Scottish Socialist Voice
Issue 303
13 th April 2007

back to index


—front page—

FREE PUBLIC TRANSPORT

Combat climate change and poverty

Tried and tested

Free public transport has been a roaring success in the Belgian city of Hasselt and in Hawaii

Rather than hammering motorists with tolls and taxes, free public transport is a fairer and more effective way to cut car usage, congestion and carbon emissions

This is a radical solution to the biggest problem facing us in the 21st century - global warming. Free public transport - an idea whose time has come

back to index

—page two—

Referendum vigil: 15th anniversary

Last Tuesday, 10 April, marked the 15th anniversary of the founding of the vigil for a referendum on devolution for Scotland, which began in 1992 on the day after the general election of that year.
An overwhelming 75 per cent of voters in Scotland had backed parties which supported a form of home rule. But the Tories’ majority in the south of England put them in power, and they remained opposed to devolution.
“The permanent vigil was set up outside the Scottish Office, which was the symbol of the London government in Scotland,” explains Pam Currie, now the Scottish Socialist Party’s national secretary, and one of the hardy souls who regularly camped out in the vigil’s portacabin.
“The vigil was non-party political, and involved people from across the spectrum, most of whom were pro-independence.”
The vigil’s place on Calton Hill continued the site’s long association with campaigns for greater democracy. In 1979, the old Royal High School building had been earmarked by Labour as a home for a future Scottish assembly - although by the time Labour took power again, Donald Dewar dismissed the site, saying it had become too closely associated with independence.
The vigil ran until 1997, when the portacabin closed its doors the day after the referendum delivered the historic vote for the Scottish Parliament, thus fulfilling the vigil’s reason for existence.
“Marking the birthday of the vigil is especially symbolic this year,” continues Pam.
“People who were the forerunners of the Scottish Socialist Party were then campaigning for a referendum on devolution - now we’re on the verge of a historic election, and calling for a referendum on full independence.”

Tensions are far from over in Gulf

The British hostages are free, but does this mean a US-led attack on Iran has been averted? Dick Barbor-Might says not, describing the build-up to the current aggression, and warning that tensions in the Gulf are far from over.
Last summer a story was going the rounds that Tony Blair had sacked Jack Straw as Foreign Secretary at the urging of Washington’s neo-Conservatives - neo-cons for short.
If this story is to be believed, a British Foreign Secretary has bitten the dust because he got in the way of Bush’s war plans.
Straw knew, as did the whole of the Foreign Office, that the March 2003 attack upon Iraq had been an unmitigated disaster.
Straw could hardly say so in public since he shared so much of the blame for the invasion.
But this is not to say that he would have gone along with a second US attack against another member of what Bush had dubbed the “axis of evil” - in this case, Iran.
Straw’s offence was that, in April 2006, he publicly described as “nuts” the notion that the Bush administration was drawing up secret contingency plans to attack Iran.
In fact, Bush’s advisers were doing just that.
Straw may have known - or guessed - this but either way, he was making trouble for the Washington hawks from within the very highest levels of the previously compliant UK government.
Just consider it from the Americans’ point of view; they would have known they would need Blair’s PR and diplomatic support.
But how could Blair and his spin doctors be expected to deliver this when the British Foreign Secretary himself had already characterised the very idea of an attack upon Iran as literally insane?
From the perspective of the neo-cons, Straw had become a loose cannon, and would have to go.
In May 2006, a month after Straw’s dismissal of an attack on Iran, Blair surprised political commentators by dismissing him as Foreign Secretary.
Straw thus suffered at Blair’s hands the very same demotion to being merely Leader of the House of Commons as had Robin Cook before him.
There is collateral for this story.
A couple of months after Straw was demoted, Irwin Stelzer revealed, in the London-based Conservative weekly The Spectator, that Washington had come to a negative conclusion about Straw’s fitness to be Foreign Secretary.
This was then “passed on” - presumably to Blair.
Stelzer was certainly in a position to know what had happened and even to do some passing on of his own.
He has been described as Rupert Murdoch’s emissary to both Blair and Brown and has been observed quietly slipping in and out of Number 10 Downing Street.
Stelzer is also a leading neo-con and luminary of such right-wing Washington think tanks as the Hudson Institute and the American Enterprise Instit ute.
He was, and is, a close colleague of Richard Perle, one of the most vindictive of the neo-cons and also a member of both these institutes.
Straw had offended Perle by speaking contemptuously of him as “an unreliable reporter” for saying that a nuclear attack upon Iran could be “over before anybody knew what had happened.”
Now Straw was gone and Stelzer had revealed why in the pages of The Spectator. For what is power if you can’t let people know that you are powerful?
Soon Blair demonstrated once again just how useful he still could be to the cause of the neo-cons.
With Straw replaced as Foreign Secretary by the inexperienced Margaret Beckett, Blair was free to cooperate diplomatically with the Americans in delaying a ceasefire in the conflict in Lebanon.
Thus the killings continued on both sides from July into August 2006, and time was allowed for Israeli firepower to wreck much of Lebanon.
Fast forward to January 2007, when Bush’s Secretary of State, Condoleeza Rice, told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that the Bush Administration would be pursuing “a new strategic alignment in the Middle East.”
The main focus of attack would no longer be Sunni Muslims - Sunni states were declared to be ‘centres of moderation’ - but upon the ‘Shia crescent’, stretching from Hezbullah in southern Lebanon to Iran.
The prime justification for this shift in American policy is that Iran’s nuclear programme has the potential to provide a nuclear weapons capability.
A second supposed justification is that ‘elements in the Iranian regime’ are allegedly providing Shia militants in Iraq with roadside explosive devices targeted at American and British forces.
Meanwhile, Seymour Hersh and other investigative reporters have revealed that, as part of its divide and rule strategy, the US is sponsoring separatist groups inside Iran that use bombings and assassinations to achieve their aims.
These operations are funded from covert CIA programmes, but neo-cons such as John Bolton are speaking openly of the desirability of ‘regime change’ in Iran just as they once did of Saddam Hussein’s Iraq.
Following the release of the 15 sailors and marines from HMS Cornwall, Blair and his spin doctors disdained this dubiously motivated but gracious act and did their best to demonise the Iranians.
And, despite outrage from the families of British soldiers killed in Iraq, Rupert Murdoch’s Sun newspaper is paying Leading Seaman Turney to play the part of instant celebrity and tell of her ‘ordeal’ as a captive of the Revolutionary Guards.
Whatever Blair might wish for, the Foreign Office seems to prefer diplomatic solutions in dealing with Iran.
The frustrated neo-cons are venting their spleen at the supine Brits.
However, the game is not over.
No less a figure than the former US National Security Adviser, Zbigniew Brzezinski, has warned the Senate of the “Manichean delusions” of the Bush White House, of a “head-on conflict with Iran” and of a “deepening quagmire eventually ranging across Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan.”
But Bush is not listening.
Ominously, a third US carrier group will soon be joining the other two in the Persian Gulf and for some time yet Blair will remain as Prime Minister, Bush’s proxy in our affairs.

