Scottish Socialist Voice
Issue 288
24th November 2006

back to index


—front page—

FREE SCHOOL MEALS FOR ALL

SSP bill is still on the table!

People across Scotland are furious at the Scottish Executive’s decision to block the Scottish Socialist Party’s Free School Meals Bill.
But if they thought we would go quietly, they thought wrong.
SSP MSP Frances Curran, sponsor of the Bill, is calling on everyone who believes in the anti-poverty, pro-health intervention, which would provide a free, nutritious school meal to every state school child in Scotland, to send a message direct to the Scottish Parliament, by texting it to Jack McConnell himself.
“This is the first time people will have been able to do this, and we will display every message on a neon board in the lobby of the Parliament,” says Frances.
“The voice of the people will penetrate right to the heart of Holyrood. MSPs can, and do, duck in the back door to avoid the public lobbying them, but they won’t be able to avoid this.
“We’re hoping for 1000 texts in the first week, so please ensure you get your message in.”
The Bill - which would have a massive impact on the health and well-being of children across Scotland - was shelved, not only by the whimpering nonentities of Labour and the LibDems, but also with the support of those false radicals, the SNP.
The careerists at Holyrood thought their undemocratic measures would put an end to the free school meals campaign, which is too popular for their tastes by half. But they are in for a shock.
Not only will we bring the public outcry into parliament, we will continue taking the campaign out onto the streets - the SSP is not just for election time, we fight all year round, year in, year out - and back to the parliamentary authorities.
“I’ve asked them to think again about shelving this Bill, and they are still considering,” says Frances. “Free school meals are not off the agenda yet.”

—page two—

Mckinnon Mills Workers Still Out

by Kevin McVey

Workers at the Mackinnon Mills factory in Coatbridge are into their ninth week of strike action.
Despite facing the intransigence of management and the worst of the November weather, the workforce, members of the Community union, remain as determined as ever to win their 2.5 per cent pay claim.
The strikers are being sustained by the overwhelming public support they are winning, reflected by the constant (and often deafening!) toots of support from passing cars and lorries at the picket line, or in the customers turning away from the shop at the factory once they realise what the Scrooge-like management are up to.
SSP MSP Carolyn Leckie is continuing to press the case of the strikers and has written to management demanding that they meet union representatives, and local SSP members continue to regularly visit the picket line to show support.
The strikers are planning to escalate the dispute from two days of strike action a week to three, and Mackinnon Mills management had better realise that these strikers are not going to go away until they secure the rise they deserve.

Civil Service Ballots for Action Against Jobs Cuts

by Richie Venton
SSP national workplace organiser

The national executive committee of the 300,000-strong Public and Commercial Services union (PCS) meets this week to ratify plans for a ballot of members across the entire civil service.
They plan to call for a one-day strike of all civil servants and other PCS members in public sector agencies on 31 January.
This huge step follows the sustained, systematic campaign of assaults by the Labour government on civil service workers’ pay, jobs, working conditions - indeed, the very existence of the public sector, as Labour privatises the parts the Tories never reached.
In the past week alone, in Revenue and Customs (HMRC), they have just announced over 200 office closures. In the past three years, 7500 jobs have been shed, with a further 5000 to go by 2008 - and an additional 12,500 by 2012.
The closure programme means devastation for the east coast of Scotland, with Aberdeen, Dundee, Inverness, Galashiels and Hawick amongst those offices facing the chop by 2010.
In the west of Scotland, offices at Coatbridge, Hamilton, Motherwell, Paisley, Falkirk, Ayr and Irvine face the same fate, as HMRC bosses and the government rush to centralise everything into East Kilbride, Glasgow and Cumbernauld.
As John Davidson of East Kilbride office told us, “All workers in HMRC are affected, not only those on short term contracts.”
John Miller, from Cumbernauld Revenue & Customs, told me, “Forced relocation of staff, the vicious job losses, the failed concept of LEAN which has led to over a million items of uncleared post - the list of attacks on us is endless.
“More and more pressure is placed on us daily as the quality of our jobs and service are undermined. How many taxpayers are now suffering the same fate as benefit claimants, left hanging on a phone, unable to speak to someone?
“We now have the chance to stand together in action as the first compulsory redundancies are issued in DEFRA and the DTI. The industrial action ballot, for a strike across the whole civil service on 31 January, is long overdue.”
Gerry McMahon, a Glasgow DWP worker added, “Cuts are pushing members to breaking point, and then many of them face disciplinary action and even the sack under the draconian Attendance Management Policies.”
Pay is another prime grievance. It’s a lottery, depending not on the skills, experience and tasks you face, but often which department you work in.
There are over 200 different bargaining units on pay, and pay inequalities of £3,500 are common for doing the same type of job in different areas of the civil service. That’s why the fight for fair, national pay structures is also at the heart of this strike ballot.
SSP members in the PCS have been instrumental in advocating civil service-wide, united strike action.
And already, as Willie Telfer, PCS Group Assistant Secretary in the Department of Transport, told me, “Members’ meetings across the country are making it clear that management can’t rely on our good will any longer.
“We are no longer prepared to come in early and work late to provide the public counter access currently provided by staff.
“In the DVLA local office network alone, we have lost 507 jobs out of an original workforce of 2100. We have secured a ‘no compulsory redundancy’ pledge, but that undoubtedly will come under pressure.
“We have been cut to the bone, the marrow comes next.”

Violence a Poor Bet for Workers

by Voice Reporter

Betting shop union Community is backing a Scottish Executive campaign to encourage workers to report all incidents of abuse.
Heather Meldrum, Community organiser for Scotland, said:
“We’re launching this campaign to raise awareness of the issue of violence against betting shop workers and encourage them to report it, however small and insignificant they think it is, because only then can we get a picture of the scale of the abuse.
“A lot of workers face daily abuse, including verbal abuse, spitting, and physical violence.”
However, many never report it, assuming it to be part and parcel of the job.
“But no-one should have to put up with it,” she continues.
“Once we get an idea of the scale and type of abuse that occurs, we can tackle it more effectively.”
In a bid to improve reporting, the union is operating an online and telephone incident reporting system.
Community is also campaigning on other issues important to betting shop staff, including working hours, unpaid overtime, shop security, safety, single staffing, pay, and proper consultation over industry changes.
The Scottish Executive’s ‘Bang Out of Order’ campaign against workplace violence includes an online reporting form.

Council Cuts are the Deepest

by Richie Venton

As we go to press, the result of the ballot for strike action by 13,000 Glasgow city council UNISON members is imminent.
These workers face imposition of a Labour council Pay and Benefits review which will force about 5000 of the 31,000 staff to accept cliff-edge pay drops in two years’ time.
Some workers gain in the package - and rightly so, after decades of pay discrimination against women workers, and poverty pay levels for women and men. But this so-called equal pay package is being paid from out of the pockets of other low-paid workers - including many women!
Human tragedies are not uncommon, as people wrestle with remortgaging their homes, or cut back on provision for their children going to university.
Meanwhile Labour council leader Steven Purcell peddles the lie that “nobody will lose a penny in pay”.
Many of those allegedly ‘gaining’ stand to lose through cuts to overtime rates, other bonuses and enhancements - low-paid cleaners losing £400 a year being just one, cruel example of this deception.
If a YES vote is secured, it will be despite the cynical attempts to bribe, bully and befuddle workers - with the council promising a hefty lump sum in December to those who ‘gain’ and sign up for the new contract.
If members vote YES, a three-day strike in early December is looming.
And if not, there will still be a battle to secure equal pay without detriment to fellow-workers.
Glasgow is not alone. Only a couple of the 32 councils in Scotland have reached settlements with the unions.
North Lanarkshire Labour council are imposing new pay and grading structure contracts on their staff, whose 7000-strong UNISON branch is lodging legal action to secure current terms and conditions and prevent wage losses.
This same council is enraging staff further by announcing severance packages of £800,000 for four heads of department as they centralise operations.
And Falkirk SNP council - yes, SNP - plan to impose mass dismissal notices on their workforce the week before Christmas!
Scotland’s own Scrooge party face a ballot for industrial action, plus legal challenges, from UNISON members.
SSP members in UNISON are arguing for an early national demo as part of mounting pressure on councillors and the Scottish Executive, to demand the required funding from the Executive and to fight off the growing queue of councils seeking to impose mass sackings and re-engagement under new contracts.

