Scottish Socialist Voice
Issue 301
22nd March 2007

back to index


—front page—

Bombs away!
For a Nuclear-free Scotland

Do you like bombs? We don’t.
We think they’re a bit dangerous and that it’s really a bit irresponsible and not at all nice of Tony Blair to force wee Jack McConnell, who doesn’t know any better frankly, to agree to have 48 of them here in Scotland.
And at a cost of £76billion too.
That’s all Jack’s dinner money from here to eternity, assuming we’re not blown to eternity, that is.
Talking of dinner money, it seems a bit off that, in the week that Scottish MSPs refused to vote through a proposal to provide free, nutritious school meals for all state school children in Scotland, at a cost of less than £100million, the big lads in London were voting through the proposal to replace Trident, for the aforementioned £76billion, when the old one goes to the knackers in 2020.
We can’t expect Jack to do much about it.
He’s only doing what he’s telt and he’d really quite like it if we’d do what he’s telt too - that is, stop shouting and roaring about independence and get on with our work, at call centres and suchlike, for the minimum wage minus transport costs.
Indeed, if we don’t do what we’re told, all sorts of terrible things might happen, like border guards patrolling the Tweed to stop us from visiting our aunties in Berwick!
But we suspect this comes from the ‘the ice-cream van only chimes when it’s run out of ice-cream’ school of reasoning.
We know better, even if wee Jack doesn’t.
If we gain independence, we’d be the ones deciding whether the Tweed has manned checkpoints or not.
And whether four monstrous nuclear submarines continue to berth in the Clyde - or get sent home to meet their makers.
We in the SSP are fully aware that independence doesn’t automatically mean a socialist republic complete with neighbourhood participatory budgets and free and fully integrated public transport.
If it was, it seems a tad unlikely that multi-millionaire and celebrity homophobe Brian Souter would be donating one gzillionth of his phantasmagoric fortune to the SNP.
Not that the SNP are exactly full-blooded in their call for a referendum; they seem intent only on proving how ‘grown up’ they are, through dressing up in smart suits and talking about business a lot.
But independence will give us greater control over our destiny - over taxation, foreign policy, defence, you name it.
We could say “bombs away!” and away they’d go, leaving us lots of lovely money to fritter away on hospitals, schools, housing and buses.
And they call us irresponsible?!

back to index

—page two—

MSPs deny kids free meals

Last Wednesday, MSPs voted overwhelmingly to ban junk food from schools and introduce basic nutritional standards.
However, they failed to endorse the policy of universal, free provision of nutritious school lunches, even though all the available evidence shows that this is what it takes to maximise and maintain uptake.
It has worked in Finland for 30 years, turning the sick man of northern Europe, riddled with diet-related heart disease and cancers, into a lean and fit nation.
And it worked in Hull too, where the council introduced the policy to combat the city’s dismal health record, and saw uptake shoot up to the high 90s, most notably in the poorest schools, by the very children the policy was designed to reach.
But oh no, the clots that brought us the Healthy Eating Helpline knew better, and kicked the SSP amendment, spoken to passionately and persuasively by Frances Curran MSP, into touch.
Clearly, the Labour faithful had made up their minds before they even entered the chamber - which they did, pretty much, only just in time to vote. On that day, politicians could dine at the subsidised Sodexho parliament canteen on such appetising and wholesome fare as vegetable, bean and chickpea balti with boiled rice, and grilled gammon steak with a ginger and peach chutney. There was also a deli special, today’s chef’s salad, soup of the day and a three-way choice on desserts too.
In a parallel universe - that is, a Scottish state-run school - students had a rather smaller choice: macaroni cheese or...a cheeseburger.
This stark societal divide serves as an appropriate backdrop to a new report by the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR), which warns that the number of disabled children in the UK is set to double by 2029, from 700,000 to 1.25million.
Why? Because of poverty, poor diet, obesity and increases in the pre-term survival rate.
The IPPR recognises a ‘two-way relationship’ between poverty and disability, in that one causes the other causes the other. Disability, in our society, too often means poor health, poverty, social exclusion and narrow life chances.
Such a shocking escalation in health problems cannot be addressed through piecemeal policy tweaks, banning the odd cola machine and putting up posters about apples.
We need a major public health intervention, such as the introduction of free, nutritious school meals, to give our young people a fighting chance in life.
Banning junk food from school canteens is well and good but it barely scratches the surface and Scotland’s mainstream politicians deserve no pats on the back.

Hopeless on homelessness

by Keith Baldassara

The Scottish Executive, and the families who find themselves homeless, are reaping the whirlwind of a failed housing policy that has seen housing haemorrhage from the public sector through right-to-buy and demolition, without being replaced in anything like adequate numbers.
Now the Executive says that, by 2012, all those who present themselves as homeless will get equal status, replacing the Priority Status referral system.
If this policy were in place today, it would pitch local authorities into serious crisis as current resources are simply inadequate. This is directly attributable to the lack of affordable public sector housing.
Those who find themselves homeless are predominately from broken homes, fleeing violence or repossession, or facing eviction from private sector accommodation because benefits cannot meet the asking rent.
On top of the lack of public sector housing is a lack of house types suitable for families. In Glasgow, for instance, there is a chronic shortage in some neighbourhoods of homes for large families.
There is also the problem of location. Families, particularly those fleeing violence, need accommodation in a neighbourhood where they feel safe. Shockingly, this isn’t always available. Other issues include the upwardly spiralling rents in the private sector, which are not covered by housing benefit, and a lack of disabled access.
In 2005/06, some 57,000 applications for re-housing were received by local authorities in Scotland. Of these, 30,000 were identified as being in priority need. If everyone was identified as such, the system would bottleneck.
The Executive claims that, in 2007/08, they will invest £1.2billion in public sector housing.
But in fact, only a quarter of this - £386.8million - will be spent on new-build public sector housing, providing only a fraction of what is so desperately required.
We must build more public sector homes by at least ten thousand per year.
If not, there is no hope of getting families into decent homes and out of B&B and temporary accommodation by 2012.
If we continue to lose public sector homes at the rate of 12,000 a year through right-to-buy, we could actually end up with a housing deficit!
In the 21st century, in one of the biggest economies in Europe, this is shameful.

Labour councillors in nice little earner

With a month to go before the Holyrood elections, we already have a couple of winners to announce, in the shape of George Black and Tom Aitchison.
Neither are parliamentary candidates - Black is the Chief Executive of Glasgow Council and Aitchison is his Edinburgh counterpart.
But they’re winners in the financial stakes, as Black is being paid over £28,000, and Aitchison over £20,000, for one night’s work on 3 May.
They are both Returning Officers for their respective cities - that means they read out the results - and that’s not a bad wadge of cash for announcing a few names, I’m sure you’ll agree.
Black’s not the only one doing no’ bad out of the election - 24 Labour councillors are receiving £420,000 in severance payments in Glasgow just for not standing.
Good to see how Labour-run councils spend all that money they save through decimating local services.
They won’t let their pals go short. You can trust Labour on that.