back to index

—page three—

news

SSP campaign kicks off in style

The SSP’s People Not Profit Scottish Parliament election manifesto was launched on Tuesday 10 April at Hampden Stadium, Glasgow.
As the Voice went to press, the substantial document, which provides a detailed socialist response to the challenges facing Scottish people and communities, from poverty to war to climate change, was already attracting widespread interest, not least because of our groundbreaking free public transport policy, easily the most radical, anti-poverty, pro-environment pledge from any party this election.
There are six flagship policies, headlined by the case for free public transport.
Scotland’s cities are choked with traffic, and gridlock has become a fact of everyday life. And it’s costing us dear.
Costing us in the billions of pounds lost to the economy every year through congestion, in the escalating incidence of asthma and other pollution-related respiratory diseases, in road accidents and road maintenance, in lowered quality of life and fear of injury, and in rising fuel emissions which in turn fuel deadly global warming.
Piecemeal initiatives like congestion charging and road tolls will do little to combat the tide of traffic, which rises year on year as the cost of motoring decreases compared to the cost of using an increasingly fractured and stressed public transport system.
Plus, these kinds of flat taxation impact disproportionately on the poor and encourage a ‘pay to pollute’ mentality that gets us nowhere fast.
The key to cutting car usage is to offer a viable alternative, as set out in the SSP manifesto - a fully comprehensive, fully integrated public transport system, that enables everyone to get mobile, from anywhere to everywhere.

Universal
To maximise uptake, we would make the system free. If this sounds like largesse, it isn’t.
Universal free provision is a policy proven to increase uptake, as demonstrated by the free school meals policy in Finland, and free public transport policy in Hasselt, in Belgium, where passenger numbers have risen by over 1000 per cent since its introduction in the late 90s, while car usage has plummeted, freeing up road-space for cycle lanes and pavements, and city spaces for people to live and breathe in. It’s not an expensive policy, by any means.
In fact, it was introduced into Hasselt to save money, being considerably cheaper than building a proposed new ring-road to cope with the pounding volume of traffic.
We have costed it at £1billion per year, a hefty sum to be sure, but pretty small beer when compared to the cost of Trident (£76billion), for instance, and half the amount of cash the SNP propose to dish out to fatcats as a result of their Corporation Tax cuts.
And by cancelling monstrously expensive white elephants such as the £500million M74 extension in Glasgow, the Edinburgh Airport rail link, and other prestige projects, we could have up to £4billion for capital spending to bring our public transport system up to world class standards.
It’s ambitious, but not as ambitious as establishing a National Health Service following six years of ruinous war, and it is proven to work.
It is an idea whose time has come, and more and more Scots are getting on board.

Referendum
Another of our key campaigns is for a referendum on Scottish independence within a year of the election.
Why? Not because we believe independence will turn Scotland into a socialist republic overnight, but because we believe it is a necessary stepping-stone, delivering greater democracy and allowing the Scottish people to take charge of their affairs.
We believe the Scots should have the final say over deportations and dawn raids, nuclear weapons and war. Just as English people should have the final say over foundation hospitals, not a handful of Scottish Labour MPs toadying to Tony Blair.
The momentum towards independence is gathering, and we are calling time on 300 years of a Union which has benefited only the empire-builders and the warmongers, while marginalising the people through the monopolising of power by Westminster.
Our other flagship polices include building 100,000 new council houses; a desperately needed initiative in this era of dwindling social housing stock and outlandish house prices.
Affordable housing is essential if we are to end the practise of dumping homeless families in B&B accommodation, if we are to keep services alive in remote communities where, at present, essential workers like firefighters and teachers are priced out the housing market, to enable young people to leave home and perhaps start their own families, and to unchain people from the millstone of ruinous mortgages, a sport only the high street usurers, the banks, can enjoy.
We also seek to introduce free school meals, to tackle Scotland’s appalling health record through providing growing children with healthy, square meals every day of their school lives, nourishing them as they grow and instilling in them the lessons of good food for the future.
Like free public transport, this is a tried and tested idea, in Hull, and also in Finland, where free school lunches helped this once obese and sickly nation transform itself into a lean and healthy one.
Though our bill has been defeated twice by a cynical parliament determined to stamp out radical parties, our free school meals campaign has reaped rich rewards, in the guise of free breakfasts in primary schools and free fruit and water initiatives, not to mention the recent advances in banning junk food from schools.
Which just goes to show how rooted in reality, and how attuned to real people’s needs, our policies really are.
Our bid to abolish prescription charges being another case in point. While charges escalate across the UK - causing untold anxiety and ill-health to those in need of multiple prescriptions but unable to pay for them all - they have been abolished in Wales. By a Labour-led assembly!
A Labour-led assembly that, unlike the Labour-led Scottish Executive, can see the obvious benefits of good health for all, both in monetary and social terms.
We are also committed to axing the Council Tax, the miserable son of the Poll Tax, which beggars the low-paid while barely tickling the wealthy, multiple home-owning elite.
Our Scottish Service Tax idea is a just, well thought-out and fully costed alternative that would do much to alleviate the stress of being poor in modern-day Scotland.
We also propose a system of carbon rationing, as a means of reducing our carbon footprint without resort to crippling price rises that would leave the less well-off out in the cold, to cancel PFI/PPP schemes and kick the profiteers out the public sector, to make the police more accountable and prison, that hothouse for offenders, a last resort, to make childcare affordable and to give families, of all shapes and sizes, real support, to provide education for education’s sake and make war a memory, to bring the troops home and Scotland to its senses.
People Not Profit is a big read, bursting with energy and ideas. But hey, we are the Scottish Socialists, and we wrote the book.