Ofcom Chokes on Junk Food Advertising Ban

Campaigners against junk food TV ads aimed at vulnerable young viewers have finally forced Ofcom - the media regulator - to act.
But the ban on junk food advertising, due to start phasing in from January 2007, will do little to combat the toxic diet modern children now swallow.
Campaigners, from Which? magazine to the Women’s Institute, called for a blanket ban on all advertising of high fat, salt and sugar (HFSS) ads and got...a partial ban, more riddled with holes than a Swiss cheese.
Ads for McDonalds’ Happy Meals and Fanta are now banned from designated children’s programming, and during programmes screened later whose audience is disproportionately comprised of under-16s, such as Hollyoaks.
But this will only reduce children’s exposure to this kind of advertising by about 40 per cent, which is something short of a bodyblow to the obesity timebomb.
The National Consumer Council warns that 70 per cent of children’s viewing time occurs outside children’s designated airtime, rising to 80 per cent for 10-15 year olds.
For example, four times as many children watch Coronation Street, which can continue to bookend its segments with Cadbury’s commercials because the adult audience outnumbers the children’s, than watch Saturday morning children’s TV.
Furthermore, McDonalds and Coca-Cola et all can continue to sponsor children’s programming anyway, so long as they do it generically - that is, using the brand, rather than a specific product.
And while celebrities and licensed characters are now banned from endorsing HFSS products, characters created by the company, such as Tony the Tiger, can carry on regardless.
Ofcom say their concern is not health, but quality programming; without advertising revenue, this latter cannot happen. Unless, say, we had a public service broadcaster, funded by license-payers...oh, quite right, crazy idea.
If they had implemented the full ban, £250 million in advertising revenue would have been lost, apparently.
Never mind that advertising is a form of aural and visual pollution that, if we were in our right minds, we wouldn’t let anywhere near us, never mind our kids.
As it is, the food and drink industry, as these purveyors of cooked-up chemicals laughably like to call themselves, is up in arms. It is “shocked” at this “over the top” measure.
Campaigners are pretty angry too. The Children’s Food Campaign calls the Ofcom announcement a “very cleverly spun cave-in to the food and drink industry”.
Which? is calling for the government to intervene and impose the pre-9pm ban.
“We are in the midst of an obesity epidemic and must use all the weapons in our armoury to prevent the next generation of British children being the most obese and unhealthy in history,” says Vivienne Nathanson, head of science and ethics at the BMA.
Scottish children are twice as overweight or obese as the UK average, which is dismal in itself.
One third of twelve year olds are overweight, 19.4 per cent are obese, and 11.2 per cent severely obese.
Keep this up, and we’ll be burying our own children as they die like flies from heart disease, cancer and respiratory illnesses.
We could do something about it of course, but that would impinge on big business, which Ofcom just won’t swallow.

—page three—

The12,000 Mile Seafood Pay Cut

by Brian Lewis

The madness that is globalisation reached new heights when Young’s, a Scottish seafood firm, announced plans to send langoustines caught in Scottish waters on a 12,000 mile round trip to Thailand to be hand-peeled.
The low-paid Scottish workforce is far too expensive it seems, so the seafood must be hand-peeled by even lower-paid workers, providing a nice little boost to Young’s balance sheet.
From February of next year, langoustines will be graded and frozen at the company plant in Annan before embarking on the 21 day journey to the Far East.
On their return, they will be turned into breaded scampi.
This move will lead to 120 job losses out of a total workforce of 250.
It’s a severe blow to this small community of 8000 people, where jobs are already scarce.
Serious concerns have also been raised as regards the environmental impact of Young’s actions.
Friends of the Earth (FoE) Scotland estimate that transporting the langoustines will generate a weight of carbon dioxide almost half the weight of the seafood itself.
Calls have been made for the resignation of Mike Parker, deputy chief executive of Young’s, from the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) over a conflict of interest.
The MSC was set up in 1997 by the international environmental organisation WWF and the major food company Unilever.
It certifies fisheries as sustainable and has awarded its own blue eco label to over 400 seafood products in 25 countries.
FoE Scotland commented: “A business executive who tries to excuse such an inexcusable decision would not seem to me to be well-placed to help the MSC judge what is a sustainable seafood.”
The bottom line is that Young’s puts profit before the environment and the workers it exploits both at home and overseas.

Peerages Scandal Dogs Blair

by Ken Ferguson

The Cash for Peerages scandal just keeps on going.
While Labour minister and ex-ministers, not to mention ex-Tory leader Michael Howard, ‘help the police with their enquiries’, and allegations surface regarding two sets of Labour Party accounts, it now appears that the Electoral Commission, which has considerable power to penalise and even close down political parties which break its rules, is getting involved.
Commission officials are now thought to be pressing for action against the governing party, even if it is only 50 per cent likely to get a result.
This is a story that begins over a decade ago.
Blair and his anti-working class allies seized power in the Labour Party in the mid-1990s, after the death of John Smith.
Smith was a traditional right-wing Labour operator but Blair and co had different ideas, involving moving Labour further to the right, decisively breaking with even moderate socialist politics.

Junk
Central to this was his successful drive to junk Labour’s historic commitment to common ownership, expressed in Clause 4 of its constitution.
New Labour was presented to the voters as a shiny new vehicle for progress and change, with old ‘dinosaurs’, such as trade unions, left behind.
After the 1997 triumph, cool Britannia and New Labour Number 10 was the happening place and the rich and famous flocked to endorse it.

Class
The fact that New Labour was quite openly in favour of the wealthy seemed to open up the prospect of a political force independent of unpleasant class politics and the poor.
The downside was plummeting membership and a growing reliance on donations from rich men and firms to avoid taking union cash, which might mean listening to them.
Last week, the monetarist guru Milton Friedman died. The phrase, ‘there is no such thing as a free lunch’, is attributed to him.
As far as New Labour goes, he got that one right. 
Voters now regard the Blair team as more sleazy than Major’s Tories, largely due to its series of financial scandals and shady relationships with the wealthy.
All of this has an uncanny similarity to the early 20th century scandals which engulfed Liberal leader Lloyd George, leading to the original laws to prevent politicians selling honours.
Indeed, in LG’s time, there was even a price list openly available, informing the rich social climber of the going rate for peerages.
That long forgotten law, banning such sales, is now being dusted down in pursuit of Blair and his supposed bribery of the rich.
A question mark now hangs over both him, and the political party he defaced in his own image.

Pipeline Protest

Irish campaigners from Rossport Solidarity Group travelled to Wales last week to join protests against a proposed gas pipeline.
In Rossport, County Mayo, Shell are attempting to progress plans for a high pressure gas pipeline and refinery. Campaigners there are concerned about the safety and environmental impact that this will have.
The same issues now affect Wales, where the proposed pipeline will carry Liquid Natural Gas (LNG) 115 miles from the refinery in Milford Haven, Wales, to Tirely, England.
Around 14 protesters deliberately lodged themselves in the gas pipe at Trebanos, near Swansea, for over a week and are determined to stay put for as long as necessary.
Jim Dunckley, from the Safe Haven Network, said the protesters want to highlight the damage that the National Grid was doing to the environment.
Adam Price, Plaid MP, commented: “It’s London unfortunately, trumping legitimate concerns in Wales once again.”
The National Grid has forcibly bought land throughout Wales in order to lay the pipe and campaigners want the National Assembly to call in plans for the pipeline.
Legal action by the Safe Haven Network, in order to try to stop the pipeline, has so far proved unsuccessful.

