Scottish Socialist Voice
Issue 284
26 th October 2006

back to index


—front page—

There’s no place like home
SCOTLAND’S HOUSING CRISIS:

n over 200,000 homeless or on waiting lists

n 300,000 live in damp homes

Home sweet home? Not so much for the hundreds of thousands of Scots mired in this country’s epic housing crisis. More than 150,000 single people and families are jammed on waiting lists for suitable accommodation.
Another 54,000 are without a home at all - many of them are young families forced to live in temporary bed and breakfast accommodation.
Across Scotland, more than 300,000 people live in miserable, damp homes, which has a massive impact on our health.
And while our crisis turns into catastrophe, since Labour came to power in 1997, £1billion, which should have been spent on council housing in Scotland, has been plundered from the public purse.
Since Thatcher introduced the right-to-buy, over half a million council homes have been bought up yet never replaced.
And spiralling house prices have dispelled any notion that the right-to-buy would get everyone onto the property ladder.
Last week, the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation, which measures poverty levels, found Ferguslie Park to be the most deprived community in Scotland - overcrowding in homes and lack of central heating were two of the factors used to measure deprivation.
Yet in the surrounding area, just like the rest of Scotland, house prices have rocketed through the £100,000 mark - the average house price in Ferguslie Park’s PA3 postcode standing at £104,884.
It leaves people on an average wage, or less, as likely to start climbing Jack’s beanstock as the property ladder.
Labour has taken Thatcher’s housing privatisation even further, trying to force councils to transfer their entire housing stock out of public control, into private housing associations.
But after the disaster of Glasgow’s housing stock transfer, which has seen £1.5billion of public money poured into the Glasgow Housing Association but not a single new house built in three years, people have said no more.
Renfrewshire and Stirling have followed Edinburgh council tenants in voting against housing stock transfer, despite their councils frittering millions of pounds on glossy campaigns to persuade them otherwise.
It looks like the housing privatisation project is now dead in the water, thanks to dedicated campaigners who’ve battled to save council housing.
But the money which would have been invested in the private housing associations has to be spent on fixing up Scotland's dire homes.
The Scottish Socialist Party is campaigning for 80,000 new public sector homes for rent over the next five years, and for every home in Scotland to be brought up to a tolerable living standard in the same period.
We need a freeze on public sector rents, and greater tenant control over housing investment and management.
Westminster, the Scottish Parliament and our local town halls have thrown mountains of good money after bad, trying to privatise our homes. Let’s put an immediate stop to that waste, and just spend the money on building decent homes.
That doesn’t sound so difficult, does it?

—page two—

Support for independence grows despite Labour’s unionist pleas

by Ken Ferguson

Scottish Labour’s front man Jack McConnell has launched a desperate drive to derail any moves towards independence in a bid to keep his hands on power at Holyrood.
The latest panic follows a series of top-level New Labour strategy huddles, both in the Edinburgh branch office and at the Downing Street Blair bunker.
What is increasingly clear is that the idea of independence is finding favour with the Scottish public, with the latest polls showing the issue winning more support than the SNP as a party and putting 2007 firmly in the frame as the independence election.
The fact that more voters now support independence than vote SNP more than implies that the drive to win it will be a multi-party affair, with the SSP in position to potentially play a key role in the run-up to May and after.
The polling arithmetic is complex but pundits are now heavily trailing the idea of an SNP-led executive in league with the ultra-flexible Lib Dems and possibly the passive support of the Greens.

Polls
Yet the opinion polls tell a different story (see Poll Shocker, below), with the Scottish Socialists outpolling the Greens who, despite being adopted as the house rebels by a swathe of supposed expert columnists, show little sign of any major lift in popular support.
What will be key in the 2007 election is whether anyone can bring a vision of an inspiring, alternative Scotland to weary voters.
Ironically, it is precisely at this point that other parties are joining the gathering stampede to grey, managerial ‘market knows best’ policies.
So we get, from our party of liberation the SNP, brave talk of ‘Scotland the Brand’, surely taking image-making to unacceptable extremes, and bold promises to cut business taxes in order to encourage the mythical ‘business community’.
The aim of this market-friendly musak is the SNP’s signal that they want their turn on the Executive benches, and that the call for independence will be safely stifled in their hands.
New Labour face the elections with a zoo full of monkeys on their backs and their support in freefall.
It looks increasingly likely that Blair will still be in power next May and that a bitter civil war will be in full flow between Adam Smith fan Brown and Bulldog lookalike John Reid.

North British
The feud will undoubtedly poison New Labour’s North British branch and has the potential to make the Massacre of Glencoe look like a love-in.
Despite all this entertaining drama, it is apparent that voters are rejecting the pro-war, pro-market politics which have been the hallmark of the rapidly disintegrating New Labour project and that they are set to spell this out in next May’s polls.
Yet they will find no way out with the LibDems or SNP, who sound more like a New Labour tribute band than an opposition.
It goes without saying that any such result will suit the Tories, but the Greens urgently need to make up their minds on how they will relate to an alternative government which still pursues airport expansion, road-building and other planet-trashing policies.
It is clear that the SSP, with its People not Profit politics, demands for free school meals, opposition to war and new nuclear power, alongside a Scottish Republic is the only party capable of presenting an achievable alternative vision of a democratic, socially just Scotland which protects both people and the environment.

Poll shocker: SSP riding high

Rumours of the SSP’s post Tommy Sheridan demise have been greatly exaggerated.
In fact, the most recent poll, by the Sunday Mail, suggests we are very much alive and kicking.
The survey of 350 people put the SSP on four per cent for the first vote, and five per cent for the second vote.
That is within a hair’s breadth of how the polls stood six months before the May 2003 elections, at which we returned six MSPs.
Polling experts say that voters make their minds up on how they will vote six months before an election, which is very encouraging for us, and proves that our policies have not been eclipsed by personalities.
The Greens trail us, which is perhaps surprising given the easy ride, and regular soft publicity they get from the Scottish media.
Perhaps that’s because the general public are not as gullible as political editors like to think.
People are crying out for change, for more equality, investment in public services, an end to Labour’s privatisation and PPP joyride, and an end to the bloody, expensive and deeply divisive war in Iraq which even now, the Labour hacks defend.
Only the SSP offers a route out of here and into a better society, and more and more people are taking heed.
Not matter what the papers say.

Pole shocker: Tesco sell dance kit

by Roz Paterson

Kids can now enjoy raunch culture too thanks to Tesco, the supermarket behemoth intent on cornering the market in absolutely everything, including infant sexuality.
Yes, your pre-pubescent child can now get into pole dancing, once the reserve of sexually abused Las Vegas showgirls, thanks to the Pole Dance Kit!
At ‘only’ £49.97, the kit comes complete with extendable chrome pole, a ‘sexy’ dance garter, ‘Peekaboo’ dance dollars and a DVD demonstrating how to move like an exploited sex worker bored out of  her mind in a tatty, seedy lap dancing club. Hoorah!
Tesco, concerned that too much of an outcry by frumpy mums with no sense of humour might dent their gzillion pound profit margin, laughably insist that the kit is not sexually oriented.
Which renders it quite a mystery as to why the product description invites users to “unleash the sex kitten inside”.
Tesco huff further, saying the kit is clearly marked for “adult use”.
Which renders it quite a mystery as to why it’s in the Toys and Games section.
The sexualisation of young children is big business. Never mind that it can cause emotional distress, body image disorders and premature, unwanted sexual experience; it’s profitable!
Next have been at it too, with their ‘So many boys, so little time’ T-shirts...for six year olds.
As have Asda, pushing padded bras at...nine year olds.
It doesn’t get any better for adults.
Now you can book an office Xmas party at a Pole Dancing Club. For a hefty £25, you get two hours ‘expert’ pole dancing tuition, one drink, and the chance to perform for a prize.
In other words, sexually humiliated in front of all your work colleagues in some dangerous shit-hole full of leering men.
Though, admittedly, at half the price of violating the psyche of your young child.