back to index

—page three—

news

Reforms defy doctors’ orders

by Jo Harvie

Highlighting their fear that their profession is being thrown into chaos, hundreds of young doctors, their families and supporters rallied in Glasgow on Saturday, while thousands more marched in London.
They say reforms under the Modernising Medical Careers (MMC) programme are cutting jobs, jeopardising the quality of patient care and placing medics in the impossible situation of having to choose between their career and their family.
MMC changes how training grade doctors get work, which will see them specialising earlier in their careers and, with Scotland designated as one region, will have doctors sent to work in any part of the country with little choice other than to leave their profession if moving from Dingwall to Dumfries doesn’t suit.
MMC has been created by the Department of Health in Westminster, and doesn’t fall under the control of the Scottish Parliament, which is supposed to be responsible for health in Scotland.
Kevin Cormack, of grassroots doctors’ campaigning organisation Remedy UK called the computerised applications system “a Kafkaesque nightmare”, followed by interviews designed by “politicians and psychologists” rather than those best placed to recruit - medics themselves.
“Patient care is suffering,” he said.
“Doctors are stressed and taking time off.”
An estimated 8-12,000 training grade doctors in the UK will be left without jobs at the end of this year’s applications process.
Dr Hamish McKay, an anaesthetics SHO at Stobhill hospital, told the Voice that was in part a by-product of changes to the way consultants will work in the future. Those changes in themselves, he believes, are not a bad thing:
“But they’re trying to introduce it far too quickly, and the disparity is going to show up when all the junior doctors disappear. This is poorly thought out and rushed through to suit a political agenda.”
A statement from SSP MSP Carolyn Leckie was read out to applause at the rally. In it, the former NHS worker leant her support to Remedy UK “in its demand for an independent review into the failures of the new Medical Training Application Service.”
The statement continued:
“This is another example of NHS cuts being dressed up as ‘reforms’ and we’re now in the situation of 30,000 junior doctors across Britain going after 22,000 jobs.”
And those who get jobs don’t know where they may end up: “This fiasco may result in doctors leaving medicine or emigrating.”
Dr Silva recently got a registrar post at a GP practice in Glasgow, which means she has narrowly missed out on the chaos directly affecting training grade doctors. But as she’s expecting a baby with her husband, who is going through MMC, she thus faces having to up sticks to wherever he is sent for work.
“It has to be more flexible,” she told the Voice. “They seem not to have noticed that Scotland is massive.”
She also feels that early specialisation will curb doctors’ general experience. “It’s not going to be as broad, and that’s got to hurt patient care.”
Equality issues are also causing concern.
With women now in a slight majority amongst newly qualified doctors, a profession long since dominated by men, MMC’s complete lack of flexibility in approach could hurt women, who are least likely to be able to move for family reasons, hardest.
The most impassioned speech on Saturday’s rally came from Sheila Cormack, whose partner Kevin had opened the rally.
“Family is being put last,” she said. “Trainee doctors already have to sacrifice lots of their family life and their free time for medicine.
“Now, we have no idea where we’re going to be in August. [If he gets] a year long post, then we have to move again. If you say, ‘Sorry, no, I can’t take that job’, then you’re out of work for a year.
“Doctors are having to choose between the career they’ve been training hard for, or their families, and it’s an impossible to choice to ask them to make.”

A tale of two Perthshires

by Richie Venton

It was a weekend of strange but revealing contrasts.
As I left the lashing rain of Glasgow for the sun-drenched hills of Perth, Alex Salmond was back in Glasgow clutching a cheque for £500,000 from Perth-born Brian Souter.
Yep, the man who made a fortune out of bus de-regulation, rail privatisation, and cut-throat business practices.
The purpose of my journey was to speak at the Perth branch of the Rail, Maritime and Transport workers’ (RMT) union, which is affiliated to the SSP, seeking modest funds for a party of modest means but big ambitions for social change.
The RMT membership straddles rail, bus, ferry and maritime occupations. They have members on the buses where Souter’s Stagecoach is the UK’s second biggest transport company.
Stagecoach has cornered 16 per cent of the UK market.
On the railways it has 11 per cent of the market, plus a further 14 per cent through their 49 per cent ownership of Virgin Trains.
In the past, Souter’s Stagecoach has threatened use of scabs against striking bus drivers.
In carving out their market shares they are notorious for temporarily undercutting rivals, then jacking up fares after driving other companies to the wall.
In Darlington, Souter’s outfit tried to buy the local authority-owned bus company, failed, and then conquered the market by running free bus services over the same routes for a time!
The Monopolies and Mergers Commission described Souter’s actions as “Predatory, deplorable and against the public interest.”
Following an introduction to the SSP’s policy for free publicly-owned transport with the Perth RMT, a rich, well-informed, healthy debate amongst these railworkers ensued.
These workers included signallers who have just been forced to strike to enforce an agreement signed by Network Rail bosses last June, after negotiations that began in 2001!
They were extremely appreciative of the role the SSP played in supporting their successful strike - whilst they faced condemnation from Labour, and yes, you’ve guessed it, the Souter National Party.
The RMT meeting included maintenance workers who got a bonus last year of just £1000 for working in the pissing rain in the middle of the night, whilst Network Rail bosses got bonuses of 50 times that.
Also present was a station worker who was seeking the union’s help in fighting a boss who tried to impose a roster whereby he has to work literally every Sunday of the year!
A world away from the lives and interests of the Souters of Perth.
Though I warned them that we couldn’t offer peerages in kind, the branch decided unanimously to give a hefty proportion of their funds to the SSP’s election appeal, to help distribute SSP election bulletins, and to hold a joint RMT/SSP public meeting in Perth to promote our candidates.
And two more branch activists signed up as individual members of the SSP.
Give me that any day of the week, compared to the SNP’s friends and fortunes.

Save Meadowbank!

by Linda Sommerville

The Save Meadowbank Campaign drew over 600 protesters to a public meeting last Saturday to hear Councillor Donald Anderson say the decision to demolish Meadowbank was ‘still open’ to debate.
Previously Edinburgh council had insisted the public consultation was confined to plans for after demolition. Public pressure forced them to extend the consultation period to allow further public comment.
The Stadium was home to the Commonwealth Games of 1970 and 1986 and is still used as a training ground for athletes and as a local sports centre for users from Edinburgh and East Lothian.
The Council plans to build houses on the Meadowbank site, and a small community sports facility.
New sports facilities will be built at Sighthill using the money raised from the sale, but this is miles out of many people’s reach.
Plus, the ear-marked area in Sighthill currently hosts football pitches and is one of the only green spaces left in the west of the city. The money will also be used to refurbish the Royal Commonwealth Pool in time for Glasgow’s 2014 bid for the Commonwealth Games.
The funding package has been imposed by the unelected quango Sportscotland.
Colin Fox MSP demanded investment in our sports facilities, saying, “Don’t let them tell you there is no money around to refurbish Meadowbank when there is £20billion for Trident.”
Meadowbank currently offers a huge array of sports and leisure activities to young people, as well as a youth club. One young boy challenged the councillors, asking them:
“Where will I go - ’cos I don’t have anywhere to go?”
The campaign’s petition has over 5000 signatures, including The Proclaimers, and will be handed into the council after a march from Meadowbank to the City Chambers on 30 March at 5pm.