—page four—

One the Inside Looking Out

by Roz Paterson

When SSP MSP Rosie Kane was jailed recently for refusing to pay a fine relating to an anti-Trident protest, she was struck by how isolated prisoners are, how severed from any kind of normal life. And how this renders it such an uphill struggle for them, upon release, to fashion a new, non-criminal existence.
Can we on the outside help? And in so doing, not only lend an individual a helping hand, but assist in making our society that bit more functional and safe?
Sure we can, through the simple means of letter-writing. But corresponding with a prison inmate requires patience, training, understanding and, most of all, commitment.
“We ask that volunteers stick with a prisoner to the end of his or her sentence, which in some cases, can mean ten to 15 years,” says Chris Thomas, of New Bridge Foundation, a charitable organisation dedicated to the befriending of prisoners.
These are people who have maybe never had any kind of stable relationship, nor a window on the normal world of jobs and families. If you can show trust in them, maybe they will learn to give trust in return, and thereby lay the foundations for a better life.
New Bridge Foundation was established in 1956 - this year celebrating its half-century - by Lord Longford, the tireless campaigner for penal reform, and friends.
“They knew people who had been imprisoned, and so discovered that they had no contact with the outside world. Initially, New Bridge was founded to provide support for the newly released, but it developed into befriending prisoners still on the inside,” says Chris.
Befriending may sound very Victorian, something a 19th century philanthropist might do in between screwing down the wages of his infant mill-workers, but it is a practical and effective means of helping prisoners rehabilitate themselves.
Chris notes that the Home Office has found that having someone on the outside who cares about you can be the defining factor in whether or not you make a successful fresh start.
“Skills and training are important, but if no-one cares about what you do and how you are, you’re more likely to go back to your old ways.”
But caring is quite a demanding task, and New Bridge is there to screen out those who are interested for the wrong reasons - because they think they may forge a romantic link with an inmate, or are fascinated by criminality  - and to recruit, train and support those who are interested for the right ones - that is, genuinely want to help someone, even someone whose views and attitudes may be very at odds with their own.
“You have to remember that prisoners live very institutionalised lives, and often don’t have normal relationships at all, having lost contact with their families and friends through being inside and, because of overcrowding, being moved, often hundreds of miles away from home.
“They can sometimes be demanding and manipulative, so we help volunteers deal with this, and go through the content of letters with them to make sure there is no manipulation involved, and that the relationship is appropriate.
“All correspondence goes through us, no-one gives out their address or phone numbers, and they may even use a pseudonym. The prisoners understand this.”
It may sound a little hands-off, but volunteers do make a difference to people’s lives.
“Having someone write to you, over a period of time, makes you feel that you are worth something, makes you feel wanted.”
For some, especially young offenders who may have just come through the care system, or whose families have thrown them out, this could be the first time they experience this.
“There’s one guy, now in Dartmoor, who’s been in the prison system since 1983. He didn’t engage with people, didn’t trust anyone, had refused to think about his release and gett ing work.
“Being in touch with one of our volunteers changed that. Now he thinks about the future, even though his release is still some time away.”
Because what he has now is a sense of hope, borne of having a functional relationship with another human being.
This particular individual has mental health problems and, if paroled next year, is more likely to wind up in sheltered accommodation than the wide world, but if he can maintain his new, positive slant on life, his future could be so much better than it might have been. Befriending can also involve meeting face-to-face.
If your inmate is moved, New Bridge will fund your travel, to facilitate the commitment that is so vital.
Last year, New Bridge volunteers travelled 18,000 miles; which gives you some idea of how isolated, geographically, our prisoners become.
“The prisoner may put you down for a visit, if you both agree, and you turn up, just like any other friend or family member. Just as your letter arrives just like any letter, from a mate or whatever. There is no stigma attached to it.”
Quite the opposite in fact, as receiving letters and being visited is high status “as so many don’t get either.”
It is estimated that four out of five prisoners lose all contact with family and friends, through the aforementioned overcrowding problem, amongst other factors, which can strain to breaking point already fragile relationships, particularly with children.
“We run a course called Family Matters, dealing with the issues of being a parent in prison, the idea being to prevent loss of contact in the first place.”
Prisoners hopefully learn to be positive about family relationships, but also realistic that, upon release, there is ground to be made up.
“It’s not going to be rosy. Things have changed.”
Prisoners generally hear about New Bridge through word-of-mouth, and volunteers hear about them at group meetings, where they are given a list of people who would like to be written to.
“And you write and introduce yourself and sometimes a friendship takes off, and sometimes it doesn’t. It’s all down to chemistry in the end.
“One (male) prisoner requested that a woman, aged between 25 and 35, write to him.
“Instead, he got a woman who was nearly 80. She said, ‘I’m nearly three times the age you requested, but will I do?’ And he said, ‘Yeah, fine’ and now they get on like a house on fire.”
Some friendships continue after release, but nine times out of ten, they don’t.
“Because you are part of their prison experience, and they are now out, and want to put it behind them.”
Volunteers have to be prepared for that.
“That’s the difference between being a friend and being a befriender. It’s not forever. You’re there to help them get from A to B.”
But it’s worth the work.
“It’s a practical way to make your community safer, you can do it in your own time, whenever you have an hour spare to write a letter, and it offers a fascinating insight into the closed world of prison.”

n If you would like to know more about New Bridge, or apply to be a volunteer, you can apply in writing to:
New Bridge Foundation, 27A Medway Street, London, SW1P 2BD, or phone 0207 976 0779, or via email at info@newbridgefoundation.org.uk

—page five—

letters page

Blair Unwelcome In Pakistan
On 18 November, Labour Party Pakistan (LPP) activists staged a demonstration outside the Lahore Press Club, in protest at Tony Blair’s visit.
Despite a heavy police presence, they brandished banners and placards, emblazoned with such sentiments as: ‘Killer Tony Blair, you are not welcome in Pakistan!’, ‘Tony Blair, not fair!’ and ‘Tony Blair, get of Iraq and Afghanistan, Bush-Blair wars are not our wars.’
The demonstration attracted a positive response from passers-by, who made victory signs on seeing the protest.
The LPP issued a press release stating that the British prime minister is a liar who invaded Iraq alongside US President Bush on a false pretext, leading to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan.
He is now a threat to world peace, the press release continued, and the people of Pakistan do not welcome him. Furthermore, contrary to what Bush and Blair claim, the ‘War on Terror’ is promoting religious fundamentalism.
The LPP vows to do our best to oppose imperialists and the religious fundamentalists in Pakistan and internationally. 
The 18 November demonstration was the only one in Pakistan against Blair’s three-day visit.
Religious fundamentalists have maintained a criminal silence. They have not even issued a statement condemning his visit.
The demonstration generated a lot of press attention within Pakistan, making many front pages.
Farooq Tariq,
Lahore, Pakistan

Don’t Shop Til Workers Drop
A Bill to ban large department stores from opening on Christmas Day and New Year’s Day has caused quite a stir at Holyrood.
The measure was introduced by a Labour MSP and is supported by the shop workers’ union USDAW.
The Bill was examined in detail by the Justice 2 Committee at Holyrood, who took evidence from a wide range of interested parties.
While they were there, I asked the Edinburgh Woollen Mill, who are keen to open on New Year’s Day because they see huge potential for tourist sales, what view they felt overseas visitors would take of a company that paid its workers - at MacKinnon Mills in Coatbridge, on strike now for ten weeks - just £3.29 per hour and refused to negotiate with them on a 12p pay claim.
From the evidence it became clear that shop workers are being coerced into working on these days by management keen to maximise profits. And indeed there are signs that if the big High Street chains open then car park attendants, traffic wardens, bus drivers, local government workers and others may also find they are called in to work.
The Justice 2 Committee decided to recommend the Bill to Parliament on the casting vote of the SSP. The Liberals, Tories and also, surprisingly, the SNP opposed it.
Labour is in a quandary over the Bill. Minister Hugh Henry refused to say whether the Scottish Executive will support the Bill. Will Labour’s links with big businesses, keen to maximise profits over all other considerations, swing their decision?
USDAW members are waiting to see whether it is only the SSP they can rely on in this Parliament.
Colin Fox, Edinburgh