Stirling students’ association vote to boycott Israeli goods

by Iain Campbell

The Stirling University Students Association (SUSA) senate have voted overwhelmingly to boycott Israeli goods, in protest at that country’s on-going occupation of Palestine and persecution of Palestinians.
As a result of the decision - reached by a 35-1 majority, with only one abstention -  a referendum of students is to be held in November, asking if they wish to support a motion to ‘ Oppose Anti-Semitism and Oppose the Occupation’.
This follows last year’s successful campaign in which SUSA students agreed to twin with a Palestinian students’ union, at Berzeit University, and condemn the Israeli occupation; that campaign was also supported overwhelmingly.
SUSA runs the Stirling students’ union bars and canteens for the whole campus area, so a boycott of all Israeli goods would be more than a significant gesture.
The boycott, disinvestment and sanctions policy is supported by most of the Israel peace movement, a majority of the population of Palestine and has already won support in universities in England Wales and Scotland through it being an official policy of the main university and college lecturers union (AUT).
The policy is increasingly being recognised as the most effective and peaceful way of making the Israel government realise that their actions, including ignoring UN resolutions on borders, the construction of the internationally condemned apartheid wall, and the blatant disregard for Palestinians’ human rights, are not acceptable.
The proposer of the motion, Gordon Clubb, called for people around Scotland to rally round the campaign.
 “Stirling Palestine Solidarity Campaign  calls for all student unions in the country to take inspiration from our students’ courageous decision and propose similar motions.
 “If we can win these, then we can win a similar vote at national level through the NUS.
“It’s not won yet at our university all the same; we still have the referendum, but we are encouraged by the massive support shown so far.
“If we are successful, then people fighting for equality, justice and peace in Israel/Palestine can now count the students’ movement as the latest addition to the international campaign to boycott Israeli apartheid.”
The Scottish Socialist Party agreed at its conference to reconfirm its support for the boycott of Israel. The motion which was passed includes a call for the party to campaign on the issue in all areas, including through the students’ movement.
Back in Stirling, the referendum announcement comes on the eve of the launch of Stirling Palestine Solidarity Campaign’s winter campaign Oppose the Occupation, Oppose anti-Semitism, at a public meeting on Tuesday 7 November, 7.15pm, in the Albion Bar’s political meeting room, Salsa Alba.

—page three—

James Watt staff to march on Greenock

EIS-FELA members at James Watt College, Greenock, have called a march and rally this Saturday, 28 October, as part of their ongoing protest against mismanagement.
The campaign dates back to March, when management notified college staff of their intention to make over 100 academic staff redundant.
They also threatened to sack all the remaining members of staff - some 700 individuals - unless they accepted vastly inferior terms and conditions, which in themselves would have resulted in one in eight lecturers being axed.
This hatchet job was necessary, apparently, in order to create a £2million surplus.
However, it is now a matter of public record that the college in fact finds itself in serious financial deficit.
The EIS-FELA is in little doubt that this disaster was borne of the “mismanagement and poor governance of the college by the current principal, his executive management and the board of management.”
Says Alan Ferguson, EIS branch secretary:
“This throws into sharp relief the whole issue of governance and accountability in Further Education in Scotland, which must be tackled.”
A staff spokesperson commented: “In just four years, the college has gone from being profitable and operationally secure, to massively in debt and bereft of managerial direction or leadership.”
Figures show that in 2002, the college operated on a surplus of £308,000. This has since turned into a £2.75million deficit.
“We need to know how this happened. We all deserve to know the truth.”
College support staff are to ballot for strike action next week, following a “derisory” pay offer, while lecturing staff are to seek a ballot if a pay offer is not forthcoming by the end of the month.
Saturday’s march will depart from the college’s Finnart Street campus at 12.30pm (assemble 12 noon), and proceed through Greenock town centre, culminating in a rally at Custom House Quay.

Children’s services face shortfall of £161million

by Wullie McGartland

A report by the Association of Directors of Social Work (ADSW) has warned that children’s services in Scotland are facing a £161million shortfall.
The shortfall has been calculated by public finance expert Professor Arthur Midwinter of Strathclyde University.
The report shows that the gap has been growing since 2001, because the Scottish Executive funding for Social Work has failed to match rising numbers of children undergoing some form of care.
There is now a 60 per cent gap between what councils spend on social work and the amount given by the Scottish Executive.
The ADSW also said there were currently 1,500 children in residential care, 3,600 in foster care, and 7,000 receiving support either at home or in the community.
The number of social workers needed to cope with these numbers and the extra workload must be increased by a quarter to 4,700.
UNISON, the trade union that represents social workers, has already made representations to the Executive warning of the crisis that could unfold in social work.
The Executive has told councils to meet any social work cost shortfalls via the Council Tax.
However, Unison has said that councils can only meet the gap in children’s services by redirecting money from other vulnerable groups.
Stephen Smellie, Chair of UNISON Scotland’s Social Work Issues Group, told the Voice: “The Scottish Executive wants councils to rob Peter to pay Paul.
“They say we can spend more on children’s services, but only if the money is taken from other vulnerable groups, like the elderly.
“Money would also have to be taken from other services for young people and families, leading to the possible closure of facilities geared towards helping children and their families and stop children ending up in the care system.
“We need more finance and resources for social work to deal with the ever increasing demands placed on the system.
“We don’t need different council departments in competition with each other for an ever dwindling purse.”

Glasgow against Islamaphobia

A number of protestors gathered in George Square, Glasgow, last Saturday for a rally against Islamophobia, called by the Stop the War Coalition and the Muslim Association of Britain.The rally followed weeks of one-upmanship between Labour and Tory politicians over who could be more anti-Muslim. But while politicians’ talk is cheap, on the streets their ignorant comments translated into violence - a Mosque firebombed in Falkirk and an Imam attacked in Glasgow.
“Their comments are leading to more Islamophobia on the ground, leaving Muslims not just figuratively, but literally bruised and battered,” said the Scottish spokesperson for Muslim Association of Britain, Osama Saeed.