SSP’s broadcast is a matchbox classic

The Scottish Socialist Party’s first election TV broadcast hit the airwaves on Tuesday this week, to a rapturous reception. It was put together by a team of celebrated young filmmakers, including award winning director Alice Nelson, from Edinburgh, and the Govan-based production company Blindside Productions.
The SSP’s second broadcast, made by the same team, will be screened in two weeks’ time on Tuesday, 24 April.

back to index

—page four—

Sold down the river

The world’s rivers are uner threat by pollution and the greed of big business

The Rio Grande, the Yangtze, the Nile and the Danube. These famous, astonishing rivers - which span hundreds if not thousands of miles, teem with life and support millions of people, from tiny fishing communities perched on their banks to vast industries stretching across international borders - are in grave danger.
So says the World Wildlife Fund (WWF), whose new report identifies the top ten world rivers most in peril from pollution, over-development, over-fishing, over-extraction and climate change.
The Rio Grande, which runs along the US-Mexico border, becoming the Rio Bravo once it enters Mexico, runs through the arid Chihauhaun Desert, yet is rich in diverse animal and plant-life and supports vast acreages of farming and even sprawling urban communities.
Without it, this area would be dust.
Unfortunately, dust may be its destiny, as the Rio Grande is dying of thirst - so much so, it sometimes even fails to reach the sea at the Gulf of Mexico - thanks to careless and badly co-ordinated over-extraction.
The WWF is working to have certain, biologically diverse areas granted national park status and to establish irrigation systems that keep farms supplied but don’t bleed the river dry.
India’s River Ganges is increasingly parched too, and for similar reasons.
Bad planning, and a lack of cross-border cooperation, is the root cause. In an age of climate change, such negligence is dangerous and could threaten many millions of people’s very existence.
But over-extraction is not the only villain.
Dams and channelisation are an increasing hazard, cutting rivers off from their floodplains - which renders both systems less able to regulate themselves, increasing the risk of flood and drought, and upsetting the fine, age-old balance upon which life depends.
The Salween, which flows through China, Myanmar (Burma) and Thailand, is home to 92 amphibian species and 147 fish species, including 47 which are found nowhere else on earth, as well as such amazing animals as the Fishing Cat and the Giant Asian Pond Terrapin.
All this is under threat because of China’s - and to a lesser extent, Myanmar’s and Thailand’s - insatiable thirst for energy.
China plans to build 13 massive hydropower dams which will turn the last international free-flowing river into a series of channels and reservoirs which will not only displace the tens of thousands whose home valleys are destined to be flooded, and devastate regions downstream whose water supply will be severely compromised, but also kill off wildlife by the score, through disrupting spawning areas and migration routes and holding water in deep basins when it should be free-flowing.
The WWF is negotiating with the Chinese authorities in a bid to convince them to build smaller-scale hydropower dams in river tributaries instead, and to regard the Salween as a potential tourist destination, and thus worthy of protection.
This crisis points up to the fact that industrialising nations need no-strings aid, and fast, to develop clean technologies to meet their energy needs, rather than the rich world’s hypocritical condemnation.
The Danube is also threatened by development, mostly centred around shipping and power generation.
Already, 80 per cent of its forests, floodplains and wetlands are destroyed and plans for a Trans-European Network for Transport a pan-European series of canals and shipping lanes - will only make matters worse.
La Plata, in South America, is another victim of industrial development.
The fall-out from industrialisation is not just a local matter, as the crises affecting the Indus and the Nile demonstrate.
Man-made climate change, the product of 150 years of industrial excess in the West, has depleted the glaciers that feed and regulate the Indus, resulting in water shortages and, ironically, flooding, in Pakistan and Afghanistan.
In 1995, the river was providing less water per person than the UN’s recommended minimum. By 2025, it is predicted that water will be considerably scarcer.
Loss of forest, another cause and effect of climate change, will render the river and its environs even less stable, prone to flooding and landslips.
The Nile is also threatened as it is a broad, shallow river with a high evaporation rate, making it particularly sensitive to increases in temperatures.
These are prime examples of poor nations paying the price for rich country’s profligacy.
Invasive species - that is, alien species introduced which then threaten native species and communities - are increasingly a hazard in the Murray-Darling river, in Australia, where indigenous species are now at 10 per cent of the levels they were before the advent of European settlement.
The European Carp and Plague Minnow, this latter introduced to eat mosquitoes though instead it simply feasts on local wildlife, are thriving here while nine out of 35 natives are threatened, and two are critically endangered.
As myxomatosis, the hideously contagious disease unleashed by the introduction of rabbits - for sport - to Australia, demonstrated, we meddle with nature at our peril.
Another man-made problem is that of over-fishing, which is causing untold concern along the banks of the Mekong, in Asia, where millions depend on this food source.
Work to clarify fishing rights and stamp out illegal fishing is underway and urgently needed to preserve fish stocks and a future for fishermen
Pollution, which affects almost every world river, is punishing the Yangtze in China, where rapid industrialisation and modern farming methods are transforming this once crystal clear river into a poisoned dead zone, with waters so dirty they are now deemed undrinkable.
Nitrogen from agricultural run-off competes with cadmium from industry for the upper hand, and the people who depend on this water are being felled by escalating rates of E.Coli, Hepatitis A and Dysentery, as well as such long-term horrors as cancer.
The Three Gorges dam, which uprooted tens of thousands of people and devastated eco-systems for thousands of miles, exacerbates this problem, through disrupting the river’s normal free-flow, a natural mechanism for cleansing the water.
The situation for these rivers, and for humanity, is dire.
We have come to this pass through bad governance and wanton waste, through putting profit before people at every turn, through a development model that never factors in the human cost.
We need fast and effective planning, based on political and economic international cooperation. Without it, we’re sunk.