Labour Leadership Challenge
Around 200 people attended meetings in Glasgow and Edinburgh at which John McDonnell spoke about his bid for the Labour Party leadership.
McDonnell emphasised that his leadership challenge was not just a matter of the policies on which he was standing, such as restoration of trade union rights, an end to privatisation, direct investment in council housing, and withdrawal from Iraq and Afghanistan.
His bid for Labour Party leadership was also a question of democracy - restoring the Labour Party’s mechanisms of democracy and accountability dismantled under Blair, and giving Labour Party members and affiliates a chance to vote on the future political direction of the Labour Party.
The unions affiliated to the Labour Party have a third of the votes in Labour’s electoral college, and will have to ballot their members in the event of a leadership contest.
While union leaders are already lining up behind Gordon Brown, the Left in the unions is backing McDonnell.
McDonnell has already won the support of the TGWU Broad Left, the Amicus Unity Gazette, and the CWU Broad Left. The RMT is also likely to back McDonnell. (The RMT is not affiliated to the Labour Party, but it does have a Parliamentary group.)
At this stage of McDonnell’s campaign, the crucial thing is ensuring that at least 44 Labour MPs agree to nominate him for Party leader. That represents just a handful of the Labour MPs who receive trade union support.
Last week’s meetings in Glasgow and Edinburgh agreed to set up a Scottish ‘John4Leader’ campaign. To contact the campaign, visit the national campaign’s website: john4leader.org.uk
Stan Crooke, Glasgow

Gie’s Peace
By Morag Balfour

100% International

I saw a great documentary last week called 100% English. It was an easy watch but raised some very interesting issues about identity.
I presume that those who volunteered did so because they believed themselves to be truly English, even down to their DNA.
My favourite participant was a pensioner called Carol. She wore a headscarf, Queen style, at all times. She lived in an ancient house she and her husband had been in the process of restoring for 37 years. She and her house, she proclaimed, were museum pieces. She couldn’t cope with any form of change.
It turns out she is not that English. She probably descends from the line of Genghis Khan. She was rather pleased by this news as she felt herself to be similar in temperament to the great GK.
Garry Bushell, the tabloid pretender to journalism, found out that, five generations back, there is a sub-Saharan African in his ancestry.
Next a fairly sleazy and generally distasteful man, claiming to be a stand-up comic, stated that people couldn’t be English unless they are white. Ian Wright can’t call himself English because the English aren’t black. A person must be able to trace ‘pure’ English parentage back at least 12 generations before being definitively English. He didn’t express it as well as this though.
In the end he had the widest global spread of DNA of anyone featured in the programme, and the least Northern European blood! He now believes than Ian Wright can be English too.
One really touching part of the documentary concerned a patriotic, soon-to-be soldier who wanted to restore England to her former glory. On finding out that his DNA was closest to that of the average inhabitant of the Ukraine he began to look at the globe in hands of the presenter.
A smile crept onto his face and he held the ‘world’, actually hugging it. The Ukraine had moved closer to him and all of a sudden he became an internationalist.
One woman was filmed at the ‘Ground Zero’ of the battle of Hastings. ‘Foreigners’ are unable to feel empathically for the population that was almost wiped out there, or so she claimed. The woman is a lawyer and is presently campaigning to have the indigenous English population recognised as an ethnic group.
She was let down somewhat by her mischievous DNA, when it came to light that rather than being English she was actually more closely related to the Romany Gypsy community. Her face betrayed her horror at this result.
Four days after discovering her ‘people’, she threatened the programme-makers with legal action claiming that the DNA results, and subsequent interpretation, were inaccurate.
DNA only gets you so far. We are more likely to be shaped by the experiences we have and the folk we come into contact with. If we are able to put down roots in a particular context we are quite likely to pick up and adopt some of the prevailing culture and beliefs.
For instance, when hurricane Katrina hit New Orleans I was appalled but not shocked that the city’s poorest were left to rot. Time spent in one of America’s poorest cities had taught me that much.
I felt connected in kinship to those who got left behind. For me, the anger was personal. The rest of the planet got a wee window then on how America behaves at home.
On a more frivolous note, another permanent consequence of my time spent in the USA is a love of Latin music - and I don’t mean the Gregorian chant variety.
Genetic roots are important but our relationships with each other have a much deeper impact on who we become.

—centre pages—

BLACK AND WHITE AND RED ALL OVER

Celebrating ten years of the Scottish Socialist Voice

When newspapers’ first editions are launched onto the stands, their chances of survival are on a par with those of newly hatched baby turtles.
Billion pound corporations swoop to swallow up smaller rivals, or set insurmountable obstacles in their path, so that they hardly ever get off and swimming.
In the cutthroat media world, publications are big, big business.
That the Scottish Socialist Voice has reached its tenth birthday this week is a remarkable achievement. This is the only weekly socialist newspaper printed and published in Scotland, the first of its kind in 50 years.
It’s taken gutsy determination and a whole load of hard work from everyone involved - the paper’s few staff, the many voluntary contributors who clatter on computer keyboards, donate photographs and cartoons, the team who help with distribution, and the small, dedicated army of sellers who punt the Voice on the streets in rain, snow and sunshine.
The Voice was first published by Scottish Militant Labour in November 1996. Those were the dark days of Tory rule, and this new beacon for socialism predicted a change of government in the next year.
“But we have no confidence in Tony Blair’s New Labour,” wrote then editor Alan McCombes. “Whatever the result of the coming general election, the battle for genuine socialism must be stepped up.”
Right enough, the government changed, in name at least, and we’re now living under Labour’s iron fist of bloody war and crushed civil rights.
Meanwhile, we hope we’ve stayed true to the Voice’s radical manifesto. In the first issue, we promised to cover the real issues of concern to real people, to report struggles for better conditions in workplaces and communities, to campaign against poverty, to expose corruption and denounce inequality, and to fight tirelessly for genuine democracy.
A vital component of democracy is a free media. And as the ownership of media in 21st century Scotland is concentrated in the hands of fewer and fewer big companies, as they buy up the competition, our news sources are increasingly tied to the interests of a small number of very, very rich men.
Even in cyberspace, where communication was supposed to run wild and free, ownership by huge corporations has allowed censorship to encroach as they protect their profits.
The Voice is published by the Scottish Socialist Party, and we wear our bias on our sleeve. Because we are not run for profit, because we don’t have to doff our caps to corporate advertisers, we are free to stand squarely on the side of the people.
From Scotland’s streets, and all over the world, we’ll let you know how people are fighting back - for better wages, against environmental degradation, for human rights.
We’re hammering out a bright red space in the bland media world. We give room to ideas when all around us, dumbing down is the order of the day.
Issue by issue, campaign by campaign, we raise the ideas of equality, peace and justice, of another, better way of organising our world which would see poverty, war and oppression wiped out.
You’re holding 12 wee pages of dynamite in your hands - put it to use and get involved.

n see page 4 to subscribe, or phone us with stories/campaign news on 0141 429 8200, email voice.reports@btconnect.com

To bring out a paper weekly, over ten years, on a shoestring budget speaks volumes for the commitment and talent of the journalists and team behind it. Many deadlines, much sweat. Glad it’s not me. Good luck for the next ten. Sorely needed.

Paul Laverty, screenwriter whose credits include My Name is Joe and The Wind that Shakes the Barley

One of the many reasons that Scottish Socialist Voice is such a success is that it speaks with a rich variety of tones.
Its combination of vivid reporting of grassroots struggles, spirited political debate and refreshing cultural comment is exemplary. Looking forward to close co-operation in the difficult but also hopeful times ahead!