—page four—

Protecting our coastline

by Roz Paterson

If you live in the inner city, with billboards for scenery and traffic fumes for fresh air, the call for a Marine Bill for Scotland may seem like a trifling matter. But think a minute. If we don’t learn to manage our seas and seashores properly, and soon, we’ll be left without a fishing industry, with miles of coastline rendered no-go areas through oil and other pollution, with filthy waters and a vanishing wildlife.
Scotland’s coast is one of our most precious resources, a place we retreat to, a place that sustains life and communities, a place of immense natural beauty and importance, with an estimated 8000 plant, fish and animal species, and a diverse range of marine habitats from cliffs to wetlands, rocky shores to white sands. Yet this place is ‘managed’ on an ad hoc basis, by over 20 different bodies, from the International Maritime Organisation to the UK Ministry of Defence.
Not surprisingly, it’s a mess.
As things stand, 16 out of 21 Scottish fish stocks, including cod and Atlantic salmon, may already be beyond sustainable limits; important maritime species and habitats, including common skate and seagrass beds, are in dangerous decline; seabird colonies are failing due to lack of food - hundreds of guillemots are reported to have starved to death in Scotland, especially on the West coast, with birds even sighted as far upstream as Glasgow; more than 1.7million farmed salmon have escaped into the wild from Scottish salmon farms since 1998.
Such an impasse has been reached through fragmented management, where there is no lead body and no-one driving an overall plan. Thus marine development and activities have been based on exploitation rather than sustainability. This is bad enough, but global warming is piling on the pressure. Marine species must adapt, and our approach to marine management must adapt with them, and quickly.
Not least because there’s a scramble going on.
Wildlife tourism is expanding, and new industries, from windfarms to fishfarms, are elbowing in beside more traditional fishing industries, plus oil and gas exploration and shipping. The sea does not have planning legislation in the way that dry land does, and this results in marine planning applications often running into lengthy, costly disputes, with outcomes not necessarily geared to environmental sustainability.
Such matters are approached sector by sector, which means that the energy sector makes decisions about offshore windfarms, while the fisheries department calls the shots on fishing quotas, and so on. The environment doesn’t get a look-in, quite frankly. Nor do people. There are local, voluntary management systems in place, but they have little money or influence. Which means, in the end up, that local communities have little say about what happens on their doorstep.
Take the case of ship-to-ship oil transfers in the Firth of Forth, as proposed by Melbourne Marine Shipping. I mean, who in their right mind wants dirty great oil transfers, which carry a horrendous risk of horrendous oil spillages, in the Firth of Forth? Indeed, anywhere?
Yet, despite vehement opposition to the proposal from all the affected local councils - Fife, Edinburgh and the Lothians - not to mention the general public, it seems likely that consent will be granted.
How come?
Because, and this is a whistle-stop summary: the issue is covered by no less than eight pieces of legislation, the Maritime and Coastguard Agency is so limited in its remit it can only consult on oil spill contingency plans, the Scottish Executive can do nothing as oil transfer is a reserved matter, the consultation process with the public was so limited that hardly anyone had the opportunity to object anyway, Forth Ports are a commercial body so their driver is profit and finally, no-one can really say whether the ultimate authority on this is Westminster, Holyrood or the harbour authorities.
Welcome to the mixed-up world of marine management.
A Marine Bill could help here, by establishing a Marine Spatial Plan that would identify more suitable places for ship-to-ship transfers, somewhere at least where precious wildlife habitats or other users’ needs were not put at risk. Through a Marine Spatial Plan, Scotland would have the final say on such matters, even though a UK Minister, technically, would have to instruct.
Such a scheme would give fragile communities a measure of security; if they weren’t on the plan, they’d at least be safe from the Caledonian equivalent of the Exxon Valdez.
A Marine Bill would also give wildlife some security. At present, there are no nationally important marine protected areas in Scotland, which means that nationally important species, such as black guillemots, burrowing anemones and flameshell reefs, have no safe places in which to thrive. Thus, biodiversity is being lost every day. The Scottish Executive has committed itself to halting this loss by 2010, but their complete inaction renders this commitment as meaningless as their previous commitment to improving the national diet.
A Marine Bill for the UK is consulting at Westminster just now, and very welcome it is too, but we require our own Bill for a simple, technical reason, as well as the fact that our needs are different and better identified and dealt with close to source. The technical reason is that UK jurisdiction over most marine activities stops outwith Scotland’s 12 nautical miles (nm) limit. A Scottish Bill would plug the 0-12nm gap.
OK, so a Marine Bill for Scotland then.
To be effective, it would have to include the establishing of a Marine Management Organisation, a national decision-making body pulling together all the strands of legislation relating to marine activities and planning, and overseeing devolved matters while coordinating with a similar UK body on reserved ones.
It would have to implement a Marine Spatial Plan, a masterplan for sustainability and best public interest.
It would have to adopt Scottish Marine Ecosystem Objectives, whereby the health of our seas were monitored regularly and the masterplan adjusted over time accordingly.
Finally, it would have to establish Nationally Important Marine Sites, to protect precious habitats and the life they sustain.
It’s the bare minimum, folks. If we do nothing, billboards may be the only scenery we have left.

n This article is adapted from a briefing by Scottish Environment Link. For further info, see www.scotlink.org