http://www.savemeadowbank.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/

back to index

—page four—

Filling in the facts on Fluoride

The toxic by-product of heavy industry that ends up in our mouths

by Roz Paterson

Andy Kerr, the minister so clueless about health he thinks PFI is good for us, has raised the ugly spectre of fluoridation of Scotland’s water supply once again, in an interview with the little-read Holyrood magazine.
Pumping a chemical - in fact, a by-product of heavy industry which is so toxic you have to pay a lot of money to dispose of it - into our water supply, so we have to drink it whether we like it or not, is necessary to tackle Scotland’s horrendous dental problems, apparently.
The problem is, of course, that filling us up with fluoride is a serious infringement of our civil liberties, especially as Kerr is doubtless less than keen on opening the matter up to serious democratic debate.
In this country, human health is seen as the prerogative of elite professionals, and ordinary folk are expected to do as they’re told.
And if that gets right under your skin, then read on...
Fluoridation of the water supply, which runs to over 60 per cent of the public water supply in the US, has been linked, in extensive and concurring studies, with lower IQ in children, bone cancer, osteoporosis, thyroid problems, Alzheimer’s and other dementias, and a whole ream of nasty allergic reactions, from headaches to gastroenteritis to abscesses and sores.
Dr William Marcus, formerly the chief toxicologist at the Environmental Protection Agency in the US, ran tests showing a link between fluoride ingestion and bone cancer development in rats.
Incidentally, Marcus was fired from his post at the EPA in 1991, for demanding an unbiased evaluation of fluoride’s cancer potential.
He won his case in court, however, when he was able to demonstrate that his dismissal was borne entirely of politics.
But what this story tells us is that the US administration is absolutely set against the idea of studies into the potentially detrimental effects of fluoride, perhaps because there are so many vested business interests in allowing this scam to continue, and because the lawsuits from damaged people could be bankrupting.
A 1999 study by Dr Hans Moolenburgh, found that 4 per cent of people using fluoridated water reported severe adverse reactions, including gastric and skin problems, cancers and neurological disorders.
Studies dating back to the 1950s find that women giving birth to Down’s Syndrome babies are younger in areas of fluoridated water.
The safe fluoride benchmark was established in the 1940s, at 1ppm - or 1mg per litre. But that was assuming that water was your only source. In fact, we ingest fluoride through toothpaste and products like mouthwashes, processed foods, soft drinks and even fresh produce, which can absorb fluoride from certain fertilisers.
The average American ingests 8mg of fluoride a day, which is way above recommended levels, and may go some way to explaining the escalating incidence of dental fluorosis - the mottling of teeth caused by excessive fluoride intake - and other conditions, such as hypothyroidism, which appears to be rampantly on the increase in the US.
As if adding an industrial pollutant to the water wasn’t bad enough, the form it takes may be even worse than at first appears.
Most fluoride is added as sodium fluoride. That’s not great, but it’s better than the cheaper chemical compounds which are sometimes used instead, such as silicofluoride, hydrofluosilicic acid and sodium silicofluoride.
A 1999 study, involving 280,000 children across Massachusetts, found significantly higher levels of lead in the blood where cheaper compounds were used.
The presence of aluminium in water is another hazard. Aluminium is used as a clarifying agent and is not readily absorbed by the body.
Add fluoride, however, and you get aluminium fluoride, which is readily absorbed, and which has been found to cause severe kidney damage and brain lesions similar to those found in sufferers of Alzheimer’s.
Rats force-fed this stuff developed short-term memory loss and other dementia symptoms.
While the American government may be happy with fluoridated water, American citizens increasingly are not.
Across the states, and more so as the years go by, cities and states are either refusing to sign up to fluoridation or reversing a previous decision and having the fluoride removed.
If you’re still worried about your teeth, chew on this: the most cited pro-fluoride overview is the York Report, 2000, which sifted through 214 studies on fluoridated water.
It came out, narrowly, in favour, but concluded that research to date was really too poor to make a decent judgement. And that’s the best one going.
Other research finds, for instance, that incidence of tooth decay is reducing in the US, but at the same rate as it is in the unfluoridated regions of Europe.
A better diet, with minimal refined sugar and plenty of calcium, and better access to affordable dentistry, including the reintroduction of school dentists, would surely be a better means of tackling our dismal dental record?
Andy Kerr may hope to sweep fluoridation in without anyone noticing, but SSP MSP Rosie Kane did notice, and lodged a motion on 13 March, noting the potential health hazards and that “not enough is known about the dangers of the cumulative effects of fluoride on the individual”.
Further noting that “the claimed benefits in relation to preventing tooth decay may be outweighed by the documented negative side-effects of water fluoridation”, she calls for parliament “to oppose any future legislation to introduce mass medication through Scotland’s water supply.”
Fluoridated water is a form of forced medication and will, if the mounting anti-fluoride data is even half-right, give us little to smile about.

back to index

—page five—

letters

Out on the election trail
As the election draws nearer I thought it might be a good idea to let folk know the type of feedback Frances, Carolyn, Colin and myself are getting on our travels. I have attended a couple of hustings already and have plenty more in the diary. The good news is that despite the difficulties the SSP have endured, through no fault of our own, we have been extremely well received. I represented the SSP at a hustings in the Women’s Library in Glasgow last week. Around 60 women attended the event. I put our policy and ideas forward in response to the questions asked and it went down very well.
At the end I got the chance to chat to many of the women and they were very supportive of the SSP. The Women’s Library is currently assisting women to register for the vote and even producing mock ballot papers and ballot boxes to help familiarise women with the process - many of those women will vote SSP.
I also attended a hustings organised by Holyrood magazine in Edinburgh on issues affecting young people, housing and communities. Again we were on top and very well received.
On Thursday of last week, Frances took to the top table in Edinburgh at a meeting organised by Energy Watch. It was great watching Frances tearing the mainstream parties to ribbons and winning the support of the audience.
Yes, we have a lot ahead of us as we enter into the election campaign - the tenement stairs, the biting dogs and the media attacks - but comrades, we are doing well. The SSP are well known and respected for all the right reasons, so let’s get into this campaign not only with comfy shoes and first aid kits (for those stairs, dogs and sharp letter boxes) but also with heads held high and principles intact.
Rosie Kane, Glasgow

Holyrude
Interesting, certainly! But extremely frustrating and bitterly disappointing in the way it operated.
That was my lasting impression of Scottish Parliamentary procedures after witnessing the debate last Wednesday morning on the Schools (Health Promotion and Nutrition) (Scotland) Bill. I must admit that I was appalled by the sheer rudeness of those MSPs who talked incessantly and wandered aimlessly round the chamber while the speeches were being delivered. 
Even more disconcerting, however, was the fact that many of them absented themselves from the chamber during these speeches, but returned, sheep-like, to record their pre-determined votes on the sound of the division bell. It was so obvious that minds had been made up well in advance that it was possible to predict with considerable accuracy, the number of votes cast on the various amendments. To vote against the amendment arguing the case for universal provision of free school meals in Scottish primary schools, without even bothering to listen to the spirited, passionate and very sincere speeches by Frances Curran and Rosemary Byrne was, in my opinion, the very negation of democracy.
As a local authority councillor of some 17 years, this sort of behaviour - and indeed the quality of many of the speeches - fell far short of anything I have seen and heard in the council chamber. It would indeed be a salutary lesson for some of the worst behaved members of the Scottish Parliament if they were to attend a full council meeting - if only to see how a debate should be conducted.
Of course the amendments put forward by the SSP and the SNP fell. A splendid opportunity to make a strong and positive move towards eliminating some of the worst aspects of poverty in both the rural and urban areas of Scotland had been lost - or at least postponed. 
The amendments, had they been successful, would inevitably have led to a significant improvement in the health of Scottish children and the illnesses associated with obesity in adults for generations to come. This would, in turn, have led to a significant improvement in both behaviour and academic performance of many children in the classroom.
So much for democracy! I know that there is a time and a place for the parliamentary whip to be exercised, but on an issue as fundamental as this for the health and well-being of the people of Scotland, surely a free vote would have been in order.
No doubt the debate will be re-run in a future Scottish Parliament. The growing support for universal free school meals will almost certainly ensure that this happens. The work of pressure groups such as the FSM Campaign Group has already wrung concessions from the Scottish Executive by extending the range of pupils entitled to free school meals and will no doubt continue to do so.
The speed, however, at which the ultimate goal can be attained will depend on the number of socialist and nationalist MSPs that are returned on May 3.   
Cllr Jim Towers (Aberdeenshire Council)
Cruden Bay, Aberdeenshire

Sexist society
Having recently served as a high court juror on a violent rape case, I think Louise Robertson’s campaign deserves full backing. (See Voice Mail, issue 300, ‘Supermarket swipe’.)
When the jury retired to consider our verdict I fully expected we would find the accused guilty, given the serious injuries the woman sustained and the accused admitting that at no time did he hear the woman say yes.
Unfortunately comments I heard from fellow jurors were “What did she expect”, “She is doing it for compensation money”, “The wounds were self-inflicted”, “She shouldn’t have accepted so many drinks from him”.
Surprisingly these comments came from women jurors. Unsurprisingly a caveman juror said, “She should be in the dock.”
The accused was found not guilty by a two thirds majority. I felt anger and despair but can only guess how the victim was feeling.
We socialists must not underestimate the mammoth task of convincing many men and many women that rape is always wrong and sexual equality is a good thing.
Roman Pankiw, Leith