Hilary Wainwright, Co-editor, Red Pepper
www.redpepper.org.uk

The Voice stands unequivocally on the side of trade unionists and has always reported supportively on the struggles we have faced. I know if PCS members are in dispute the Voice can be relied upon to tell the truth.
Outside of my own union I can also rely on it for accurate reports of struggles in the trade union movement.
The Voice is an outstanding newspaper. I am sure it will go from strength to strength, and become our main weapon as we build the SSP into a mass socialist party which will transform the lives of working people in the years ahead.

trade unionist Gerry McMahon

Your Voice on the Streets

While we have hundreds of subscribers to the Voice, who by paying in advance for the paper to be posted out, provide the rock of funding which keeps the paper going every week, most Voice readers get hold of their copy from an SSP stall.
You’ll see the bands of weather-beaten SSP members, with papers, leaflets and petitions, on town centre streets, at community post offices, and outside shopping centres - outside because privately owned shopping centres tend not to let our intrepid campaigners darken the doorsteps of their temples to consumerism.
Campaigning on free school meals, handing out free fruit at the Paisley High St stall, Renfrewshire SSP branch secretary and currently candidate in the local Elderslie by-election, Gerry McCartney, explained the importance of their regular stall:
“Although we stand in elections, it is the people who stand out in all weathers, week in week out, and engage with the public who bring the problems of real people to our branch and help us to formulate policy.
“We are not like other parties. We don’t just turn out at election time and expect people to support us because we wear the right label, and we don’t hide in between elections.
“We’re in the High Street every week thanks to Dougie and Geoff, who organise our stall.
Free school meals is only one of the issues which we know has massive support because of the feedback we get from our street activists.”

Ten Years of Cutting Edge Reporting

The Voice is a hard-working, campaigning newspaper, and is no slouch when it comes to breaking stories and scooping major interviews.
Back in 2001, when most journalists were abandoning the Middle East to the American bombers, we sent our then editor, Alan McCombes, to the frontline, where he sent reports from the Pakistan-Afghanistan border.
More recently, we have been privileged to receive reports from inside Iraq, via our Baghdad correspondent Isam Rashid, whose dispatches have included an interview with Haji Ali, the former Abu Ghraib inmate, famously photographed draped in a long hood, apparently wired up for torture, whose image became a symbol of the abuses at the heart of the American occupation.
Isam has also spoken to families blighted by Depleted Uranium poisoning and to workers and families trying to stay alive in the most dangerous nation on earth.
On the home front, we have supported workers in strife, from the firefighters fighting for 30k in 2003, to the nursery nurses struggling for regrading and a decent pay deal in 2004, to the Body Shop’s Soapworkers in Easterhouse to the Mackinnon Mills workers in Coatbridge, from the DWP to the BBC.
We have been on the picket-line and at the meetings, standing shoulder-to-shoulder with workers everywhere.
We have secured interviews with such thorns in the establishment’s side as Tony Benn, David Shayler, Craig Murray and Greg Palast, with writers Paul Laverty, Iain Banks and Edwin Morgan, actor Dougray Scott, comedian and campaigner Mark Thomas, and lesser-known but inspirational figures including two Iraqi women - fearless aid worker, Rana, and film-maker, Eman Khamas.
We have also given voice to those who usually don’t make the papers, people trying to get by on benefit, asylum-seekers persecuted here and abroad, social workers and the people whose lives were pulled together by their services, call centre workers, single parents, pensioners and young people.
Our centre pages have been a forum for fierce debate, on prostitution and the legalisation of drugs, and discussion, from the need to reclaim our connection with the land to the commodification of education.
And our front pages have served as a call to campaigners and a means of reaching out beyond the SSP, to those who condemn the war, who demand free school meals, the scrapping of prescription charges, public ownership of utilities and the privateers kicked out our hospitals and schools, a decent minimum wage, open borders and an end to detention and dawn raids, and a society built on hope and comradeship, not hostility and cynicism.
We give voice and people hear us.

Best wishes from LCR (France) to Scottish Socialist Voice.
For ten years now, we have watched with huge interest your efforts to unify the Scottish Left and build a socialist party able to give a political translation to the various movements of resistance against neo-liberalism. LCR support your fight for an independent socialist Scotland and appreciate your
contribution to the European Anti-capitalist Left network.
We hope that the Voice will gain more audience during the next months and that the SSP will have good results for Holyrood elections. Anti-capitalist and internationalist greetings

François Duval (LCR National Leadership)

—page eight—

Sheridan and Byrne abandon workers

by Davy Landels
SSP Parliamentary NUJ rep

Members of the National Union of Journalists, employed through the Scottish Parliament as caseworkers, researchers and personal assistants for the SSP group are now involved in an industrial dispute with Tommy Sheridan MSP and Rosemary Byrne MSP. The dispute has been caused because the two MSPs have ripped up a collective agreement with the workers, unilaterally breaking a contract agreed to in 2005.
This weekend the National Executive Council of the Union gave full backing to the workers involved in the dispute. Workers in the NUJ Chapel will now be asking for support from the wider labour and trade union movement. This dispute needs to be settled quickly before the eleven workers involved face the prospect of being issued with redundancy notices.
In 2005 the SSP Group and SSP Parliamentary Workers signed a collective agreement where individual workers would no longer be employed by individual MSPs. Money was taken from each of the MSP’s Allowances and deposited in a collective pool to pay workers’ wages. From that date, workers were employed under a joint contract of employment with all the MSPs.
Three months ago Tommy Sheridan MSP and Rosemary Byrne MSP resigned from the Scottish Socialist Party and the Parliamentary Group.  They then withdrew £24,000, previously deposited into the pooled resources of the Group. This was done with the connivance of the Scottish Parliament Corporate Body (SPCB) who had originally advised all parties in how to set up the contract in the first place.
By withdrawing this money from the pool Tommy Sheridan and Rosemary Byrne have breached their contract of employment with the workers. The shortfall means that there will not be enough funds to pay workers their wages for March and April 2007.  Effectively Sheridan and Byrne are forcing workers into redundancy. They have rejected offers to solve this dispute and come to an agreement that would mean the continued employment of all the workers involved. They have refused to replace the money from their allowances to pay workers they previously employed.
To comply with employment legislation, the SSP Group will be forced to issue redundancy notices within the next month. This will make eleven workers unemployed in February 2007. Two months before their contract would normally finish.
The contract was agreed after taking advice and direction from the SPCB. 
Therefore the Chapel recognise the main dispute is with Sheridan and Byrne who have broken their contract of employment with the workers. The Chapel also believe that the Scottish Parliament must recognise and take responsibility for their role in the process which has led to the current situation.
Although the remaining SSP MSPs who make up the group may be put in the intolerable situation of issuing redundancy notices, the NUJ members are in no doubt who has caused the situation. They are in no doubt who their dispute is with. They are in no doubt who can resolve the situation.
Rosemary Byrne and Tommy Sheridan must put aside petty political squabbles and honour their agreed contract with the workers. Workers are suffering as a consequence of their intransigence. It is ironic that the two MSPs boast about their support for trade unions and workers in struggle when they are riding roughshod over the pay and conditions of trade union members.
The NUJ Chapel in the Parliament would like to make it clear that this is not about the political differences the two MSPs have with the SSP. This is purely a trade dispute. It is about guaranteeing the pay and conditions of workers. It’s about ensuring collective agreements are honoured.This dispute needs the support of the wider movement. The NUJ Chapel have appealed to trade unionists and supporters to send messages of support. Send them to:

n nujspchapel@hotmail.co.uk

Davy Landels, 34 George Street Paisley, PA1 2JY

n Messages of protest should be sent to:

Tommy Sheridan MSP, Scottish Parliament, Edinburgh, EH99 1SP

tommy.sheridan.msp@scottish.parliament.uk

Rosemary Byrne MSP, Scottish Parliament, Edinburgh, EH99 1SP

rosemary.byrne.mspf@scottish.parliament.uk

George Reid MSP (Presiding Officer of the Scottish Parliament) Scottish Parliament, Edinburgh, EH99 1SP

ficers@scottish.parliament.uk

Bank Faces Protest for Farepak Compensation

by Colin Fox

Campaigners fighting for compensation for customers and agents swindled out of their savings by the Farepak collapse have organised a protest outside the headquarters of the Bank of Scotland on 11 December.
The collapse of the Christmas hamper and voucher trading company has meant 150,000 working families across Britain have lost at least £40million.
It has emerged that the company was cashing cheques sent to it 15 minutes before it went bust.
And it has also emerged that the big financial investors were warned off the doomed business up to a month before its collapse. I have contacted Farepak campaigner Suzy Hall at www.unfairpak.co.uk to condemn the swindlers and offer her the support of the SSP.
I have also asked the Scottish Executive to press the Dept of Trade and Industry to consider introducing a bond scheme similar to the ABTA one which protects holidaymakers.
Campaigners have demanded that the Halifax/Bank of Scotland fully reimburse Farepak customers. And they have good reason for this because, in the first place, the bank was responsible for the company’s collapse, by insisting that the £40million collected go to repay them, knowing full well the losses this would mean for savers. And secondly, because the HBOS after making ‘extreme’ profits last year of £8.5billion, have offered a paltry £2million to pacify the anger of the families affected.
Liquidators are said to be predicting a payout of just 4p in the £1.
The 11 December protest at the HBOS headquarters in Edinburgh was chosen as it was to have seen the Bank entertain its esteemed guests and favourite customers at a Christmas champagne reception.
All those affected by the Farepak collapse are encouraged to attend the protest. I will certainly be there.