—page five—

letters page

—centre pages—

Extraordinary rendition: the vanishings

Since 11 September 2001, the US has held ‘enemy combatants’ in Guantanamo Bay without bringing them to trial or even informing them of the charges they faced. Human rights agencies across the world have condemned this ‘stain on democracy’ but the worse news is, Gitmo Bay is just the window-dressing. What lies beneath is an international network of cramped prison cells, torture rooms and unmarked graves. Welcome to the extraordinary world of rendition, CIA-style.
A century ago, the American programme for dragging fugitives back to justice in the US was established, and called rendition.
Since 11 September 2001, rendition has become extraordinary, being used to drag people away from justice, and into an altogether darker, more deadly world of torture rooms, rabbit hutch-sized prison cells and disappearances.
British journalist Stephen Grey was instrumental in lifting the lid on this abhorrent practice, which he details in his new book, Ghost Plane: The True Story of the CIA Torture Program.
When Guantanamo Bay opened up, Grey made enquiries and was told by ‘some people who are close to the CIA’:
“(This is) what the they want you to see. But you should know there’s a much wider system of detention, of camps around the world where people are being taken.”
A year later, Maher Arar, one of the first victims of extraordinary rendition to emerge, was released.
“He described so compellingly what happened to him and how he was taken in this Gulfstream jet, this executive jet, which seemed bizarre, flown across the Atlantic from America to Syria, and described the terrible torture that he faced.”
Grey wanted to know what happened to everyone else.
He was able, in time, to pinpoint the plane on which Arar was dispatched to Syria.
“I was able to find that actually the movements of these private jets, probably through some errors by the agency and others involved, were quite easy to track around the world.
“So I found out not only his plane, but a total of about 20 different planes used by the CIA and allied agencies to move people around the world.
“I got thousands of flight plans of these planes.
“You had people like Maher Arar coming out and making these statements of rendition: ‘I was sent to Egypt, Morocco, Syria.’
“And you wondered, should you believe these people? They’re accused of being terrorists.
“You wanted...some way of verifying their statement.
“(T)he importance of these planes was, they allowed us to confirm...that exactly what they said... was true.”
Arar was flown from Teterboro, a local airport in New Jersey, via Dulles airport, Washington DC, to Rome.
Then onto Jordan.
“He was beaten in Jordan, and then he was driven over the border into Syria to this place: the Palestine Branch...(which)..is one of the worst interrogation centers in the world...
“When he got there, he wasn’t the only person that had been sent there by the United States.
“Up to seven other prisoners were sitting in these same cells about the size of graves, three-foot wide, six-foot wide.
“And up to seven other prisoners there at the time had all been sent there by the United States.”
And some are still there.
“The whole story of this rendition program is that there are only a few people who have emerged to tell their stories, and so many others have disappeared completely.
“There was one man connected with the Hamburg cell, probably a suspected terrorist who was sent there in December 2001.
“He’s quite a big man. He couldn’t even fit in the cell.
“And he’s been held there for over a year in this tiny solitary cell, beaten and beaten constantly and never brought to trial.
“So, although people say that he’s a man who’s been involved in the 9/11 attacks, he was deliberately sent to a place where he couldn’t be brought to trial, where we couldn’t hear the evidence against him.
“So we don’t know the truth about these allegations.”
Extraordinary rendition is used to “take people...to countries where they had no connection at all.
“Maher Arar...was a Canadian citizen...sent to Syria.
“We’ve got an Egyptian citizen sent to Libya. We’ve got Ethiopian citizens sent to Morocco, really showing how it was used as a method of outsourcing of interrogation, not simply just to imprison people somewhere else.”
Take the case of Muhammad Haydar Zammar.
“He was one of the key suspects from 9/11.
“In fact, when he was captured, he was captured in Morocco in December of 2001.
“He was one of the first people in US custody for the 9/11 attacks.
“And you would have thought...that he would have been held by the United States, brought to trial perhaps, questioned in New York.
“But, in fact, he was sent to Syria.
“I got hold of a German intelligence report, which specifically states how the US organised that transfer to Syria, and what’s more, there were trade-offs involved.”
For instance, “they asked the...European Union not to criticise Morocco over human rights, because of (transfers there), because of Morocco’s cooperation in the War on Terror.
“So you see that behind this network of transfers and cooperation, there are trade-offs...with...some of the people that we would otherwise criticise over human rights.”
Bush recently called Syria a crossroads for terrorism.
And yet his administration is cooperating with Syria in order to have prisoners sent there to be tortured.
“I think the contradictions here have been so apparent that the relationship probably has deteriorated recently.
“But even going back to this period - busy period after 9/11, 2001, 2002 - at that point, the State Department was saying very clearly that people would be tortured in Syria.
“The Syrian regime was put on the candidate list, if you like, of the Axis of Evil.
“It was stated very clearly, this is a country condemned by George Bush for its legacy of torture and oppression.
“And at the same time, they were sending people to Syria.
“And the key thing was, this was a covert operation. It was embarrassing, and it’s still the most embarrassing country for the administration, because they’ve talked about their agenda of spreading freedom and democracy in the Middle East, and yet the same people who are preventing that democracy from happening, the secret police of these countries, are on the other hand referred to as liaison partners in the War on Terror.”
Last December, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said, “The United States has not transported anyone and will not transport anyone to a country, when we believe he will be tortured.”
This, says Grey, is a “legal fiction”.
“One of the United States ambassadors to Egypt told me,  it was kind of nod-nod-wink-wink that went on.
“They knew perfectly well these people would be tortured.”
Currently, investigations are underway regarding people snatched off the streets, for instance in Milan, where Abu Omar was kidnapped.
Abu Omar...was under investigation for involvement in terrorism, and the Italian prosecutor involved wanted to bring him to court.
“In fact, if he was still in Italy now, he would be in court. They were collecting evidence against him.
“Instead, in February of 2003, he was snatched off the streets and taken in a series of executive jets via Germany to a jail cell in Cairo, where he says he was severely tortured.
“He was released briefly, and he made a phone call back home to his family in Milan and explained what had happened and how he had been kidnapped.
“And because Italian police were listening to that phone call, the story was revealed.
“He was quickly re-arrested after making that call. Presumably the Egyptians were listening, too.
“But that unlocked that whole scandal in Italy. And the Italian prosecutors...have pursued this case absolutely vigorously. And there’s going to be a trial very shortly of the CIA agents involved.
“There are arrest warrants for them. None of them are being caught.
“Perhaps they never will be, but there will be an open trial, perhaps held in their absence, that’s going to take place in Italy and will expose further details of this whole operation.”
There is an investigation underway in Germany too, into the case of Khaled El-Masri.
“Khaled El-Masri, who was on holiday in Macedonia in Eastern Europe...was picked up and flown to a CIA prison in Afghanistan, held for five months without any charges, without any accusations made against him, finally released without any compensation, without any apology, without any confirmation by the CIA that they carried out this act.
“He has returned to Germany and made the complaint to the German government.
“And what’s interesting is the German government are treating that as a criminal offence, as a suspected kidnapping.
“And now they’re looking to find those responsible. And it looks like, in the coming weeks, they’re going to issue an arrest warrant for some of the people they believe carried out that transfer from Macedonia into Afghanistan.”
Meanwhile, “There are hundreds of people that were captured in Afghanistan, for example, that were not sent to Guantanamo.
“When they say the jails are empty, it’s quite frightening, because you think, well, where have they put all these people?”

n To read full interview transcript, see: www.democracynow.org

The day the US tore up its own constitution

Last week, George W Bush signed off on the Military Commissions Act 200.
Doesn’t sound too controversial perhaps, but this new law includes the abolition of habeas corpus - that is, the right to a fair trial - for certain classes of suspect:  enemy combatants.
It also allows the CIA to continue using interrogation techniques as long as they don’t cause “serious physical or mental pain” - which is widely being interpreted as the greenlight to continue the extraordinary rendition programme.
By the way, it’s up to the President to determine who is, and who isn’t, an enemy combatant.
Jonathan Turley, George Washington University Constitutional Law professor, comments:
“It’s a huge sea-change for our democracy. The framers (of the constitution) created a system where we did not have to rely on the good graces of the President.
In fact, Madison said that he’d created a system essentially to be run by devils, where they could not do harm, because we didn’t rely on their good motivations.
“Now we must. And people don’t realise how significant this is.”
In fact, he noted with alarm the national “yawn” that greeted this new threat to freedom; only a handful of protestors stood outside Capitol Hill, and were swiftly dispersed.
The implications of the Military Commissions Act, he warns, are endless.
“I think people are fooling themselves if they believe that the courts will once again stop this president from taking over˜taking almost absolute power.
“(W)e may have, in this country, some type of uber-president, some absolute ruler, and it’ll be up to him who gets put away as an enemy combatant, held without trial.
“It’s something that no one thought - certainly I didn‚t think - was possible in the United States
“And I am not too sure how we got to this point.”