SEEKING REFUGE
by Donnie Nicolson

Terror squad back in action

It had stopped for four months but last week it started again in earnest. Yes, the reviled Dawn Raids, which earn the government so much bad press, and cause terror among Scotland’s new citizens, are back with a bang.
Out of the blue, the Home Office Heroic Armoured Child Snatcher Squad aka the Dawn Raid Unit flew into action at 7am on Monday morning, crashing through the front door of a Congolese family in Cardonald, Glasgow. The father, mother and three children are now in Dungavel detention centre, waiting to be returned to the world’s worst war zone.
But why the extended purge on the Congo? Critics say that the Home Office is desperate to deport as many Congolese refugees as it can, because a landmark court ruling next month could potentially make citizens of the troubled African state “unremovable”, ie immune to deportation from the UK.
We were reminded this week of the tragic desperation of ‘failed asylum seekers’. The Nepalese man who set himself on fire in the Immigration court died in hospital. Uddhav Bhandari, a 40-year old father of two from Edinburgh, doused himself in petrol and ignited his own body with a match. Despite intense medical care, he died in Glasgow’s Royal Infirmary on Sunday.
Any suggestion that the Home Office are bad sports is being denied by John Reid, who’s on a mission to re-style himself as the Mr Nice Guy of New Labour.
Writing in this week’s Sunday Mail, Reid ‘hit back’ at columnist Elaine C Smith who dared to suggest that the Home Secretary’s now infamous ‘Alf Garnett’ outburst was a tad beyond the pale.
“I am not a racist,” says Reid. He backs up this outlandish statement by reminding readers that his grandmother and his wife were immigrants to the UK. Readers may justifiably complain that, while the Home Secretary himself may not be a cowl-wearing closet KKK sympathiser, the activities of his Home Office goons are racist and vindictive.
John Reid take note: we don’t care if you married a Brazilian woman. Your personal beliefs are not under scrutiny here; your political actions are.
John goes on to say “The action we are taking is not about targeting ‘foreigners’ as some have crudely accused me of”. This statement is incredible. Whom did he say, while on live TV, that the Home Office would be targeting? That’s right; “foreigners”!
Reid’s tub-thumping rant, which uses the phrase “cracking down” twice and talks of “tough action” three times, ends with this ominous sentiment: “In the past we have not been tough enough in enforcing the rules. This is changing and I won’t apologise for that.”
Not tough enough yet? Be very afraid.

Morag Balfour will return after the election

back to index

—centre pages—

Independent thinking

The Scottish Socialist Party is the only party going into the May election explicitly committed to a referendum on Scottish independence within one year - one of our six key pledges.
The SSP is striving to create an independent nuclear-free, multicultural, Scottish socialist republic.
That is a long term goal. In the short term, we can take a mighty leap forward towards that goal by breaking free of the suffocating stranglehold of the British state.
The SSP has never hidden its socialist politics. We are a working class party that stands up for ordinary people against big business and the rich. Our flag is deepest red.
But we work with other parties on the immediate objective of independence.
The SSP was the first party in Scotland to sign up to the cross-party Independence Convention, which now draws together the SSP, the SNP, the Greens and a range of individuals.
We also back the non-party Independence First campaign, launched in 2005 to fight for an independence referendum.
In 300 years the people of Scotland have never been given the chance to decide our own future. We are 100 per cent confident that when the arguments are presented for and against independence, the people of Scotland will decide to break with the past and march confidently forward into the future.
Whatever the balance of forces after May 2007, the SSP will build cross-party support for a referendum bill within one year.
The Act of Union was a travesty from the moment it was signed - a stitch-up between the ruling classes of two nations, designed to further their own agenda and to hell with the people.
The intervening 300 years have witnessed no significant redress of this democratic deficit. Scotland remains the short-changed northern neighbour: a dumping ground for nuclear missiles yet with no say in defence policy; an underpopulated nation yet with no say over immigration.
Scottish troops are still used as the British state’s cannon fodder.
Scottish culture and history are still largely suppressed in our schools.
Scottish votes and voices continue to be drowned out, unheard.
The United Kingdom, this nominally multi-national creation, was, and remains, nothing less than an Anglo-centric, centralist state with all political power vested in the Crown and Westminster.
There is no doubting that many Scots on the make have benefited from the Union. Indeed, one such is poised to become Prime Minister. But the people, the ordinary, working peopl e of Scotland, have gained nothing from the Union and lost much.
The SSP has been at the forefront of the call for independence, as a major democratic advance, a means by which, at last, we can decide who, if at all, we go to war with, how we treat our workers, how we run our welfare state and organise our energy resources.
The SSP believes that independence is an idea whose time is coming and that the 2007 elections will see a further surge in support for pro-independence parties.
The SSP will work with others, including the cross-party Independence Convention and the non-party Independence First campaign to bring about an independence referendum in the shortest timescale possible after the May 2007 elections.
If necessary, the SSP will itself introduce a bill to hold an independence referendum within the first year of the new parliament. Even the Blair government, which was lukewarm about devolution, managed to call a referendum on establishing a Scottish Parliament and a Welsh Assembly within six months of coming to power in 1997.
We challenge the pro-Union parties to explain why, if they are so confident that they represent the majority of the Scottish people, they continue to deny the Scottish people the right of self-determination in a democratic referendum.
The bulwark of today’s British state is not the Tory Party, who have long since been kicked into touch in Scotland. No, the arch-Unionists in this election are the Labour government. The ex-party of the working class are now giving it big guns for Queen and Coronation Street, warning that armed guards will surely stalk the Tweed and ex-pats will never again see their loved ones south of the border.
But the more ludicrous their arguments, the more surely we all know they’re losing.
They are on the run, and the SNP are the pretenders to their throne.
The SSP opposes the SNP’s increasingly pro-business vision of an independent Scotland, which promises hundreds of millions of pounds in Corporate Tax cuts to big business. This could only be achieved by plundering our public services.
The SSP is fighting for a different Scotland. Instead of slashing corporate taxes to the level of the Irish Republic, as the SNP propose, we would slash military spending to Irish levels. Scotland’s current share of the UK’s bloated military budget is over £3billion, while the Republic of Ireland spends just £700million. We would use the extra billions to transform Scotland.
Nor do we subscribe to the bizarre idea that the Queen should remain the Head of State in an independent Scotland.
Our call is for a Scottish socialist republic, in which the people are sovereign, not some dim descendant of the house of Saxe-Coburg, and not the multinationals who like to squat on our shores till the government subsidies run out.
We seek to throw out the weapons of mass destruction that lurk on the Clyde, and bring our troops safely home. We will fight to become a nation, a beacon, of peace, not an exploited outpost of the dying British Empire.
We will welcome people fleeing oppression, war and poverty, and offer them full rights and a place in our society.
We will cherish our civil liberties, not straitjacket them with ID cards and Criminal Justice legislation. We will live in real hope, not manufactured fear.
We will look after our workers, repealing Thatcher’s anti-trade union laws and delivering a fair minimum wage for all, including those under 21.
We have a powerful vision of the nation we can be, in which everyone has rights, and democracy is extended and extended, from proportional representation in all elections to participatory democracy forums at local level, where neighbourhoods can vote on and veto the decisions that affect them.
This is our world, and we will fight tirelessly to bring it into the hands of the people, to bring socialism into being.
We harbour no illusions that independence, in itself, will cause this transformation. But we believe it can help us on our way, by delivering massively increased democracy and making the ideas of socialism - equality, wealth redistribution, peace and human solidarity - more easily achieved.
Should the referendum on independence be won, and we believe it will, we will argue for the establishment of a Constitutional Assembly, independent of political parties, to draw up a brand new constitution for Scotland to be ratified in a further referendum.
This would not be an appointed panel of notables and celebrities but a democratically elected body, representative of Scotland’s geographic, ethnic and gender diversity.
That Constitutional Assembly would be given the task of drawing up a constitution based on two essential, abiding principles - those of maximum democracy (eg no hereditary powers; full proportional representation; no external military control) and maximum equality (eg full and equal citizenship for all who live and work in Scotland; no discrimination on the basis of race, religion, gender, sexuality, age or disability).
British unionists claim that independence only entrenches nationalist divisions, but we believe it will serve to end petty divisions.
England has much to gain from independence. National cultures can look genuinely outward. History, art, music, sport from across these islands can celebrate its diversity, its national identity and its place in the world.
The Labour government’s witless attempt to quantify Britishness, and to enshrine it in citizenship tests and ID cards, only serves to emphasise how ill the trappings of the Union become us.
Through independence, we become ourselves, and enable others to do likewise.
The 2007 election marks the 300th anniversary of the Union. Let’s make it the last anniversary, as we unite around a vision of a nation at peace with itself, its past, and the world.
Let’s raise the standard of a Scottish socialist republic, for the people of Scotland and the citizens of the world.