Free School Meals Fight Goes On

by Colin Fox

Despite attempts to kill off our Bill to introduce free school meals for all pupils, the campaigning goes on.
Last week the Edinburgh South branch of the SSP held a public meeting on the issue in one of the biggest schemes in their constituency, ironically called the Inch.
Over the past three weeks SSP members in the area have been out in all weathers, leafleting, visiting community groups and  speaking to parents at both the local primary schools. They even managed to get important media coverage in the Edinburgh Evening News, The List and on Talk107fm.
It was heartening to hear reports of comments people have made to us, like: “Oh I got one of your excellent leaflets through my door. I totally agree with you.” Or “I saw your article about free school meals in the Evening News, quite right, it’s high time we were spending money on the things we need rather than the wars we don’t need.”
As a consequence of all the activity the branch has recruited five new members. We sold more than 60 papers in two weeks with our stall outside the local Morrisons supermarket. But more important than all that is the clear evidence that the SSP has re-established a great deal of our credibility and respect in this part of Edinburgh following the dispiriting events of the past few months. And it is also obvious that work has had a really positive effect on those branch members who got involved. We have all thoroughly enjoyed the work and found it fruitful and invigorating.
Three more public meetings are planned in and around Edinburgh in the next three weeks. If they are as successful as the Inch one, the SSP will be well on our way to recovering our past glories.

—page nine—

Cardiac Arrest down Gorgie Way

by Andy McPake

As far as jobs go, being a Premier League football player can hardly be the worst. You have fame and a fortune - especially if you play for the Old Firm - and you have respect that it not given to many professionals such as nurses or teachers. And it’s not like you ever have to deal with the same level of stress, after all you get paid for doing your hobby.
But try telling that to Steven Pressley and his embattled colleagues at Heart of Midlothian. In the space of a month they have seen their manager leave due to stress and now the shop steward himself - Pressley - has come under fire.
The latest controversy of Vladimir Romanov’s tenure at the club first came to the public eye on the 26 October when Pressley, alongside fellow Scotland international Paul Hartley, said that he felt that the effective running of the team had become “an impossible task”.
Despite the mild wording of Pressely’s statement it caused a great deal of controversy within the club.
What followed was a crackdown on all those who dare question the rule of club Tsar Vladimir Romanov. Pressley was dropped for the club’s trip to Falkirk. This came as the club captain alleged that players and staff loyal to Romanov at the club had been working to have him ousted as club captain. He was therefore dropped due to his failure to be “mentally fit for the game”.
I am sure that many reading this paper will feel an empathy with the Hearts players and staff that have been forced from work due to stress caused by the actions of an egotistical and manipulative individual.
The harassment of Pressley, who is not only the club captain but also the players’ Union shop steward, should concern all socialists, even smug Hibs fans like myself.
Voice readers will all feel that we have a right to speak up when things at our work are going wrong. Even if you are a Jambo.
Romanov is almost a caricature of a bad boss, hiring and firing whenever and whomever he likes, whilst having utter contempt for the people who buy his product.
Hearts fans must surely now turn on Mr Romanov. The clubs’ fans were instrumental in bringing down previous Chairman Chris ‘pie man’ Robinson and it beggars belief they can stomach a tyrant like Romanov.
The sooner they make it clear that his behaviour is not acceptable the better.

Nazis and National Borders

Standing on the Shoulders of Fascism: From Immigration Control to the Strong State by Steve Cohen. Published by Trentham Books.

by John Nicholson

“As soon as it became obvious that he (Jean Charles de Menezes) was himself not involved in terrorism, the Home Office suggested he had overstayed his leave in the UK - as though this somehow justified his being shot dead.”
In this collection of essays, new and old, Steve Cohen demonstrates that immigration controls are not so much standing on the shoulders as seeped in every fibre of their being with fascist overtones. And that they have always been so. Fascist upsurges have prefaced all legislative and practical controls of movement of people. Just as “...the Nazi extermination programme was preceded in time by the forced, brutal, mass deportation of Jews”.
Three questions emerge. Can anti-fascist and anti-immigration control movements ever join together? Is it possible to argue for ‘fair’ or even ‘benign’ controls? And, can the success of individual anti-deportation campaigns translate into opposition to all immigration controls? In reverse order, the author first suggests that it is only through self-organisation of the ‘undocumented’, in militant campaigns, that victory can be achieved.
This requires solidarity, not pity. Cohen states:
“The struggle against controls is only politically effective when it is threatening, when it involves masses of people in struggle, when it refuses to make any concessions to the ideology of immigration control, when it represents a danger to the state”.
Second, the notion of ‘just’ or ‘humane’ controls is a contradiction in terms, and in the view of the author, a system of law built historically on fascist activity could never be humane. Reminiscent of Thatcher’s election-winning slogan, ‘Labour Isn’t Working’, Home Secretary Charles Clarke was removed recently because his system of deportation of non-British prisoners ‘wasn’t working’.
But no one subject to immigration controls wants them to ‘work better’, when what this means is yet more, firmer, faster, and furious, unchallengeable removals. Including those ‘criminals’ who have been re-detained for crimes of fabricating documents simply because they wanted to work -aiming for legitimate work, paying taxes and national insurance, contributing to society - and the economy.
Indeed, the Immigration and Nationality Department employs 17,392 people - whose job in 2004 was to remove 56,920 other human beings. Not to mention the private contractors who manage removal centres and immigration ‘escort’ services.
The latest Home Secretary assured Parliament that he had over 400 full-time staff now coping with the ‘problem’ of 1000 ‘foreign’ people who had served their time but were going to be rounded up, detained again, and then deported.
This new triple punishment exceeds the objections of the Manifesto of the Campaign Against Double Punishment, of the early 1990s, usefully appended by the author.
Third, there is no choice.
There is no third way. Collusion with the machinery of immigration control stands shoulder-to-shoulder with collusion with the fascists.
Local authorities, voluntary services, even lawyers, all have to take sides. But the question of how - how anti-fascist and anti-immigration control movements can make effective common cause - is another story.
Still waiting, still needing to unfold - and be told.

Tuned In
with Keef Tomkinson

Saturday 25 November

Two-Lane Blacktop, Film4 12:55am
Musicians Dennis Wilson and James Taylor star as two drifters who challenge Warren Oates to a cross-country race in a film that could only have been made in the 1970s. Thoughtful and tender, it’s everything a road movie should be.

Sunday 26 November

Planet Earth: The Future, BBC4 10pm
A common theme of David Attenborough’s sensational Plant Earth series on BBC1 has been the impact that climate change is having on the animal life we take for granted. This spin-off series looks at how earth’s species will respond to their changing environment.
Hookers, Hustlers, Pimps and Their Johns, ITV4 11:05pm
Beeban Kidron’s documentary looks at the hidden and not so hidden sex industry of New York. As much of a marketplace as it is a sub-culture, prepare for your comfort zone to be tickled and spanked.