Labour MPs intend to keep on dawn raiding

The controversial and hugely unpopular method of processing asylum claims may soon be decentralised, following a high powered meeting of Scottish MPs at Westminster with Liam Byrne, the UK Immigration Minister.
The proposal follows a recent growth in anger at dawn raids carried out on families in Glasgow by special Home Office ‘snatch squads’.
Earlier this year, under considerable pressure from campaigners, First Minister Jack McConnell intervened, announcing an agreement with the Home Office that dawn raids would be kept to a minimum, and that a much greater duty of care would be imposed.
However, even this limited progress was thrown aside last month, during a ‘get tough’ initiative called by Home Secretary John Reid, using draconian methods that echoed the darkest periods of 20th century Europe and sent a wave of terror through the asylum seeker community in Glasgow. It was this latest assault on the community which led to a public outcry and forced the Home Office to re-think their tactics.
Campaigners hoping for an end to dawn raids will be disappointed by the results of MPs talks. Ian Davidson MP said that while the Scottish group were in ‘listening mode’, current practise would continue, and that dawn raids were ‘undesirable but necessary’.
It’s good to know that Davidson and his New Labour cronies think that dawn raids are necessary.
That it’s necessary for children to be dragged away from their parents by goons in body armour in the early hours of the morning.
That it’s necessary for family, friends, neighbours and classmates to be snatched from their communities.
That it’s necessary for the same children to witness their parents being handcuffed by immigration officers, bundled into vans in only their nightclothes and then separated from their own sons and daughters.
That it’s necessary for new mothers to be denied being able to breast-feed their hungry babies.
That it’s necessary, as happened in Ian Davidson’s own constituency recently, for a father to threaten suicide by jumping from the top of a Glasgow tower block rather than have his family returned to torture and possible death.
That it’s necessary to bring this reign of terror on fellow human beings, whose only guilt is fleeing persecution, torture, rape, murder and countless other attacks on their human rights.
Davidson and the rest of his useless colleagues in Westminster should grow some backbones and demand an end to all dawn raids and detentions, rather than cow towing to Home Secretary John Reid and his Immigration Service boot-boys.
Scotland should be a country open to all fleeing poverty and persecution, not a country whose elected representatives sit back and do nothing about the poverty and persecution faced by people in their own constituencies whether they are natural born Scots or new Scots.

n Volunteers packing the Scottish Socialist Voice subscriptions this week will not be joined by one of our regular helpers, Lev Galitsky from Knightswood, Glasgow. Lev, who came to Scotland from Ukraine in 2004, was detained while signing at Brand St Immigration centre and faces being deported to Israel as the Voice goes to press. Lev’s lawyers, Rosie Kane MSP and her caseworker, and activists from the Unity Centre have been working flat out to try and overturn the decision to deport him. The Voice will continue to campaign for an end to the inhuman practise of dawn raids, detentions and deportation.

—page eight—

Renfrewshire votes no to housing stock transfer

Campaigners have hailed the second public vote against housing stock transfer in the space of a week as a terrific victory against privatisation.
Following the rejection of the scheme in Stirling, council tenants in Renfrewshire also voted ‘no’ to the transfer of their homes from public, local authority control to a housing association.
The secretary of the campaign for a ‘no’ vote in Renfrewshire, Gerry McCartney, told the Voice:
“This is a fantastic result. The Labour and Lib Dem government has spent millions of pounds promoting privatisation of council housing, but they have been defeated in a David versus Goliath struggle.
“Tenants have shown the good sense to reject this ridiculous policy, and have instead insisted that their homes should remain in public ownership and democratically accountable to local councillors.
“The government must now hand over the money earmarked for Renfrewshire’s housing so that it can be invested. We are calling on tenants to join our campaign to force the government to release these funds.
“There are now 125 local councils which have voted against stock transfer with an all-tenant ballot in the UK, three of those in Scotland - in Edinburgh, Stirling and Renfrewshire. Additionally, a number of Scottish local councils - North Ayrshire, East Renfrewshire, Dundee and Aberdeen - have decided not to go for stock transfer, either because of tenant opposition or due to a realisation that stock transfer is expensive, unaccountable and will lead to a poorer service.
“This means that the pressure is on for the money to be invested directly. This is a battle we can win.”

Renfrewshire SSP pick candidate to stand in Elderslie by-election

The Renfrewshire Scottish Socialist Party branch have nominated Gerry McCartney to represent them at the Elderslie by-election on 7 December.
Gerry is 28 years old, lives in Elderslie, and is secretary of the victorious campaign against housing stock transfer in Renfrewshire. He is a public health doctor for NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, until recently working locally as a GP in Paisley.
“I am delighted to have been nominated to stand in Elderslie,” he said. “The people in this area have been let down by politicians who have privatised their schools and leisure centres, cut back spending on libraries and community halls, and who have now attempted to privatise council housing.
“If elected I will bring a new vision for the area. The other candidates seem to be fighting a battle over how many potholes they could get filled. I think whoever is elected can get these filled, but only the Scottish Socialist Party will put People before Profit.
“I will be accountable to local people, hold regular surgeries in the village, and argue against further cuts and privatisations in services.”

The battle for free school meals is in your hands

by Johanna Dind

The SSP’s Free School Meals Bill has entered an important and decisive stage at the Scottish Parliament. For the next two or three months it will be debated in some detail at the Parliament’s highly influential Communities Committee.
According to the government’s own figures, one in three children lives in poverty and yet less than half of them are entitled to free school meals. All the research commissioned agrees that poor nutrition affects school attainment and concentration. Don’t all kids deserve the same right to succeed at school?
Poor nutrition is not only the matter of the poor. Currently, Scottish schools are allowed to sell junk food and are even encouraged to enter into ‘partnership schemes’ to promote poor diets!
The Labour Executive argues that introducing free school meals for all would only mean ‘feeding rich kids’. The Tories and Lib Dems for their part claim that introducing free school meals for all is unaffordable.
Implementing this bill will cost £74million. Some £235million was left unspent last year in the Scottish Executive’s budget.
What about the health costs related to obesity and other health problems associated with poor nutrition? It is estimated that to treat obesity alone, if it continues to increase at the same speed, would cost £171million a year to the NHS with a total economic cost of £2billion!
The last time this bill went through scrutiny at the Parliament, 37 MSPs from six different parties and political groups gave it their support, but more needs to be done. SSP members and all convinced activists have to put pressure on the other 90 MSPs and mobilise the public.
What can you do?

n Get your local SSP branch to organise a public meeting or event on the issue and encourage people to bring ideas with them.

n Write articles or readers’ responses to your local newspaper.

n Speak with your colleagues, neighbours and friends.

n Participate in actions organised to fight for this basic children’s right.

n Give leaflets out at local stalls, community meetings and other events.