back to index

—page five—

letters

The abuse of Angelika
Even in death, murdered woman Angelika Kluk can’t avoid having her sexual history made public and used against her. 
The lawyers defending the man accused of her brutal rape and murder are seeking to cast doubt on her reputation by discussing sexual relationships she had in her short life. 
As if the fact that Angelika had sexual relationships somehow makes her rape and murder less of a crime. 
Women still have to endure the stress and horror of having their sexual history paraded for all to discuss if they are to achieve justice in rape trials. 
This abuse of women must stop. 
Only when the crime of rape is viewed by society as an act of violence rather than sex will this juducial abuse end.
It would appear that throughout her life, Angelika was abused by people who were in positions of trust and who abused their power.  And even after her violent death, the abuse continues in the media. 
I suppose the best that can be said about priest Gerry Nugent is that, unlike some other men in positions of power, he did not deny his relationship when questioned in court.
Barbara Scott
Edinburgh

Heavy fuel for heavy rockers
Voice reader Yiannis Kokosalikis has a host of recipes for those who rock - but are also easily followed by anyone who enjoys a spot of Perry Como.

Feast of Perun
Ingredients:
1.5 kg organic new potatoes (diced)
5 (or more) organic carrots (chopped)
400g organic button mushrooms (diced)
4-5 (or more, never less) garlic cloves (diced)
1 organic onion (finely chopped)
1 organic apple
1 lemon’s juice
salt, black Pepper, smoked Paprika, dried chives and oregano to your heart’s content and lots of olive oil

Mix all (not the apple) in a large baking tray. Add a bit of water. Peel apple and grate over the over the food. Mix again. If you’ve added the right amount of paprika, the oil/water should be of a semi transparent red colour. Put tray in a preheated (180 C) oven. In about 20 mins check if more water is needed. Bake for another 45 mins or so stirring every 15. Raise temperature to 220-230 and bake for another 15. Serve with feta cheese or something similar - not that there is anything similar to the mighty Feta.

SEEKING REFUGE
Wullie McGartland

Desperately fleeing Darfur

Intolerable” and “unacceptable” - with these words, Tony Blair described the current situation in the Darfur region of Sudan. Words that he obviously didn’t use when talking to his underlings at the UK Immigration Service, who consider the region to be a perfectly safe place to return Darfurian asylum seekers to.
Luckily the Court of Appeal thought otherwise, deeming Darfur an unfit place for the return of refugees.
The ruling came after three Darfurian men challenged a deportation order. The UK government claimed there was no chance of persecution and torture to any returned Darfurians as they would be sent to refugee camps outside the Sudanese capital Khartoum, on the other side of the country to Darfur.
However, the Court of Appeal ruled that conditions in these camps were appalling, one of the judges, Lord Justice Buxton, saying that reports on conditions in the camps made “frightening reading”.
In fact, many of the camps surrounding Khartoum have been demolished, leaving 250,000 people homeless, without water or other services, on the edge of a desert.
The Law Lords however rejected the claim that the men would face torture if returned to Sudan.
A judgement shown to be wrong after evidence emerged revealing how the Sudanese government really treats its returning refugees.
Sadiq Adam Osma had been in Britain since 2004, but was sent back to Sudan in February this year, after his appeal for asylum was rejected by the Home Office. Upon arrival in Sudan, he was taken into custody and tortured.
He managed to escape to a secret location elsewhere in Africa.
The Aegis Trust, an organisation dedicated to eliminating genocide, organised a meeting between Guardian journalist, Inigo Gilmore, and Mr Osma, where he described the horrific violence he endured.
Three people had “beat me everywhere”, he said, producing photographs showing extensive scarring and injuries to his body
“My whole body was numb; so I couldn’t feel anything anymore. I was bleeding everywhere. I was completely soaked in blood, and the room was covered with my faeces and urine. I was expecting to die. I never thought I would be alive now. My torturers were saying to each other: ‘Let’s just kill him.’”
Mr Osma had come to the UK after suffering imprisonment and torture when a teenager and learning that his mother had been killed in an attack by the Janjaweed and Sudan’s air force on his home village.
The Home Office said it did not “routinely monitor the treatment of individuals once removed from the UK - we would not remove them if we considered that they were likely to suffer persecution on their return.
This callous disregard for those it returns to Sudan should not really surprise anyone. It’s common practice with regards to many countries, however violent.
Mr Osma’s asylum case is expected to go through British courts once again.
But this time there will be evidence that torture has taken place, thanks to the UK government’s decision to return him to his persectors. He can also show a Sudanese arrest warrant, issued during his absence
The UK government should heed the Aegis Trust, who said of the return of refugees to Sudan:
“We learn from history that we shouldn’t show genocidal regimes how little we care for their victims.
“In July 1938, 32 governments decided at the Evian Conference that they did not have room for Jews fleeing persecution in Germany. It proved to be a turning-point, as the Nazis realised they could unleash total destruction on the Jews with impunity.”