Monday 27 November

Monkeys, Rats and Me: Animal Testing, BBC2 9pm
No debate is more polarising than animal testing, and Oxford University’s decision to build a new testing centre brought the debate into the mainstream news. Adam Wishart examines the debate and what happens to the animals used in the process.
The Parallax View, BBC1 11:50pm
As America fell to pieces in the 1970s, a generation of filmmakers used cinema to expose the paranoia and cynicism swamping the nation. Uber-Liberal Warren Beatty plays a journalist investigating a mysterious corporation’s role in the assassination of prominent politicians.

Tuesday 28 November

638 Ways to Kill Castro, Channel4 10pm
Revolution is a lot like football and if Che Guevara was the dazzling playmaker of his generation then Fidel Castro has been a supreme anchorman, doggedly defending his revolution. This doc talks to those hired by the CIA to murder him. They all failed.

Wednesday 29 November

Evicted, BBC1 10.40pm
You have to hope this has some effect. A film looking at the traumatic impact of eviction on three young girls and their families. A home should be a right but for many it’s a distant dream.

—page ten—

international news

Flower Jobs Freshly Cut

by Malcolm McDonald

Last month Miami-based Dole Fresh Flowers announced the reduction of 900 jobs in Colombia and 2,600 in Ecuador, slashing at a stroke a third of its workforce in the two countries.
Of the two, the harder hit is undoubtedly Ecuador - Dole is pulling out its entire operation there, whereas some jobs will remain in Colombia. Local economies will be ravaged by the reality of the US firm’s decision. In Malchingui, a town 25 miles north of Quito, 300 workers, predominantly women, will be rendered jobless.
“This is the alarm bell,” said Ignacio Pérez, the head of Expoflores, a flower growers’ association with 180 members. “We were like Little Red Riding Hood, you know: The wolf is coming, the wolf is coming. Well, the wolf is here.”
Reaction was swift. Outside Dole’s Miami headquarters, protesters from South Florida Jobs With Justice demanded a reversal of the company’s decision to withdraw from Ecuador. Meanwhile a leading union activist asked whether it was REALLY a coincidence that Splendor, the farm taking the biggest Colombian hit, just happened to be at the centre of a bitter row over unionising?
Dole handed stunned employees a letter from the Miami HQ citing the reasons for the lay-offs as increased competition from China, Africa and Asia.
The nexus of the story, however, lies way north of Miami, in Washington DC: 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue to be exact.
People at the White House have an abiding economic interest in the Andean nations, as Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia and Colombia are termed. US-Colombia trade alone has rocketed to $15billion a year since 1990, mostly in flowers, clothing, alcoholic drinks and fresh produce.
All four countries have enjoyed the benefits of trade preferences with the US which have effectively eliminated profit-munching tariffs, thereby keeping the countries’ exporters competitive in the global market. These trade preferences, however, are about to run out.
To maintain a similar competitive playing field, each of the countries has been trying to negotiate free-trade agreements with the US. None have managed to clinch a deal, although Peru and Colombia are far nearer completion than Bolivia or Ecuador.
There’s a strong will in Washington to fix this situation. The object? Restore already frayed diplomatic relations AND poke Hugo Chavez in the eye while they’re at it. Or in White House-speak, according to US economist Gary Hufbauer, they “recognised that loss of trade benefits would unfairly punish Peru and Colombia, staunch allies in the drug war, and give the populists in Bolivia and Ecuador more reason to push back against the US.”
That’s a reference to Bolivian president Evo Morales who, although no sworn enemy to free trade, has used harsh words against the US.
So the Republicans are very keen to push for an extension to trade preferences for all four Andean nations by passing a bill through Congress during the “lame duck” session - the period between the midterm Democrat success (November) and January, when the new Congress takes the pledge. During this period, the Republicans hold sway, and intend to shove the extension through under some arcane and obscure law which no-one knew existed.
There’s a problem for Ecuador, though.
In May, Ecuador seized the assets of oil giant Occidental when the company sold off part of an Ecuador field without state approval, thereby violating their agreement. Needless to say, Occidental were none too happy with this, and the situation has been handed to an international arbitration committee to decide who gets what.
Grant of an extension to Ecuador may well depend on whether its new president agrees to abide by the decision of that committee, which could mean devastating penalties to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars.
Ecuador should have a new president soon after the run-off elections later this month. In the blue corner, banana tycoon and free trade candidate Alvaro Noboa.
In the red corner, anti-free trade candidate Rafael Correa, a US-trained economist and friend to Hugo Chavez.
It’s clear which candidate sits at the top of the White House wish list, but the Ecuadorean public don’t see it as such a one-horse race. In the latest poll, Correa is virtually neck-and-neck with Noboa.
Should Correa defy US will and succeed to the presidency, two questions arise:
One - How long will it take the US to economically decimate Ecuador?
Two - How long will he live?

Torture Charge for Rumsfeld

Now that he has resigned, Donald Rumsfeld may finally face prosecution for war crimes, specifically those of authorising interrogation techniques that amounted to torture in Iraq, Afghanistan and Guantanamo Bay.
The case against Rumsfeld, and a slew of other high-ranking US officials and legal advisers, is being brought by a number of agencies, including the New York-based Centre for Constitutional Rights, the International Federation of Human Rights and the Republican Attorneys Association, on behalf of 12 victims of torture, 11 from Abu Ghraib and one from Guantanamo Bay.
They have requested that the German Federal Prosecutor now open an investigation, leading to a criminal prosecution, into the responsibility of senior US officials, from the Defense Secretary down, for authorising such atrocities against human beings as 50 days of sleep deprivation, 20 hour interrogations, food and water deprivation, being stripped naked and threatened with dogs, and sexual and religious humiliation, in the context of the widely discredited War on Terror.
These interrogation ‘techniques’, as they are so clinically called, are in direct contravention of the 1949 Geneva Conventions, the 1984 Convention Against Torture and the 1977 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, to all three of which the US is a party.
The lawyers who provided the legal advice which facilitated these acts of torture and further, sought to immunise those responsible for it from prosecution, are also in the frame, including former Chief White House Counsel and now US Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez.
There is no way they could not have known that their ‘advice’ would result in torture being actioned. Thus they are equally as culpable as those who physically carried out these horrendous, dehumanising acts, if not actually more so, given that they were in a much more powerful position to say no.
Under international humanitarian and customary law, and as re-stated in German law, these acts constitute war crimes and can be prosecuted as such.
The case is being brought under the Code of Crimes Against International Law, which Germany enacted in compliance with the Rome Statute that created the International Criminal Court (ICC) in 2002, which allows ‘universal jurisdiction’ for war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity, no matter where the crimes were committed, or the nationalities of those who committed them.
It had to be done this way as the US has been extremely diligent in ensuring all its seniors are immune from prosecution, both in Iraq and at home. The Military Commissions Act 2006 took it one step further by narrowing the grounds of liability under the War Crimes Act, and backdating this to 1997.
The US, needless to say, has not signed up to the ICC.
A previous war crimes case was dismissed in 2005. This one is different because Rumsfeld has now resigned, which means he can no longer claim sovereign immunity from prosecution. Furthermore, the Military Commissions Act 2006 reveals America’s hand, in that it is clearly resistant to any idea of bringing those responsible to justice.
Plus, there is much more evidence this time, new testimonies and documents, including the shocking August 2002 ‘Torture Memo’ in which Rumsfeld authorises interrogators to strip prisoners naked and threaten them with dogs.
On top of which, US Brigadier General Janis Kaplinski, a defendant previously, is now a witness for the prosecution.
Another ground for optimism is that, in 2005, a US investigation was ongoing into these allegations, so the other case was shelved. That has since proved to be worthless, as only the lowest ranks were in line for prosecution, so the new one may finally get underway.