Campaign for essential referendum

Eric Canning, the Acting Convenor of Independence First Strathclyde branch, explains the aims of this campaigning organisation with an eye to the approaching elections
On 10 March, in Perth, Independence First (IF) convened its second AGM since its foundation. It was a well attended and, at times, a well-argued meeting reflecting the cross spectrum of views within its membership.
Reports were given, including from the numerous branches which have been formed across Scotland.
Independence First has been formed on a non-party political basis to campaign for a referendum on independence for Scotland, including members of different political parties and none. Since the engineered Union of Parliaments in 1707, the ordinary citizens of Scotland have been denied their democratic voice in this determination. Now is the long overdue time to exercise this right.
The march and rally on 31 March in Edinburgh - assemble 12.30pm at East Market St - is the major pre-election event being organised by IF. Locally, branches are rallying to this event with leafleting and publicity actions.

Petition
The Scottish Parliament election on Thursday 3 May will in itself be something of a referendum where many people will deliberately choose to vote for only those candidates who support such a determination.
A petition by IF has already been presented to the Scottish Parliament for such a referendum but has been rejected by the current Lab/Lib executive - no surprise there!
Edinburgh and Lothians branches are expanding and recently a Strathclyde branch has been formed to cover Glasgow and the surrounding areas. Anyone interested can contact Independence First Strathclyde Branch, c/o Alert Scotland, 4th Floor Rm 3A, 52 St Enoch Square, Glasgow G1 4AA, or for all Scotland, www.independence1st.com
Independence First will continue to campaign right up to the election on 3 May - for example the Strathclyde branch are organising a lunchtime fringe meeting at the STUC congress on Tuesday 17 April in Glasgow - but more importantly to make sure that those parties committed to a referendum fulfil that pledge in the resulting new parliament.

Welcome to Scotland:
the country where families are dragged from their beds in the darkness of dawn, and dispatched back to torture and murder on a tax-funded plane. The SSP wants to see a Scotland that will welcome people fleeing oppression, war and poverty, and offer them full rights and a place in our society. Refugees come here seeking sanctuary. In too many cases they find only degradation and persecution. They are victims at the hands of a chaotic asylum system which crushes hopes and atomises families through seemingly arbitrary deportation, insensitive interviewing processes, lack of support. On top of that, they are barred from working and forced to endure the stigma of a voucher system. We seek to close down Dungavel and end dawn raids, and to grant citizenship to all who seek sanctuary in Scotland. We need their skills, their culture and their companionship every bit as much as they need us.
Scots have always paid UK’s blood price
For 300 years, Scottish regiments have been catapulted to the frontline of Britain’s imperialist adventures abroad.
During the days of empire, it was the blood of our working-class youth that stained the world map pink.
Today, it is the same blood that is being squandered in the fields of Iraq and Afghanistan.
If nothing else, independence is an escape hatch from this latest despicable invasion, in which over 650,000 Iraqi civilians have lost their lives.
An independent Scotland could, unilaterally, withdraw its troops from the Gulf and in so doing, bring pressure to bear on other governments, notably that at Westminster, to do likewise.
We could also refuse to participate in any military action in Iran, Syria, North Korea or wherever else the American empire seeks to lead us. Without a full-blooded UK back-up, the US case for war, in any part of the world, would be considerably weakened, not just on the international stage, but at home too.
An independent Scotland could also pull the plug on extraordinary rendition - the US secret flights system that sees terror ‘suspects’ flown to regimes where they can be tortured, for the United States, without the US having to take any responsibility for it - by withholding access to our airports and airspace.
Likewise, we can block the transportation of military personnel and hardware.
Meanwhile, at home, we could rid ourselves at last of the scourge of nuclear weapons, by uprooting Trident and sending it home.
The billions we would save would be more than adequate to compensate those who would lose their livelihood through nuclear disarmament.
We would further save money by bringing our military budget into line with that of the Republic of Ireland’s.
Over £2billion would be saved, more than enough to bale out defence workers who would lose their jobs, bring pensions up to a decent, liveable standard, build tens of thousand of new council homes and introduce free, fully integrated public transport.
Without weapons and wars, we would be a powerful force to contend with.

Scottish citizens not British subjects

by Mary McGregor

We believe that everyone in Scotland should be a citizen not a subject.
The existence of the United Kingdom, with its unionist, imperialist and monarchist state, propped up by its Crown Powers, is the biggest obstacle to real democratic advance. How can the UK call itself democratic, when its head of state is decided by hereditary principle - in other words, an accident of birth?
The SSP is for the abolition of all Crown Powers. These are repressive powers that, in reality, give control to the ‘hidden state’. It is for this reason that the struggle for democracy in Scotland today must take the form of militant republicanism.
Unlike the SNP, the SSP is committed to establishing a socialist republic, which means the abolition of the monarchy, the Crown Powers and the House of Lords.
While capitalism depends on the state to control the working class, socialism is based on the working class controlling the state.

ID cards
The ID cards, proposed by the Labour government, must be opposed. They are intrusive and expensive - they will protect us from no-one, particularly not the state, as anything can be faked.
Genuine democracy means that anyone in a position of power must be elected, accountable and recallable. This fight for wider democracy is the key to changing society through mass participation.
In a truly democratic Scotland we would support freedom of workers to organise and the scrapping of the anti-trade union laws.
The scrapping of the Criminal Justice Act would mean people would have the freedom to demonstrate and young people would be able to vote at the age of 16.
We believe in a democratic and secular Scottish republic, where religion is a private matter. There is no place in our Scotland for a state based on any religious dogma.
A secular Scotland would promote tolerance, fairness and equality across all our communities.

back to index

—page eight—

Campaign for free public transport

Lorna Bett, who is top of the SSP list for Mid Scotland and Fife in the Scottish Parliament elections in May, joined activists in Cupar last Saturday campaigning for free public transport. Lorna said:
“Our proposal for free public transport can be delivered for less than a third of Scotland’s share of UK defence spending.
“It is a positive way to tackle global warming and poverty by rewarding people for doing the right thing, using public transport. Commuters from Cupar could save thousands of pounds a year in travel costs under this proposal.”
Lorna also joined in with an SSP street stall in the town and helped distribute the Scottish Socialist Party’s special edition election campaign newspaper.

SSP has youth on its side

Socialist candidate Scotland’s youngest

The SSP was campaigning on Dumfries’ streets last weekend, with activists, including the SSP’s top two list candidates for the South Scotland region, Colin Turbett and Charlotte Cameron, taking up a host of local issues.
Aged 18, Charlotte is the youngest candidate as yet announced standing in these elections.
In fact, since the age at which candidates are eligible was only lowered to 18 this year, we believe she’s the youngest candidate to stand in Scotland, ever.
That’s something which she finds “quite scary”, she told the Voice, but it also makes her very proud.
And she, along with the SSP’s other young candidates, is giving the party a connection with young people that others won’t have.
“It’s easy to spout rhetoric about young people, about the problems we face in school or college, in low paid jobs, in trying to get somewhere to live, but as people get older we lose touch with how it really feels. So I think to have someone experiencing all of that just now is very useful.”
Charlotte grew up in Dumfries and Galloway, then recently, “like nearly all the young people around here, had to move away to study.”
That’s a problem which will be exacerbated by the proposed closure of Glasgow Uni’s Crichton campus in Dumfries.
“There will be absolutely no opportunity for higher education in the area if it goes ahead, people will have to move away and often they can’t move back.
“Crichton has the highest ratio of disabled students of any uni in the UK, so it’s used by lots of people who aren’t able to move away. The proposed closure is cutting them off from any access to higher education, and that’s blatantly a breach of their human rights.”
Charlotte and the other SSP activists met up with Crichton campus staff and students to help with their campaign to save their jobs and courses, and together they leafleted and gathered signatures at Queen of the South’s game against Dundee.
That followed an SSP stall in Dumfries on housing, one of the most urgent local issues.
“Dumfries and Galloway was one of the first places where council housing stock was transferred to private control,” Charlotte explains.
“Rents have already gone up since that happened, then last week DGHP (the organisation which now runs the housing stock) announced they want to raise rents by 40 per cent.
“Owning a house is impossible for most people, because prices have been pushed so high as many are sold off as holiday homes.
“The lack of housing has got so bad that 69 villages in Dumfries and Galloway have been designated ‘pressured areas’, and the right to buy has been frozen.”
It’s an issue that SSP activists will be taking up relentlessly, along with the lack of local facilities.
“There are too many Tescos and not enough skate parks! It took ten years of pressure to get a skate park built in Dumfries.
“They’ve just built a new Tesco, and they’ve permission for another within 18 months - it looks like it’s easy to get permission just as long as what you’re building is to make profit.”