back to index

—centre pages—

 

back to index

—page eight—

Supporters go wild for SSP in the West

Scottish Socialist Party members in the West of Scotland region headed for the seaside, lochside and hillside in a staggeringly successful campaigning Easter week.
A host of SSP stalls - in Saltcoats, Largs, Clydebank, Greenock, Dumbarton, Balloch, Paisley, Kirkintilloch and Lennoxtown - have been matched with a huge effort to get tens of thousands of Scottish Socialist Party  bulletins out through doors in towns and villages across the region.
“We’ve had a fantastic reception wherever we’ve been,” regional organiser Davy Landels told the Voice.
“We’ve got thousands of signatures on our petition to scrap the Council Tax and replace it with a fairer alternative, based on income.
“We’ve been in areas which none of the other parties are targeting, and we’re campaigning on issues that really touch the heart of the problems people face in their lives everyday.
“People are absolutely sick of the Council Tax - and when you point out that other parties had a chance to support the SSP’s bill to scrap it in the last parliament, but didn’t, then they’re even more appalled.
“Folk aren’t stupid, and they recognise the rank opportunism of the SNP and LibDems who are dragging this issue out, now it’s election time.”
One indicator of the enthusiasm for the SSP’s message in the West of Scotland is a surge in sales of the Voice, which is going down a storm - with 47 copies sold in one sunny day in Saltcoats, and 30 in Largs, being just a couple of examples.
In Greenock, where Davy is standing as a candidate for the council in Inverclyde South, a ward where the SSP has previously won 16 per cent of the vote, two consecutive stalls have each sold more than 80 copies of the Voice - and that was before Morton’s 9-1 victory on Saturday sent the town into delirium.
The top of the regional list candidate, Pamela Page, a modern studies teacher from Kirkintilloch, has been right round the region campaigning - including a stop in Paisley on Saturday, where she helped the local branch members conduct a survey of passers-by, asking them to check a list of SSP policies.
John Miller, the SSP council candidate for the Paisley South ward, told the Voice:
“Many people were surprised to find that they were in agreement with so many of the party’s policies that it was more akin to a discovery than a conversion.
If the success of our campaigning can be carried through to the ballot box, then the mainstream parties will get a bit of a fright!”
As well as the regional list for the parliament, the Scottish Socialist Party is standing council candidates across the West - in all of the wards in Renfrewshire and West Dunbartonshire, as well as a significant number of council wards in East Dunbartonshire, Inverclyde and North Ayrshire. (See issue 302 for a feature on Ardrossan and Arran candidate, Nigel Hunter.)
In West Dunbartonshire, Jim Bollan is one of the Scottish Socialist Party councillors defending his seat.
He has represented Renton for many years, and has an outstanding record in fighting for his constituents.
“The success we had in the campaign to save Leven Cottage care home, the SSP being at the forefront of the campaigns to save two primaries, Christie Park and Renton Primary, and the fact that we convinced the council to hand back Renton CE Centre to the community rather than sell it off - all of these things are registering with people.
“The Scottish Socialist Party has a really high profile here, people are talking about the party.
“We have got involved at the grassroots of community campaigns and people warm to that.
“They see we’re a party of action, unlike the other parties who are just all talk, and we really can get things done.”

How to vote Scottish Socialist on 3 may

On 3 May, take 15 minutes to go to your local polling station.
Get your voting papers at the desk and mark an X beside Scottish Socialist Party on the left side of the Scottish Parliament ballot - on the peach-coloured side under the heading ‘Regional Members’.
Spread the word - vote on the LEFT side for the LEFT-wing Scottish Socialist Party.
And as well as your Scottish Parliament ballot paper, you’ll also collect your council ballot too.
SSP convenor Colin Fox says:
“The new ‘STV’ voting system means that there is a real possibility of numbers of SSP councillors joining those we already have in Glasgow and West Dunbartonshire and that, like them, they will prove effective fighters for their communities.”
Voting for council candidates is different to your parliamentary vote. Mark a preference number, not an ‘X’, to vote for a candidate.
To cast your first vote for an SSP council candidate, mark their box with a number 1. And if we’re not getting your first vote, please give the SSP your second (2), or third (3).

back to index

—page nine—

cultural resistance

MIXED MESSAGES

Histrionics. An exhibition by Roderick Buchanan, at the Gallery of Modern Art, Glasgow, until 28 October 2007. Free admission

Glasgow’s Gallery of Modern Art (GoMA) has opened Histrionics - a monumental exhibition of new work from Roderick Buchanan that looks at sectarianism and related issues as part of the gallery’s Blind Faith programme.
Born and raised in Glasgow, Buchanan has already produced several works addressing ideas of identity and Scottish culture and with this exhibition considers and reflects on certain aspects of identity in Scottish society.
There are several pieces in the exhibition, ranging from photographs of footballers to information on figures such as Thomas Muir and an exploration of the family trees of the artist and his wife, in their own ‘mixed marriage’.
In the middle of the gallery is ‘Here I Am’, a massive red triangular theatre showing two films of flute bands, one Loyalist, one Republican.
Buchanan had intended to film the two bands together, an idea which was met with laughter from the bands themselves, so they were filmed separately instead.
The end result is spectacular. Both bands play, neither band’s music interrupts each other, and the pendulum edit means both get an equal crack at representation.
Following on from Sanctuary and Rule Of Thumb, Blind Faith is the third in GoMA’s successful biennial series where the power of contemporary art has been proved to raise awareness and challenge attitudes to difficult social issues. Blind Faith will focus on identity, neighbourhood and nation, bringing in the issue of sectarianism - a priority for Scotland to address, but often seen as a West Coast issue, particularly in Glasgow.

n Histrionics talks at the GoMA: Roderick Buchanan, Gallery 1, GoMA, Thursday 3 May, from 6.30pm to 7.30pm.

Roderick Buchanan talks about his work and about the new work he created for this exhibition. Free, no need to book. Des Dillon, The Studio, GoMA, Thursday 3 May, from 2pm to 3pm. Author Des Dillon reads from his recent play ‘Singin I’m No A Billy, He’s A Tim’. Free, no need to book.