n www.ccr-ny.org

—page eleven—

international news

US media becomes right-wing mouthpiece for the keep the troops in Iraq campaign

by Ken Ferguson

In the wake of midterm elections, powerful American media institutions are feverishly spinning against a pullout of US troops.
Under the headline “Get Out of Iraq Now? Not So Fast, Experts Say”, the 15 November front page of the New York Times featured a “Military Analysis” by Michael Gordon.
The article reported that - while some congressional Democrats are saying withdrawal of US troops “should begin within four to six months” - “this argument is being challenged by a number of military officers, experts and former generals, including some who have been among the most vehement critics of the Bush administration’s Iraq policies.”
A few hours earlier Gordon appeared on a CNN show as a pundit and declared that withdrawal is “simply not realistic”.
Sounding much like a Pentagon spokesman, Gordon went on to state in no uncertain terms that he opposes a pullout.
Normally if a New York Times military-affairs reporter went on television to advocate for withdrawal of US troops as unequivocally as Gordon advocated against any such withdrawal on CNN, they would quickly be reprimanded - and probably would be taken off the story.
But the paper is cheerleader for the views of the country’s national security state.
Current media coverage of US policy in Iraq seems to be little more than a remake of how mainstream news outlets portrayed Washington’s options during the Vietnam War.
Routine deference to conventional wisdom has turned many prominent journalists into co-producers of a Groundhog Day sequel that insists the US war effort must go on.
Whether in 1968 or 2006, most of the Washington press corps has been at pains to portray withdrawal of US troops as impractical and unrealistic.
Contrary to myths about media coverage of the Vietnam War, the American press lagged way behind grassroots anti-war sentiment in seriously supporting a US pullout from Vietnam.
This lag time amounted to several years - and its bloody consequences meant the additional deaths of tens of thousands of Americans and perhaps 1million more Vietnamese people.
A survey carried out by the Boston Globe, in February 1968, found that out of 39 major daily newspapers in the United States, not one had editorialised for withdrawing American troops from Vietnam.
Today - despite the anti-war tilt of national opinion polls and the recent election - advocacy of a US pullout from Iraq seems almost as scarce among modern-day media elites.
Careful statements about benchmarks and getting tough with the Baghdad government, as with the Saigon government, are markers for a national media discourse that dodges instead of enlivens debate.
In Vietnam this was called ‘Vietnamisation’ of the killing and now we have ‘Iraqisation’.
The Democrats are likely to wilt before this media offensive and shelve any ideas of an early pullout.

Can the Germans come together?

by Felicity Garvie

I’ve just come back from my second visit to Germany in two weeks, firstly in Frankfurt at a G8 conference organised by Attac, and then in Rostock in former East Germany, at a European Anti-Capitalist Left meeting. The German left is currently in the process of a historical regroupment which will culminate next year in the merger of the Left Party. PDS from the East and WASG, a new electoral formation mainly based in the West, so it was interesting to discuss with activists in both East and West Germany.

Privatisation
For the biggest left regroupment in German post war history, it’s going to be a rough ride! With a grand coalition of SPD (Social Democrats) and CDU (Conservatives) in power under Premier Angela Merkel for the past year, the privatisation bandwagon is rolling big time across Germany. The SPD in Berlin is planning to sell off its council housing and the state-owned railways are to be privatised in 2009. There are big workers’ struggles going on with a several weeks-long strike at a big hospital in Berlin against job cuts/downgrading whilst the Volkswagen workers have had their working week extended by 7 hours with no extra pay. The pension age has been raised to 67, tuition fees for students have been introduced in some universities and the German army is increasingly being used in foreign conflicts.
Against this background the disparate sections of the left in East and West are trying to reach agreement on policy and constitutional matters in time for the merger. There are no less than six groupings within the “new left”, ranging from the so-called Reformist Left which includes the PDS, the successor of the pre-1989 state party in East Germany; through the Anti-capitalist Left (main supporter: Attac), the Left Opposition network (CWI and 4th International) to the Socialist Left, supported by the SWP. Added to this there is the East-West dimension which means the two big organisations, PDS and WASG don’t trust each other for historical reasons. Both are dominated by an entrenched hierarchy, the former of career politicians and the latter of - the same, e.g. Oskar Lafontaine, who used to be a minister in a previous SPD government, along with some former trade unionists who have rejected the SPD in the West. Together, they won 54 MPs at the general election last year which was an amazing feat for the new left.
There is little doubt, however, that the merger will go ahead, but the question is at what price? The WASG, which was a social and trade union-dominated movement that erupted out of disillusionment with the SPD’s neo-liberal policies, is losing its youth and rank and file activists who are disappointed at the bureaucratic direction in which it’s going. In the former East, radicalised youth and workers are not likely to join PDS - PDS actually lost half their vote in the Berlin regional elections in September. Things are further complicated by the fact that in Berlin, the WASG members are refusing to join PDS because they were in a coalition of cuts in jobs and services with the SPD. After the elections both parties are renegotiating and PDS has said it will not agree to any more privatisation of services or the introduction of tuition fees. It remains to be seen whether they will stick to this in practise.

G8
The new Left Party is therefore likely to be top-heavy with little input from ordinary members and bogged down in policy discussions from the start. WASG started out as a fresh, campaigning force but there may not be much appetite left for this. However, with a large mobilisation for the G8 summit next year and big industrial battles looming on the horizon due to the speeded-up neoliberal agenda nationally, it is to be hoped that new forces will refresh it once more and transform it into a broad, fighting, class-based party.

—page twelve—

RESISTING THE RACISTS

SCOTLAND’S SIKH COMMUNITY STANDS UP FOR ITSELF…AND ALL OF US

by Catriona Grant

Sunday 19 November was a bitterly cold day, but not bitterly cold enough to deter 300 Sikhs from the local temple down by the Shore and from far away places like Glasgow and Leeds, as well as a sizeable contingent of non-Sikhs, to converge on Pilrig Park, Leith, to protest against the recent racist assault on a 15 year old Sikh male, whose hair was cut off by his attackers.
Uncut hair is a mark of Sikh identity - Sri Guru Gobind Sigh Ji instructed all Sikhs to come before him with uncut hair.
Thus, Sikhs believe that uncut hair unites them with God and gives them a spiritual energy.

Identity
Cutting this young man’s hair was not just an attack on him as a person but also on his Sikh identity and religion.
The attackers have not been caught.
Despite the freezing conditions, the event was very colourful. 
A vivid and noisy demonstration of mostly Sikh men, but including young Sikh women, entered the park chanting “Our Wond’rous Lord is Great” and waving Saltires with slogans emblazed on them, such as “Proud to be a Scottish Sikh” and “Sikhs serving Scottish communities”.
Tartan turbans were sported by a few of the men too.
The rally, though borne of a serious issue, was an uplifting affair.
The children of the Edinburgh temple sang morning prayers in Punjabi and English and a Roti band from Glasgow sang and played music. 

Protection
There was a prayer for protection read from the scriptures, and speeches from the Sikh community, the inter-faith groups of Edinburgh and Scotland.
Local MP and MSP respectively, Mark Lazarowitz and Malcolm Chisholm, also addressed the crowd.
One British Sikh leader blamed the racist and religious assault on the “attack on multi-culturalism which is leading to hate of distinct communities”.
The Sikh leader from Edinburgh stated that Sikhs had a special relationship with Scotland going back to the Scottish Regiments in the Punjab and the Sikh traders who never ignored even the smallest and remotest Scottish village when selling their wares. 
The Sikh community is a distinct religious community but very much part of Edinburgh and Scotland.

Scottish
They identify themselves as Scottish Sikhs and were upset and horrified that such a horrible attack should happen to one of their young men.
In Pilrig Park, they proudly showed off their religion and faith. 
Leaflets explaining why Sikhs believe cutting the hair is a horrific attack on the person, and an attack on their God and their religion, were given out to the non-Sikhs in attendance.
As the night drew in, a cold wind sent the flames of the candles guttering, and it became clear it was time for us all to go home.
This attack will be remembered by Scottish Sikhs for a long time to come, and will not be tolerated in the community in which they have lived for decades.
Sikhs are very much part of the fabric of Leith, Edinburgh and Scotland and we must unite with them for a Scotland where distinct communities are welcomed as an integral part of who and what we are.

A nation built on immigration

The right-wing press is in a frenzy over the 45,000 Bulgarians and Romanians who, once they become members of the EU, intend to ‘flood’ into the