Gie’s oor bus service back

The Renfrewshire Branch of the Scottish Socialist Party held a protest in Ferguslie Park Avenue, Paisley, to highlight the atrocious lack of public transport in Ferguslie Park after 7pm at night and on a Sunday.
Iain Hogg, the SSP candidate for North West Paisley in the local elections, and also the candidate for the Scottish Parliamentary elections for Paisley North, said:
“This situation has been going on for far too long. The people of Ferguslie Park are entitled to a better service from the bus companies.
“Ferguslie is like a desert for transport at night, and on a Sunday there are no local buses all day.
“The council has done nothing to put effective pressure on the bus operators to provide a better all-round service, and the operators only seem to want to run at the busiest times.
“One of the reasons we are advocating a free public transport policy is that there are still areas like Ferguslie Park where you can’t get a bus at any price.
“With traffic congestion and global warming a burning issue there has never been a more pressing time to promote public ownership of public transport.”
Branch member Andy Bowden, an activist with Scottish Socialist Youth and council candidate for Paisley East, added:
“Many jobs in the modern world require mobility and attendance at odd hours, and if people have to shell out for taxi fares, then many jobs, especially for young people on the lower minimum wage, become unfeasible.”
John Miller, SSP candidate for the Paisley South council seat said:
“A recent protest at the Tannahill Centre has seen a cash machine installed in the post office by the Bank of Ireland.
“Whilst this is not a perfect solution to the problem of cash-point facilities, since it will only be available in Post Office hours, it is a great improvement on what went before.
“It shows that protest can produce results and that the activists of the SSP are prepared to take to the streets to fight for working people.
“We hope that the bus companies will respond positively.”

back to index

—page nine—

cultural resistance

Catch a neon fire

Neon Bible by The Arcade Fire. CD out now

by Malcolm McDonald

The new release from the Montreal-based seven-piece must be one of the most eagerly awaited recordings of the year. With the arrival of 2004’s Funeral, all manner of rock royalty (David Bowie included) tripped over each other to claim discovery of the band’s grand vision captured by that record, with its songs of sorrow made into joy.
Rather than grossing-out supporting U2 in Megadromes across the US, Win Butler and his rangy crew chose instead to piece together this new offering. In their own time. In their own way.
This approach is typical of the band. Neon Bible chimes, bangs, jangles and roars like nothing else. From the galloping piano of opener Black Mirror (“mirror mirror on the wall, tell me where the bombs will fall”) to the closer My Body Is A Cage, The Arcade Fire manage to sing songs about everything from environmental disaster to the War on Terror and make them all sound uplifting.
Some of the songs here are anthemic, yes - quite the opposite of a selling point to this listener - but others are disarmingly direct.
A massive church organ opens Intervention, which gets laid into organised religion (“working for the church while your family dies”).
The grand and breezy No Cars Go swings in somewhere between mid-’60s Bacharach, Belle and Sebastian and The Waterboys.
In the relatively downbeat Windowsill, the USA of Homeland Security alerts gets a pasting (“I don’t want to fight in a holy war/ I don’t want salesmen knockin’ at my door/ I don’t want to live in America no more”).
Ocean of Noise nails a slinky Tom Waits groove as sung by a world-weary Ian McCulloch.
You can’t resist such references, yet comparisons in this case are unnecessary.
I listened to this and tried to put my finger on what I was hearing. I was hearing a band near the height of its powers, writing and performing with a self-assurance that makes each song sparkle and glow.
For those who stumbled upon Funeral and couldn’t stop listening to it, be prepared to repeat the experience.

The long road to freedom

Bill Scott takes a look at the origins and influence of Burns’ radical classic, Scots Wha Hae

It’s not Wallace or Bruce who is the true hero of Scots Wha Hae, much though Burns admired their struggle for Scottish freedom. Burns wrote this poem during a time of great hope and great repression. The French Revolution and Tom Paine’s Rights of Man inspired Thomas Muir to found the Friends of the People in 1792 to campaign for greater democracy. After its first convention he travelled to France to unsuccessfully plead for the French King’s life - he feared a backlash that would follow the execution - and came back via Ireland in order to meet with the United Irishmen.
In 1793, on his return to Scotland, Muir was charged with sedition and arrested at Stranraer. Carried to Edinburgh in an open cart in chains, Burns was at Gatehouse-of-Fleet as Muir’s convoy went past. 
Forbidden from paying open tribute to Muir, Burns went home and composed a poem “about another man who paid dearly for standing up to tyranny”.
Read in this light the lines of the poem take on new significance - “Noo’s the day and noo’s the hour” means that the time for struggle against the state’s repression (“Chains and slaverie”) is not in some romantic past but right now.
Nor is Burns being a simple patriot when he asks “Wha’ for Scotland’s king and law Freedom’s sword will strongly draw?” The king he supports is the same king as found in Beethoven’s Fidelio (Freedom) and he is calling on all free men to take up arms in defence of liberty. 
What was at stake was not only the Scottish people’s own freedom but that of their children and Burns’ sentiments are the same as those of La Passionara during the Spanish Civil War - “It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees”. Or as he put it “We shall drain our dearest veins/But they shall be free”. 
Fearful for his own freedom after Muir’s conviction and transportation to Australia, Burns had the song published anonymously and he was not openly acknowledged as its author until years after his death. For music, Burns chose a tune, which if oral tradition is true, was sung by Bruce’s army as they marched to the field at Bannockburn.
The tyrants of Scots Wha Hae are not Edward but the government of Burns’ own day - busy taking away hard won rights to protect their own power. The poem therefore could not be more relevant today. As in Burns’ time people are being arrested and transported in chains to places far from any hope of aid from friends and family. Botany Bay or Guantanamo Bay? Liberty or Repression? Humanity or Barbarism? We face the same choices today as Burns faced.
Saturday 31 March sees the Independence First march and rally. Will you march not only for Independence - thus ridding Scotland of Trident - but also in defence of the freedoms won by our parents and grandparents? Remember - “Libertie’s in every blow, Let us do or dee!”

Tuned in
Keef Tomkinson

Square-eyed socialist Keef recommends next week’s TV

Sunday 25 March

Ms Dynamite in Search of Nanny Maroon, BBC2, 8pm
Niomi Daley (that’s Ms Dynamite) has been fascinated by stories of Nanny of the Maroons, a Jamaican woman who successfully led a revolt by slaves against the British Army. Dynamite sets out to discover why, 250 years on, Nanny remains such an inspirational figure in Jamaica.
Schindler’s List, ITV3, 10pm
Spielberg’s contribution to remembering the horror of the holocaust stuns the senses. Full of humanity yet frank in its depiction of the Nazis’ slaughter of Europe’s Jews. One of those films which is important to watch.

Monday 26 March

The British Way of Death, BBC4, 9pm
A wee look at how funeral services have moved from kiddie-fiddler ministers mumbling over gothic organ hymns to celebrations of life with John Lennon on vibes. Personally I want Boards Of Canada - Dayvan Cowboy‚ and Johnny Cash - These Are My People‚ at mine.

Wednesday 28 March

Luke Mitchell: The Devil’s Own? BBC2, 10.40pm
I don’t know if Luke Mitchell murdered Jodi Jones. But what I do know is that the hysteria created by the prosecution and media cast doubts over the verdict. It seemed Mitchell’s musical taste, not the actual evidence, was being examined. If his appeal is successful it will cast a shadow on the legal system and leave a family without justice.