Save our pool - united we will swim

The Pollokshields United Reform Church (Fotheringay Centre, Fotheringay Road, Glasgow) are staging a fundraising concert for the Govanhill Baths Trust on Sunday 22 April at 6pm.
The concert will feature Fotheringay Players: conductor David Bruce, Anne and Jim Binnie on pianos, Bharati Bundhoo on tantura, and June Binnie on percussion. Music includes Saint-Saens’s Carnival Of The Animals.
Please come along and support the campaign to raise funds to re-open the Govanhill Baths as a much needed sporting and well-being centre for the whole community.

n Tickets are £5 from McCalls newsagent, Calder St, Govanhill, Glasgow

Tuned in
Keef Tomkinson

Saturday 14 April

Face of Britain, Channel4, 8pm
Why do we look like we do? Do we share common bumps and dents? Is it cause of the North Sea breeze that my brothers and sisters in the North East share a smile that only exists in a wind tunnel? This doc looks at our DNA and its similarities and missing links.
Falklands 25: A Soldier’s Story, ITV4, 8.40pm
Documentary following a Falklands veteran back to the Malvinas, as Argentina refers to it, to re-visit areas of the 1982 conflict and speak with other veterans and islanders on the issues around the war and how the islands have moved on since then.

Sunday 15 April

Brief Encounter, Film4, 3.20pm
Yeah, yeah. This story may be about two posh people, speaking in posh tongue but it really is tragically tender. Based on a Noel Coward play, Celia Johnson and Trevor Howard are the terribly nice couple who meet in a railway café and then fight the desires that burn between them.
Lost In Translation, Channel4, 9pm
In what is one of the loveliest and hippest films in recent years, Bill Murray is the aging actor who meets bored newly wed Scarlett Johansson in Tokyo. Romantic without being sensual, their relationship grows out of personal emptiness in their alien surroundings. The soundtrack is immense.

Monday 16 April

Blue Suede Jew, BBC2, 11.30pm
The King of the Jews meets The King of Rock n Roll. Not quite. Gilles Elmalih is ‘The Elvis from Jerusalem’ who hopes the music of Elvis can bring peace to the region and world as a whole. To aid him in this quest, he claims Elvis advises him from the beyond.

Tuesday 17 April

Mr Miss World, Channel4, 10pm
Miss World? Bad, ok. What if it’s for transsexuals? And what if this doc is following a contestant from County Durham? Yeah, you’re intrigued. Gavin is Miss England and must face the competition in Thailand while choosing to reveal his secret life to his parents. Hopefully he wins.

Friday 20 April

Mr Smith Goes to Washington, Film4, 4.35pm
Jimmy Stewart is the idealist Senator who, unbeknownst to him, is being sent to Washington to protect local political and economic forces. He is soon at odds with these dark elements and must take on the shadowy corruption of America’s great democracy. As radical as It’s a Wonderful Life, but it’s Jimmy!

All Week
Election Coverage, various channels, various times
Don’t bother. They all lie. Just vote SSP cause they care about ending poverty. And poverty is bad.

back to index

—page ten—

international news

Teacher killed in Argentina

Workers strike in protest as colleague is slain by police

Mass demonstrations of striking teachers brought Argentina to a near standstill on Monday, as they protested the killing of one of their colleagues by police at a demo in the Patagonian province of Neuquen last Thursday.
Tens of thousands took to the streets of Buenos Aires and other cities nationwide to protest police brutality and demand the resignation of Neuquen Governor Jorge Sobisch, who they hold to be politically responsible for Carlos Fuentealba ’s death.
The chemistry teacher was participating in a roadblock as part of a demonstration over teachers’ pay when he was hit and killed by a cannister of tear gas, fired by the police at close range. Governor Sobisch had ordered police to break up the road block.
On Monday’s demos, teachers were joined by supporters from other trade unions and human rights organisations. With support from the country’s two main trade union federations, schools remained closed, public transport halted and banks and many offices shut for a couple of hours. The autonomous Confederation of Argentine Workers, CTA, declared a 24 hour strike while the government-aligned General Confederation of Workers, CGT, called a one-hour work stoppage.
Around 25,000 people marched in Neuquen, where demonstrators painted the facade and doors of Government House black and blocked the main routes leading to the capital of the Patagonian province. Governor Sobisch withdrew all police forces from the city.
Buenos Aires City declared a day of mourning and Buenos Aires province ordered flags in schools to fly at half-mast on Monday.
Meanwhile the union which represents teachers in Neuquen announced that no pay talks will take place until the ‘officials responsible for the killing’ of Fuentealba resign their posts.