There is a task for everyone, don’t be shy! The kids need you.
Johanna is the free school meals coordinator for the Lothians. You can contact her by email: johannadind@hotmail.com

—page nine—

The brutality of British imperialism

Britain’s Gulag: The Brutal End of Empire in Kenya by Caroline Elkins. Published by Cape Press 2005

by Charlie McGuire

The period 1952-60 in Kenya is often recalled by imperialist commentators as a time when British rule, and the progressive civilising mission contained therein, was challenged by a vicious and savage movement, known as the Mau Mau. The reality was somewhat different. As Caroline Elkins shows in this outstanding and exhaustively researched work, far from being the victim of such violence, it was the British ruling class that was responsible for a campaign of mass murder and torture truly horrifying in its scope, and one that continues to deface social, economic and political structures in Kenya today.
The roots of the conflict went back to the British colonisation of Kenya. The first half of the twentieth century saw huge tracts of the best land stolen from the African population by white settlers. This was followed by a raft of discriminatory laws designed to cripple crop production by African farmers, forcing them off what remained of their land, and into wage-slavery on the white-controlled estates.
Of all the local tribes, it was the Kikuyu who were most affected by the march of British imperialism in East Africa. They were the biggest single tribe and it was they who had lost most of their land, in the fertile central highlands of the region. Not surprisingly, a liberation movement eventually developed within this tribe. Dubbed by the British as the Mau Mau, it was a movement whose aims could best be summed up in the key words of the oath taken by its adherents: Land and freedom.
The British response to this movement was brutal in the extreme. Viewing the Kikuyu in violently racist, sub-human terms, they soon embarked upon a series of barbaric measures designed to shore up their rule in the colony.
First, was the establishment of the so-called pipeline system. This was a network of detention camps, into which thousands of Kikuyu men were herded. There, they were placed into one of three categories, ‘White’, ‘Grey’, and ‘Black’, with the last of these categories containing those the British regarded as the most hardline Kikuyu. The aim of the pipeline system was to isolate and break these so-called hardliners, leading eventually to their re-classification as ‘Greys’, then ‘Whites’, before eventual release back into new, British-controlled reservations. Measures to achieve this included mass interrogation, forced labour, torture, including castration, and routine murder.
Failure to break the insurgency led to an intensification of the measures. ‘Black’ prisoners were now to be permanently detained, with no hope of freedom.  Larger swathes of the Kikuyu male population were also rounded up, forced into slave labour and tortured. So too were the wives of suspected Mau Mau sympathisers. These women also suffered the most appalling tortures, including systematic rape, and murder.
In time-honoured fashion, the British also used divide-and-rule tactics to defeat the resistance. Those Kikuyu willing to collaborate with the regime were rewarded with privileges and the land stolen from their kinfolk. Known and reviled as Loyalists, these elements were given a free hand by the British to commit the most dreadful atrocities against prisoners and their families. In this fashion, new and permanent socio-economic and political divisions were created by the British ruling class among the Kikuyu population.
The inability of the British to break the liberation struggle led to a final move: Forced detainment of the entire Kikuyu population and individualised torture of all of the estimated thirty-thousand so-called irreconcilable Kikuyu who remained in the worst of the prisons. The application of this policy saw one and a half million Kikuyu people being shoehorned into brutally-run concentration camps and villages, whilst in the prisons, inmates were subjected to torture methods that included whippings, burnings, starvation, and daily beatings. Some were even shackled close to mosquito swamps and eaten alive. By 1960, it was all over. The struggle had finally been defeated.
However, although successful in its efforts to destroy the liberation movement, the exceptional brutality that the British state meted out in the process undermined fatally its rule in Kenya. In 1963 independence was achieved. But this did not mean that land and freedom had finally been secured for the Kikuyu. On the contrary, the new government headed by ex-political prisoner Jomo Kenyatta, proved to be classically neo-colonial. The interests that it upheld were very much those of the British, the white settlers and the Kikuyu loyalists. The rule of this neo-colonial oligarchy continued unabated under Kenyatta’s successor, Moi, and it remains largely in control in today’s Kenya, presided over by Mwai Kibaki.
Elkins book exposes the true violent nature of British colonialism. It gives the lie to the propaganda peddled by reactionary historians such as Niall Ferguson, who argue that the British Empire existed as little more than a form of benevolent paternalism. It also reveals the hypocrisy of institutions such as the war-crimes tribunal and international criminal court. Over 100,000 Kikuyu were killed as a result of Britain’s campaign of genocide in Kenya, but none of the British cabinet ministers or military officials responsible, were or ever will be called to account for their crimes. Recently re-published in cheaper paperback form, this is a harrowing book for sure, but one that is invaluable for those who wish to understand more about the real character of imperialism the world over, past and present.

Images of survival

An exhibition of Robin Taudevin’s photography, entitled Glasgow and Timor Photographs: Fighting for Refuge, is currently on show in Glasgow.
It features pictures he took of asylum-seekers in Glasgow in autumn 2005 and of refugees who fled the violence that broke out this year in East Timor.
It was in East Timor in May that he tragically lost his life in an accident, aged just 29.
Robin’s work sets out to document the lives and struggles of refugees and to give others a glimpse of their day-to-day lives in a strange land.
He said of his work:
“Most people in Britain don’t know who asylum-seekers are... it is easy to think of someone as your enemy if you do not know his face. It is easy to despise people if you do not know their story. These photographs are an attempt to remedy that in some way in Glasgow.”
The exhibition is taking place at Mono, Kings Court, Glasgow, until the end of October, 12noon-10pm, admission is free.

n For more information: www.robintaudevin.com

Tuned in
Keef Tomkinson

Saturday 28 October

Gentleman’s Agreement, Film4, 3.00pm
Years before enthusiastically naming names‚ Elia Kazan directs Gregory Peck in this expose on polite American society. Peck plays a journalist passing himself as Jewish to reveal anti-semitism in the people around him.

Sunday 29 October

Johnny Guitar, Film4, 3.00pm
When most westerns were backing up the American Dream, this subverted these ideas and attacked America’s anti-communist hysteria. Both lead roles are women with Joan Crawford and Mercedes McCambridge battling one another as their men follow obediently.
The South Bank Show, STV, 10.45pm
Boring cultural show has interesting subject: author of the Adrian Mole books, Sue Townsend. This self confessed socialist, republican and atheist talks about her career and how her failing health has influenced her writing.

Monday 30 October

Storyville: Street Fight, BBC4, 10.30pm
This Oscar-nominated documentary follows the dirty tricks and electoral battle for the Mayorship of Newark, NJ. There are two candidates, both black and both democrats.

Thursday 2 November

Eorpa, BBC2, 7.30pm
Eorpa continues to be BBC Scotland’s most genuinely interesting current affairs programme. This week it looks at trafficking of women in Italy, Moldova and the UK.

Friday 3 November

The Battle of Algiers, More4, 9:00pm
Either by coincidence or celebration this is the masterpiece of recently deceased director, Gillo Pontecorvo. A documentary style dramatisation of the Algerian liberation struggle between 1954 and 1962, it’s breathtaking.

—page ten—

international news

Election tied between reformer and the richest man in Ecuador

by Jack Ferguson

In Ecuador the Presidential elections are set for a second round run-off vote between Rafael Correa, a reformist friend of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, and Alvaro Noboa, banana magnate and Ecuador’s richest man.
Noboa led Correa by around 27 per cent to 22 per cent in the first round, meaning Ecuadorians will have to go back to the polls on 25 November.
Alvaro Noboa gives the term ‘banana republic’ a new meaning, with his control of the huge Noboa Group of industries that he battled his siblings for control of after the death of his father.
Noboa has opposed campaigns for workers’ rights within his own companies, and Noboa Group workers have been illegally dismissed for joining trade unions.
In one 2002 incident striking workers at a Noboa subsidiary were attacked and shot by company thugs. Noboa Group was also criticised in a Human Rights Watch investigation into child labour practises in the banana industry.
Rafael Correa on the other hand was the Economics Minister in the previous government, but was forced to resign by the President after selling Ecuadorian debt to Venezuela.
Although he has said that he does not consider himself part of President Chavez’ Bolivarian movement, he considers Chavez “a personal friend.”
A professional economist, he describes his five “axes of reform” as constitutional revolution, ethical revolution, economic and productivity revolution, education and health revolution, and dignity, sovereignty and Latin American integration revolution.
Also he promises to deal with foreign companies over exploiting Ecuador’s oil:
“Many of the oil contracts are a true entrapment for the country. Of every five barrels of oil that the multinationals produce, they leave only one for the state and take four... That is absolutely unacceptable. We’re going to revise and renegotiate the contracts.”