Thursday 29 March

Eye of the Needle, Film4, 6.50pm
What’s the best kind of Nazi except for a dead one? Yes, a foiled one. Donald Sutherland is the evil Nazi spy trying to scupper the Normandy landings who flees to a Scottish island (can’t remember why??) and creates some domestic strife.
F*** Off I’m A Hairy Woman, BBC3, 9pm
Since this is on the BBC’s entertainment channel I doubt this will be a sensitive look at women and body hair and more like a Channel Five show called How Low Will It Grow? Anyhoo, comic Shazia Mirza grows her hair for six months to see if she can live with it.
Storyville: Screamers, BBC4, 10.30pm
This sounds absolutely interesting. It chronicles American band, System of a Down, and their mission to raise awareness of the 1915 Armenian genocide by Turkey, through their American and European tour.

back to index

—page ten—

international news

Darfur’s dark descent

“Killings of civilians remains widespread, including in large-scale attacks. Rape and sexual violence are widespread and systematic. Torture continues.”
So says a report, prepared for the UN Human Rights Commissioner (UNHCR) by a high-level mission to Sudan, on the human rights situation in Darfur, where violence has been raging for the last four years, killing 200,000 people and displacing a further 2million.
The report tells us nothing we don’t already know. In Darfur, quality of life is nose-diving, people are being tortured, murdered, or simply starved to death, and desperately needed aid workers are withdrawing under a hail of fire, predominantly if not completely from government-sponsored militias.
This mass murder is being conducted “in a climate of impunity”.
The Khartoum government is not standing by impassively; it is actively “orchestrat(ing) and participat(ing) in these crimes” and obstructing all efforts by the African Union, the UN and NGOs to try to stem the tide of abuse which, it seems clear, now amounts to genocide, the victims being almost entirely black, ethnic Africans and the aim, equally clearly, to wipe them from the face of Darfur.
The report is strongly worded, yet is unlikely to be enough to move the UNHCR, where attempts to investigate the situation in Darfur have already been blocked by allies and clients of the Sudan government, notably China, which has become Sudan’s new best friend thanks to Darfur’s oil, for which it has secured exploration rights. Not from the people of Darfur, but over their heads from the Khartoum government.
The ‘scorched earth’ policy pursued by government-sponsored militias - aka the Janjaweed, often literally backed up by Sudanese troops, blazing guns and helicopters - becomes explicable in this light.
Rounding up women and girls from a village and raping them in front of their brothers and fathers, before murdering them all is, undeniably, a very effective means of depopulating a land.
Those who aren’t cut down already will run for their lives. Living a half-life in a Chad refugee camp, teeming with disease and dying children, is better than being decapitated or burnt alive in front of your family, if only marginally.
To ensure no-one returns, the villages and fields are burnt to ashes.
While foreign intervention is hardly a favourable solution, the situation in Darfur is now so critical that progressive organisations within the region are calling for a UN peacekeeping force. And they want it yesterday.
Sudan Liberation Movement (SLM) leader Abdelwahid al-Nur welcomed the UN report but said its charges against Darfurian rebel forces - whom the report said were “guilty of serious abuses of human rights” - were false.
How could it be otherwise, he said, when the SLM were calling for UN intervention, and were doing so much to help internally displaced people, including facilitating aid for them?
Khartoum has characterised the conflict as a fight between ethnic Africans and Muslim Arabs, and been quick to play the ‘we are Hezbollah’ card, attempting to align itself, in the eyes of the world media, with anti-imperialistic organisations in order to gain credibility for what is, in truth, just a dirty rout in the name of money.
Underlining this truth is the fact that many Arab tribes have refused Khartoum’s ‘enticements’ - arms, land, threats - to fight their ‘cause’, and instead joined forces with their ethnic brothers. Literally their brothers, in many cases.
Arabs and Africans have lived side by side here for generations, strengthening their ties through marriage. Blood here has proved thicker than water and, indeed, oil.
But they are paying a terrible price, losing their homes and security as Darfur splits up along territorial lines. Much of northern Darfur is now controlled by the Sudanese Liberation Army, fighting the ethnic African side, while other areas, such as Jebbel Midob, in the north east, is in the hands of forces controlled by Khartoum.

back to index

—page eleven—

international news

Disappeared but not forgotten

by Patrick O’Hare in Argentina

In March 1975, a military coup installed a brutal eight-year dictatorship in Argentina.
Backed by the CIA, the regime was renowned for its appalling human rights record, as political opponents were tortured, raped and killed at over 500 secret concentration camps set up across the country.
When Argentina finally returned to democracy in 1983, over 30,000 people had been ‘disappeared’ - including socialists, trade unionists, journalists and even nuns and priests who spoke out against the dictatorship.
Only months after the 30th anniversary of the coup, in 2005, a key witness in the trial of former police officer and torturer Miguel Etchecolatz was kidnapped.
The witness, Julio Lopez - now an elderly man in his seventies - is still missing and his disappearance serves as a reminder that the dark days of repression are not over.
At the forefront of the campaign to find Lopez are the courageous human rights group, the Madres De Plaza de Mayo.
Back in 1977, when the military was busily destroying any opposition and stifling free speech, the Madres were one of the few groups who dared to raise their voices.
At first a loose grouping of mothers whose children had been abducted by the military, the Madres used to gather in Plaza de Mayo or in nearby churches and hold a silent vigil, carrying pictures of their missing loved ones.
Each week, as the repression and kidnappings increased, more mothers made their way to the plaza, identifying each other only by their white headscarves - often the nappies of their missing children - which became the symbol of the Association.
Today, the Madres still converge on the Plaza every Thursday, not only to remember their sons and daughters, but also raising the flag for justice and equality, for the same ideals that their murdered children fought for 30 years ago.
“Our children left us a path”, Juanita told me, when I visited the bookshop-cafe that the Madres run in Buenos Aires.
Once a busy housewife without time for politics, Juanita become aware of the brutal practices of the dictatorship when her own son became one of the thousands to ‘disappear’.
Now 93, she still works in the Madres’ cafe every day, studying, writing and giving interviews.
She described how the Madres, by tackling the problems that society faces today, are keeping alive the dream of a fairer society which many of her son’s generation gave their lives for.
They have opened a university, giving poorer students access to education, and recently became involved in a project building decent housing for the millions living in Buenos Aires’ sprawling slums.
In a building project partly funded by the government, in Villa Oculta, residents who were previously unemployed and living in ‘ranchos’ made of paper or cardboard are now building their new homes, simultaneously earning a diploma in construction.
Surprisingly, given Argentina’s reputation for machoism, 50 per cent of the building workers are women. The Madres run a neighbourhood creche to look after the women workers’ children.
The Madres have good relations with the current government of Nestor Kirchner, the first to recognise that the 30,000 victims of the dictatorship were in fact excecuted, and not killed in combat, as previous governments tried to claim.
Yet when I visited their weekly march, leader Hebe De Bonafini underlined the differences the group still have with the left-leaning Argentine President.
“We will never accept reconciliation because reconciliation always goes hand in hand with forgiveness,” she explained. “And we will never forgive those officers who tortured, raped and threw our children, still alive, into the sea.”
The Madres motto is “We will not forget, we will not forgive, and we will not negotiate,” Juanita later told me.
By negotiate, the Madres mean that they will not accept any compensation for the loss of their children; a controversial principle which eventually led to a split in the Madres organisation.
“We won’t accept money for the blood of our children. Nor do we want exhumations. Our children were alive when they disappeared and it is alive that we want them returned to us.”
Thus, often painfully, the mothers have refused to participate in identifying remains or having the bodies of the disparecidos returned to them.
“We know that our children are not dead,” explained Juanita. “They are living in the struggle. A part of them lives in every young revolutionary who takes up the struggle anew. They march beside us every Thursday in Plaza Mayo.”
Understandably, the Madres are scathing of those who kept quiet or left the country during the dictatorship.
“There were many who quietly left the country whilst our sons and daughters were being tortured in concentration camps. They grew fat, got rich and now they come back to the country.
“Quite frankly I find that shameful.”
Juanita continued, saying that during the World Cup in 1980, many people were carried away by a nationalist fervour. Yet this was also a time when the military stepped up repressive measures and kidnappings.
The Madres were again one of the few groups who continued protesting, marching, campaigning, alerting the international media (who were there for the football),  that outside the stadiums a more horrific story was being covered up - that of los desparecidos.
Up until 2005, a ‘law of due obedience’ meant that all officers outside the generals who headed the military junta were immune from prosecution, and since then there have been very few offenders brought to justice.
“There are still many fascists in Argentina. During the dictatorship, the judiciary condoned and covered up the killings and kidnappings. They lied to us. Yet only four judges have ever been removed from their posts.”
Right-wing elements in the Buenos Aires police force are suspected of involvement in the Julio Lopez kidnapping and subsequent cover-up.
City governor Jorge Sola recently admitted that there are still around 50 officers in the force who also served under the dictatorship.
In the face of such threats and challenges, Juanita sees the role of the Madres as important as ever.
“We must educate the young people of today so that what happened to our children will never happen again,” she urges.
That said, it seems clear that the Madres have both feet firmly planted in the present. Looking round the bookshop, full of young people, Juanita said she was reassured that Argentina now had a government which would look after them when the Madres were gone.
But I get the feeling that Juanita and the other Madres might be around for a long time yet, an inspiring example of courage and determination in the face of heart-breaking adversity.