Charter for democracy

Charter 77 was founded in Czechoslovakia 30 years ago as a campaign for democracy and human rights. People involved gathered in Prague at the end of March to consider their experiences and the impact of their campaign. Thomas Swann reports.
In 1976, the arrest and prosecution of the psychedelic band The Plastic People of the Universe inspired clamours for greater freedom in Czechoslovakia, a country at that point in the grip of a hardline Stalinist government.
A group of intellectuals drafted and signed a document that began a movement that was perhaps the most influential move against the Soviet-style regime in the country.
Charter 77 formed 30 years ago, not as an anti-communist resistance group, but as a human rights body. The aim was to pressure the ‘neo-Stalinist’ government into complying with the Helsinki accord, signed by the ruling Communist Party in 1968.
The Helsinki accord was supposed to guarantee the civil liberties of the people, and while the Party had enshrined these in law in 1976, it was evident that its commitment was lacking.
Sculptor and musician, Jiri Pliestih, remembers the absurd restrictions on personal freedom that were a normal part of life in Czechoslovakia.
“(To perform as a musician) you had to go through the examination of the ideological board where you should prove that you are able to play music, you should prove you are able to sing folk songs, and you should prove you are able to know something about the communist movement.” 
If one accepted these limitations then one could live a claustrophobic life, within the enclosed space defined by Soviet ideology.
“We couldn’t do that, and we sent other musicians to prove in our names that we were able. We got this permission to play, but very soon we were not allowed to play everywhere.”
It was in the face of such Kafkaesque repression that Charter 77 came to life.
The declaration the Charter dissidents produced in January 1977 stated the signatories’ will to live a life not dictated by the Party. The choice of the three original spokespersons manifested this opposition.
Jiri Hajek was an ex-government minister and one of the ‘reform-communists’ of 1968. At this time the government had sought to democratise the Soviet system. This ‘socialism with a human face’ was crushed by the Soviet Warsaw-Pact invasion of Czechoslovakia
Vaclav Havel was to become the most recognisable of the spokespersons. His work as a playwright and essayist, criticising what he called ‘post-totalitarianism’, and subsequent terms as president of the Czechoslovak and Czech Republics, gained him international notice.
Philosopher Jan Patocka was arrested and interrogated by the State Security service following the publication of Charter 77. He died of a heart attack in the days following.
It was Patocka’s phenomenological philosophy that provided the foundation for Charter 77. “In a nutshell,” writes philosopher Aviezer Tucker, “Patocka held that human authenticity is ‘life in truth’, the uniquely human potential to witness the grand presence of truth.” 
What this means is that for an individual to live a genuinely human life, they must reject any lies and actively seek truth and knowledge. For one to be able to undertake this philosophical task, one must have access to freedom of speech and thought. 
In Czechoslovakia, as in other Soviet Bloc countries, where divergence from the party line could be punished with imprisonment and interrogation, this meant that the authorities had to uphold their obligation to adhere to the Helsinki accord. The Charter 77 dissidents aimed at ‘helping’ the Party achieve this goal, by engaging in a “constructive dialogue with political and state power”.
A diverse collection of individuals from various spheres of society, Charter 77 defined itself as being passionately apolitical. Havel emphasised this character at last week’s conference on the movement, held in Prague. 
The people involved were not interested in ideology or politics. It was composed of people who wanted to live in freedom; a meeting of reform-communists and non-communists in complete equality.
When Pliestih decided to sign Charter 77 in 1988, his motivation was similar. “To try to publish your work as an artist was impossible almost. I wasn’t that politically motivated but I was just pissed off at the situation and the regime.” 
The then spokesperson of the group told him he shouldn’t sign, but that he should “live in the intention of Charter 77”. This ‘living in truth’ was the most important thing for the dissidents. As Havel stresses, they didn’t want to represent the people or act as a moral authority.
There were those, however, who saw a potential in Charter 77 for something greater and more concrete.
Petr Uhl, a journalist and Czech Commissioner for Human Rights from 1998 to 2001, describes himself as a “Trotskyist and revolutionary Marxist”. As one of the founding signatories of Charter 77, he recognised it as “a step in the direction of political revolution”. The human rights orientation of the movement provided a base for this. 
Patocka’s and Havel’s philosophical writings cut a path through Soviet ideology towards “the emancipation of the individual, the transformation of object into subject, not just on the economic but also on the political level”.
However, the Charter 77 dissidents’ strict apolitical attitude led to this potential being wasted. Following the Velvet Revolution in Czechoslovakia in November 1989 that brought about the collapse of the Soviet system, no group existed to show the way.
The ‘civil society’ that Charter 77 sought, where human rights are respected and the moral character of the individuals ensures the moral character of the state, failed to materialise.
This lack of direction allowed the Communist Party elite to retain influence and profit from the plunge into neo-Liberalism at the hands of the first post-Communist Prime Minister, Vaclav Klaus.
Charter 77’s greatest success was, perhaps, when foreign diplomats, beginning with Dutch Foreign Minister Max van der Stoel, opened relations with the dissidents rather than the Soviet governments. The emphasis on gaining political freedom was now put squarely on the people, and not the state.
Charter 77 showed that human rights, and socialism, as Uhl argues, can only be achieved from below, from the self-organisation of the people.

back to index

—page eleven—

international news

Brazil votes on new abortion law

Following Portugal’s ‘yes’ vote in the recent abortion referendum, Brazil’s newly-appointed minister of health, Jose Gomes Temporao, has called for a new debate on abortion.
He told a reporter from the newspaper Folha de Sao Paulo that he sought to make the issue a health, rather than religious or moral issue, predictably provoking angry cries from the Roman Catholic church.
On Good Friday, for instance, the archbishop of Rio de Janeiro, Cardinal Eusebio Oscar Scheid, interrupted an Easter Passion play to tell a stunned, 10,000-strong audience that the massacre of innocents must not be allowed.
That, said Temporao, is exactly what’s wrong with the current state of the debate here; moral hysteria is to the fore and health considerations are marginalised.
No wonder, he says, 65 per cent of Brazilians cleave to the current law, which allows abortion only in cases of rape, or where the mother’s life is at stake.
Yet 200,000 women suffer from complications following abortions in Brazil every year, mostly illegal procedures.
A 2005 study, published in medical journal The Lancet, conducted by New York’s Guttmacher Institute, suggested that 68,000 women die every year, and over 5million are hospitalised, as a result of botched, mostly illegal, abortions, through a lack of trained personnel or suitable medical resources.
The Institute drew on data from countries including Brazil, and also Chile, Nigeria, Uganda, Guatemala and Peru, amongst others.
Marge Bercer, editor of the journal Reproductive Health Matters, wrote in The Lancet:
“When legal restrictions on abortion are reduced, the rate of deaths and morbidity decreases greatly.”

