripped that even of Saddam’s time, it is clear the mantle has been passed on.
The rally included contributions from veteran (and former) Labour MP Tony Benn, a staunch opponent of the war, Craig Murray, the former British ambassador to Uzbekistan, and Richard Horton, editor of The Lancet, the medical journal which published the report stating that 100,000 civilians had been killed in Iraq as a result of the US-led invasion.
Jimmy Scott, a firefighter from Maryhill, travelled down from Glasgow to attend the march.
“All different kinds of people came, and we were entertained all the way by a group of kids who taught us Urdu. We learnt to say hello and count from one to 33. I’ve no idea why we stopped at 33!”
On arrival, the mosques of Manchester had opened their doors to the protestors, and were offering curries “which were very gratefully received.”
However, at the rally, Jimmy noted how many different socialist organisations were represented, “all saying virtually the same thing.”
It made him realise, he said, “why voters get so confused and why uniting the left into the SSP was so important.
“I think it was important too that we were there, to show that the SSP is alive and kicking and still fighting.”
Jack Ferguson, co-organiser of Scottish Socialist Youth (SSY), was also there.
“It was an impressive march, with people having come from all over England, Wales, and Scotland.
“But I was dead pleased to see that there were other things going on as well, that the Manchester contingent had organised events for the whole week, including a rally of resistance, socials, a Palestinian solidarity meeting - all making the link between opposition to war and the defence of public services, the rights of asylum-seekers and the case for council housing.
“Socialists and grassroots activists had thought beyond the march, which was great, because you can only go to so many marches and hear the same chants and the same songs.”
Carolina Perez, from Glasgow, noted that there was a big local presence, underlining the fact that this wasn’t just an anti-war demonstration transplanted north from London.
“There were lots of community groups, fighting to keep maternity services open, for more money to be spent on public services rather than on wars, and for better council housing.
“There were also loads of trades unions banners and placards from groups like Hands Off Venezuela.
“There was a lot of local support, and support from towns and communities all across the country.”
Which is more than can be said for the Labour party.

Families on peace manoeuvres

by Jack Ferguson

In the days running up to the start of the Labour Party conference Military Families Against the War mounted a controversial and colourful protest against a government that had sent their children to die for a lie.
The idea was that Rose Gentle, whose son Gordon was killed by a roadside bomb in Iraq, and other campaigners from MFAW would set up camp with tents in the centre of Manchester for several days in Albert Square, right next to the Town Hall and within spitting distance of Tony Blair’s hotel.
But Manchester City Council, supposedly the administrators of a ‘City for Peace’, had other ideas and tried to ban the camp. Unfortunately for them MFAW would not be moved, declaring they would come anyway and set up camp.
The council were faced with a barrage of bad publicity, and even the police were trying to distance themselves from what was clearly a political decision, despite the council’s claims it was about health and safety.
After all the publicity and a flurry of emails from anti-war activists demanding MFAW were given their right to peaceful protest, the council were forced to back down.
Commenting on the decision, Rose Gentle said: “I think it’s because they came under so much pressure. We wrote to them asking for a compromise, and in the end we met them and were offered the peace gardens, on the other side of the town hall from Albert Square. But the past two weeks have been really tiring trying to get it all sorted.
“Since then the people of Manchester have been great, we’re really grateful for their response. Ordinary people have come up and given us their support, by signing the petition, bringing us food and anything else that we need. We really want to thank the people of Manchester.”
I took part in the camp on Thursday night, and found it an interesting and eye opening experience. It was really good to get a chat with parents from across the UK who are part of MFAW, hear about their experiences in the campaign and how they think we can step up the fight against the occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan. It was also great to meet grassroots anti war activists from Manchester and London who had come to stay and lend their support.
Interacting with the people who were curious about what people were doing with tents in the centre was also important. Late into Thursday night a young guy who had been on a night out came up and congratulated the campaigners on their stance. He then told us he was on leave from Afghanistan and was going back the following Sunday.
While his attitude was as a soldier he would do what he was told, it was still eye opening to hear his views on the situation there. He said it was a terrible place to be, and nobody understood what they were doing there. He was stationed further north than most of the fighting, and showed us pictures of their camp and its ruined surroundings on a digital camera. He also really disliked the American troops and their attitude to others.
I asked Rose about what the camp was all about, and pointing to Tony Blair’s hotel, she answered:
“We want to ask Tony Blair while he’s in Manchester for a meeting, and we want him to set a date and let us know when the troops are coming home. If Tony Blair resigns it’ll be time to hit Gordon Brown or whoever ends up being the next Prime Minister until we get them home.”
When I asked her about what MFAW planned next and how folk in Scotland could best help out she added:
“We want to get a meeting of military families up in Glasgow as soon as possible. We’ve met new families in Manchester and we meet them all the time. We really need funds so we can get people up to Glasgow and get a meeting off the ground. The best thing people can do is send funds directly to me so we can get that organised.”
* www.mfaw.org.uk


back to index