Financial reform
He also advocates reform of the financial sector, including limiting offshore deposits by local banks to no more than 10 per cent of their holdings, and enforcing a compulsory restructuring of Ecuador’s foreign debt.
In one promise guaranteed to draw US wrath, he has called for the closing of the US military base at Manta, which is central to Plan Colombia and US efforts to give military support to far right forces in the civil war there.
One advantage he has over other candidates is that he speaks the indigenous language of Kichwa, and is able to communicate with indigenous Ecuadorian highlanders in their own language.
However, Correa has already been making allegations of fraud against his billionaire opponent. Although his promises still intend to compromise with market forces, even his reformist stances may yet prove too much for the rich and their imperialist allies to stomach.

Appeal grants right to asylum from female genital mutilation

A Sierra Leone teenager has been granted asylum in the UK, following an appeal to the House of Lords. Her home government is outraged by the decision but human rights activists are delighted, as this could set an important precedent for other women seeking refuge from the abhorrent practise of Female Genital Mutilation (FGM), also known as female circumcision.
In applying for asylum on the basis that she feared being forced to undergo what is almost invariably a dangerous operation with horrendous medical and psychological complications, Zainab Fornah, 18, has, according to the Sierra Leone government’s information minister Septimus Kaikai, denigrated her country.
Women, he insists, can choose not to have the operation in Sierra Leone, where around 90 per cent of women are circumcised, a procedure that involves the removal of part or all of the clitoris, resulting in reduced or no sexual feeling and which can threaten the life of the patient, through contracting deadly infections, for instance, and leave them facing a lifetime of constant pain.
The practice, which has deep cultural roots and is based on the idea that only by partially removing a woman’s sexual organs can her ‘honour’ be protected, also has serious implications for childbirth. Some 31 per cent of circumcised women are more likely to need a caesarean section, 55 per cent are more likely to have a baby that dies shortly before or after birth, and 66 per cent are more likely to have babies requiring resuscitation following birth.
A WHO report published this year (see Voice 268) established FGM as a form of mutilation.
Yet Zainab’s initial application was denied, on the grounds that the Refugee Convention of 1951 states that asylum-seekers must come from a social group fearing persecution in order to be granted asylum and that Zainab was not a member of such a group.
This despite the fact that FGM is often carried out on girls as young as seven.
The Law Lords saw the matter rather differently, Baroness Hale of Richmond saying it was “blindingly obvious” that the asylum laws applied to this case and expressing surprise that an appeal was ever needed.
The UN Refugee Agency welcomes the verdict, its UK representative Bemma Donkoh commenting that the Agency has “consistently advocated that the refugee definition, if properly interpreted, can encompass women who have been persecuted for gender-related reasons.
“Significantly, all the parties involved in this case accepted the fact that FGM constitutes a particularly horrendous form of treatment and a violation of human rights that amounts to persecution.”
FGM is still practised in 28 countries, with around 6000 procedures carried out every single day.
Activists in these regions admit that it is difficult to speak out, yet people are, increasingly. In Sudan, it was religious leaders who led the process, and in Burkino Faso, a phone-line has been established for people to report cases in confidence and without fear of reprisal.

—page eleven—

international news

Ten die after waste dumped on West Africa

by Roz Paterson

On 19 August, after failing to find anyone in Amsterdam and then Nigeria willing to dispose of its chemical slops, a Panama-registered, Greek-owned oil tanker operated by Dutch firm Trafigura, instead dumped them in 11 sites near Abidjan, in Cote D’Ivoire, at the dead of night.
A stinking cloud of fumes spread across the city in the ensuing days and, within a fortnight, ten people were dead and thousands had been treated in hospital for nausea, respiratory problems and nosebleeds.
The toxic waste was the dregs from oil tanks that had recently been cleaned, and contained mercaptan, a poisonous residue of decaying crude oil.
It should always be incinerated but in this case was simply dumped, allegedly by a local firm, paid by the Dutch firm in good faith.

Angry protests
The angry street protests that followed culminated in the government’s Transport Minister being pulled from his car and beaten.
On 6 September, almost the entire cabinet resigned and the call went out for the oil tanker, the Probo Koala, to be found and impounded as part of a criminal investigation into Trafigura’s activities.
Now a Dutch lawyer, acting on behalf of more than 1000 of the toxic dump victims, is suing Trafigura, demanding $12.5million from them within two weeks as a preliminary settlement, though the full claim is likely to be much higher.
Trafigura, which was previously fined £9.4million for its role in the UN oil-for-food scandal, insists it acted properly and that a local company, called Tommy, is the true villain.
But Bob van der Goen is having none of it.
“(Trafigura) should have known that Cote D’Ivoire couldn’t process this waste. They should have known the danger for people and the environment.”
Ten people, including two Trafigura executives, have so far been charged in connection with the dumping.

Space is final frontier for Cowboy George W

by Ken Ferguson

Almost half a century ago, when space was largely confined to the pages of illustrated comics, the Soviet Union launched the first satellite, Sputnik, and with it the space race.
In the decades that followed, we saw moon shots, space stations and shuttles.
But in the new world of one aggressive superpower, space stories have been replaced by Star Wars as part of the US policy of world domination, known as ‘full spectrum dominance’.
This has as its central aim the ability by the US imperialists to control any region of the planet and destroy anyone who gets in the way.
Under pressure President George W Bush has now set out his stall to ensure that the US remains top dog, according to reports leaked to the highly influential Washington Post.
Bush sees space as ‘the final frontier’ for the Yankee militarists, every bit as important to their plans as control of the oceans, continents and skies.

Destruction
The aims are set out in a White House policy document reflecting Bush’s folksy Texan determination to ensure that he is the Sheriff of the Stratosphere and clearly warning that anybody thinking otherwise faces destruction by US forces.
The document pulls no punches, saying:
“The United States will preserve its rights, capabilities, and freedom of action in space; dissuade or deter others from either impeding those rights or developing capabilities intended to do so; take actions necessary to protect its space capabilities; respond to interference; and deny, if necessary, adversaries the use of space capabilities hostile to US national interests.”
This latest Bush diktat comes just two years after the publication of the US air force doctrine on protecting US satellites and spacecraft. Defence secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, is a high profile backer of the development of systems to protect satellites and space stations.
It goes on to boldly claim that space activities have improved life for both ordinary Americans and people around the world by enhancing security and economic growth and “revolutionising the way people view their world and the cosmos”.