Tongue-Thai’d

In Thailand, insulting the king is a criminal offence.
Indeed, last month, a Swiss man was sentenced to ten years in prison for vandalising portraits of the aforementioned monarch.
Thus, when a video clip appeared on the YouTube website last week, taking the rip out the said royal, there was going to be trouble for sure.
The controversial clip comprised pictures of King Bhumibol Adulyadej, spliced with images of feet and scrawled graffiti. Feet are considered dirty in Thailand, thus images of them stamping all over the king’s face is deemed offensive.
Alerted to the horror, the Thai government - a military junta which seized power last year - immediately blocked the site.
Enter YouTube, recently and controversially acquired by Google Inc., who have agreed to help the junta keep a lid on video clip-related dissent.
“While we will not take down videos that do not violate our policies, and will not assist in implementing censorship, we have offered to educate the Thai ministry about YouTube and how it works,” said YouTube’s PR person, of the company’s plan to assist the Thai government in implementing censorship.
She argued that this was better, surely, than having the Thai government block the site completely.
But many in Thailand are unmollified by this corporate weasel-speak, which they feel is simply a crude infringement of free speech.
The first video has now been withdrawn, but a host of others have popped up in its place, including messages saying the Thai junta is “evil and hates free speech” and clips simply featuring Thai people discussing censorship.
Thai’s leaders say they are not evil and in fact love free speech, but cannot tolerate rudeness to the king.
Only Google Inc, who previously censored itself in line with demands from China’s repressive government, seem convinced by this line of argument.
Others cannot help but observe that the Thai leaders have been clamping down on free speech since they took power, whether it involved rudeness to the king or not.

 back to index

—page twelve—

 

Iraq’s decline and fall

The fourth anniversary of the fall of Baghdad, culminating in the famous toppling of the Saddam statue in Fardus Square, was not marked in Iraq by cheering crowds.
Instead, over a million angry people surged through the streets of Najaf, one of the nation’s holiest shrines, to demand the withdrawal of foreign troops.
The peaceful protest, a sea of Iraqi flags and wave upon wave of virulent anti-US sloganeering, was organised by followers of Moqtada al-Sadr, whose al-Mahdi army had been warring with US forces for three days by then, in the southern city of Diwaniyah.
Moqtada al-Sadr was not in attendance. He has been lying low, possibly in Iran, since 14 February this year, when the US security crackdown, the co-called ‘surge’ of 20,000 troops, began.
But the radical Shia cleric’s support is nonetheless strong, both in parliament, where his party has six ministers and 32 lawmakers, and at a grassroots level, particularly amongst young Iraqi men.
Sadr’s supporters at the rally said unity against the occupation was the theme of the day, and orders had been given not to display pictures or flags that could inflame religious tensions.
As far as many Iraqis are concerned, foreign troop withdrawal is the essential prerequisite for returning Iraq to some kind of normality.
Occupation and peace just cannot co-exist.
Though the march was certainly peaceful, al-Sadr used the event to amplify his call for Iraqi police and soldiers to join the armed struggle against the ‘arch-enemy’, the Americans and British.
In Baghdad, meantime, the streets were empty following a government ban on vehicles.
Not to facilitate spontaneous celebrations, but in the hope of preventing any major attacks.
Thus Iraqis marked the fourth anniversary of their ‘liberation’ by staying barricaded behind their front doors, watching the scenes in Najaf on TV, assuming they were lucky enough to have any electricity supply.
And while demonstrators stamped on US and Israeli flags, drawn on the pavements, and shouted “Down with Bush, down with America”, the US authorities noted only how this kind of mass outburst showed how free and democratic Iraq had become since 2003.
Most Iraqis see things otherwise. Their country has been atomised by the invasion and its seemingly endless aftermath.
Take the three days beginning 27 March, when a truck bomb in Tal Afar killed 152 people.
On 28 March, off-duty Shia policemen killed 45 men, mostly through shots to the head.
And on 29 March, three simultaneous attacks in the city of Khalis saw 53 dead, while a suicide bomber in Baghdad killed 62.
Call this freedom? Call this democracy? Not unless you have a very sick sense of humour.

Blair - losing the war, at home and abroad

While Iran and the 15 marines monopolised the headlines, the British Army suffered its worst week in over two years in Iraq, with six soldiers killed, four as a result of a roadside bomb in Basra.
Perhaps even more shocking than the running total of 140 British dead since March 2003, are the ages of those killed, ranging from just 18 to 28.
The Basra ambush occurred last Thursday morning, when a Warrior armed personnel carrier came under fire from a ‘rogue militia’ and then ran over a bomb which killed the four soldiers, and their Kuwaiti interpreter, instantly.
The UK government immediately held the Iranians to account, Tony Blair noting that “there are elements, at least, of the Iranian regime that are leading, financing, arming, supporting, terrorism in Iraq...”
If this strikes you as familiar, then you’re not alone.
Some four years ago, Blair and his buddy George W Bush were voicing similar certainties regarding Saddam Hussein’s sponsorship of terrorism.
Vice President Dick Cheney’s still at it, this week insisting a link between the toppled dictator and al-Qaeda did exist, despite all evidence to the contrary.
The latest evidence being intelligence documents declassified following intense pressure from the now Democrat-controlled Congress, which detail an investigation into whether intelligence was manipulated by White House hawks to show such a link.
It was.
Blair may implicate Iran in the four deaths, but there is very little hard evidence to back him up, army sources admitting it will be almost impossible to determine the origins of the bomb or, indeed, make any other definitive link with Iran.
Support for the war is faltering, an ICM survey, commissioned by BBC Scotland, finding 66 per cent favouring an immediate withdrawal of UK troops from Iraq.
Meanwhile, in the US. Senate majority leader Harry Reid, a Democrat, is moving a motion to cut funds for the war, as backup to the Democrat plan to establish a timetable of US troop withdrawal.
The Senate has 31 March 2008 pencilled in its diary, the House of Representatives is looking at 31 August 2008, and the President is looking to veto both.
Denying funding, therefore, is plan B, designed to force the President’s hand.
Cheney, using the language of a small boy playing Commandos in his back yard, says such a move will lead to US failure in Iraq, as if the bloody ruins of this once cradle of civilisation did not exemplify failure on the grand scale.
Reid’s plan is likely to fail this time around, but he’s unperturbed. Each time such a move is presented, it garners more and more support. That said, if he thinks his party are reflecting the mood of the American people, he’s wrong.
The American people are far more radical.
On 30 March, the Strategic Vision polling group asked 600 Iowa Republicans - yes, Republicans - if they favoured US withdrawal from Iraq within six months.
Fifty two per cent said yes, and only 39 per cent said no.
The Iraq ‘war’ is lost, both here, in the US, and on the roadsides of Basra and Baghdad.
It’s more than time the troops came home.


back to index