India abhors ‘economic miracle’

by Ken Ferguson

The shooting of at least 20 protestors by West Bengal police has sparked widespread condemnation across India.
Farmers in the Nandigram area, angered over government plans to build an industrial park on their land, fought police with rocks, machetes and pickaxes on Wednesday, said officials.

Clashes
The clashes followed earlier unrest, which in January prompted the federal government to suspend plans to establish scores of Special Economic Zones to attract overseas investors with generous tax breaks.
Most of the zones, including the one that was to be set up in Nandigram, would be built on farmland.
Anger has been intensified by the fact that the deaths are being exploited by the right-wing BJP as part of their anti-Communist propaganda, as the state has been run by the Communist Party of India for 30 years.
It also illustrates the grubby compromises forced on the left in office by the neo-liberals.

Unreported
This is the largely unreported side of India’s so-called economic miracle, making it the joint world neo-liberal page three pin-up, alongside the Chinese dictatorship.
Beneath the breathless, business-friendly reporting and loving shots of gleaming skyscrapers lies the brutal dispossession of farmers, which is now meeting growing resistance, including the resurrection of a political formation long since written off by the western elites - Maoism.
If the ‘experts’ bothered to study Mao, they would realise that the Indian elite faces a sophisticated opponent, not just some unorganised gunmen.
Across India, tens of thousands are now engaged in opposition - both political and military - under the supposedly defunct banner of Maoism.
One report to the Indian parliament stated:
“Twenty six battalions have been given to the states which are affected by Naxalite (Maoist) movements. Which means 26,000 men and officers, (which) is equal to an army of a small state.
“We have said that if they need air support, we will give it. Initially they (Maoists) were using axes and swords. Then they started using pistols and guns.
“Then they started using AK 47 rifles and now they have started using hand grenades and landmines. (T)hey are also using rocket launchers.”

No dialogue
And in an uncanny echo of their former colonial masters, the central government urged Maoist-affected states not to enter into dialogue with the CPI (Maoists) unless they give up arms.
Unlike China, India is still a democracy and it is increasingly clear that while the economic ‘miracle’ is making a minority rich, millions stand to be crushed by the chariot of neo-liberal ‘progress’ and they seem unlikely to submit without a fight.

 back to index

—page twelve—

Conditions bleak, outlook poor

Four years on, and Iraq’s death toll reaches all-time high
“If this is not civil war, then God knows what civil war looks like.”
This was Ayad Allawi, former interim prime minister of Iraq speaking, just over a year ago.
Since then, the situation has only got worse, and how.
As the current prime minister, Nouri Maliki, desperately tried to make the case that, four years after the US-led invasion that unleashed a maelstrom of kidnapping and killing, the sectarian violence was coming to an end, you could all but hear the eight bombs that went off in the northern state of Kirkuk, all within the space of an hour.
A Pentagon progress report to Congress found that the number of attacks in Iraq was at its highest in the last three months of 2006 than at any three month period since 2003.
In December, there were 1300 murders in Baghdad, and 45 attacks a day.
The report stated: “Although most attacks continue to be directed against coalition forces, civilians suffer the vast majority of casualties.”
The UN says that 3000 people are killed every month in Iraq.
On the ground, Iraqis negotiate life rather than live it.
Most fear leaving their neighbourhoods, and even their homes, for fear of being abducted, murdered or worse.
Dead bodies are picked up daily, in rivers, gutters, by the roadside, on rubbish tips, scarred with the marks of torture, often decapitated.
Drivers have to crawl through checkpoints mounted by insurgents - some of whom wear police uniforms - knowing they could be pulled out the car and dragged away, forever.
A BBC/ABC poll of 2000 Iraqis painted a bleak picture of the civilian state of mind.
Hope is dying.
Less than 40 per cent had anything good to say about their lives now.
While politicians, generally ones sitting in the safety of London and Washington, bicker about whether what’s happening in Iraq is, strictly speaking, a ‘civil war’ (perhaps ‘grotesque, bloody, uncivil war’ would be more to their liking?), the once sovereign nation most certainly fits the description of a ‘failed state’.
That being one that cannot keep its citizens safe, cannot produce, manufacture, function economically in any real sense, that cannot maintain its borders and is riven with internal, warring factions.
Over 4million people have gone, including the educated professionals, the doctors and nurses and teachers and engineers needed to help Iraq rebuild itself.
They were one of the main targets for kidnappings and killings, and female professionals even more so.
Working in a hospital in Iraq is more than your life’s worth these days, and thus the healthcare system is imploding, leaving this nation of widows and wounded with noone to turn to.
The law has imploded too, hijacked either by the ‘state’ - as demonstrated by the death sentences meted out to three Iraqi women recently (Voice 300), allegedly for criminal offences but in truth, most probably for political opposition - or by insurgents, police officers being heavily implicated in sectarian death squads.
Meanwhile, back at the ranch, George W Bush marked the fourth anniversary of the invasion, and nearly the fourth anniversary of that ‘mission accomplished’ moment, with a trite speech on the need to stay the course.
American security would be at risk if coalition forces now withdrew, he said, as Iraq had become a haven for terrorists.
Thing is, it wasn’t before.
But post-9/11 policy has bred terror, seeding it in places where before it could never take root.
Not that Bush will shoulder the blame.
It’s all down to al-Qaeda, you see, that phantom menace that feeds off American foreign policy, harvesting recruits every time an American gun opens fire near the Sunni Triangle.
The presence of coalition troops is intensifying the situation in Iraq.
It is not the case that US troops are all that stands between Iraq and chaos; they are the chaos.
Yet a military escalation is already underway, and the cyclical downtick in violence - it always seems to ebb in the months of January and February - is being cited as a sign that the surge strategy is working.
For one thing, it’s too soon to say, and for another, the trend is, overall, ever upward.
There is no ebb.
The US, and its international and government allies, are seriously outnumbered by Shia and Sunni militias, whose guerilla tactics outflank them at every turn.
Of course, it is not only the insurgents whose hackles rise at their approach.
They are distrusted, even loathed, by Iraqis everywhere, for invading, for making life so unimaginably worse that some even wish for the days of Saddam Hussein, for turning back the clock on women’s rights and basic energy and security needs, for Abu Ghraib, for stealing Iraq’s money and now, through a law all but written by multinational executives, its oil.
And for setting up one puppet government after another and calling it democracy.
Or, to put it another way, pissing down their back and telling them it’s raining.
One in ten Iraqis are likely to leave in 2007.
They’ll go anywhere, on any terms, so long as it’s out of here.

The writing on the wall

Guantanamo Bay is a dizzy experience, as inmate David Hicks will tell ya! Just hours after his legal team left, he was forcibly sedated, leaving him dizzy and bewildered for weeks! Hicks will be brought before a court on Monday 26 March, to face a single charge of providing material support for terrorism.
He is expected to plead guilty.
Meanwhile, back home in Australia, a life-size replica of his cell - all 1.8m x 2.4m of it - has gone on display in Sydney. Visitors to the top attraction report feeling traumatized by the experience. And they’re only in it for seconds! Hicks spends 22 hours a day in the blank-walled box, his uncertain future stretching endlessly before him.
And closer to home, in Montrose, a mural by 18 year old Miki Warren appeared this month, to remind us that, while our lives move on, for those trapped in the time-warp that is Guantanamo Bay, the agony and uncertainty never ends.


back to index