Mars
Bush has sought to revive the national interest in space by calling for Americans to return to the moon in 15 years, and even use bases there to serve as a launch pad for Mars.
While there is bread and circuses element to this, it also flags up the fact that there are no areas off limits for the US war machine.
The order also underlines Bush’s opposition to the establishment of arms control treaties that would restrict US access to space, or set limits on its use of space.
It backs the development of ‘space capabilities’ weapons - to support US intelligence and defence initiatives.
Answering concerns that the policy will accelerate weapons in space Bush’s spokesman Tony Snow claimed there was no change, telling a sceptical media that the exploitation of space for defensive purposes did not mean that America was seeking to develop space weapons.
Spokesman for the top war body, the National Security Council, Fredrick Jones flatly claimed, “Protection of space assets does not imply some sort of forceful action.”
Instead, he insisted, “Technology advances have increased the importance of and use of space... Now, we depend on space capabilities for things like ATMs, personal navigation, package tracking, radio services, and cell phone use.”
So, if we believe the peaceniks in Washington, it isn’t Star Wars at all but making sure you can get that last tenner out of the hole in the wall, find a short cut and, like ET, phone home.
Twinkle, twinkle, little star indeed.

 

—page twelve—

Death of a health service

Millions of Iraqis die as services collapse and doctors flee
“Our experience has taught us that poor emergency medical services are more disastrous than the disaster itself.”
So says Dr Bussim Al Sheibani, and his two colleagues, writing this week in the British Medical Journal,
Hospitals function with few or no trained staff, floors are a litter of blood and other spills, left because there is no antiseptic cleaner to remove it, beds are made up with dirty bedsheets, flies buzz everywhere.
“Many emergency rooms are no more than halls with beds, fluid suckers and oxygen bottles.”
Some don’t even have these; they are simply rooms waiting to become morgues.
Says Dr Qasim al-Nuwesri, of Chuwader Hospital in Sadr City: “Of course we have typhoid, cholera, kidney stones, but now we have the very rare Hepatitis Type-E and it is becoming common in our area.”
As is the incidence of children dying from Kala Azar through eating food from rubbish dumps; a consequences of the shattering of Iraq’s infrastructure is that stinking rubbish piles up all around.
Kala Azar, caused by the sandfly parasite, attacks the internal organs. It’s a disgusting, deadly condition but easily treated with Pentostam - problem is, there is no Pentostam, so these children just die.
As they do of dehydration, bleeding, diarrhoea, respiratory ailments - and all for lack of such basics as small bore syringes and oxygen masks, hydration kits and Vitamin K injections.
About 250,000 children have been born in Iraq since 2003 and received no immunisations. That’s another medical timebomb.
The Iraqi health service was once the envy of the Middle East. People came here for heart transplants, cancer treatment, facial reconstruction.
The rot set in during the 1980s, when oil funds were diverted away from infrastructure and into the military. It got dramatically worse during the 1991 Gulf War and subsequent sanctions which both starved the health service and impoverished and sickened the population.
Since 2003, it has nose-dived.
Nowadays, even the dying dare not venture into these hospitals, targets  not just of sectarian militia, but also US attack.
In Fallujah, in 2004, the General Hospital was under siege by US troops. Doctors were stranded and medical supplies were blockaded.
Last year in Baghdad, brain surgeon Basil Abbas Hassan was shot dead on his way to work by US soldiers.
Prior to the 2003 invasion, there were 34,000 doctors practising in Iraq. Since then, 18,000 have fled, more than 2000 have been murdered. and 250 kidnapped.
Those still practising do so in clinics tucked discreetly away in residential districts, or in the middle of medical compounds. It’s still not safe and the exodus continues. Anyone with the means is now getting out.
This brain drain is cataclysmic.
Amer Hassan Fayed, Assistant Dean of Political Science at Baghdad University, says: “We could end up with a society without knowledge. How can such a society progress?”
Under Articles 55 and 56 of the Geneva Convention, occupying forces must provide food and health service to the population. The US and UK have flouted this duty.
Reconstruction monies have been misappropriated. Under Paul Bremer’s watch, for instance, $8.8billion went missing and remains missing.
“Of the 180 health clinics the US hoped to build by the end of 2005, only four have been completed and none opened,” according to medical charity Medact.
Extreme poverty is aggravating Iraq’s health crisis.
Eight million Iraqis live on less than $1 a day, 96 per cent depend on government food rations of cooking oil, flour and rice, subject to availability, and over 68 per cent of people have no access to clean water.
Yet, say Iraqi medics, the international community is ignoring their plight. They are pleading for help, for equipment, drugs, personnel...and no-one hears them.

Echoes of ‘Nam as US fortunes in Iraq plummet

by Ken Ferguson

President Bush’s comparison of the current situation in Iraq to the Vietnam war’s Tet Offensive is of massive significance.
It is also mistaken. The Iraq debacle is far worse.
For several months in early 1968, the National Liberation Front - popularly known as the Viet Cong - and elements of the regular army of North Vietnam, maintained an all-out offensive on US forces and their South Vietnamese puppet allies.
Although in terms of territory held or recaptured, and enemy forces destroyed, the US clearly won the battle, it is beyond question that the psychological war was won by the NLF.
Three incidents in particular illustrate this.
On 31 January 1968, when an elite commando unit of the Viet Cong stormed the heart of US power in Vietnam, its Saigon embassy.
They blew a gap in the perimeter defences, killed several US military police and held control for several hours until the were wiped put by a vastly superior force.
Journalists present at the scene were summoned, by the US Commander in Vietnam General George Westmoreland, to a press conference in the smoking ruins.
They could, as one reporter put it, “hardly believe their ears as (he) stood among the ruins telling us all was well.”
Probably the most significant event in the media war was to provide one of the most iconic images of the entire brutal war.
Nguyen Van Lam, a captain in the Viet Cong, was captured by South Vietnamese forces in Saigon and, after some brief questioning, was shot in the head by the chief of South Vietnam’s national police, Brigadier General Nguyen Noc Lon.
Unfortunately for the US, the execution was photographed by leading US photojournalist Eddie Adams, and the image was wired around the world.
It was also filmed by an NBC crew and American viewers saw the entire sequence on early evening bulletins.
Then there was the battle for the city of Hue, over which US marines took a month to regain control and, it was reported at the time, discarded their own weapons, which kept jamming, in favour of the ever-reliable AK-47s they filched from dead enemies
Reading the returns of those killed, Westmoreland smelled victory and requested 200,000 extra soldiers to finish the war.
But when his request was leaked in the New York Times, US opinion assumed it to be a desperate response to looming defeat.
Westmoreland was promoted and moved a few weeks later.
His political boss, President Lyndon Baines Johnson, fared little better, almost losing the New Hampshire democratic primary to peacenik rival Eugene McCarthy.
He pulled out of the Presidential race a few weeks later.
The situation in Iraq now is much like that of the early 1970s when, post-Tet, it was clear the US could not win and the desperate search for an exit was on.
The plan then was to make the Vietnamese take the hits and it was called ‘Vietnamisation’.
On Monday’s Channel 4 News, a US spokesman spoke of ‘Iraqisation’.
If I was the US Ambassador to Baghdad, I’d be hoping my residence has a heli-pad.


back to index